I've been struggling all evening, to manipulate the full size version on my poor old computer.
Now it's getting late, so it'll have to wait. In the meantime here is a lower resolution (about 1/4) first draft.
Beautiful! It is amazing to see the full site. I can't wait until the PDS release, when I can go to work on the horizon.
Very nice work James. And this wouldn't look out of place on the cover of a science fiction paperback from 50 years ago!
Wow James!
Here's your image as the coolest of cool Polar_Polar Pans. A Polar Peter Pan perhaps!
Can't wait until we see this filled in....extra cool!
Well done James (and well done Mark)! This is one of the things we have been waiting for. When we get the full res I'm, probably going to print it on a polymer film and make a real wallpaper out of it for the side wall of my study.
Thanks guys
Absolutely stunning!
Compliments to jamescanvin and congratulations to the SSI team and 3 cheers for Peter Smith for making this all possible.
Do they plan to fill in the lower tiers?
I don't see why not. This is not the actual complete pan, yet.
Stunning job, guys. There's something eerie about that disembodied robotic arm floating there, too.
A random, meaningless point on some near-featureless, empty, frozen northern plains on an entirely uninhabited planet - which has now become the centre of the universe for a vast, varied team of people. Fantastic!
(It reminds me a little of the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degree_Confluence_Project - precise locations you'd never give a second glance gaining some strange significance through external factors. This odd little spot on Mars, seemingly identical to its surroundings for many, many kilometres, is now important. And will be photographed, prodded, dissected and analysed, because everywhere is interesting.)
I played around with the hills a bit. Considering the quality of the data, they are remarkably featureless.
Not surprising considering flatfield noise, jpeg compression artifacts and plain dust in the air.
It is just that hills at other landing sites were so much rockier, even in poor quality imaging.
That's probably because these are more distant than say the Pathfinder Twin Peaks.
I'm not sure about Twin Peaks, but the low hills in tedstryk's post above are about 20 km to the SSW. There's a large crater a similar distance to the SW of the Columbia Hills - this shot shows it:
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/606/2P180161224EFFAEM9P2629L6M1.JPG
Of course its visibility varies a lot with dust levels. Here's a more recent winter view with clear air:
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/1532/2P262366320EFFAY00P2264L7M1.JPG
Another draft. I added in the arm work volume mosaic from the first week, unfortunately they don't quite overlap.
Also available at twice the resolution compared to yesterdays (half of full)
http://www.nivnac.co.uk/mer/index.php?title=phoenix-sols-3-to-28-r1bc-92-pointings&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
Enjoy.
James
And James' updated panorama deserves another polar projection.
Many thanks for the great work!
Michael
Amazing works James and other. Really appreciate it .
James : how do you do to take the time to do this pictures? You are really productive this time.
Version updated to sol 32, it's already out of date with all the sol 33 images. But at least it's now at full resolution.
http://www.nivnac.co.uk/mer/index.php/phoenix-sols-3-to-32-r1bc-103-pointings
James
Really nice job! Yah - SOL 33 gives you that steenkeen 2 degrees!
Paul
Awesome work, James! Can't wait to see what the final panorama will look like!
James' pan as a polar, and I vote it as a new 'emoticon'! SMILE
Or how about as a "don't panic" emoticon? There's something oddly familiar about that polar image... (Or perhaps just something odd about me...)
Great imagery James Canvin & Astro0.
Wonder how they'll compare to the official ones that will be released by NASA? My own thoughts are that the first 360 pans should have been the priority for the first few sols, before unstowing the arm & digging. That arm is quite an intrusion.
Can I ask, what software was used & is it expensive?
Thank you.
Andrew Brown.
The arm adds a certain je ne sais quoi for me. In retrospect, maybe the first Spirit panorama should have had the arm outstretched and pointing toward the Columbia Hills a la Babe Ruth, as if to say, "There. That's where we're going".
