Greetings all! I am searching for detailed construction and design information about the NASA Viking '75 Mars project hardware, particularly for the lander, aeroshell, base cover, and bioshield. Can anyone recommend good sources? I am especially looking for engineering drawings and under-construction photographs.
To set the stage, here is an https://picasaweb.google.com/113792041573871319555/VikingLanderDiagrams?authuser=0&feat=directlink&noredirect=1 drawings and photos which I've collected so far.
I have already read the "usual" books, such as NASA RP-1027 "Viking '75 Spacecraft Design and Test", the press kits, the scientific papers produced about the mission, a number of industry papers covering various instruments and subsystems, the major Martin Marietta books, etc. I am hoping to find additional sources. Any ideas?
Also, does anyone know if there are aeroshell, base cover, or bioshield components lurking in a museum or in storage somewhere?
FYI, I have visited three of the best landers still on Earth: The Proof Test Capsule in the Smithsonian NASM, the Flight Capsule 3 (backup) in the Museum of Flight near Seattle, and the Science Test Lander in the Virginia Air and Space Center. I've taken nearly 1,000 photos of the three of them (most of which are publicly available in other Picasa Web albums of mine). I've taken a few measurements, but I would dearly love to find more authoritative drawings of more hardware (interior, exterior, everything). I have begun submitting some Freedom of Information Act requests to NASA/JPL which has started to bear some trivial but kind of fun fruit.
---
Update as of March 2017: During the past few years I have been fortunate enough to collect a significant amount of information on the Viking lander hardware. My thanks to a number of organizations for providing me access to their resources:
Can't remember where I read this, but at least one piece of a spare aeroshell assembly wound up in someones backyard.
Seems like I saw a pic somewhere. Maybe Sky and Telescope a LONG time ago.
I have begun creating a 3D model of the Viking lander, attempting to be fairly detailed and as accurate as I can manage (based on the references I have, including some 900 photographs I've taken of three authentic landers). I recently completed my first pass at the lander's sidebeam #1, which forms one third of the lander's hexagonal body. Here is https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/YK2b9Cmb3gXecs_x0B8p29MTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink of the backup lander body in the Museum of Flight near Seattle.
The model linked above represents the solid machined aluminum beam without any of the brackets, fittings, and flanges which are bolted or screwed to the sidebeam. The attachment points for all those brackets etc. are represented as carefully-located bolt holes. As I understand it, each sidebeam consists of a lander-body long side and half of the adjacent two short sides. The three sidebeams are apparently connected to each other via the vertical landing leg https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/MvsF3IwLRP9vdREuxNN59tMTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink, which are bolted across and under the joints between adjacent sidebeams. The top and bottom cover plates also help to hold the body together; fastener locations for those plates are included in the model.
Proportions of the model are based on dimensions I have taken from some authentic landers, various published references, and a lot of photo interpretation and cross-check. I have been careful to ensure that the various points of contact between the lander and its aeroshell are reconciled (three large bolts, one under each leg primary support fitting; six shear points, two under each sidebeam; and three guiderail roller assemblies).
If anyone has corrections or questions, I would be pleased to address them!
I am looking for a good-quality version of an image published in NASA Ref. Pub. 1027, "Viking '75 Spacecraft Design and Test Summary: Volume 1 - Lander Design" issued by the Langley Research Center in 1980. Figure 20 "Lander Body" (on page 25) is what I hope to find.
The http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19810001592_1981001592.pdf (10MB) on the NASA Technical Reports Server has an almost illegible image of Figure 20. I have examined two original printed copies of RP-1027 from nearly libraries; in both cases the original halftone printing of Figure 20 is fairly poor. https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/TVAMbGu4rV4b5xp3axAj69MTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink which I scanned at 400 DPI from one of the copies.
Does anyone know if a photographic print or high-resolution scan of that image is available in some archive somewhere? I recently sent a message to the "Contact Langley" web site asking about this image, in case that turns it up.
Edited to add: as a prior reply mentions, I am creating a 3D digital model of the lander. My intention is to make that model freely available, both as a 3D SketchUp mesh and as 2D blueprints. The purpose of the blueprint form is to aid my ultimate goal of scratch-building an actual model, probably 1/8th scale. My https://picasaweb.google.com/113792041573871319555/VikingLanderDiagrams?authuser=0&feat=directlink&noredirect=1 (including "Figure 20" linked above, which shows the lander's internal Equipment Plate) are already shared, in case they help folks also interested in the Viking project.
I've now completed the first-pass 3D model of the lander's three sidebeams. https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/PBYQvqSvQH7-dQeVOj77ZtMTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink, and one render by itself (sidebeam 3 is in the lower right, #1 on the left, and #2 in the upper right, with meteorology boom mounting bracket attached):
This is only a small fraction of the job, but it's nice to see the shell of the lander in the round.
