Well http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Rosetta/index.html isn't going to get to 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko (Chury) till 2014, but it's not to early to set up a thread. There are a bunch of earth fly-bys, a Mars encounter at 200km in 2007 and a few asteriod passes. Not to mention the mission to land on the comet itself.
Only another nine and a half years to go.
Wow, i did not know that there will be a Mars Flyby.
Interesting...
Also, I believe they will be observing Comet Tempel 1 during the Deep Impact encounter.
Here is a nice http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Rosetta/SEMSZYV4QWD_0.html of the back of one of rosetta's solar pannels taken by one of the 6 micro cameras on the Philae lander. Looks like the pictures of the surface from the lander are gonna be sweet.
For those that understand German this site has lots of info about the Rosetta mission:
http://www.bernd-leitenberger.de/rosetta.html
http://www.bernd-leitenberger.de/philae.html
A few asteroid passes!
Great news. Wonder which ones???
During the first http://www.rssd.esa.int/SB/ROSETTA/include/The_Swingby.html by Rosetta which took place on the 4th of March, ESA ran a http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Rosetta/SEMQ4RYEM4E_0.html to find the best ground based images of the spacecraft during closest approach. The http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMKI9W797E_FeatureWeek_0.html were announced on Monday. A gallery of all images taken of the spacecraft is available http://esamultimedia.esa.int/images/rosetta/contest/index.html.
I remember reading that due to the large size of rosetta's solar panels there was the hope that the shape of the spacecraft migh be resolvable, alas, only one submitter claims to have http://esamultimedia.esa.int/images/rosetta/contest/target7.html.
Rosetta meanwhile took some excellent photos of the earth and moon during the encounter
And I thought the seven years that Cassini took to get to Saturn was long. I don't know what I will doing 9 and a half years from now. It is definitely going to be worth the wait. The pictures look really sharp!
http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Rosetta/SEMT4V2IU7E_0.html
ESA’s comet chaser mission Rosetta took these infrared and visible images of Earth and the Moon, during the Earth fly-by of 4/5 March 2005 while on its way to Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko.
A repeat of above data from TPS. http://planetary.org/news/2005/rosetta_earth-moon-images_0506.html
Good news on the problem with the sticky thermal door covering the OSIRIS cameras -- a problem which ESA had indicated in two status reports starting in January, but about which I simply could not pry any information from them. (Even Mike A'Hearn -- who is a co-investigator! -- had only been told that it was "some kind of stickiness".) ESA's close-mouthedness is a serious pain in the ass.
However, judging from the latest status report, they seem to have finally developed a software fix for it (after one unsuccessful earlier try).
http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=37534 :
"On 31 May a test of the OSIRIS door mechanism was carried out with the
presence of the PI team at ESOC. The purpose of this test was to
characterise the behaviour of the flight model, compare it with the test
results on the ground models and finalise the new software routines for the
control of the door to be uplinked on 14 June. The test was successful and
the OSIRIS team has already delivered the new software. ESOC is preparing
for next week's uplink and verification operations."
Postscript: they do plan to use the OSIRIS cameras -- along with all of Rosetta's other remote-sensing instruments -- to observe Tempel 1 during the Deep Impact collision.
Bruce - would you classify ESA's press efforts as almost being obstructive in places?
Doug
I don't know if "obstructive" is the word, but "idiotic and counterproductive" are definitely applicable. I just stumbled across an old clipping from the JBIS on why the ESA chose to initially display the photos from Giotto in that way that made them totally incomprehensible (and infuriated Thatcher to the point that she forbade Britain to get involved in any major way with the ESA): they were DELIBERATELY made incomprehensible to the public so that the camera's principal investigator would have absolutely total control over their initial interpretation!
I don't know how much of this is the inevitable tangle that accompany international cooperation, and how much is due to the phenomenon in which Jeffrey Bell firmly believes: that European nations still have distinctly anti-democratic and pro-aristocratic tendencies in their political leadership and so still try to resort to "Father Knows Best" approaches in dealing with their own citizens. If so, they've just received another rude awakening on that front...
I swear I saw some fantastic nebulae observations by one of the Rosetta instruments somewhere online at one point.
Buggered if I can find them now
Is there any sort of public-group that represents the public to Nasa? I'm not aware of one, but a representative body that say "right - you need to tell us about x, y, and z, and stop wasting money on b and c" or something? (nasawatch doesnt count )
I think something seriously needs to be done to sort ESA out. I wanted to find some HRSC images a few days ago, and it took me for ever to find that page that just has them all listed, it's ..well...crap.
The interface for HRSC data is worse than crap as well.
The Marsis thing is a case in point. We should have had a blog type thing, something, ANYTHING to keep us up to date, I figure there's about £1 of my money invested in MEX, so it's time for some pay back
Doug
ROSETTA STATUS REPORT
Report for Period 9 December 2005 - 6 January 2006
The reporting period covers four weeks of passive cruise, with
monitoring and minor maintenance activities.
On the subsystems side, the attitude guidance has been changed to +X
Earth pointing on 14 December 2005, to reduce the disturbance torques
experienced by the spacecraft and therefore the fuel consumption for
reaction wheel offloading.
http://sci.esa.int/jump.cfm?oid=38558
http://fr.arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0602631 - First albedo determination of 2867 Steins, target of the Rosetta mission
--- On the basis of its polarimetric slope value, we have derived an albedo of 0.45 +/-0.1, that gives an estimated diameter of 4.6 km, assuming an absolute V ma gnitude of 13.18 mag. ---
Thre's some speculation that Steins may be one of the rare E-type asteroids (enstatite chondrite) -- although it's so small that its near-IR spectrum is rather fuzzy.
The unusually high albedo measured with both polarimietry and with brightness + thermal infrared data (we need Spitzer measurements) really does seem to put this rock in the "e" category. I don't know how sure they currently are that this corresponds to rare and "weird" Enstatite chondrites. Is it the enstatite chondrites that have nearly identical oxygen isotope systematics to Earth and Moon rocks?
ANY opportunity to get a good look as something besides variations-on-a-theme of S type asteroids is extremely welcome. The only totally limited look we have of one is NEAR's nice flyby sequence of C type Mathilde, but it's just a nice sequence of pictures, mostly.
The short 6-hour rotation rate of Steins will help get some rotational coverage, like Gaspra and Ida.
What exactly will the closest approach distance to 2867 Steins be? I'll settle for an order-of-magnitude number if the distance is not precisely known yet.