Happy Canada Day everyone!
Brian
( unnecessary full quote removed )
Thank you very much for your answers James. Very much appreciated. I must try & few more things myself. I will be keeping an eye out for further interesting images.
( unnecessary off topic question removed )
Andrew Brown.
Do they plan to send back a panorama composed of lossless images like they did with Pathfinder later in that mission?
There is a plan is to conduct a lower compression, more filters, less down-sampling pan as I understand it ( called the Re-Peter Pan ) Of course, with Pathfinder, it had 1/16th the resolution to contend with.
Doug
Hi Doug,
That is going to take some time & a huge number of frames. Is there enough time left in the Primary Mission to accomplish that?
What would be interesting would be a horizon pan at around the time of the Midnight Sun, do determine atmospheric light scattering, etc.
Andrew Brown.
A crude attempt at filling in the deck and panels using the ground-based test images.
The real thing should be spectacular!
WOW! Beautiful job, Astro0!
Great job Astro - I'm still working on getting the deck pan added to The Peter Pan
Doug - Maybe I'm wrong but I thought the name Re-Peter Pan was just applied to the the repeated bits of Peter Pan where there were dropouts in the data the first time around.
Andrew - yes it will take quite a long time - it depends just how much compression and how many filters are used - but I could imagine the horizon pan being done by the end of the primary mission.
The full colour version is going to be tricky to pull off I think, however in the meantime here is a quick greyscale version. 144 images in this!
http://www.nivnac.co.uk/mer/index.php/phoenix-peter-pan-sols-13-to-40-r1bc-aam
Polar version
http://www.nivnac.co.uk/mer/index.php/phoenix-peter-pan-sols-13-to-40-r1bc-aam
Click image - quarter of full resolution
James
Awesome work, James!
Agreed. It's great James .
Well... As long as you eventually get the colored version completed, James...before the end of next week. J/k
Good work on those greyscale images
James, you are a wizard!
BBC's The Sky at Night did a great job - sent Chris Lintott out to Tuscon for a day or two and had a brilliant half hour program on BBC4 just now.
I noticed something in the background of an interview....
Pan on the wall at Phoenix HQ and on Sky at Night at the same time. Doesn't get much better than that!
I notice that in the first shot from inside the HQ at the start of the program you can see it on the left on the other side of the room. Gives a bit of context to it's location.
James
On their website at least, it's the official NASA version, not mine.
http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11662574
ah, ok.
Just chatted with Mark Lemmon -- he said that as of this morning he's declaring the Mission Success Pan to be complete (in terms of data acquisition). He said there's one or two things he'd like to go back and do, like get the part of Mars above MECA that was blocked by the arm, and maybe do some imaging with the arm in a position in the work volume like it was about to do some work, but the data bits are down for a full pan.
--Emily
Are there plans to cover the area hidden behind the meteorology mast? Maybe with the RAC? :-P
I guess most of the area under the lander could be similarly imaged...
Thanks for the info, Emily! Here's hoping I finally get to use that 8X10 frame I bought from Aaron Brothers, pretty soon
Can anyone enlighten me to which fairy tale this comes from ?
14E1-0: SSI 15F - Deadly Poppy Field
Thanks.
Any news on when they will image parts of the scene without any compression ?
Wizard of Oz
Disabling image compression is less of a benefit than full, but compressed frames would be. It would be similar bandwidth-wise, given a 4x compression ratio.
We now have an unobstructed view of the crater rim on the horizon to the west, which had been partly blocked by the arm:
http://www.met.tamu.edu/mars/i/SS044EFF900109567_11E1EL1M1.jpg
(Of course that "obscuration" resulted in one of the signature images of Martian exploration! )
Crop & 3 x enlargement of hills at Azm 278 deg Sol 44.
Is that a small impact crater at the bottom just right of centre at the bottom of this crop?
