Raw images started. Rhea! http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/images/raw/raw-images-list.cfm?browseLatest=0&cacheQ=0&storedQ=0
More great images... http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/images/raw/raw-images-list.cfm?browseLatest=0&cacheQ=0&storedQ=0
I hope cassini imaged Tethys. I'm looking forward to seeing the polar areas seen poorly until now.
As nice as they are I expected better images!? Maybe they will come in the next upload batch.
I've moved the posts regarding images from Rev21 (~late February 2006) to this thread.
I've been very impatient for the first look at Helene. Here it is... a composite of six images. Saturnshine illuminates the right side. Another smoothy.
Phil
Saturnshine is a Lovely word! Nice!
OH JOY! Tetheys!!!
I can't wait to see Steve Do his magic!
http://saturn1.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/images/raw/raw-images-list.cfm?browseLatest=0&cacheQ=0&storedQ=0
Amazing view.
Very rough pseudo-color composition (IR+CL+UV)...
Excellent Tethys mosaic!
This image is derived from ugordan's Rhea color image... I used Photoshop's spherize filter (twice) to convert the map projection from orthographic to stereographic (approximately speaking). See how craters that were very foreshortened along the limb are made nearly circular in this projection.
Phil
Phil: I've long thought a good way to handle distant moon and planet images was to convert them to a stereographic projection. For "extract all you can" processing... apply some procedure that estimates the fraction of limb-containing pixels that are off-disk and correct them to a best estimate "on disk" brightness. Then project to stereographic.
Calculate several overlay map-images for each stereographic image: Incidence angle, emission angle, pixel-size-in-km and phase angle. Using the geometry map-images and photometric functions, photometrically correct the images for incidence/emission/phase, and generate a quality weight for each pixel:
Transform the images and the weighting masks into map projection. Multiply each image by it's weight mask and sum. sum each weight mask and divide the final summed map by the weight map to get optimally weighted mosaics.
For colorimetry, weight is maximum at 0 deg normal incidence angle and zero at 90 deg terminator data. For relief mapping, weight is maximum at (maybe) 75 deg incidence and goes to low values at normal incidence and terminator (all shadows) illumination. Etc.
Nice shot!
Several Titan NAC raw frames are already down, taken from distant 400 000 Km. Most likely they're part of the ISS_021TI_GLOBMAP001_VIMS observation and downlinked during the first radio science pass.
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/images/raw/raw-images-details.cfm?feiImageID=64420
Edit: Hm... this probably belongs to the Titan forum... Duh!
Here's a Rev 21 Tethys grab bag:
RGB composite overlay(crude):
This really belongs in the 'reprocessing historic images' thread, but I'll be naughty and post it here (spank me!)
Tethys from Voyager 1... I'm posting it to show another view of the craters in this area.
First, you can see the large southern craters, and even the big but very subdued basin north of the really big one (whose name is Melanthius). They are not new discoveries.
Second, look at Penelope, the large crater in the middle of the disk. Very prominent in one image, invisible in the next (and well seen by Cassini). Why does it disappear? In the left-hand view the shading is albedo, not topographic shading. It just happens that the albedo and topographic shading cancel out in the right-hand view (think about how the sunlight falls on the crater walls). But also, see how Penelope falls on the border of a dark stripe, one of two on Tethys. Its pattern of light and dark is like the craters at the edge of Cassini Regio on Iapetus. Whatever explains Cassini Regio is presumably at work here. This is the best example, but not the only one, on Tethys.
Phil
I am a bit confused. I have worked with the V-1 sequence, and the crater gets fainter, but I can't find the frames in which it disappears.
It's 349073, the one after your left-hand image here.
Here is my set of Voyager images of Tethys:
I tried producing a color image of Helene, but to tell the truth -- the thing is as white as can be.
The left image is approximately true color using R/G/B filter combo, the middle is stretched color using IR1/GRN/UV3 filters and the third is the RGB image heavily color saturated to bring out very subtle color differences. The same result turns up if using the stretched color so I omitted it.
Just noticed this... http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/images/raw/casJPGFullS18/N00051445.jpg
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/images/raw/raw-images-list.cfm?StartRow=17&cacheQ=1&browseLatest=0&storedQ=1192479
Steve Albers has updated his Tetheys Map. http://laps.fsl.noaa.gov/albers/sos/saturn/tethys/tethys_rgb_cyl_www.jpg
Steve can previous post help with the mapping? It has some areas that can fill in some lower resolution areas.
Steve's map of Tethys is very nice, as usual. Here are polar hemisphere versions of it - to be precise they are azimuthal equidistant projections, parallels of latitude are equally spaced.
Phil
north:
Again on Helene imagery...
I processed the 6 frames from green/CL filters, using Registax for stacking and for detail enhancement (I'm just a beginner with this powerful software, but results are very encouraging
).
Then I used UV/IR in order to have also a color version, but I had to enhance saturation (as ugordan):
The Lagrangian satellites continue to appear very smooth. Is it possible that particles in other orbits "snow" out onto them? If so, they should look smoother than very small satellites in other orbits. Radar could say something about comparative smoothness... I don't know if it would be possible to do that from Earth, since only a point observation is needed.
Two replies... to JRehling about radar from Earth - they couldn't get enough return frrom a tiny satellite to make that work. Bistatic radar from Cassini might be possible (but very unlikely as geometry has to be perfect). But I think photometry (phase function) is really the key to doing this, and it will be easy with lots of images throughout the mission.
And to Dilo - I also think the top of the Helene image is a biig crater - don't agree about a central peak, though. But this is almost the same view as the one from Voyager 2, if I'm not mistaken, and that shows the crater nicely.
Phil
Greetings,
I've been updating my Tethys map along the lines of the discussion on post #27. This version also shows a bit more of the far southern crater that was near the limb in a recent NAC image.
http://laps.noaa.gov/albers/sos/sos.html#TETHYS
Sure enough angel1801, here is a simulated image using Celestia at this URL:
http://laps.noaa.gov/albers/sos/saturn/tethys/tethys_celestia.jpg
Here the relatively blank areas in the map represent good news as we'll get some first looks at new details on Nov 8-9, 2006.
Powered by Invision Power Board (http://www.invisionboard.com)
© Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com)