And earlier still:
February 2007 - Rosetta Mars flyby (200km altitude)
Bob Shaw
They definitely intend to use the MIRO microwave spectrometer during the Mars flyby -- the first time such an instrument has ever been used there -- to make Martian atmospheric observations. (Such a gadget would have been added to MRO if they'd had the weight margin for it). I believe they also intend to use many of the other instruments, too -- although most of them would just reiterate the far more sweeping orbital observations that Mars Express has been doing.
Since I've just done the sums, I thought I'd share:
(Quite) approximate pixel size of the asteroids in http://www.mps.mpg.de/projects/rosetta/osiris/ (2048 x 2048 pixels @ 0.00115 deg/pix) at closest approach:
2867 Šteins: http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.php?showtopic=873&pid=46374&st=15entry43680 @ 1700km => 135 pixels
21 Lutetia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21_Lutetia @ 3000km => 1600 pixels
Astrophysics, abstract
astro-ph/0603585
From: S. Alan Stern [view email]
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:04:41 GMT (508kb)
Alice: The Rosetta Ultraviolet Imaging Spectrograph
Authors: S.A. Stern, D.C. Slater, J. Scherrer, J. Stone, M. Versteeg, M.F. A'Hearn, J.L. Bertaux, P.D. Feldman, M.C. Festou, J.Wm. Parker, O.H.W. Siegmund
Comments: 11 pages, 7 figures
We describe the design, performance and scientific objectives of the NASA-funded ALICE instrument aboard the ESA Rosetta asteroid flyby/comet rendezvous mission. ALICE is a lightweight, low-power, and low-cost imaging spectrograph optimized for cometary far-ultraviolet (FUV) spectroscopy. It will be the first UV spectrograph to study a comet at close range. It is designed to obtain spatially-resolved spectra of Rosetta mission targets in the 700-2050 A spectral band with a spectral resolution between 8 A and 12 A for extended sources that fill its ~0.05 deg x 6.0 deg field-of-view. ALICE employs an off-axis telescope feeding a 0.15-m normal incidence Rowland circle spectrograph with a concave holographic reflection grating. The imaging microchannel plate detector utilizes dual solar-blind opaque photocathodes (KBr and CsI) and employs a 2 D delay-line readout array. The instrument is controlled by an internal microprocessor.
During the prime Rosetta mission, ALICE will characterize comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko's coma, its nucleus, and the nucleus/coma coupling; during cruise to the comet, ALICE will make observations of the mission's two asteroid flyby targets and of Mars, its moons, and of Earth's moon.
ALICE has already successfully completed the in-flight commissioning phase and is operating normally in flight. It has been characterized in flight with stellar flux calibrations, observations of the Moon during the first Earth fly-by, and observations of comet Linear T7 in 2004 and comet 9P/Tempel 1 during the 2005 Deep Impact comet-collision observing campaign
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0603585
Astrophysics, abstract
astro-ph/0603720
From: Jessica Agarwal [view email]
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 13:00:59 GMT (713kb)
Imaging the Dust Trail and Neckline of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko
Authors: J. Agarwal (1), H. Boehnhardt (2), E. Gruen (1 and 3) ((1) MPI-K Heidelberg, (2) MPS Katlenburg-Lindau, (3) HIGP Honolulu)
Comments: 4 pages, 3 figures, to be published in the proceedings book of the conference "Dust in Planetary Systems 2005"
We report on the results of nearly 10 hours of integration of the dust trail and neckline of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko (67P henceforth) using the Wide Field Imager at the ESO/MPG 2.2m telescope in La Silla. The data was obtained in April 2004 when the comet was at a heliocentric distance of 4.7 AU outbound. 67P is the target of the Rosetta spacecraft of the European Space Agency. Studying the trail and neckline can contribute to the quantification of mm-sized dust grains released by the comet. We describe the data reduction and derive lower limits for the surface brightness. In the processed image, the angular separation of trail and neckline is resolved. We do not detect a coma of small, recently emitted grains.
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0603720
A busy period for Rosetta :
- Honda comet tail observation last July
- Lutetia observation in January (At very far distance I guess. Does anyone know the distance ?)
- Mars flyby in February
- Jupiter observation in April in support of New Horizon
http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=40366
>Lutetia observation in January (At very far distance I guess. Does anyone know the distance ?)
approximately 1.62 AU at January 1, 2007 and increasing up to 1.8 AU by the end of the month.
Quite strange moment for imaging, Rosetta will have tens of "encounters" within 0.1 AU while going through inner parts of Main belt after 2007-2008. Of course , it will be rather small asteroids, smaller than giant Lutetia (almost 100 km long), but yet suitable targets for exporation.
Does anyone know whether it will be possible to do a mass determination during the Lutetia flyby? Usually these require ultra stable oscillators attached to the transmitters, in order to get a stable enough frequency to track the doppler shift. And you would like to fly as close to your target as possible.
Seeing as how it's an M type, a density measurement, even if it's rough but reasonable (spec. grav +/- 1.5), would be a very useful piece of information.
a 3000 km flyby is pretty useless for any asteroid mass determination unless the 'oid is something really big, like over 100 km. What's Lutetia's est. diam?
Around 100 km. So it's borderline.
Well, Galileo flybys of Gaspra and Ida were around the same ballpark distance (1600 and 2400 km, respectively) and mass estimates were acquired, probably through two-way doppler before and after the encounter. Rosetta is reaction wheel controlled so in principle it should allow a rough mass estimate to be given in the same way, especially since Lutetia is significantly more massive than the former two so its signature should be much more easily detectable.
EDIT: On second thought, determining Ida's mass was much more straightforward. It has a moon orbiting at a known distance and a known orbital period so mass can be determined to high accuracy. As for Gaspra, the http://radioscience.jpl.nasa.gov/publications/dsn.html has this to say:
Rosetta warms up for Mars swing-by
http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMNJ8D4VUE_index_0.html
Instruments from both Rosetta orbiter and Philae lander will be used during the observation campaign.
The purpose of the 36-hour observation campaign of 21-Lutetia is to understand the rotation direction of the asteroid.
Rosetta will be able to observe Mars from about 20 hours before it makes its closest approach to about a few weeks after.
Rosetta instruments will be switched off around the eclipse period. However, Philae lander will still be operating and taking measurements during the eclipse as the lander has its own independent power system.