Still got quite a bit of work to do on this. (My software was never designed to do deck pans, I've never attempted an MER one). But the rest of the view is too good to keep to myself, so here is the latest test version:
http://www.nivnac.co.uk/mer/index.php/phoenix-sols-13-to-43-r-1bc-aamp-r-abc-1
EDIT: Replaced with a better version
James
Nice one Tesheiner. I was hoping somebody would do one.
I didn't have time before work this morning to do anything other than hit the upload button.
Cheers,
James
Great view guys ! However, here it comes:
Stupid question of the day for the imaging gurus:
How difficult is it to make a rotatable polar view ?
I like the perspective of polar view images, but I find it impossible to grasp the entirety of the horizon without rotating the laptop or my head to pain-enduring positions. I've seen VR movies of normal 360 deg. panoramas posted in UMSF from time to time, and they were gorgeous Can the same be done with polar view panoramas ?
PS. I know about rotating the panorama in image viewers, but this does not quite do the trick.
You mean something like this?
http://jekbradbury.googlepages.com/index.html
Move the mouse to rotate and click to toggle modes between full pan and zoomed in.
Fantastic, this is exactly what I was talking about !
Jekbradbury, a million thank you !
I am humbled by the enormous amount of ingenuity in this forum. I am officially spoiled
Awesome work, guys! Can't wait to see the next version of the panorama, James
Great panoramic James . Very impatient to see the final version .
This is the part of the panorama that I'm gonna crop for that 8X10...
The only qualm I have with the mosaic is that a part of the robotic arm scoop can be seen next to the solar panel to its right (shown in that white bracket). I can Photoshop it out myself...but I'll just wait to see what other changes you make to the Pan in subsequent versions
'I'll just wait to see what other changes you make to the Pan in subsequent versions '
Here is what I could fill in from earlier photography which can be pasted over the Canvin version of the color pan. Alas, the earlier pan also had the arm blocking part of the view. I made a rough color match of the earlier grayscale images without any attempt to recolor rocks, etc. I hope the plans to re shoot those parts needed to provide a clear panorama bear fruit!
Don
Yes I noticed that. Remember that these are all quickly thrown together test versions I'll cut out some bits of arm (there are others) for the final version. They have retaken the bit with that has the arm in (see post 60), but I'm inclined to leave it in my version.
Can I say an enormous thank you to everyone in this thread who has posted work of the utmost professionalism, that even NASA themselves are going to find extremely difficult to usurp.
You guys bridge the gap between Science & Art very effectively & put certain 'artists' to shame who think unmade beds or a flashing light is art. The work you guys do is worth vastly more & are part of the long term investment of our species.
It would be great James Canvin for two versions of your remarkable pan. One with the arm in place & one with no arm, showing the complete Martian Landscape in Scandia Colles without any obstructions.
Also the Sky @ Night was repeated at lunchtime today & yes your work was on display at Mission Control.
This is most certainly an interesting site, both scientifically & visually. I for one will study the pans intently.
BTW where in the UK are you from James? It is a great website you have there James.
I have put in requests for midnight sun observations, perhaps a timelapse movie of the sun swooping low over the northern horizon, the first ever such observation from another planet, also due east, west & south observations on another sol but at the same time, to get a differing illumination on the landscape. Also is not Holy Cow supposed to be imaged with illumination from the midnight sun at some point?
James, I wonder what you could produce from said observations? No doubt, would be mind blowing.
Andrew Brown.
My final version. Unless I do one with the arm removed, personally I'd rather see someone put the missing part of the arm in!
Full resolution, touched up and with artificial sky.
http://www.nivnac.co.uk/mer/index.php/peter_pan
James
Hi James,
Do you have trouble with your website. I'm unable to view your panorama, and when I go to your blog, I see a page without CSS forming and no images. It's me or … ?
I really want to see your panoramic picture .
Here is a new version of my spinning polar pan applet:
http://jekbradbury.googlepages.com/index.html
Click to zoom
To those of you that have had problems accessing my site - just try again.
