According to Space.com, the final selection has been made for the next DISCOVERY mission.
It will be the GRAIL lunar gravity mapping mission.
http:///www.space.com/missionlaunches/071211-moon-insides.html
Edit: Just noticed that Norm Hartnett posted an official link earlier on the KAGUYA topic:
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2007/dec/HQ_07274_Grail_Mission.html
I was pleasently surprised by the September 2011 launch date. I had been under the impression that Discovery 12 was expected to launch in the 2012 time frame (possibly even 2013). I am unable to download the 2006 AO for some reason, so I can't go back and re-read the fine print.
One of the reasons I was glad to see the launch date is that Discovery and New Frontiers seems to keep moving out later and later. Juno was originally scheduled for 2010, but got pushed into 2011 due to budget problems (the probe wasn't over budget, NASA was just a little short on funds). I had visions of Discovery 12 being pushed out to the latest date possible.
Let's all cross our fingers and hope that the next Discovery AO really does come out in early 2008 as promised, and we don't end up with another 5-6 year gap between selections.
Recalling what happened to Discovery 11, it's good that Discovery 12 has completed selection.
It will be interesting to see how much is budgeted for launch as it appears that it will be too expensive to keep Delta II for 2011. As pointed out in another thread, Landsat DCM moved from a Delta II to an Atlas V 401 for that very reason. Landsat DCM is scheduled for July 2011 and its launch was contracted a few months ago. For the same lead time, the GRAIL launch would have to be contracted soon. Given that Falcon 1 has not proved itself, it seems likely that GRAIL will use an EELV. GRAIL mass was not mentioned in the release and articles, but I am just thinking of the LCROSS addition when LRO moved to an Atlas V and whether there is another opportunity like that here.
GRAIL is supposed to support the return of humans to the moon. I couldn't figure out this statement at first, but then I thought maybe a very high fidelity gravity map would help the Orion spacecraft in lunar orbit conserve its fuel during those longer surface-stay missions.
Or could it be of sufficently high resolution to locate subsurface volatile depoits or other lunar resources?
(BTW, should GRAIL have its own thread?)
Yes, I believe GRAIL needs its own thread.
On to business. Noticed this article a few days back. Thought I'd give someone else a chance to post it first. But here it is.
http://www.moondaily.com/reports/Lockheed_Martin_Spacecraft_To_Be_Flown_For_NASA_Grail_Lunar_Mission_999.html
A major issue is that far side gravity has always been filled in with interpolation from near side data and the regions of the far side that past spacecraft passed over before occultation. Since a spacecraft can't be tracked from earth over much of the far side, there has been a big hole in most coverage. This is one of those missions that, while not flashy, will do some much needed science, though it will also have cameras for PR (kind of reminds me of Juno in that regard).
Looks like GRAIL is going to have some company on its ride to the moon.
http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/080410-ladee-moon-dust-mission.html
It was actually expected. We already knew that
A. GRAIL will be launched in 2011
B. LADEE will be launched in 2011
C. LADEE will cost only ~ $100M
EDIT: "The LADEE orbiter is expected to ride in the back seat of an unmanned Delta 2 rocket behind NASA's Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL)"
A Delta II launch in 2011? This IS a surprise to me.
The press release and all other materials I've seen so far on LADEE has a conspicuous utter lack of information on the instrumentation and measurements, and only the most vaguely worded phrases on scientific objectives.
PIO incompetence at it's most glaring, or deliberate obfuscation? I'm normally utterly un-paranoid, but this just irritates me.
So far they talk about "spectrometer for atmosphere studies and a dust detector aimed at the moon's gritty regolith." I think that LADEE is fairly new project and that specifics and other possible science instruments just aren't defined yet.
For the record, some launch info from NSF.com and LADEE's Twitter: GRAIL and LADEE are going to be launched on separate launch vehicles. LADEE will probably use the yet-to-be-developed Minotaur V launch vehicle.