The ESA Rosetta website has a list of the various planetary and asteroid flyby's and their dates, but I did not find a graphic / plot of the trajectory. Is there a figure of the trajectory on ESA (or another public) website that shows the flyby's similar to the figure on the Messenger website for the Messenger mission --
http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/the_mission/trajectory.html
For those interested in this kind of thing, a special issue of Space Science Reviews is in the works that will publish several Rosetta-related papers, mostly dealing with the instruments. Several of these papers are in press (i.e., "http://www.springerlink.com/content/1572-9672/?sortorder=asc&Content+Status=Accepted"), and, for a limited time, SpringerLink is offering free access for non-subscribers, though one may have to register (freely).
Also, note that a http://www.springerlink.com/content/q58315621w03/?p=4002b36eece2422599f02be6e8edbb65&pi=0 on the James Webb Space Telescope was just published, and I believe access is free to this one as well.
I saw a passing mention of Phobos and Deimos observations... will these improve visual imagery/catrography, or does Rosetta have some new instruments to bring to bear... or both?
IM4,
Thanks for the doc.
http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMNRESMTWE_index_0.html
An animated sequence of Lutetia imaging and an image of Mars and the Milky Way taken by OSIRIS.
I can't get RealPlayer or Windows Media Player to play the high-res version of the animation. Is anyone else having more success?
I wish ESA would post these things in a format that I could more easily repost. I know that animated GIF isn't the world's best animation format but it's something that I can pull individual frames out of and resize for posting...
That Mars and Milky Way image is really gorgeous, though!
--Emily
I can't get it to work, either, Emily; must be the site itself.
Agree with you, though: beautiful pics! Almost tempted to infer that the dark spot on Mars is Syrtis Major, but in all probability it's just an artifact.
Emily,
you have to download the http://www.divx.com/ in order to see it.
EDITED: ...And the asteroid's details are quite remarkable...
http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=40588
29 Jan 2007 09:29
Report for Period 13 January to 26 January 2007
Rosetta will be soon exactly 10,000,000 miles away from Mars at 2007-Feb-04 05:26:33 UTC.
The spacecraft is currently going almost directly toward Mars with a speed of about 20560 mph.
So, what is a more significant figure: 10,000,000 miles or 10,000,000 km?
What's a mile?
(well - it's a European spacecraft after all )
Doug
A mile is in the eye of the beholder
Statute, nautical, imperial... yadayadayada...
I'm all for the metric system. If I could convince the USAF Reserve to let me run 2 km instead of 2 miles for my biannual physical fitness test, life would be better...
The great thing about using a variety of units: miles, km, sols, days, etc.
is there are so many more milestones to celebrate. The more the merrier!
If the UK would switch to KM, I'd be very happy.
Doug
I'll admit, I am a stick in the mud when it comes to metric...for space exploration, great, but as for every day life, give me miles, feet, pounds, and inches. Well, off to watch the game...
Ted, why to complicate your life using Km in space and Miles on Earth?
I have impression that the only way to convince all to use the same unit system is... to create a new one!
I know, is a madness... anyway, what do you think of the space covered by light in a billionth of sec? (hey, you should like it, is pretty close to a foot!). Then use all power of 10 units (metric is better from this standpoint, no doubt).
Even better, we could divide the day in 10^5 "seconds" and we will have such a lenght unit equal to 259mm or about 10 inch)... ok, stop the metric madness!
Wouldn't you rather have a litre
Doug
Even that's not strictly SI. I'll have a cubic metre and a pork pie please.
I'm reminded of a rather foul song I co-wrote for a laugh whilst a teenager...I'll share it with you next time I see you - not suitable for forum consumption
John the Grocers life fell through the ground,
When he got nicked for selling apples by the pound.....
Doug
Basically, in the 1970s, there was an abortive attempt to make America metric, but a few things did change and have stayed. My understanding is that something similar happened in the UK, but got a lot farther. I know the whole Celsius thing has been a point of confusion when I am on that side of the puddle (which collectively over the course of my life would total up to about a year), because, well, 40 degrees instinctively sounds cold to me, even though I know that it isn't on the Celsius scale.
As an American, I never got to see these "in person," but I saw one on a news story here. You see, when Britain went over to a decimal money system, they ran a series of public service announcements urging people to use the new decimal money.
The PSAs had a little jingle that I still recall, perhaps because of the actual way they stated some things. Specifically, while the decimal money was called decimal, the old-style money-counting system was referred to by the abbreviations for pound, shilling and pence, which for some odd (and I'm sure quite English) reason was abbreviated to "LSD." So you got:
"Decimal shops
Give decimal change,
LSD shops give...
LSD change!"
Hearing that for the first time, I figured there was no problem -- you'd have no issue getting rid of LSD change. Just invite a lot of people from San Francisco...
-the other Doug
I can't understand why people would want to go metric, after all what's wrong with the old (Imperial?) system:
12 lines to an inch, 12 inches to a foot, 3 feet to a yard, 220 yards to a furlong, 8 furlongs to a mile and 3 miles to a league.
16 drams to an ounce, 16 ounces to a pound, 14 pounds to a stone, 2 stones to a quarter, 4 quarters to a hundredweight and 20 hundredweight to a long ton.
Now that is what I call creative units, and if it leads to an occasional case of unintentional lithobraking, so what.
Don't forget troy ounces. That's what makes the joke about "which weighs more, a pound of gold or a pound of feathers" work. (Answer: a pound of feathers weighs more, because a pound (avoirdupois) of feathers is 453 grams but a pound (troy) of gold is only 373 grams.)
--Greg
The part that I find really odd is that "Imperial" measures are fundamentally defined by calling on metric SI base units e.g. the international avoirdupois pound is defined officially as being equal to exactly 453.59237 SI grams. This opens up a whole other argument about pounds being units of force and not mass but I really don't think we should go there again.
In any case surely shouldn't the Pound be defined as equal to the weight of one of George Washington's boots or something?
Well, one of my latest classes is a crash physics review rolled into new stuff for space sensors, and all I can say is thank God for the metric system. I have enough trouble figuring out where to put decimal points without worrying about duodecimal/hex unit conversions to boot!!!
Precious...Just precious...
http://www.spaceurope.blogspot.com
Isn't it ironic that all this "discution" about metric vs imperial occurs in the Rosetta's topic ?
M.Champollion, where are you?
I think it's because the switch to the metric system is almost the latest news we have from over there.
