http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6461201.stm
Scientists studying pictures from Nasa's Odyssey spacecraft have spotted what they think may be seven caves on the surface of Mars.
well I guess that makes habitats a much easier task of creating now, plus with whatever we find in the walls of Valles Marineris.
It may be a nice target for HiRISE !
Wow!
Nice place to send Robot-Speleologist...
I wonder if there are bats inside...
Here's the http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2007/pdf/1371.pdf. The http://www.nature.com/news/2007/070312/full/070312-11.html suggests off-nadir HiRISE observations.
I'm not too surprised at all about this find. I've suspected some small but collapsed cave like structures on some of the HiRISE JP2 images. These particular ones from Odyssey are HUGE. It causes me to raise an eyebrow or two! ...but only because it seems to support what I already suspected.
I suspect there is an extensive network of caves throughout many parts of Mars that will not easily be detected from satellite. Most of the larger structures should be very deep underground (kilometers). The Martian crust may look sort of like Swiss cheese. Perhaps MARSIS can help in detecting some of the relatively shallow ones.
This discovery only provides hints as to where both the missing water and atmosphere on Mars may have disappeared to. Deep underground there maybe caves where the atmospheric pressure is great enough for stable liquid water or ice. I'm talking about places that would be measured in kilometers. But we maybe waiting for a very long time for the REAL evidence because it won't be so easy to find.
B)-->
Even more exciting, what about ancient sulfate stalactites, or pegmatite dikes filled with Martian tourmalines? The mind reels...
Would we recognize a kimberlite pipe in any of the photos?
It sounds like, if these extensive cave networks don't exists now, they will in the future--from human activity. I think there is little question that some of these rocks exist somewhere on Mars. But where? The answer to that question would go a long way to financially support human colonization of the place.
Considering the surrounding terrain and location these would seem to be lava caves, not karst caves. This means that they may be quite extensive (or at least long), but not very deep. And no stalagmites/stalactites unfortunately.
As for kimberlite pipes, yes they would probably be visible in a HiRise image, if they aren't covered by loose material (a very big if!). However it is far from certain that they even occur on Mars. Kimberlite pipe genesis is not well understood, so it is difficult to judge whether conditions on Mars are suitable.
We need to know more about these for many reasons, not the least of which is that they might be a nice cost-effective place to set up a base if they're extensive and capable of being sealed off...good way to get out of the UV & avoid flying a lot of shelter hardware to the surface.
My only concern for the suitability of these caves to human habitation is that, being volcanic (empty lava tubes and such), the only occur in regions of "recent" volcanism.
These are the most boring places on the planet, IMHO.
Also, if these cave systems are all located near and within the big volcanoes in Tharsis, then how easy is it going to be to stage useful exploration from the side of a mountain in the middle of the highest-above-datum portion of the planet? How easy is it going to be to simply deliver the gear we'd need to bring from Earth to such a location? Not a lot of atmospheric braking, that high above datum.
Now, if there was a reasonable expectation of finding cave systems branching out from the floors of the deep valleys -- *that* would be an excellent place to look for life and to dig in for human habitation.
-the other Doug
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005LPI....36.1051B
Meridiani caves?
Yes, you can found stalactites in basalt cave!
When I was younger I do a lot a caving.
In 1982 we stay a few month in Hawaii to survey lavatube and climb down many pit like this one.
This look very similar to the pictures in article.
At the bottom of Mauna Ulu crater that was in eruption from 1969 to 1974 we found a cave, in fact the roof of a magma chamber, with many sulfate stalactites and stalagmites up to 1 meter in length.
They formed in less than 6 years from water drainage in the subjacent basalt.
Is this possible on Mars ? sure that Kau desert is a very wet place by comparison.
There is also basalt stalagmites in some lavatube:
But not sure if such a structure can survive billion of years.
Lave-tube igneous speleothems will be about the same on Mars <and Venus, and Io> as on Earth.
Solution/Deposition speleothems are a whole different catetory. I suspect that low-altitude caves on Mars could well have sulfate mineral speleothems. If the "razorbacks" at Meridiani required liquid after the dunes were lithified and later fractured, than such mineral deposits could form in cave-like voids (or small solution cavities... sulfate geodes, anyone?)
An examination of broken stalagmites and stalactites might generate information on past marsquakes.
Might be an interesting line of inquiry.
Agreed...would love to see cross-sections of same!
Can you imagine sending a rover into one of these? Talk about autonomous nav...the PI would be biting his or her nails down to the elbow until it finally emerged & called home...
http://www.stoneaerospace.com is getting ready to send the Depthx submersible robot to autonomously map and navigate in realtime from the map, the ?world's? deepest cenote/solution spring.
Stone also wants to go to the moon...commercially.