-- Tom
For those following at home I have added the Viking lander's top cover plate to my 3D model. It was a challenge to reconcile the externally-visible features with Martin Marietta's drawing of the interior Equipment Plate (instrument locations, support posts, etc.). I've tried to minimize the discrepancies. Here is a line drawing of the overall body:
There is a model - I'm not sure of its fidelity - at the California Science Center. If there are details there that could be useful, let me know and I'll head over with a camera.
Doug
IIRC, they've got the actual ground engineering test lander in the lobby of the National Air & Space Museum in DC. I wonder if the curators there have complied a dataset of public-domain information on same; might be worth an e-mail.
Hi Doug -- regarding the California Science Center's lander, thank you very much for the offer! I suspect that unit is a replica created by Penwal Prototypes, rather than an authentic Martin Marietta unit. I base this largely on the photo shown on the http://www.penwalprototypes.com/portfolio/signature-projects.html (look for the Viking Lander thumbnail), compared to on-line photos I've found of the CSC's lander. Details such as Camera 1's clear housing; the mock-up BIO and GCMS inlet processors; the silver foil bands on some leg's white cloth contamination fairing skins; the dark bands wrapping the meteorology boom cabling; the fuel tank and roll-control thrusters, and fuel-line routing and joints. I wrote to Penwal a few months ago asking about their replica and whatever references they may have had, but never received a response.
Overall I don't think it is authentic enough for my purposes, except I am very curious about the exposed camera 1. Did Penwal manage to acquire a surplus original ITEK facsimile camera unit? It seems out of character with the rest of the lander; too much detail. So I would very much enjoy seeing some photographs of that camera's innards (both the upper rotating opto-mechanical part, and the lower fixed electronics part) from various angles. If possible!
Hi nprev -- that's the Proof Test Capsule in the National Air and Space Museum. I've actually visited it three times in the last year, and accumulated about https://picasaweb.google.com/113792041573871319555/VikingMarsLander?authuser=0&feat=directlink&noredirect=1 of that fantastic unit. I have not yet attempted to contact the NASM archive division, which I really should do! Thanks for the nudge.
In September had the opportunity to spend a couple of days at the Museum of Flight near Seattle WA, and study the Viking lander Flight Capsule 3 (flight-backup) on display there. I took over 500 detail photographs of the lander. I recently completed processing (e.g., brighten shadows, diminish background distractions, add captions) and have uploaded them to a Google https://picasaweb.google.com/113792041573871319555/VikingLanderFC3?authuser=0&feat=directlink&noredirect=1 if anyone else is interested. They join about 180 photos of the FC3 I had taken a year ago.
The images are about 12MPixels in size. If you use Picasa web's magnifying-glass tool to see the full version, it usually takes five seconds or so before the complete image is available. Before then the little zoom-navigation widget only goes to about half size; the bar will re-scale to access the full detail when ready.
I also had a chance to meet Chris Vancil and Eckart Schmidt, both of whom worked to restore the FC3 for display (Eckart worked during the mission at Rocket Research Company on the terminal descent engines), and also Ron Hobbs of the museum staff. It's a great facility with an amazing collection.
A few months ago I was delighted to acquire a vintage set of blueprints of the "Viking Lander Body Structure Assembly" by Martin Marietta. With the permission of the UMSF administrators I am making scans of them available to all, hoping they provide useful information or at least enjoyable viewing. Here is a https://picasaweb.google.com/113792041573871319555/VikingLanderBodyBlueprints?authuser=0&feat=directlink&noredirect=1.
Overview
I suspect this set of blueprints was intended to guide assembly of the core body and its myriad brackets and fittings, rather than to support the fabrication of the various piece parts. There are extensive dimensions listed on the plans (which is what I find so valuable!), but not enough to fully define the parts. The print set consists of 35 sheets. Sheet 1 is composed of over 100 individual pages, consisting of notes, parts lists, and Design Change Notices. Sheets 2 through 35 are the actual shop drawings (one large page per sheet). In the above album I have shown the drawing sheets first, then the various notes pages. What follows in this message are some of my interpretations and explanations of the contents of this historic blueprint set.
Five Lander Body Variants
Martin Marietta's part number for the core lander body is 837J3100000. The plans show five (5) distinct variants of the body, denoted with tags -009, -010, -019, -020, and -029. All five have unique features (generally quite small). Variants 9 and 29 are fairly close to each other; 10, 19, and 20 have a lot in common. I would love to learn what variants correspond to which manufactured lander body units. There is a table on Sheet 1 https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/Uj4Qw8Oq_yXNZZCajy1uZ-g0AB190KvrXvgQeGCzRsQ?feat=directlink&noredirect=1 which seems to list the five body variants with cryptic nomenclature:
ASSY/PART NO. --- NEXT ASSEMBLY --- TT
837J3100000-009 --- 837K0100000 --- PC (?Proof Test Capsule, PTC?)
837J3100000-010 --- 837J1000200 --- TM (?Thermal Effects Test Model, TETM?)
837J3100000-019 --- 837J2000200 --- SD (?Lander Structural Dynamic-Test Model, LDTM?)
837J3100000-020 --- 837J3000200 --- SS (?Lander Structural Static-Test Model, LSTM?)