GRAIL has its own website now, with a detailed mission description.
http://moon.mit.edu/index.html
Updates:
Denver Post article. (URL deleted)
http://www.space.com/10790-nasa-moon-gravity-grail-satellites.html
Updates for 7 Sep 2011:
http://www.space-travel.com/reports/Moon_Mission_Ready_to_Fly_999.html
http://www.space.com/12826-nasa-grail-moon-mission-launch-thursday.html
http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/582116main_GRAIL_launch_press_kit.pdf
http://www.spaceflightnow.com/delta/d356/status.html
The Delta rocket has had a completely successful launch from Florida, the two GRAIL spacecraft have deployed, they are communicating with earth, and their solar panels have deployed. Their propusion systems remain to be tested, but everything is looking good.
NASA has announced a kid contest to give names to each spacecraft.
HD videos of the launch, launch replays, and spacecraft separation can be seen using the following three links:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1elSL-w1B8g
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD9_AJD3u8I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKxiuk0MhA4
I was in Florida for the launch ( demoing Eyes on the Solar System for the TweetUp and for the KSC Visitors Center ) and saw it go early today :
http://www.flickr.com/photos/doug_ellison/sets/72157627515484719/
VERY glad to have seen a Delta II launch - it's been the backbone of everything that excited me in exploration for 15 years!
Beast and Beauty?
Let's keep the name suggestions out of this thread, OK? It's not like anybody is listening to them here, and it'll just add a lot of noise to the forum. If you must discuss them, go to the chit-chat section. But an even better thing to do with your time would be to figure out how you could bring this contest to some kids who might not otherwise be given the opportunity! Maybe you can't enter or win, but maybe some kid that you mentor can.
GRAIL-A LOI burn in progress; follow it at http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/eyes/.
Both A and B have successfully completed LOI:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/grail/news/grail20120101.html
Happy New Year!
Ebb and Flow! Not bad...
My Dad went to Fulneck school near Leeds, UK, in the 1920s. He said there were two members of staff, a married couple I believe, called Ebenezer and Florence. Naturally the kids called them Eb and Flo. Not quite the same but close enough to slip in a wee anecdote! We now resume our scheduled programming.
Phil
I would have gone for Isaac & Newton
Ebb and Flow are busy adjusting their orbits... here's a timeline with some useful details, but not taking into account the possible extended mission.
Phil
http://www.spaceflight101.com/grail-mission-design-timeline.html
... and the first video from Moonkam:
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2012-031
This link has a still plus a link to the video)
Phil
The science phase of the mission is now underway.
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/grail/news/grail20120307.html
Go Ebb! Go Flow!
The mission has been extended to December, with the expecation now that the eclipse will be survivable.
http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n1203/21grail/
... and lots of nice MoonKAM pics here:
http://images.moonkam.ucsd.edu/main.php
Phil
Oh no, I distinctly remember the Deep Impact impact being washing machine sized.
Yeah, but these are Maytags!
Phil
These kids have picked some really nice shots for MoonKam.
Quick animation of a few frames
So, decommissioning GRAIL. The mission will end in December 2012. Spaceflight 101 describes it as follows:
"When the science phase has ended, the final mission phase will begin. During a 5- to 7-day period, a Ka-Band calibration is made and GRAIL continue to provide science results as sunlight and power allows. Early in December, 2012, the GRAIL Mission ends. About 20 days after the end of this phase, the GRAIL Orbiters will impact the lunar surface because their orbits will not have been maintained. No special area has been targeted for impact."
Earlier this year, Spaceflight Now said: "Mission planners are formulating ideas for the impact scenario, evaluating the possibility of aiming the crashes so they are within the field-of-view of instruments on NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter."
So, we're getting pretty close now -- December 2012 is just three months away. Has anyone heard anything about the decommissioning? Have impact sites been chosen?
Doug M.
MoonKAM on GRAIL has taken over 100000 images now (I'm not sure if it is currently collecting images). There is a handy interface to them here:
https://moonkam.ucsd.edu/image_gallery/locations
A zoomable map interface of the now almost ubiquitous design (give the designer of that interface a nobel prize or something) - you can search by various methods, then click on an icon and link to the image itself.
(there's also a vast gallery but that is hard to find things in)
Phil
So we are extending the GRAIL/MoonKAM Eyes on the Solar System interface this coming week to include the extension, but even we don't have details in the final decommissioning. There's a big +/- in there, and no detail on the finality of it all yet.