Bill Stone is definitely a man to keep an eye on. He http://blogs.indiewire.com/steve.rosenbaum/archives/012976.html with his plan for a manned exploration mission to Shackleton crater equipped with only enough fuel for the outbound trip pour encourager les explorers to well, like, explore.
He's definitely the man for this job too - he http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5797001505961854840.
Here they are...
http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b14/ustrax3/Possible%20caves%20on%20Mars/cave06.jpg
http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b14/ustrax3/Possible%20caves%20on%20Mars/cave05.jpg
http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b14/ustrax3/Possible%20caves%20on%20Mars/cave04.jpg
http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b14/ustrax3/Possible%20caves%20on%20Mars/cave03.jpg
http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b14/ustrax3/Possible%20caves%20on%20Mars/cave02.jpg
http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b14/ustrax3/Possible%20caves%20on%20Mars/cave01.jpg
If you've taken the cave 'targets' from Themis toward the IR, remember that IR imaging is quite different to VIS imaging and you might see quite strange and odd results. IR imaging at night doesn't show the topography too well and is more about the thermal inertia of the target.
Doug
No, those pictures are indeed VIS. Here's the full figure from the abstract, which also includes daytime and nighttime IR.
That'll teach me to comment without digging first
Some nice Lat-Long info from these...
Dena
http://themis-data.asu.edu/img/V18053001
http://themis-data.asu.edu/glossary.html#ctr_lat-6.084 N http://themis-data.asu.edu/glossary.html#ctr_lon239.061 E
Chloe
http://themis-data.asu.edu/img/V13448001
http://themis-data.asu.edu/glossary.html#ctr_lat-4.926 N http://themis-data.asu.edu/glossary.html#ctr_lon239.193 E
Wendy
http://themis-data.asu.edu/img/V17716001
http://themis-data.asu.edu/glossary.html#ctr_lat-8.099 N http://themis-data.asu.edu/glossary.html#ctr_lon240.242 E
Annie
http://themis-data.asu.edu/img/V18340001
http://themis-data.asu.edu/glossary.html#ctr_lat-6.267 N http://themis-data.asu.edu/glossary.html#ctr_lon240.005 E
Abbey & Nikki
http://themis-data.asu.edu/img/V14334002
http://themis-data.asu.edu/glossary.html#ctr_lat-8.498 N http://themis-data.asu.edu/glossary.html#ctr_lon240.349 E
Jeanne
http://themis-data.asu.edu/img/V18315002
http://themis-data.asu.edu/glossary.html#ctr_lat-5.636 N http://themis-data.asu.edu/glossary.html#ctr_lon241.259 E
I can't find any MOC's to match so far - and I'm sure if there were some, they'd be in the abstract.
I'm just guessing here - on the possible structure w.r.t. the collapsed lava tubes - and this is possibly the worst 3d visualisation of all time - BUT - perhaps it's something a bit like that ( just not crap )
Doug
Doug,
I'm not sure you have the names matched to the right image as the caption in the abstract says the names are listed clockwise, not according to the alphabetical label (which would've been more intuitive).
I looked for them in the HRSC archive through the http://www.rssd.esa.int/index.php?project=PSA&page=MarsExpress (I'm at work) and found four in H0979_0000_ND3.IMG, Chloe in H1904_0000_ND3.IMG and Jeanne/Annie in H0968_0000_ND3.IMG.
Unfortunately, I don't have access to Gimp here in the office so I couldn't view the images at full res and/or crop for display on the forum.
I just listed the names in the order they were, and the image numbers in the order they were - ABCFED (with E having two caves and thus two names )
Screw H1904 - that's 1 Gig+....but I've got the other two HRSC obs on the way down.
Doug
H1904 is a pretty dark image anyway.
BTW, Dena is visible at the bottom of the Chloe THEMIS image as well.
So...this must be Clöhe and Jeanne, right?
About Jeanne I don't know but Clöhe looks like even less of an abyss than my previous image...
Pulled out what I can find from the HRSC images....one could, if feeling hatefull towards ones ISP - get some of the stereo pairs and have a go, but I don't think you would learn much.
Doug
I guess this is a pretty stupid question, but why are they so round? I would expect a tube collapse to be sinuous, or at least oval.
Perhaps impactors punched holes in the roof? Even small secondaries would probably have power enough to do that.
They look transposed vs the original images, but on another note, is there any value in stacking them? There are three images of Dena and two of the others to work with.
Is there any radar coverage of any of these areas or would this become an interesting candidate? Or is the radar sensitive enough at 100m depth?
Seems from the discussions here that a lava tube type collapse is most likely so perhaps there is no need for radar coverage. still just wondering.
APD :
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap070528.html
Powered by Invision Power Board (http://www.invisionboard.com)
© Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com)