837J3100000-029 --- 837K0100000 --- <blank>
I don't know the meaning of the "TT" column, but I'll guess that it represents the purpose or role of the lander units (perhaps Test Type). If so, I wonder if the table's two-letter designations represent the test units who's names I've added to the table in parentheses. For what it's worth, the Flight Capsule 3 (backup) lander body in Seattle's Museum of Flight has stenciling from Martin Marietta on https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/3T9Ylrc_YI5rcuymf_O_odMTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink&noredirect=1 which includes the notation "P/X 837K0100000-009" (as well as "S/N 0000003"). This suggests that the FC3 body is of variant type -009; perhaps the two Flight bodies FC1 and FC2 are also this type?
According to the set's revision history information, the initial release of the prints was on 27 June 1972. The revisions incorporated into this set occurred during the interval from 7 March 1973 to 15 January 1975 -- just seven months prior to launch of Viking 1. The last few revisions are mostly re-labeling of part-numbers or changes to fasteners. (Assembly of the Flight landers had been largely completed by late 1974.)
The lander body components are assigned Martin Marietta part numbers generally of the form 837J310xxxx-yyy, where xxxx identifies the component and yyy identifies a specific variant. For example 837J3100053-001 is the Surface Sampler's main mount (which happens to only come in one variant). The drawings often do not identify a specific variant in overview contexts, but all components have a formal variant tag. Sheet 1's parts-list pages include a group for each of the five lander variants (e.g., pages 9.001 to 9.021 contain the parts list for variant 9; pages 19.001 to 19.017 list parts for variant 19). I have collated all parts-lists pages into a https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0Apy4CXbgbQHxdHlDdkdpWmxLeWFGY19seVFGY29TNkE&output=html showing which component variant belongs to which body variant(s). The spreadsheet also enumerates the drawing sheet(s) on which the given component is notably visible.
Scan Process
My paper copies of the drawing sheets are printed on C-size (17 x 22 inch) sheets, reduced from the master E-size (34 x 44 inch) sheets. The reduction is by a bit over 50%; Martin Marietta's reduction-copy process was a bit casual, yielding some skewed orientations accommodated by wide margins. I suspect this print set came from two different master original printings, because some sheet images are slightly larger with different borders than others. I have rectified the scans to be squared to the image area and of uniform size. I scanned the paper sheets at 600 DPI, which yields an image of about 120 million pixels (nearly 13K by 10K pixels). Google's PicasaWeb service currently allows a maximum image size of 50M pixels, therefore the album contains 300 DPI versions. Each sheet's image caption includes a link to a full-resolution version on DropBox.
A few of the drawing sheets are fairly clear prints, but most have extensive background mottling introduced in Martin Marietta's copy/print process. I have begun digitally cleaning the scans. In order to avoid loss of faint and obscured detail this is largely a manual masking job, which is very tedious. To date I have completed masking the first three drawing sheets (numbers 2, 3, 4). I hope to occasionally replace others with cleaned versions. A few of the sheets have annotations applied by a prior owner of the set. I will be removing such annotations during masking.
Lander Body Size
All linear dimensions are in inches and are usually specified to thousandths. These blueprints confirmed my earlier suspicion that the hexagonal body's long and short side lengths of 43 and 22 inches as stated in some NASA documents are incorrect. The long side length is approximately 43.359 inches; the published figure probably resulted from a simple rounding. However, the short side actual length is approximately 24.566 inches, which is about 10% larger than the published value. The height of the core body (excluding top and bottom covers and some integrally-machined protrusions) is exactly 18.000 inches, which agrees with the published value.
By the way the odd values for the side lengths are not direct design parameters. They are derived from the actual design parameters which are the distances from the body geometric center to the perpendicular midpoints of the sides. The design distance from the body center to the midpoint of a long side is specified as exactly 26.700 inches. From body center to midpoint of a short side is specified as exactly 32.125 inches. Application of some mathematics yields the side length values listed above. (I was pleased to discover that length estimates I had made earlier, based on known https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/K7o_gOK9kRyoZ7-xXWwoSNMTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink&noredirect=1, a scale https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/3zZLv00h0MP0qgCjQ1HnGNMTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink&noredirect=1, and knowledge of the nine-point interface between Aeroshell and lander, were only off by a few hundredths of an inch.)
The core lander hexagonal body consists of three (3) sidebeams, each machined from a single piece of aluminum. The three sidebeams are broadly similar but differ in numerous details (flanges, holes, stiffeners, etc.). The sidebeams are spliced or butted together with the vertical joints on the centerlines of the three landing legs. Therefore each sidebeam represents one complete long side and the halves of two adjacent short sides (appearing as angled short "wings" seen from above). Here is a https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/YK2b9Cmb3gXecs_x0B8p29MTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink&noredirect=1 I've created of sidebeam 1.
