Rev 109 'looking ahead':
http://ciclops.org/view/5594/Rev109
Mission description:
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/files/20090420_titan_mission_description.pdf
Some imaging may be lost due to downtime at Goldstone apparently. It won't be the highest priority stuff, but it still amazes me that mankind can contrive to have science data collected and beamed back all the way from the far reaches of the solar system and then fail to tune in to it.
Spooky! (Titan in eclipse)
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/photos/raw/rawimagedetails/index.cfm?imageID=188803
Cool
From the 'Looking ahead' bits it seemed that these observations are accidental, in the style of 'we will do cloud observations, but Titan turns out to be in eclipse', but I assume they have a purpose...I guess you could look for lightning
..VP?
Are they on purpose? Good question... I am not sure. the filter sets and the exposure times aren't all that different from other cloud monitoring observations. I guess that there wasn't a check to see if Titan was in eclipse at the time. At least Titan is visible in these images.
Another of the T53 raw images:
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/images/raw/casJPGFullS49/N00133830.jpg
From the Looking Ahead article:
"VIMS will acquire a high resolution observation of the margin of a bright region with lobate edges. This bright region surrounds a 300-kilometer wide dark region near 40 degree south latitude, 280 degrees west longitude. This dark feature resembles many of the dark lakes seen at Titan’s polar regions. The fact that two features with morphologic characteristics similar to Titan’s polar lakes have been found on Titan’s trailing hemisphere near 40 degrees south Latitude suggests a possible connection with the mid-latitude convective cloud features seen earlier in the Cassini mission. It is not known if surface liquids at these features help increase the methane “humidity” levels at this latitude, or if these features are fed by rainfall from the clouds. ISS and VIMS will observe this feature in the higher altitude mosaic observations."
N00133830 and N00133829 combined, noice-reduced, gradient adjusted, and limb brightened, and contrast enhanced.
(And dust rings left in).
Here is a crude ISS mosaic from the T53 flyby
Comparison with Celestia image (I'm putting the dark thingy right smack at [-40S, 280W] as advertised. It is visible in the recent global mosaics of Titan):
Corrected T53 mosaic location and approximate footprint on Celestia view from CICLOPS "Looking ahead" image:
Final T53 Mosaic:
[EDIT (4/25/09): graphic removed, corrected version posted http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=5957&view=findpost&p=139561 (this thread, post#18)]
(This is a sizable chunk of real estate that is no longer "neutral gray" on the big Titan map.)
The full res version of the mosaic can be found at: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/3472772378/
-Mike
Very nice! (The US looks a bit on the small side though.)
Probably because the scale bar on that map should be 2000 km instead of 4000 km. Thanks for spotting that...
The bright streak at the extreme left looks familiar.
http://www.planetary.org/image/PIA09032_med.jpg
Yep, the bright streak region is visible there. We saw them back in T20 and led to my LPSC talk back in 2007:
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2007/pdf/2219.pdf
Fantastic work Mike. The western portion of the T53 area with its streaks is fascinating as VP’s abstract points out. Is there or is there not a mountain range? I gotta admit I’m hooked on the VIMS notion of a Titan Sierra. The animated image below is my favorite image from T52 on April 4th covering the area of VIMS mountains. Is it just an albedo apparition?
They might be or they might not be. I'm just not as convinced about them being mountains based on the present evidence as others have been. I am definitely not convinced that they drive orogenic clouds at 40 South. Mountain height vs. atmospheric scale height doesn't make as much sense for them to exist as here on Earth. Certainly we do see hill chains on Titan based on the RADAR, so I don't think I would definitely say they are not mountains, they very well could be. But the albedo relationship with topography has been pretty spotty as we have seen bright mountains and dark mountains. And the topographic shading VIMS says they see...well, again, we'll see.
Personally, my bet is that they are fresh fractures akin to the ones you see on Dione.
I took my T53 Mosaic and carefully warped it to match features up with the PIA11149 Feb 2009 Titan Global map.
Here is a blink animation with the PIA11149 and an overlay (not a blend!) with the T53 Mosaic.
That's fantastic Mike - it's great to see what fits where. Funny thing though, there are lots of other parallel streaks on the earlier ISS mosaic that don't appear on the new one. Are they artifacts of the special processing used in 2007 for particular scientific (as opposed to cartographic) purposes? Is it time to reprocess the earlier mosaic to make it more compatible with the rest of the global map?
I can only speak for the the T53 mosaic - it has lots of artifacts. There are dust rings everywhere, edge effects, JPEG compression artifacts (now warped in a NW to SE curve), and artifacts due to the warping process.
The dark zone running SW to NE in is right between two images, so it is very suspect.
The W to ENE dark channel in the central W part of the mosaic is real. Two images have this structure in different portions of the image and they matched up perfectly.
Here is another blink with the T53 Mosaic vs. PIA09032: Titan's Sierras.
Could that vertical streak be a row of hills? It kind of looks like one.
T53 Mosaic blended with the February 2009 Titan Global Map (PIA11149):
Links to Flickr page, 2.1 Mb JPEG at full resolution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/3482176588/
Image N00135063, cropped and enhanced, taken 4-26-09 (? from non-targeted flyby sequence). Highlights include Hotei arcus (lower center) and Minerva (upper left). Click on image for approximate Celestia grid location.
Powered by Invision Power Board (http://www.invisionboard.com)
© Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com)