--Greg ;-)
http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Rosetta/SEMKRCO2UXE_0.html
ESA
15 February 2007
As an aside, several Rosetta instruments and investigations-related papers have been posted over the past few weeks in the "http://www.springerlink.com/content/1572-9672/?sortorder=asc&Content+Status=Accepted" section of the journal Space Science Reviews. These papers will be assigned to a specific issue(s) at a later date.
Minerva wasn't much of a scientist - camera, temp data and the ability to 'bounce' itself around a little.
Philae - however...
Rosetta Lander Scientific Instruments
Investigation of comet materials http://www.rosetta-lander.net/science/cosac1.htm MPAe D chemical analysis with mass spectrometer (MS) and gas chromatograph (GC); pressure sensor http://www.rosetta-lander.net/science/ptolemy1.htm Open University UK isotope analysis (ion trap, GC) http://www.rosetta-lander.net/science/apx1.htm MPCh D element analysis ( Alpha Xray Spectrometer) Cameras for viewing of the comet core http://www.rosetta-lander.net/science/civa1.htm IAS F panorama, stereo and microscope cameras, imaging infrared spectrometer http://www.rosetta-lander.net/science/rolis1.htm DLR D landing and down looking camera Investigation of comet core structure http://www.rosetta-lander.net/science/sesame1.htm DLR D seismic measurements, dust monitoring, permittivity probing http://www.rosetta-lander.net/science/consert1.htm CEPHAG/LPG F microwave tomography http://www.rosetta-lander.net/science/mupus1.htm Univ. Münster D penetrator with thermal sensors Plasma and magnetic environment http://www.rosetta-lander.net/science/romap1.htm Univ. Braunschweig D magnetic field and plasma monitoring Sample Retrieval http://www.rosetta-lander.net/science/sd21.htm Politecnico di Milano I drilling and sample distribution
"Philae - however..."
The entire Rosetta mission is entirely comparable to Galileo/Jupiter Probe, and Cassini/Huygens and in older times, Viking Orbiters and Landers in ambitiousness and in the scientific scope and variety of instruments. This is one big, impressive mission.
Indeed. I think of it as CRAF+. Kudos to ESA for stepping up with an enhanced mission after NASA had its budget slashed and had to renege on some of its international commitments.
Correct. This is a flagship. It will give us much more return than Deep Impact, Contour and Stardust combined.
Not to discount the samples from Stardust or the possibility to study 3 different comets with Contour. But long term study is the key. To see the change, not to take snapshots. Using a suite of instruments. You can repeat observations to answer new questions. This is something Contour or Deep Impact could not do. Deep Impact in particular has been a big disappointment. For me it looked more like an engineering demonstration than a science mission. Stardust is a little bit different: There you have the material and can study it again and again. But these very short flybys should be something of the past (This is even true for New Horizons, but hey, there is no way to orbit Pluto, so you must flyby).
If I look at Discovery missions so far, many did carry only very limited instruments: MPF, Stardust, Contour, Deep Impact. On the other hand, orbiters were much more productive: NEAR, Lunar Prospector, hopefully Messenger and Dawn (although Dawns instruments are very limited too). Genesis is a little bit different, but Kepler has a very limited scope too.
I go as far and say: One flagship like Cassini (3 billion $) gives you much more return than 8 Discovery missions (400 million $ each). Discovery missions need a very large amount of their budget just to built the spacecraft bus and launch it. The science instruments are only tiny fraction. This relationship get better the bigger the mission.
Analyst
But of course, one LV failure with 8 discovery missions is a little less drastic than a single LV failure on a flagship mission. There are benefits to spreading things out a little.
Doug
I've been thinking about this issue in relation to possible future outer solar system missions, possibly with major inter-agency collaborations. One possibility would be to launch component modules separately and assemble them in Earth orbit. You could have a single interplanetary propulsion unit plus entirely independent modules for (for example) planet orbiter, moon orbiter, balloon probes module, lander - the failure of any one of which would not jeopardise the entire mission. Of course it would be desirable to have a back-up interplanetary propulsion unit on the ground that the other bits could just wait in orbit for if necessary.
All this considered, I stand by my opinion. Maybe the risks are higher (all eggs in one basket), but the benefits are higher too. For me, subjective, the benefits of flagship missions outweight the risks of loosing one.
Analyst
I just thought I'd point out something I http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00000866/: The Society is sending your very own Doug Ellison to Darmstadt, Germany to cover the Mars flyby for the blog, since I can't travel for business right now. Be nice and give him some (virtual) company as he stares blearily at his laptop screen beginning around 2 am CET on Sunday...
--Emily
I noticed that in your blog and was duly delighted. He will have plenty of company!
Is a long extended mission a possibility for Rosetta?
http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/db_shm?sstr=67P&group=com&search=Search
seems to indicate that the target comet will make a distant Jupiter pass around 2017/2018
http://spaceurope.blogspot.com/2007/03/rosetta-120307-osiris-update_13.html.
Thanks ustrax... look at the last paragraph... "No timetable for publication" of the acquired data.
... sigh ...
Did he say anything about the trajectory for the upcoming earth flyby (or does anybody know?) I have long wished another spacecraft would make a Galileo-like flyby with its cameras on.
Emily has some new info in her http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00000903/:
MOST.
Not all.
Doug
weren't spectacular for them to merit public release
You see, I don't get that at all... what, we're only allowed to see "spectacular" images now? I've sat through three mouse-clicking, RSI-inducing years of countless (clink) black and white pictures of MER sundials for pity's sake, so I don't care if they're "spectacular" or not, I'm ***interested***!! I want to see them, and share them with all the people I give my talks to, not just because, in a very small way, we all helped pay for them, but because it's what's supposed to happen. Isn't it? They design, build and launch the probes, they take pictures and measurements, send the data back, and we are told what they learned - or did I miss something? Did I miss a Part B of the Plan that states that the only people allowed to see the results are the people in the offices and labs, because the "Little People" couldn't possibly understand what the missions learned..?
Sorry, but I feel quite strongly about this. I'm busting my guts Out There giving talks at every opportunity, being an advocate for the world's space programs, trying to convince people that the money spent on space probes is well spent and wouldn't be better spent on other things, and when I come up against something like this it just makes my job so much harder.
I received word that VEx will be having, as mentioned before, a major release within a month, and that further releases should be monthly. I look forward to this, but I'll believe it when I see it.
