Close encounter of the third (of December) kind approaching fast. There seems to have been little anticipation so far for this flyby of Epimetheus (compared to say Hyperion or Phoebe), although at ~9000km, it will be the closest 'rock' flyby in the whole of the prime mission.
I understand that approach is from the nightside, phase angle is very high at C/A (139 degrees) and spacecraft speed is ~22km/second - these all presumably hamper the usual suite of investigations. Having said that, does anybody here have any detail regarding ISS observations an hour or so either side of C/A?
Jase
Actually, there was an accidental flyby of Polydeuces in February 2005 that was closer.
More info on the Epimetheus encounter will be available next week.
The Looking Ahead article for Rev53 has just been posted:
http://ciclops.org/view.php?id=4020
There are no Epimetheus observations (at least by ISS) until shortly after C/A when Epimetheus is 36,000 km from that satellite. ISS will then commence imaging Epimetheus using nearly its full compliment of filters until Cassini is 43,000 km from the moon.
Thanks VP. I suppose the risk of sun damage to the optics prevented a NAC snap of the tiny sliver of crescent at C/A - would have been great to see that lumpy terminator at 70m/pixel though....
It will be very interesting to compare the terrains of Janus and Epimetheus at ranges of less than 40,000km (next year for Janus)- theories of shared histories abound, and they have very similar albedos and of course almost identical orbits.
Cassini images thus far make their terrains appear quite distinct due to the different lighting conditions when images were shuttered, but unfortunately there don't appear to be any opportunities for mid-range observations of Epimetheus at sub-50 degree phase angles (even allowing for the XM).
This is a shame, beause I can't rid myself of the feeling that Janus (and thus maybe Epimetheus) has relatively dark lag deposits at the bottom of some craters.....
And my version of the above, processed to show detail near the terminator. Looks like this is the south polar region in the middle, and only outside the broad southern facet do we see the territory previously imaged by Voyager. Earlier Cassini close-ups were of the area past this limb at upper right.
Phil
Very nice. Are we seeing 3 distinct shades of grey in that prominent crater, or is one of those shade boundaries just a change in slope? Do we have suitable data for an anaglyph?
R+B color and greatly enhanced:
The grooves of Phobos and the dust of Deimos. I could have mistaken it for either Martian moon (and yes, I know is much larger, but there is still the resemblance). Wow!
Really Nice !!
Is it an illusion or is this hemisphere covered by a giant impact scare like the one found on Hyperion (upper right 2/3) ?
If it is really a crater, it confirms that like Hyperion, or asteroid Mathilde, Epimetheus has a rubble-pile structure.
Marc.
Very cool stuff. The depression with a central peak (crater or not) was best seen previously in May 2005: http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA07531 . Epimetheus' geology certainly shares some similarities to Hyperion. However, unlike moons like Telesto, Epimetheus seems to be only partially dust covered. Might be interesting to see what VIMS can pull out of their data.
No, it's not an illusion, this is a big crater.
Here is a mosaic of Voyager images of Epimetheus, projected onto a sphere and viewed from the south pole (azimuthal equidistant projection):
OK, thanks a lot Jason and Phil. Following your Voyager mosaic Phil, the big crater on left of the new Cassini image corresponds to Pollux.
I'm impatient to see a new map of Epimetheus. With the three "relative-close" flybys performed by Cassini, the coverage of the moon's surface must not be too bad.
Marc.
Here's another handy misshapen-lump-'o-ice key, out of scale and with north crudely to the right. Is there an object in this system (excluding Enceladus and Titan) without a grotesquely disproportionate impact structure?
Great Exploitcorporations,
Finally, I'm not quite sure about my identification of Pollux in the last Cassini pictures.
I think also that you made a mistake with the blue dot in the Voyager image. I would have put it in the smaller neighbouring crater which is half in the shadow (lower right), called Hilairea.
Marc.
Not bad, though I would make one correction (I think...):
Thanks! Those two craters were confusing.
Yes Phil, I realized (a little bit too late) that I was wrong. Nice composite. Thanks again.
And I completely agree with Jason's corrections (it's what I tryed to explain in my previous post).
Marc.
Hmmm... looks a bit like Hyperion if you do a bit of stack'n and tweak'n...
What is the dark arc in the 11 Nov 1980 image in Exploitcorporations's post?
IIRC, that's a ring shadow. Saturn was still pretty close to edge-on to the Sun in 1980 (the plane crossing was in 1979).
Hey, EC!
Good to see ya!
Yes, the arc is a ring shadow...
Agree with nprev.... great to see you back EC!
Am I imagining things, or does the edge terrain on the left of the image seem more muted, as if ice blasted by ring particles perhaps?
Craig
And now for the image that has been my desktop background for the last month:
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA09813
Ahh, it's always nice to see color views produced by you guys where color is available. The lack of a brownish tint in stretched color reminds me of Telesto. Can't remember if Helene fits into this category as well?
That is beautiful!
Phil
I thought you liked spheres, Phil?
Admittedly a featureless sphere would be more to me present taste, but this is a nice second best.
Phil
Featureless? No, No. The perfect world would have the north pole, south pole, and the equator clearly marked.
Could this mean that Iapetus is close to a perfect world ???
Marc.
Powered by Invision Power Board (http://www.invisionboard.com)
© Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com)