Any idea when the gravity map will be published? I can not seem to find any information on it. Is there one currently being made or is it not public yet?
The entire mission seems pretty uneventful so far. From what I remember there was a some excitement because GRAIL would be able to test the Two Moon hypothesis. What happened? Is it still a valid theory?
Even if the gravity map isn't complete yet, if part of it seemed to suggest the above was correct I would expect at least some kind of announcement from NASA. Is everyone being hush, hush, instead?
It's my first post so be gentle
The mission is still in progress, currently acquiring higher resolution data, and it takes a lot of processing and analysis. The map is not released because it's not finished, and the interpretations can't be done properly until it is finished. It's not like an imaging mission where results are available on day 1. We know the mission will end in December, and I would expect very little serious detail to be published until (a) LPSC in March next year, or ( the publication of a paper in Science or Nature, whichever comes first. So - be patient just a bit longer!
Phil
Actually, at DPS they said that there was an article in preparation (I assume in Science) based on the prime mission data, and that they hoped but couldn't be certain that it'd be published around the time of AGU, which is in a month. But it sounds like the schedule's a bit tight for that. Hopefully before the end of the calendar year.
We are coming up to the end of GRAIL's extended mission. Has anyone heard anything about the final impact plans? Originally the impacts were to be untargeted, but later there were suggestions of impacts within view of LRO, or one impact in view of the other GRAIL's MoonKAM.
Phil
FWIW, I haven't heard a thing. That mission has pretty successfully flown under the media radar since it launched. I think some missions wish they had more attention, but I think GRAIL prefers operating in "stealth mode." Their science results will improve massively the more time they have to work with more data, so the longer nobody pays attention to them, the better they'll look when they do create a stir.
I wonder how far in advance they have to know where they're going to crash in order to attempt LRO observations of the impact? (I don't even know if LRO observations will be possible.)
This is from spaceflight101, a very useful site:
http://www.spaceflight101.com/grail-mission-updates.html
"A total of three additional Mapping Cycles are planned. On December 3, 2012, the mission will come to an end. A short period of decommissioning will be performed before the two spacecraft impact the lunar surface. To further increase science data return, Teams are currently evaluating a targeted Mission Termination meaning that the GRAIL Orbiters will make a targeted Crash on a picked site on the Lunar Surface that is in sight of instruments on NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. A decision on that will be made as the mission progresses and propellant is consumed to support the science phase of the mission."
So LRO observations were considered earlier in the year... but did it turn out to be feasible? And (or) will it happen?
We should know fairly soon, I guess.
Phil
There's a press briefing at AGU on Wednesday next week. I won't be there in person, but Casey Dreier will be there representing the Planetary Society. I've asked him if he can ask this question. (I want to save my question for science )
A wee update - MoonKAM was turned on for the extended mission and added some images to the gallery:
http://images.moonkam.ucsd.edu/v/mk12_10/
But now the camara has been affected by a solar flare - it can still be commanded but may not work, as I understand it. I don't know the date of the event yet.
https://moonkam.ucsd.edu/news/moonkam_mission_interrupted
Phil
Huh.
Please pardon my lack of memory here, but this is a straight-up off-the-shelf camera, isn't it (i.e., not rad-hardened)? If so, seems to have held up pretty well, esp. since we're just approaching the next solar max.
Hmm. Okay, thanks, Mike.
Wonder which event took them out?
http://www.spaceflight101.com/grail-mission-updates.html
More news. It was over Thanksgiving. And the final fate of the spacecraft, targeted or not, is still not decided.
Phil
Science Results in 9 minutes live at
http://live.projectionnet.com/agupress/fm2012.aspx
Pics and maps here. A deeply fractured crust.
Phil
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/grail/multimedia/gallery/gallery-index.html
now on Science Express:
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/early/2012/12/04/science.1231753
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/early/2012/12/04/science.1231530
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/early/2012/12/04/science.1231507
Hmm. Looking over the maps doesn't seem to show any obvious discrepancy that would imply a low velocity impact. Thats one strike against the two moon hypothesis. Personally, I'm rather happy. Didn't like that theory much anyway. Our Moon is a unique object.