OSIRIS camera on Rosetta obtains ‘light curve’ of asteroid Steins
http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Rosetta/SEMCC2R08ZE_0.html
I love the "relatively slow speed of about 9kilometres per second" note for editors. You know you're spending too much time in space when 40,000 kph is relatively slow.
Here's a Steins http://s148.photobucket.com/albums/s18/spacEurope/?action=view¤t=2867-Steins.flv.
Information on Rosetta's Earth Fly-By 2
Someone was asking for information on the Rosetta fly-by of Earth in November 2007. I asked the Rosetta science ops people for some info.
The closest approach (CA) will take place on November 13 (DOY317). At the moment of closest approach, the altitude of Rosetta will be 5330 km above the Earth surface, at sub-surface position: 63°46' S, 74°35' W (local time 16:17). A glance at Google Earth shows the closest approach is above the Magellen Strait, between South America and Antarctica. Not the spot I would have picked, but that's why I don't work in Flight Dynamics.
The Earth solar elongation around closest approach shows a very unfavorable configuration for observing the Earth during the ESB2 event. The solar angle from +Z, towards +X, must not exceed 140 degrees for thermal reasons. We assume a minimum observing angle of 10° and a maximum angle of 140°. For solar elongation angles between 20 and 95 degrees, the duration of the attitude is not constrained; for larger angles (but smaller than the hard upper limit 140 degrees at 1 AU) the maximum attitude period is 4 hours. Attitudes with SEA smaller than 20 degrees would violate several instrument constraints.
Power and data rate are not expected to present any constraints, since we are at 1 AU.
Some of the ideas being explored for instrument operations are shown below.
ALICE (AL): UV spectrometer observations:
• decontamination) and dark exposures)
• 1 Earth pointing spectral calibration and flatfield using Earth Airglow)
• 3 Moon pointing observatoins with absolute flux calibration and flatfield using Moon’s limb, slit in N-S direction)
• 1 stellar pointing for calibrations with preferentially Vega
MIRO (MR): Microwave Instrument for the Rosetta Orbiter Observations:
• 2 Earth pointings to stare at Earth during approach and recession for detector linearity calibrations.
• 2 Moon pointings to stare at Moon during approach and recession for detector linearity calibrations.
• 1 Asteroid Mode sequence test run at closest approach
OSIRIS (SR): Science camera SR Observations:
• 3 Moon pointings for science – spectrophotometry of lunar disk), Moon Na/OH tail, also straylight calibration)
• 2 Stellar pointings for calibrations on Vega and 16 Cyg
• 1 Earth pointing for calibration and imaging, Spectroscopy and straylight
• 3 imaging observations
VIRTIS (VR): Visible and Infrared Mapping Spectrometer Observations:
• 1 stare to Earth terminator, repeated several times before CA
• 2 scans from Earth limb to terminator, repeated several times before CA
• 1 raster mosaic
PHILAE (LZ): Rosetta Lander Observations:
• continuous RoLand Magnetometer and Plasma Monitor (ROMAP) measurements 6 days before and 1 day after CA
• 1 imaging of different CIVA images during CA
Magnetometer (RP) Observation: continuous magnetometer science observation 7 days around the CA
Radio Science (RS) Observation: one ground station configuration for radio science anomalous acceleration measurement
SREM (SE): Radiation Monitor Observations: continuous science observation with increased sampling of 24 hours around CA
So to summarize what I take away from this, the trajectory is not great for observations due to observation constraints. We come in on the dark side, close to the terminator, which means we have the highest relative speeds with the worst observing conditions when we are closest. Still, the early planning has a lot going on. They'll try to catch more images with the Lander camera, like they did at Mars, but they are not certain what the orientation will be so it isn't at all certain yet. During the long cruise phase, the teams are not in place to do experiments. So the fly-by and the time around it will be used for a number of calibrations, which are important if not overlly exciting. Should be able to get some decent images as we sail away on the light side.
The ESA page on the Rosetta mission is at: http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Rosetta/index.html.
Rosetta Science page: http://www.esa.int/esaSC/120389_index_0_m.html
Hope that helps.
-Don
Any idea how close the lunar approach will be? I remember it being quite distant last time.
Ted
Rosetta and New Horizons watch Jupiter in joint campaign
http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMHFHT4LZE_index_0.html
More like "Rosetta and New Horizons watched Jupiter in joint campaign".
Yeah, but I was adressing the fact the joint part of the observations is over. Probably has been for quite a while now.
The flyby portion of the joint study is over, but joint observations do continue.
From: http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00000875/
"Feb 28
03:00 Turn to Jupiter for New Horizons flyby support
[activity descriptions removed -- CW_II]
08:00 End New Horizons Jupiter flyby support
Mar 1
19:30 ALICE observations of Jupiter begin
Following its flyby, New Horizons will exit the Jupiter system by flying down Jupiter's magnetotail.
Rosetta will be able to study the Jupiter system using its ALICE instrument from outside the magnetic
field at the same time that New Horizons studies it with its own ALICE instrument form inside the
magnetic field. The observations will take place in a total of 22 blocks over the next two months,
each block lasting anywhere from an hour to nearly four days.
May 9
17:30 ALICE observations of Jupiter end"
From: http://www.physorg.com/news92058084.html
"We couldn't pass up this opportunity to study Jupiter's meteorology, rings, aurorae, satellites, and magnetosphere," says Alan Stern, Southwest Research Institute, Colorado, and New Horizon's Principal Investigator....
The idea for the joint observations came from Stern. As well as leading New Horizons, he is also the principal investigator for Rosetta's ALICE instrument.
ALICE is the ultraviolet imaging spectrometer. Designed to analyse gases being given off by Rosetta's target comet....
Rosetta will study Jupiter for between 6 and 8 days in total, spread over the next few weeks. Each time Rosetta opens its eyes to look at Jupiter, it will do so for several hours at a time, collecting as much light from the faraway planet as possible. "Rosetta will give us the big picture context in which to see the up-close data from New Horizons," says Stern. During this time, New Horizons will be riding the long tail of magnetism that stretches out behind Jupiter and funnels charged particles away.
Rosetta's ALICE was the prototype for the ultraviolet imaging instrument flying on New Horizons.....
Note the newly posted (with temporary free online access) special issue of http://www.springerlink.com/content/j3243rxx3v43/?p=7cbb4f4126ea499eacc95a22f2f27ea2&pi=0, which contains 33 articles.
It's a shame the perspective is so, well, earthlike.