Blueprint Notations
Each of the drawing sheets has a border dividing the sheet into an 8 by 8 grid of 64 zones. Zone coordinates range from 1 to 8 (bottom to top) and A to H (right to left). One portion of a drawing will frequently refer to another view or section on the same or a different sheet. Such zone references are denoted by a square containing number / letter coordinates, with a small sheet-number outside the upper right corner.
Large circles with multi-line text generally represent part numbers (e.g., 837J3101042-009) or fastener types (e.g., ST25D40-5-3).
Small circles containing a dash and three digits denote a simple flat shim part (of which the lander contains dozens). Sometimes the circle is omitted. The three-digit number is the variant tag for the shim's part number, all of which belong to the overall lander part number 837J3100000. For example, a notation of "-075" refers to shim 837J3100000-075. The parts-list pages show the shim's nominal sizes, with width and height larger than final to allow for trimming tolerances. The drawing sheets generally show the final shim sizes (which I've listed in the above spreadsheet when known).
Horizontal triangles containing a number are flags which reference one of the notes listed on pages https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/ltp63TfVi1ODE0sdmRXFIug0AB190KvrXvgQeGCzRsQ?feat=directlink&noredirect=1 to 2.003 of sheet 1. Such notes detail process operations, assembly instructions, etc.
Small rectangles define construction reference planes, or specify tolerances in relation to a reference plane or point. In the following example the lower rectangle defines the associated feature (not seen in this fragment) to be Plane E. The upper rectangle specifies that this plane must be parallel ("||") to Plane A (defined elsewhere) within 0.020 inches.
A few features on the lander required a particular degree of machined surface finish. These are denoted with a stylized kind of letter J with an adjacent number (representing the roughness average value in microinches).
Anachronism
Most of https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/ylPWatM5dsBO988gX-EGm-g0AB190KvrXvgQeGCzRsQ?feat=directlink&noredirect=1 is devoted to a prominent component which is not present on the final Flight-type lander bodies. It is an earlier design for the lander's Radar Altimeter Antenna mount (described in the parts list as "Support-LAA" and belonging to body variant 10). https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/RrlCDHW3TOzmfhR5j8GzSNMTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink&noredirect=1 of the Thermal Effects Test Model (TETM) has such a projecting assembly, visible at the right upper corner of the front of the inverted body (which corresponds to the lower left corner of sidebeam 2). This reinforces the idea that body variant -010 was used for the TETM, and that "TM" in the table I listed near the top of this write-up is the Thermal Model.
Thanks to the extremely kind assistance and cooperation from the staff at the California Science Center I have been able to take detailed measurements and photographs of the Viking lander on display at the CSC. I owe a huge debt of gratitude to David Gansen, Frank Hernandez, and Ken Phillips of the CSC senior staff for facilitating my recent visit -- thank you gentlemen!
My https://picasaweb.google.com/113792041573871319555/VikingLanderAtTheCSC?authuser=0&feat=directlink&noredirect=1 is now available, with captions. Also available is an https://picasaweb.google.com/113792041573871319555/VikingLanderMeasurements?authuser=0&feat=directlink&noredirect=1 totaling over 300 individual measurements.
I used a variety of tools to capture the measurements, principally a high-quality 6-inch dial caliper and 12-inch outside caliper. Longer or hard-to-reach features were measured with a small tape measure (with ability to directly measure diameters). Angular measurements were made with a digital angle gauge. Profiles were captured with a multi-tooth plastic contour gauge. Broad curves were captured with flexible curve templates. A few part outlines were directly traced on paper.
There was discussion earlier in this thread regarding the origin of the lander displayed at the CSC. Last year I had reservations regarding its authenticity based on its numerous mock-up components and the listing of this apparent unit on the Penwal Prototypes http://www.penwalprototypes.com/portfolio/signature-projects.html web site. Over a year ago I had written to Penwal asking about their involvement, but never received a reply. The CSC staff does not have much information regarding the nature of this lander. I have not been able to contact Lockheed Martin, who loaned the unit to the CSC. Then a couple of months ago I found and purchased a vintage 1981 Denver Post https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/iMx7OAfYWzZ-aIjK4GyMVdMTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink&noredirect=1 which appears to show the same lander:
Here is a progress report on my 3D digital model of the Viking lander. I had begun modeling the body in 2012, but started completely over this past winter. During late 2012 and 2013 I had acquired the original blueprints described in a prior reply, and captured a few hundred additional photographs of the landers in the Museum of Flight (Flight Capsule 3 aka the backup body) and the California Science Center (what I suspect is the Thermal Effects Test Model or TETM). These new data motivated me to re-start the model. Here is an overall view of the current effort:
Nice work, and thanks for sharing the SketchUp files so that others may play
Update on my project to create a 3D digital model of the Viking lander: I have added more and more core body fittings, brackets, equipment mounts, shims, etc. It's probably not yet recognizable as a Viking lander to most folks, but it's starting to look interesting. I've created a few simple fly-around (and -through) animations of the work-in-progress https://www.dropbox.com/sh/irxexra7unnoedy/AABhrrFHzSEFqF_A90ZMArv2a?dl=0 (in the preceding public directory the file named "Viking Lander" is the composite model with all components in place). They are listed on my brand-new https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCL223KT3dfyv_hGzdnsrw5g/videos. Here are individual links (with video times):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKn7YSTMuX0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tI_OdL1kf2g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_eFM7P3tsU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oG_xh6ACid0
Edited to add: if your computer and network access allow it, viewing at full-screen in 720 or 1080 resolution makes for a nice clear image.