Anyway, excellent news! I hope NASA scientists can pull more info out of the new data in the future. For our closest neighbor, there is still a lot of unknowns about it. I would love it if they can find more specifics about the Thera-Earth collision. The moon's mantle should have some answers, or it could surprise us. Who knows?
I'm having trouble finding a Mercator-projected map of the Moon to compare to the GRAIL map. Does anybody know a digital one?
You could go here:
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/mapcatalog/usgsTopo/
or other pages from this list:
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/mapcatalog/
But Mercator is not used very much these days as you know.
One other option would be to make your own here:
http://www.mapaplanet.org/explorer/moon.html
Mercator is one of the options under Advanced Options. Choose the data set you want, set the projection and resolution you want... and the lat-long extent. Warning, for Mercator don't choose 90 north to 90 south (it would be infinitely large), but the GRAIL maps are cut off at about 70 N and S.
Phil
Ah, I'd completely forgotten I could set the projection in map-a-planet. Thanks for the reminder.
Do you know why the lunar folks seem to like Mercator projection so much?
It allows craters at mid- to high-latitudes to appear circular. Almost all traditional lunar sheet maps from ACIC, USGS etc. used conformal projections (Mercator, conformal conic, polar stereographic) with that special characteristic. Only with the advent of digital mapping have non-conformal (read: shape-distorting) projections like Simple Cylindrical (Equirectangular) or [shudder] Sinusoidal been used to any extent.
Phil
GRAIL talk starting pretty quick:
http://www.ustream.tv/nasajpl2
"NASA will host a media teleconference at 10:30 a.m. PST (1:30 p.m. EST) Thursday, Dec. 13, to provide an overview of events leading up to twin spacecraft being commanded to impact the moon's surface on Dec. 17 at approximately 2:28 p.m. PST (5:28 p.m. EST). "
Phil
Emily's discussion of the GRAIL results is top knotch:
http://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakdawalla/2012/12110923-grail-results.html
Indeed it is; world-class real science explanation, as per her usual.
So that's what happens when you give a talented planetary geologist a computer with word processing capability...
Just a reminder
UPCOMING EVENT: NASA Moon Mission News
10:30 a.m. PST (13:30 EST) Thursday, Dec. 13 (18:30 UTC)
LINK http://www.ustream.tv/nasajpl2
NASA will host a media teleconference
to provide an overview of events leading up to twin spacecraft
being commanded to impact the moon's surface on Dec. 17 at
approximately 14:28 PST, (17:28 EST). (22:28 UTC)
NASA's Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) mission, whose two washing machine-sized probes were named Ebb and Flow by elementary school students in Bozeman, Mont., via a nationwide contest, have successfully completed their prime missions and have only days to go on their extended mission science collection. As planned, the duo is running low on fuel. They have been orbiting the moon since New Year's Eve and New Year's Day, respectively, giving scientists unprecedented detail about the moon's internal structure and composition.
from images of today's teleconf, the two spacecraft will hit an unnamed mountain 75 degrees north on monday evening (UTC)
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/grail/news/telecon20121213.html
Had no idea they 'caught' LRO up to now. Fascinating!
The scattered fragments will be the most northerly artifacts on the lunar surface, for a while.
Phil
And speaking of locations... on the posted graphic the longitude is given as 26.63 degrees East. Oops - it's West! Yes, west of the prime meridian. You could call it 333.37 E if you prefer. Maybe that wacky lunar gravity is playing with the trajectory.
(I just noticed Emily has it right in her blog - well done!)
Phil
On the other side of the quality scale from Emily's fantastic work we have this from The Grauniad: http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/dec/13/moon-nasa-lunar-reconnaissance-orbiter
Someone alert the Planetary Protection Officer!
Let's hope they splash down safely!
Grauniad - that takes me back.
Phil
Rocket burn complete, according to JPL.
Coverage starts at 2:00 PST.
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2012-398b
I made animation of last flight of Ebb and Flow.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDf5YsMvpJQ&hd=1
Live broadcast on NASA TV now.
http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/index.html
EDIT: Just a quick (from work) banner.