The PDS announced a few days ago the first release of ALICE data from Rosetta.
Waddayaknow - Alan and his team deliver the goodies nice and early. Meanwhile the European lot drag their feet.
Not sure how 'suitable for public consumption' Alice data is, but I'll certainly have a look at some point
Doug
Is there some other data for us to look at?
No, now go away or I shall taunt you a second time.
Split posts to http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.php?showtopic=5256
I was hunting around today for basic information on the specs of the Rosetta navigation camera and came up pretty much empty except for the caption of the http://www.esa.int/esa-mmg/mmg.pl?b=b&topic=Comets%20and%20Asteroids&single=y&start=66, which state that an image of 820 by 820 pixels corresponds to a FOV of 4 degrees. Can anyone point me to a link with any more official information on detector size or FOV or angular resolution or any of that stuff?
--Emily
The field of view is about 5 degrees, pixel scale 0.005 degree/pixel (18 arcsec/pixel), no filters.
Sorry, I don't know of any website or publication I could point you to.
http://www.selex-sas.com/EN/Common/files/Galileo_Avionica/Relazioni_Esterne/Scheda_Prodotto_2/Space_2/NAVCAM.pdf
All credit to the RPC-IES team for delivering to the PDS - what we really want is Osiris and CIVA though
It is worth noting that over the weekend Hubble studied Lutetia with WFPC/2 and SBC to characterize it in UV. It also did visible band imaging which included a detailed satellite search. I look forward to seeing the results of this - wow, a moonlet would be cool.
http://archive.stsci.edu/proposal_search.php?mission=hst&id=11957
http://www.stsci.edu/observing/phase2-public/11957.pro
Today on arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.4187 note that Spitzer has also made observations of EPOXI's target Hartley 2, but there is nothing published about it yet.
Also note that a paper titled New visible spectra and mineralogical assessment of 21 Lutetia, a target of Rosetta mission is forthcoming in http://www.aanda.org/index.php?option=com_forthcoming&Itemid=18&lang=en#section_9
Some news about Steins on the french agency site :
http://www.cnes.fr/web/CNES-en/7806-gp-steins-unveils-its-secrets.php
Interesting information about the string of craters.
Speaking of which, any idea of when results of the Steins flyby are going to get published in the refereed literature?
I knew those craters had to be related, and not just a trick of shadows.
I'm not convinced. Remember the great north-south chain of large craters down the central meridian of our moon? Invoked as evidence of internal processes, now ignored. But for the record, check out the other image in that story - it has a similar chain running left to right across it.
Phil
Coming back to the line of craters again - I've already said that I think the craters appear to have different ages - some more subdued than others. Another reason I'm not convinced by this interpretation (drainage of regolith into a fracture, as suggested for Phobos) is that the scale is wrong. A little world, a little crater, I'd expect to see a little crack (if any) and really tiny pits. In fact I think such pits, if they did form on Steins, would be too small to be resolved in Rosetta images. This is like the Valles Marineris of Steins. I believe this is just a random set of craters that appear to be in line in this view, but if you look at the full image sequence you can make out other apparent lines as well, including one that re-uses some of these craters when relief distortions change the apparent alignment.
Phil
Alignments are not just apparent. When you change the angle at which you view the body, you change the faces on that body that are in the way of a stream of impactors. If you rotate Steins to a variety of angles, you can line up any number of craters into potential chains.
I think one or two of those craters look suspiciously like sinkholes, and there could well be internal faulting that is causing some of the observed cratering. However, the small but significant size differences, the weathering and appearance differences, and especially the depth differences in the craters in this little chain tell me that at least some of them are impact craters made by somewhat different types of impacts (bigger and smaller impactors, differences in relative velocity, etc.).
When you look closely at the Real World, observed phenomenon are usually the results of blends of causes, not of nice, tidy, neat, this-explains-it-all processes. If two different processes are possible, rest assured that, to one degree or another, the results of both of those processes will be observed.
-the other Doug
The Rosetta blog is back, baby. Gearing up for next month's Earth fly-by.
The Blog is at logically named:
http://webservices.esa.int/blog/blog/5
The updates will probably be slow for the next couple weeks. The most recent post:
On Friday, 13 November, 2009, at 07:46 UT, ESA's Rosetta satellite will make her third (and final) swing-by of Earth, picking up a gravity assist from our bulky home planet and altering trajectory as she enters the next stages of the 10-year journey to Comet 67 P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko.
The ESA Flight Dynamics team have predicted Rosetta's altitude at the point of closest approach (perigee height) on 13 November to be 2481 km, slightly higher than her first swing-by in March 2005 (1954 km) and lower than her second swing-by on 13 November 2007 (5295 km). We'll update this figure as we get closer to the swing-by date itself...
The geographical point of closest approach (the point on the Earth's surface over which she'll make closest approach) is 109°E and 8°S - just off the coast of the Indonesian island of Java.
Thanks for the reminder ... need to update the trajectory in my simulations a little!
EDIT: done
8 November Moon image is up
Some interesting observations are planned for the flyby
http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=45865
Note in particular the 24-hour "movie" of the approaching Earth (please ESA don't mess up and release it!) and the attempt to detect water on the surface of the Moon.
Let's just hope they flip it the http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00001247/ before releasing it this time
I'll settle with them releasing it. One can always flip it afterwards.
Osiris is a STUNNING instrument - 2kx2k CCD - can't wait to see what they come up with.
I just wish they'd release the data from previous flybys etc.
Absolutely beautiful view of Earth... http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMXJY3VU1G_index_0.html
Whoa! That's a stunner of a pic, all right. We do have a nice little piece of real estate with curb appeal, don't we?
It's not stretched - buy your computer might be stretching it to fit your desktop.
You know, it's very easy to make jokes about ESA's data release, outreach and P.R. abilities; period.
A couple of the images downloaded today (Friday).
http://www.esa.int/esaSC/SEM8KIHVY1G_index_0.html
A couple of outbound navcam images http://webservices.esa.int/blog/post/5/904 on the blog.
Flicker gif:
http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n15/ugordan/earth_navcam.gif
Fair is fair, someone at ESA is doing a nice job getting these looking good and released in a timely way.
I can see my town on that nightside view... should have opened up a telescope and returned the favor, had I not gotten up at 0330 and driven to Atlanta and back. Maybe I can catch an image tonight if the sun angle isn't too bad.
Really nice images, and I agree with NGC: Kudos to ESA for the timely release.