Amazing Tom, thanks!
When I was at the CSC I was somewhat puzzled by the odd look of their display unit, so your ideas on how it came to be make sense.
For me just the photos are a tremendous resource for vehicle construction; I was quite time limited the day I spent there (with so much to see) and didn't take nearly enough images (a dozen or so) and not from the angles you were allowed. And the comparison notes between the display and designs are fantastic!
Here is some additional information on Viking lander hardware which I collected in Hampton Virginia USA in November, at NASA's Langley Research Center (home to the Viking Program Office) and at the Virginia Air and Space Center. Thanks to the generous time and assistance of Mary Gainer, LaRC Historic Preservation Officer, I had the rare privilege to examine a Viking surface sampler's Collector Head and Shroud Unit in the LaRC archives. Thanks to the extremely kind cooperation of Allen Hoilman, Curator and Director of Exhibits at the VASC, I was able to spend an entire day (when the VASC was closed to the public) measuring and photographing the Viking lander on display. I believe this unit was the Science Test Lander while at JPL in the 1970s.
Examining the surface sampler Collector Head Shroud Unit (CHSU) at LaRC was an extreme treat. I have never found high-quality photographs of such a unit, to say nothing of seeing and handling one in person! The LaRC's CHSU is accompanied by a collector head as well (serial number 20). It is a pristine unit, fabulously clean compared to the units mounted on the landers at the VASC and Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum (both of which which saw much testing during the '70s and thus are quite grubby), or the collector head on the lander displayed at the California Science Center (which has a thick coat of cracked and peeling yellow paint). I was able to capture nearly 100 http://tinyurl.com/vikingchsu of the CHSU and collector head. Here is a reduced-resolution sample:
My on-going quest to research the Viking '75 missions recently took me to the Pacific Northwest where I had opportunities to measure and photograph some unusual Viking lander hardware. My thanks to Rachel Tillman and http://jimtillman.net and the http://www.thevikingpreservationproject.org for granting me access to a Meteorology Electronics Assembly (MEA), Tape Recorder (TR), and S-Band High Gain Antenna (HGA), as well as some rare original technical documentation, and also special access to the backup Flight Capsule 3 lander body in the Museum of Flight in Seattle. My grateful thanks also to the http://www.museumofflight.org staff including Senior Curator Dan Hagedorn and Registrar and Accessions Team Leader Christine Runte for facilitating my after-hours access to the FC3. All of your help was critical in making my 3000 mile trip a very enjoyable success.
Firstly are about 50 photographs and some measurements of lander http://tinyurl.com/vikingtr serial number 001. The lander tape recorders were unusual in having all-metal recording tape in order to survive the ~240F sterilization temperature to which the complete lander capsules were subjected. This unit lacks its top cover which thus exposes the tape transport and record/playback head mechanisms to view. A marvelous device. For reference https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/1yKMWLCyT5Dc3bcq5pB-WdMTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink&noredirect=1 of one of the lander tape recorders right after its installation within a Flight lander. Here's a reduced-size image of the TR under study:
Tom,
Your in depth examination of the Viking Lander is exemplary. Viking was my first interplanetary experience.
It was well covered by Australian media at the time, and I cut out from the newspapers every clipping related
to the mission and pasted them in a scrap book. Sadly, that book slowly fell to pieces over the years.
After getting home from primary school, I couldn't wait for Dad to come home from work with the daily
papers, which I would scan, page for page for any scrap of information on Viking.
Just like Apollo, we wonder how so much was achieved with what today is regarded as ancient technology.
It was robust, it was tested inside out, then tested again. It was the best of its day - as we all were.
Many thanks,
Gary Fearon
Today's update on my digital 3D http://tinyurl.com/viking3dmodel of the Viking lander (which is freely available at the preceding link): the core lander body is essentially complete, including over 300 unique pieces. To celebrate I created a new https://youtu.be/xvaLlSN4Fiw, about three and a half minutes long, presenting various aspects of the model.
Wow Tom. Thanks much for the video. It gives me insight into one of my favorite missions and all your hard work.
In case you don't know about this particular treasure trove of high resolution Viking hardware images, have a look at
http://crgis.ndc.nasa.gov/historic/Viking_Archives_Collection.
I was unable to leave that archive before I downloaded every single one of them.
Hi bear10829, that is indeed a wonderful archive. In fact I've met Mary Gainer, NASA Langley Research Center's Historic Preservation Officer who is driving the on-going enlargement of that site. With Mary's generous permission I visited Langley in November 2014 to examine and measure a Viking lander surface sampler http://tinyurl.com/vikingchsu that is in the Langley archives. Every few weeks Mary and her team add new images to that archive site.