I'm on a cheap host and have had a lot of visitors in the last 48 hours. I think the problems really started when a direct link to the large jpg itself was on the front page of digg for a time yesterday. I'm just glad that it didn't coincide with the time it was on the front page of MSNBC, which brought over 25000 hits in just 5-6 hours on Saturday.
James
Well it made my computer think for a while but in the end it has managed to churn out a huge polar version of the Peter Pan.
http://www.nivnac.co.uk/mer/index.php/polar_peter_pan
(Smaller versions available as well )
Wonderful panorama, woohoo!
A few aesthetic comments:
- we really need that arm to extend out to the edge of the image, blotting out a bit of fake sky is no issue.
- I also definitely vote for the panorama to keep the arm. It is true that it obscures a tiny bit of the horizon, but let's face it: one bit of this landscape is pretty much like any other bit, so not much harm is done. The arm is very necessary to include in the pan, it is after all the main instrument of the mission!
- the area immediately around the arm needs to be brightened a tiny bit (obvious from the thumbnail). There's also another splotch near the middle that seems a bit too dark.
Woohoo again! - I just noticed you made mainstream internet media James:
http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/07/11/1195385.aspx
Cosmic Log by Alan Boyle is one of my favourite science blogs. Great to see the exposure for you and for UMSF and Emily as well.
Yeah, we talked about that on the http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=5235&view=findpost&p=120476. I'm very proud that it was actually the lead image on the front page of a major news site for most of Saturday.
And it was great exposure for all mentioned, I've had tens of thousands of hits and many positive comments.
Thanks for work, James. This image is now hangin' on my wall...
Once again, outstanding work, James!
I hope you don't mind me tweaking your colors very slightly:
http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/9/14/1431389/peter_pan_f10_half_tweak.jpg
James Canvin's polar projection overlaid on a false color HiRISE image:
From the HiRISE images it appears that the local terrain around Phoenix has been significantly darkened. I was curious how to correct the view for a "pre-landing" (read pre-retro blast) view.
I used the IRB[=RGB] images hosted on Emily's blog (http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00001557/) to calculate the darkening effect in the local area around Phoenix.
I selected two representative areas in the HiRISE images, one near the Phoenix spacecraft (inside the blast zone), the other beyond the obvious blast zone in the false color image. Both areas needed to be fairly uniform (and easy to find) in the images. They correspond to the central section of the smaller polygons.
- Add 5% to the IR brightness
- Add 11% to the Red brightness
- Add 15% to the Blue-Green brightness
Hi,
From the great James Canvin's Peter Pan, Ive added an full synthetic sky to show the sun in approximative place at 12:00 of the landing site, with its elevation at this season. And this is for showing the way martian sky could be. Hope you will like it, in particulary James .
Without clouds
http://www.db-prods.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/jamescanvin-peter_pan-artificialfullsky-v2-webrowse.jpg
Hires 6 Mo : http://www.db-prods.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/jamescanvin-peter_pan-artificialfullsky-v2-web.jpg
And with clouds
http://www.db-prods.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/jamescanvin-peter_pan-artificialfullsky-v2-clouds-webrowse.jpg
Hires 6 Mo : http://www.db-prods.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/jamescanvin-peter_pan-artificialfullsky-v2-clouds-web.jpg
Nice.
I don't understand the sun position though, wouldn't it be due south at 12:00?
James
Yes, but, honnestly, I've placed it by seeing shadows and reflection on the deck. But, is it strongly possible that I've made mistakes.
Ah, OK, thanks Ant, looks good whatever time of day it is. (mid afternoon I think )
Thanks Stu
Doug : great QTVR. I don't know how to do it but I really appreciate it .
Here is The Peter Pan projected to a Vertical Projection, suitable for overlay on top of HiRISE images or simply for a birds-eye view:
Nice.