Can hardly wait to see the pics from 67P/Gerasimov; the terrific quality of these images is making me drool in anticipation!
Yeah. .. I'm buried under that big swirl of clouds that was Ex-Tropical Storm Ida.
(4.5 inches of rain in 4 days of yuck.)
Good-bye Rosetta and Good Luck!
(Good riddance Ida and don't come back!)
And dig http://webservices.esa.int/blog/post/5/904: "In the camera field of view, Lutetia shoudl [sic] appear about as large as the Earth looks in these images." And we only have to wait until July!
on arXiv today
http://arxiv.org/abs/1001.3010
http://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2010/06/aa12928-09/aa12928-09.html about ESA's Standard Radiation Environment Monitor instruments, one of which is flying on Rosetta
Saw this interesting item in the Planetary Exploration Newsletter, but before you get excited, there is no OSIRIS data at all released yet (nor VIRTIS, either).
I asked via Twitter and it was a 'We'll ask' . Sadly nothing from the lander instruments either.
Rosetta developed a leak in the attitude control system fuel lines
http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=47733
but controllers are confident that it should not impact the mission at C-G...
Unwelcome news. Last thing we want to see is a repeat (in some respects) of the Hayabusa drama.
Saw some Lutetia spectra this morning -- it is only slightly red. I read numbers off the I/F graphs like 0.09 in blue and 0.95 to 0.1 in red wavelengths. Steins was shown in a color combo to be much redder but I didn't see any Steins spectra; there must be some in literature by now.
Last March Rosetta was used to observe the asteroid collision in the asteroid belt that formed "comet" P/2010 A2
observations by Rosetta are reported http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v467/n7317/full/nature09453.html (you need a subscription to access the paper) and are summarized http://www.skyandtelescope.com/community/skyblog/newsblog/104877759.html
images are available on Nature website: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v467/n7317/fig_tab/nature09453_F1.html
and on ESA's website: http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=47829
The Nature paper on Rosetta observations of "comet" 2010 A2 plus its supporting materials and images are now available free on arXiv
http://arxiv.org/abs/1010.2883
http://www.astrium.eads.net/en/news2/good-night-rosetta-the-comet-chaser-sleep-tight.html
Astrium systems engineer Alois Eibner will send the last radio command (for the time being) to the space probe on Wednesday 8 June 2011.
...During the 32 months of deep sleep, the probe, weighing approximately three tons, will be largely on its own. Radio contact will no longer be possible, as there is not enough solar energy for all on-board systems during this phase. Never before has a solar-powered space vehicle ventured into these depth of space, further away from the Sun than the planet Jupiter. Rosetta has to take that risk in order to reach the comet.
To make sure the probe is ‘wide awake’ when it reaches its destination, the engineers will set the ‘onboard’ alarm. A clock with triple redundancy ...
Hah! I bet some on this forum are familiar with the old "triple redundancy" alarm trick!
I've been wondering for quite a while, how far will Rosetta be from the sun at aphelion? The animation on their http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Rosetta/SEMRZF1PGQD_0.html says the orbit of Jupiter (!) around 2012 but isn't really a precise number. Will it actually cross the orbit? That would be a first for solar powered spacecraft, correct?
"http://www.astrium.eads.net/en/did-you-know/rosetta-the-miles-more-chaser.html of approximately 800 million kilometres from the Sun and about 950 million kilometres from the Earth.
It will be the first time a solar-powered probe has ever travelled such distances."
http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/profile.cfm?Object=Jupiter&Display=Facts&System=Metric
Perihelion (closest)
Metric: 740,679,835 km
English: 460,237,112 miles
Aphelion (farthest)
Metric: 816,001,807 km
English: 507,040,015 miles
I have seen an aphelion of 5.09 AU mentioned somewhere
What would darn scary if it woke up and it was revieled two clocks had failed......
32 months asleep sounds pretty scary.
As Rosetta is http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEM38RJ4LOG_index_0.html, http://www.mps.mpg.de/en/aktuelles/pressenotizen/pressenotiz_20110608.html
Good night Rosetta.
ESA Release: "We sent the command via NASA's 70 m Deep Space Network station in Canberra, Australia, ensuring the signal was transmitted with enough power to reach Rosetta, which is now 549 million km from Earth"
It has been a hive of activity here for the past week. ESA wanted to have some people on the ground here in Canberra to ensure that everything went well. We did our usual magnificent job of course and, as confirmed by their media release, the ESA team were very happy with how it all turned out.
Sleep well Rosetta, the alarm is set for 2014
I had yet to see any scientific result of the 2007 Mars flyby, so this paper is quite welcome: http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.3926
Most of the Rosetta cruise phase data up to the Steins flyby are now archived, see
http://www.rssd.esa.int/index.php?project=PSA&page=rosetta
Looks like the content mirrors that of the PDS Small Bodies Node archive. Too bad the VIRTIS dataset wasn't released. Earth (Mars as well?) high spectral resolution visual spectra = yummy.
an interesting paper recently published in Astronomy & Astrophysics:
http://www.aanda.org/index.php?option=com_article&access=standard&Itemid=129&url=/articles/aa/abs/2012/12/aa20116-12/aa20116-12.html (in free access after registration)
if the authors are right, the nucleus of C-G should look more like a flattened spheroid than like a starfish as assumed until now. they predict that it may resemble a rounded body like Tempel 1.
From my point of view this is a much more realistic shape model. The oddly symmetrical star-shape of the previous model screamed 'artifact' at me.
Phil
Cited from http://www.esa.int/For_Media/Press_Releases/ESA_activities_in_2013_of_interest_to_media_-_Update_25_April_2013:
Just found this: cute LEGO model and some information I didn't know (descent camera MSL style, and interesting ways of coping with the cold cometary night!)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwkliXod6Ns
Some more infos/pictures of recent activities in this http://blogs.esa.int/rosetta/.
Edit: Official press release of 11 October 2013: http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/Rosetta/Rosetta_100_days_to_wake-up.
I know it's a little early, but does anyone have any clue towards what EOM at the end of 2015 really means for Rosetta? The official pages say little about it, and I know the main factor against an extended mission is probably the greater distance from the Sun causing power loss, but will it just be left in parking orbit? Might as well try a daring NEAR-style end if the ship and its instruments are still functioning well...