Tom,
Your progress is astounding and it is a pleasure to support your work!
Thank you Rachel, I appreciate the compliment and I look forward to our future Viking collaborations. You and the http://www.thevikingpreservationproject.org/ have an incredibly valuable collection.
I just completed a https://youtu.be/tKiiQpMdnTM of my work-in-progress digital 3D http://tinyurl.com/viking3dmodel of the Viking lander (which is freely available at the preceding link). This video is nearly six minutes long and shows detailed operation of the lander leg mechanisms, with cut-away sections revealing internal latches, springs, the honeycomb attenuator, pin-puller, etc.
On May 20 I visited the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum in Washington DC to photograph the Viking lander Proof Test Capsule (PTC), which has recently been undergoing conservation prior to being re-exhibited in the remodeled Boeing Milestones of Flight Hall. Thanks to the very kind assistance of Matthew Shindell, curator in the space history department, and Jessica Bulger of the collections department, I had an hour of special access prior to museum opening. This allowed me to get over and under the lander for detail photography, and include scale references against some components. The result was nearly 900 images I've processed, added descriptions, and uploaded in a new http://tinyurl.com/vikingptc2016.
This was the last time in probably quite a while that 360-degree access will be possible to the Viking PTC due to the new exhibit arrangement that will not allow the "back" (leg 1 area) to be readily seen. For the past few decades the PTC has been exhibited in a very professional glass-walled module, which allowed 360-degree views but mostly through one or two panes of brown-tinted glass. For a short period this spring, including the recent day I was photographing, the lander was removed from that module (which is not being re-used). Thus reflection- and smudge-free images were possible, and I took great advantage of the opportunity - hence the large size of my new album. (During three visits in 2011 and 2012 I acquired about 450 earlier images, some of which suffer from glass artifacts.) Most of the images were taken later on May 20 during normal operating hours, around and between the temporary barriers surrounding the lander. But the early-morning hour with the Smithsonian staff allowed unusual details to be captured, for which I am very grateful! It was a privilege to be granted such access. Thank you Matthew and Jessica.
On a related note my on-going project to create a high-fidelity digital 3D model of the Viking lander continues. I decided to try having a commercial 3D print made of some small parts, for fun. I had to choose something which I had already modeled (of course!), which had a minimum wall thickness large enough to be within the printing capability (which eliminates some parts, even at full scale), and which was not cost-prohibitively large. I chose to print one of the guide roller assemblies that interfaced between the lander and its Base Cover guide rails:
My main goal is to model essentially all exterior piece-parts of lander hardware (though I'm undecided about a few external components such as the prominent wiring bundles - they would be hard to model and I don't have good data on the routing of the Flight lander wiring, which differs from the PTC and other test-unit wiring in various places). I would like to model the interior but I lack sufficient references to do a high-fidelity job on most items (and doing so would add about two years to the project). I'm doing selected "hidden" parts for which I have good information and which catch my eye, such as the leg mechanisms and the three interior struts that support the large Terminal Descent Landing Radar (TDLR) box below the lander body. I plan to model the Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators (RTGs) to a good level of detail because they are such iconic devices and I have the info. I'm not sure about internals of the three Terminal Descent Engines (TDEs), I've got almost enough information on them.
In my fantasy I would also model the Aeroshell and its numerous components, and the Base Cover and Mortar Support Truss. But they would entail another couple years' work, so that's very uncertain.
Regarding my recent Viking research at the Smithsonian NASM, it was wonderful and a real privilege to be allowed a one-hour session right up against the lander with a collections specialist! To be clear I am not affiliated with any institutions, the staff did not know me, and I have no formal credentials. Thus being granted that access was an honor for which I am grateful. With that said there was a LOT of additional information I would have loved to acquire. Quite understandably (for the reasons above) I was not permitted to make contact with the lander myself. I did provide references to my earlier visits at NASA Langley, the Virginia Air and Space Center, the California Science Center, the Museum of Flight in Seattle, and the founders of the Viking Mars Missions Education and Preservation Project, who all allowed me to take direct careful measurements of authentic lander hardware. I could have spent ten hours gathering measurements and still not covered everything on my "PTC Bucket List." But I completely understand why that was not permitted.
I recently completed a 12-minute https://youtu.be/1vyzoWudom8 that illustrates some of the research methods and modeling approaches I've been taking during creation of the Viking lander digital model.
In July I was delighted to show and discuss the model at the 40th landing anniversary event organized by the http://www.thevikingpreservationproject.org, with a personal invitation by Rachel Tillman. The event was sponsored by Lockheed Martin and held at the Wings over the Rockies Air and Space Museum in Denver CO. The lander was built by Lockheed Martin heritage company Martin Marietta just outside Denver. I met a number of original Viking folks at the event, which was a treat!