That cross-section chart updating every couple seconds is so cool. Minute left...
And it's done. Goodnight, grail. It's up to LRO to see what it can see when the sun comes up....
Final resting place for Grail A&B is now named in honor of "Sally Ride".
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2012-401
This was probably the most exciting moon mission possible next to a sample return or human landing.
Congratulations GRAIL! You've made history.
And two new holes in the ground at that
Ebb, one of the GRAIL spacecraft, made some final images from very low orbit which can be seen here:
http://images.moonkam.ucsd.edu/v/ebbs_last_images/
Phil
Any news from LRO? I see nothing on the main website or camera's individual site. We're past full moon by now.
Even if they do have an image, which they might not, I'm not surprised to see nothing right now. It's New Year's Eve, and last week was a holiday. NASA won't release something when they don't expect anybody will be paying attention.
One other point - LRO is in a higher orbit now so the small GRAIL craters will be very small in the images. It may be easier to locate them if the new images have illumination very similar to the older ones. That could take months to arrange. So I expect they will take images every time they are over the mountain, but any announcement might take longer.
Phil
Moreover - just because a site is in sunlight doesn't mean LRO is going to be over it quickly - the groundtrack of the orbit has to be taken into consideration also and it might be several cycles ( lunar days ) before a good view is available.
Final (or nearly final, not sure yet) video from GRAIL, three days before impact:
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/video/index.php?id=1181
Phil
I found it interesting to realize that the 10km altitude of that video above the moon is about the same altitude as jet planes fly above Earth.
As far as I know - those were the last frames taken by MoonKAM - I got the raw frames from Sally Ride Science last week ( although they've been on their website for a while ) and just did a bit of deinterlacing and rotating to get the best I could out of them.
Thoroughly impressed by the MoonKam project as an education tool.
Throughout 2012 I did as much as possible to encourage students to give it a try.
Wonderful to see those final frames blended into such a great film. Nice job Doug.
Can't wait to see the results from the JunoCam project in 2016.
Few weeks ago I did two animations from those images, but I was too lazy to finish my blog entry about them .
Faster version (timewarp 5×) is available http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vplB4oXNGw&feature=player_embedded.
Slow (~realtime) version is available http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLsQ_abnW9c&feature=player_embedded.
My animations are without some images in the beginning of the NASA's video, because they weren't published (yet?).
http://my-favourite-universe.blogspot.cz/2013/01/po-stopach-mesicniho-grailu.html.
The cameras were bolted to the spacecraft in that orientation probably about two years ago - and now lay smashed on the lunar surface.
I'm going to say yes...it's a bit too late.
Here's an updated version of my Nearside Moon map with the GRAIL impacts added.
Phil
Is http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=4271&view=findpost&p=136339 of yours still current? Trying to make sure I have a matched set
Yes it is - no more farside impacts. Incidentally, Chandrayaan-1 was predicted to impact in 2012 as its orbit evolved, but as it was not tracked or trackable we don't know where it fell.
Phil
LROC spots craters formed by GRAIL probes (sorry I couldn't find the original paper in the conference abstracts):
http://science.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/03/19/17374953-spacecraft-spots-graves-of-twin-moon-probes?lite
Wow. LROC is an impressive instrument indeed, and their science team is getting very good at this sort of thing. Well done!!!
There is no abstract, this was a press conference, not a paper. It's cool to see this even with LRO in its higher orbit.
Phil
Better images and text at the NASA/LROC site:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/grail-results.html
How accurate were the pre-impact predictions?
Here is an overlay of the pre-impact prediction on the new topo map showing the actual impact crater locations. B was nearly 1000 m off its prediction, A only about 600 m. Not bad!
Phil
The giant impacts did not create the maria. They created the big craters (basins) which contain some of the maria. The maria, the lava flows, are anywhere from 400 to 2000 million years later than the impacts, as shown by sample dating. Since GRAIL's linear features do not follow the pattern of big impact basins either concentrically or radially, they are most likely not related to the impacts.
Phil
Powered by Invision Power Board (http://www.invisionboard.com)
© Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com)