All I remember from semi-public sources is, that they actually don't know yet how long the mission can be sustained, because several properties of the comet are unknown. The uncertainty begins with the strength and structure of the assumed crust of the comet, relevant for the way the lander can hopefully be fixed to the surface, and ends with the way the surface of the comet may desintegrate.
The orbiter will first try to reduce some of the uncertainties by propper mapping.
Power isn't expected to be available for continuous operation, but for phases of operation and phases of battery recharge.
Details about press conference on the 10th being streamed online:
http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/Rosetta/Background_briefing_Rosetta_wake_up_and_year_ahead
It is about time to revive this thread. This contest looks like fun; I bet there are some mages here who would like to participate.
http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/Rosetta/Wake_up_Rosetta
http://download.esa.int/esoc/wur/esa_wakeuprosetta_rules.pdf
Go Rosetta!
http://download.esa.int/esoc/shares/rosetta_wake-up_faq_20_jan_2014.pdf
http://www.livestream.com/eurospaceagency
The general press are talking about a wake-up time of about 10:00 UTC Monday.
However this is a little misleading, as the first confirmation signal will not arrive at Earth until between 17:30 and 18:30 UTC.
So it's going to be a few hours between the countdown clock on the main page ticking to zero and getting the signal back. Might not have to stay up overnight.
Also, welcome back general, it's been a long time since you posted on here!
This streaming link seems more reliable than the ESA website:
http://www.livestream.com/eurospaceagency
First glimpse of C-G might come in March, from 100,000 KM away:
http://www.astrium.eads.net/en/news2/time-to-wake-up-rosetta.html
Should be fully awake (along with me!).
Signal traveling now hopefully... Just a few more minutes. Saw a screen where it will show up. Just noise for now.
Nothing yet...
I can't help but feel nervous
There is a spike now, possbly the signal!
Is that peaky-looking thing on the display a signal?
Yes it is!
And applause now, yes, it's the signal!!
I knew I had to take a break and start to prepare dinner to have the signal!!!
Contact, wahoo!
I notice I made a spelling error above ("possbly"). I'm not going to correct it; it reflects that I was excited to see the signal when I was typing!
Yay! Signal received!
http://www.esa.int/For_Media/Press_Releases/Rosetta_ESA_s_sleeping_beauty_wakes_up_from_deep_space_hibernation
Just the very, very best news that could be possible today. This is gonna be one hell of a mission. GO ROSETTA!!!!!
Thank goodness!
Lots of useful info in the http://www.esa.int/For_Media/Press_Releases/Rosetta_ESA_s_sleeping_beauty_wakes_up_from_deep_space_hibernation so I'll quote some of it here. I thought about starting a new thread, but I think that the time to start a new thread will be with the first images in May.
45 minutes of terror
https://twitter.com/esaoperations/status/425362252196089856 -- it's not just awake, it's talking!
long thread but ...
going back a few years and posts
#132 and #188
and some others
there is a shape file for Comet 67P Churyumov-Gerasimenko
ftp://naif.jpl.nasa.gov/pub/naif/generic_kernels/dsk/churyumov-gerasimenko/
and there is a ? almost? wavefront .obj file
ftp://naif.jpl.nasa.gov/pub/naif/generic_kernels/dsk/churyumov-gerasimenko/input_files/
it is in that text file
-- a 90x45 px image in radians (Km) 90 north to 90 south X 0 to 360
puled from the "churyumov-gerasimenko_512.bds" file
http://www.imagebam.com/image/c86760302732191
and the .obj file ( rotated to match the above plate file ) and the "DEM" draped over it
http://www.imagebam.com/image/b073c5302733121 http://www.imagebam.com/image/a4a65f302740136
Really happy here.
If all goes as planned, Rosetta promises to be one of the most spectacular missions ever. Getting excited.
The end of this Guardian article has some intriguing speculation; nuclei are active, so Philae won't stay where it lands forever. Unlike NEAR, stuck on Eros until the end of time (or a violent homecoming in a few megayears), Philae may very well end up going on a second unplanned voyage in just a few of C-G's orbits....
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/jan/20/rosetta-comet-chasing-spacecraft-wakes-up
note that there has been another reconstruction of the shape of the nucleus which looks quite different from the pointy shape posted above. see this old post http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=873&view=findpost&p=194503
A few links you might find useful:
Rosetta dedicated website:
http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/Rosetta
Rosetta in depth: http://sci.esa.int/Rosetta/
Rosetta overview:
http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/Rosetta_overview
Rosetta orbiter:
http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/Rosetta/The_Rosetta_orbiter
Rosetta Lander:
http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/Rosetta/The_Rosetta_lander
Rosetta instruments (a total of 21);
http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/Rosetta/Orbiter_Instruments
Rosetta Factsheet:
http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/Rosetta/Rosetta_factsheet
Rosetta FAQ:
http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/Rosetta/Frequently_asked_questions
Rosetta on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ESA_Rosetta
Rosetta on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RosettaMission
Rosetta dedicated Blog: http://blogs.esa.int/rosetta/
Rosetta on You Tube:
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbyvawxScNbtAhH8vHAYl-pyEirPi-4Ad
Rosetta for kids:
http://www.esa.int/esaKIDSen/SEMGZ6Z2OMH_OurUniverse_0.html
Rosetta on Flick:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/europeanspaceagency/sets/72157638315605535/
Rosetta fly-bys images:
http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/Highlights/Rosetta_flybys
Rosetta 3D Flash model
http://orbits.esa.int/orbits/science/satellite/flash/rosetta.swf
Rosetta
images :http://www.esa.int/spaceinimages/Missions/Rosetta/(class)/image
Rosetta videos and animations:
http://www.esa.int/spaceinvideos/Missions/Rosetta
This New Scientist article on Rosetta seems to imply that there may have been a problem as the "signal arrived late"
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn24908-up-and-at-em-rosetta-craft-gaining-on-target-comet.html
"One thing they will be keen to understand first is what happened to cause the half-hour delay. Rosetta's overnight reports may provide the answer."
BUT, the signal arrived within the hour long window as predicted so maybe its just being somewhat "sensational"
Concerning the slight delay in signal acquisition:
according to http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn24910-snoozebutton-glitch-delayed-rosettas-wakeup.html there was another computer reboot in September 2012, during hibernation
A funny and informative Rosetta-themed xkcd what-if:
http://what-if.xkcd.com/82/
Did a little forum maintenance today, starting http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.php?showforum=76 and http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.php?showtopic=7835.
Powered by Invision Power Board (http://www.invisionboard.com)
© Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com)