This past weekend I completed a 3D digital model (using SketchUp) of the Viking lander's Surface Sampler Collector Head, a complicated electro-mechanical device. Here is an image comparing the model to an https://goo.gl/photos/pPY6yjAum8BBYxjR7 that I was able to examine at NASA Langley Research Center in 2014:
I've completed modeling the hardware that mounts the Surface Sampler Collector Head to the sampler boom or arm. Here are some renderings of the model:
Making progress on the Surface Sampler Acquisition Assembly (SSAA) housing, from which the furlable boom (with collector head mounted at tip) extends and retracts. Here are the eight frames comprising the housing's structure. The numerous skin panels which are bonded or screwed to the frames are not yet modeled.
As someone who has dabbled in various 3D platforms for some time - including SketchUp - I genuinely doff my cap to you - this is incredible work, Tom.
Have you considered using Structure from Motion (i.e. ingesting a LOT of photos into something like AgiSoft Photoscan) - as way of getting reference photos into a 3d digital domain? Happy to help with that if it could be useful.
Thank you for the compliment, Doug! It's a labor of love, equal emphasis on labor and love. I've probably invested about 1500 hours in front of SketchUp and Photoshop working on the lander model. The whole thing is available to anyone free of charge on my DropBox site; I'm sure I posted a link earlier in this thread.
Regarding automated processing of 2D photographs into a 3D image, I have in fact experimented briefly with AgiSoft's Photoscan. Last summer Mattias Malmer and I corresponded about our respective spacecraft-modeling projects and he suggested it. I was totally disappointed with the result, though I acknowledge I gave it a challenging object to detect and model. I have 30 or so photos of a particular bracket on the lander (High Gain Antenna down-lock), which I fed to the software. The images were ~4300x2800 pixels and taken from viewing angles of about 180 degrees horizontally and perhaps 90 degrees vertically (range limited by obstructions). It never yielded anything more than a blob. I tried a few different crop levels, and even masking out the (complex) background. Nada. I suppose I should have tried on a simpler case, but I was suspicious of the level of dimensional accuracy that might result in the best of cases.
In total I have over 3500 photos I've taken of actual viking test hardware (all posted for free access in Google Photo albums), so I've got a reasonable collection of source images for experimentation. Maybe again at some point!
Yeah - structure from motion can struggle with flat mechanical parts - I tried a couple of years ago with the refurbished Ranger bus being worked at the California Science Center ( https://sketchfab.com/models/cae6c1b3d25349efb59bc6af98f95e51 ) and the effort was barely worth it. I'd like to try with your photos - but the links to your albums earlier in this thread appear to have died.
Thanks for pointing out dead links. I have edited the base post to add a complete set of the on-line resources I've created, using the current Google Photos style links.
If you want to experiment with structure from motion, perhaps a good candidate would be the High Gain Antenna. There is an album of https://goo.gl/photos/dGEy1SLphDRKEgCu8 dedicated to the HGA. There are also a fair number of HGA photos in a few other albums: the https://goo.gl/photos/hedHCChRTyAbsN7W9 at The Museum of Flight, the https://goo.gl/photos/DPPq6cci1dNQJRVP9 and https://goo.gl/photos/nwr4Mt2CAaHYJraw9 at the Smithsonian NASM, and the https://goo.gl/photos/kk3cojepePDNo3yg6 at the Virginia Air and Space Center.
During the past few weeks I've added the front inset bulkhead (through which the boom or arm protrudes) with nearby boom-retract limit microswitch, plus the exterior skin panels of the Surface Sampler Acquisition Assembly (SSAA) housing frames. The SSA looks a bit more complete at this point (even though it's empty). Also added are the pedestal base on which the SSAA sits and the yoke gimbal mount (more details in next reply).
Here are close-ups of the pedestal base and yoke gimbal mount, which includes the azimuth and elevation drive assemblies, for the Viking lander's surface sampler's housing. The gear train for the azimuth drive (horizontally-arranged gearing, on the left) is based on a drawing of the actual hardware though the tooth counts and dimensions are estimated. The vertically-oriented elevation drive has an approximately-correct fixed worm-wheel gear, but the spur and bevel gears inside the little gearbox are speculative due to lack of reference documentation. The gear tooth profiles are simplified. The large cylinder is a very rough model of the drive motor for the elevation axis.
Next up are the components of the boom extend-retract drive mechanism and the boom stowage drum for the lander's Surface Sampler Acquisition Assembly, in approximate form due to lack of detailed reference material (as denoted by the green tint). The hollow interior of the large drum contained a few feet of the Flat Conductor Cable (FCC) that runs through the middle of the boom (not shown here, but see earlier replies for renderings of it). This slack allows the boom to extend and retract by ten feet, as the slack within the drum is wound clockwise around the stationary hub when at one end of full travel, and re-wraps to be counter-clockwise around the hub by the time the other end of travel is reached. The flattened boom itself wraps around the exterior of the drum. The large slot in the drum (visible in the second image) allows the FCC to pass from the boom into the drum, and the slot in the hub (partly visible in the first image bracketed by curled bend-limiter fences) allows the FCC to exit the assembly through the center of the hub (coming out on the side visible in the third image).
Thanks. Always wondered how that worked.