Hmm, from that perspective Damocles might be a better name for the lander.
Phoenix appears to be under attack by some sort of giant claw!
Awesome perspective... what an amazing image (all of them).
NASA TV showed this image of the Panorama. If that's the official, 'complete' version... Then I guess I don't have to worry about replacing the 8X10 I made from the Pan that James did.
[quote name='punkboi' date='Jul 31 2008, 06:46 PM' post='121899']
NASA TV showed this image of the Panorama.
Whish has been released as PIA11007
But at low resolution. Will a larger resolution version be released?
Don
I think http://phoenix.lpl.arizona.edu/images.php?gID=17106&cID=193 gets you to the press release page at the LPL site and you can select for download the 61MB version on the right
Looks to me that 61 MB version is magnified and it's not higher resolution than the "medium" res, 24 MB view since the panorama was taken in 2x2 binned mode.
Interesting. Why would they up-rez the thing?
Err, no. The green/blue were 2x2 binned but the red was at full resolution. (except for the deck which really was down sampled but their version doesn't include that anyway)
Hence why mine has similar dimensions to their large version. 26642 vs 26720 pixels for the full 360
Mark Lemmon clears up some of this...the short version is, no, you're not crazy, the binned images really are blurrier.
Hi,
I recently made a James Canvin's Peter Pan version for Stellarium. Very helpfull to see where is the sun and view when it will "touch" the ground .
http://www.db-prods.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/phoenixlandingsite.zip
Installation procedure are described in the read-me .
And screens :
http://www.db-prods.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/stellarium-phoenix.png
Today midnight sun
http://www.db-prods.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/stellarium-midnightsun-phoenix.png
Hope you will like it (if you are user of Stellarium)
That's really neat! I've used Stellarium before, it's a nice program. Is there any way to change the colour of the atmosphere?
Hi James
I've dragged the file and clicked on the landscapes tab but just get a list of four landscapes and no "Setting landscape updates the location" and choose "Mars". to cross this is in windows vista
Roy
oops old version of Stellarium, now downloading 0.9 this one should work thanks.
well tried that and have crossed the "Setting landscape updates the location" but still nothing happens.
Hi James again
At last I've got it going, instead of dragging the file into texture/landscapes I dragged it into another landscapes folder that is at the same level as textures and not inside it.
Thanks James it looks great, now I'm off to play with it
Roy
Lol I redownloaded Stellarium just for this (I had uninstalled it a while back), and am not sorry I did, lol.
Very nice work!
Yes, this works beautifully.
FYI - as Reckless said, for PC users put the 'PhoenixLandingSite' folder under \Program Files\Stellarium\landscapes\PhoenixLandingSite and then the rest of the steps as per the instructions in that folder's document.
Ant103 - this is absolutely excellent and I have already used it today in an outreach talk. Very effective! Thanks.
Astro0
PS: For anyone who doesn't know Stellarium get it http://www.stellarium.org/
PPS: Ant - I hope you don't mind, here's a little tweak of the PeterPan to which I've added the phantom robotic arm just to make Phoenix look complete.
Thanks .
Astro0 : happy to see that it's usefull for you . And really like the adding of RA .
Those are simply astounding images guys - well done!
Two things - are there plans for another panoramic grand image just before Phoenix's mission ends in mid November? It might be useful to see any emerging ice/frost on the ground, cloudier skies and compare with the earlier images.
Another thing that has been niggling at me. Where precisely is Phoenix in terms of its regional location? I mean within a 30/50 km radius? Has anyone precisely determined the distant hills/craters seen from Phoenix and thus determined their and Phoenix's location? Can the rim of Heimdall, the crater seen in that spectacular shot of the landing last May, be seen in the distance from the Phoenix landing site?
There is a lot of information on the landing site in this thread http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.php?showtopic=557&st=0&start=0
Powered by Invision Power Board (http://www.invisionboard.com)
© Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com)