The Viking lander's Surface Sampler Acquisition Assembly (SSAA) is complete, for now at least. The https://3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/model/7bf78edb-6655-4c80-9ad9-8632f2abcac8/Viking-Lander-Surface-Sampler-Acquisition-Assembly is available at the 3D Warehouse. The final set of components to be finished included the boom supports and guides:
I've completed a detailed (nearly 18 minutes long) https://youtu.be/4c5o6jaJOuI that demonstrates operation of the Viking lander's Surface Sampler Acquisition Assembly. The video features the 3D digital model of the lander that I've been working on for the past few years (and which has a few more years to go until completion), described in earlier replies.
My thanks to the following organizations who have allowed me to research their Viking artifacts:
https://vikingpreservationproject.org
http://www.museumofflight.org
https://californiasciencecenter.org
http://www.vasc.org
https://www.nasa.gov/langley
https://airandspace.si.edu
Tom, that is fantastic! I am old enough to remember those missions, and have always wondered how those arms worked.
Thank you for being such a Viking fan and for your hard work.
Tom, thank you for a fantastic movie. It is visually striking and extremely informative. The details of how the ten foot arm roles up are ingenious. I would think this movie would be particularly valuable for engineering courses to show how design translates into function---with details from two of the most iconic space craft ever. The description, narration and music all incredibly well done.
Beautiful engineering, beautifully rendered and presented. Congratulations!
John
As a humble chemist (albeit one who vividly remembers reports of the mission at the time and the pictures splashed across newspaper front pages) I have to say I'm blown away by this. Brilliantly informative and impressive stuff!
The next chapter in the effort to create a high-fidelity Viking '75 Mars lander 3D digital model is complete - the S-Band https://3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/model/4c0d0d3b-a1d9-4d81-9453-63d912fe27a0/Viking-75-Mars-Lander-High-Gain-Antenna-Direct-Communications-System (HGA) and its https://3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/model/f1b84d8e-7062-428f-ba59-549df33ae2ce/Viking-75-Mars-Lander-High-Gain-Antenna-Deployment-Mechanism (the preceding links lead to the SketchUp https://3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/user/u6e66c350-32eb-4e02-a5c5-ae6a9e4c3ac3/Tom-D?nav=models where the model files are freely available). Here are images comparing the model to actual antenna units:
Tom, what you're doing is not only historical preservation, but a work of art.
I wish you the best of luck in continuing the effort.
I've completed the remaining two communications antennas of the Viking '75 Mars lander: the S-band Low Gain Antenna (LGA) and the UHF antenna. The LGA was small a receive-only antenna used to pick up commands sent from Earth. Here are rendering of the LGA (https://3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/model/648d8c07-f99e-493a-99b0-35fc5d1f5e51/Viking-75-Mars-Lander-Low-Gain-Antenna):
Nice to see these antennas again. I especially recall the LGA from the downlinked images. Thanks Tom!
Over on nasawatch it's being claimed that the NASA worm logo appeared on the Viking lander, but I couldn't find any evidence of this. Bicentennial logo, yes, Viking patch logo, yes, American flag, yes, but no obvious worm. Maybe there's a small one on the patch? I couldn't find any high-res images of the patch as it appeared on the lander. Anyone know?
its already April 2nd, so what the heck is the NASA "worm" logo? so i found this https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/04/nasa-brings-its-iconic-worm-logo-back-to-mark-return-of-human-spaceflight/ article. This https://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/5-8/features/symbols-of-nasa.html says it was used from 1975 to 1992, so guessing everything on the lander would have been finalized before then, so no probably not on Viking hardware.
As far as I know, the NASA "worm" logo did not appear on the Viking landers. As mentioned, the wind covers for the two Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators on each lander sported an American flag, the US Bicentennial logo, and the patch designed by Peter Purol. The Proof Test Capsule lander at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum has a good representation of the Flight wind cover decorations:
I have completed a 22-minute video that describes the Viking lander's three https://youtu.be/ISRnnCQG06I in detail (UHF relay antenna for transmitting to either Viking orbiter, S-Band Low Gain Antenna for direct reception from Earth, S-Band High Gain Antenna for direct transmission and reception to/from Earth). I hope that people find it interesting.
The latest addition to my work-in-progress Viking '75 Mars lander 3D digital model is the propellant- or fuel-system tanks, valves, piping, and the MR-50F roll-control thrusters that are mounted on the fuel tanks. The digital model is freely available via DropBox as a https://www.dropbox.com/s/ulbw4ukmvbfyc6g/Viking%20Lander.skp?dl=0 model file.
Here are detailed views of the MR-50F roll-control thrusters, made by Rocket Research Company (now part of Aerojet Rocketdyne), with solenoid valves by Parker Hannifin. The thrusters were used during the final minute of landing on Mars to orient the lander such that it would point in a desired azimuth in its landed location to optimize mid-day solar illumination in "front" of the lander where the two cameras had best coverage of the Mars surface.
Here are details of the pair of main valves on each of the lander's two fuel tanks. First the valves and lines for fuel tank 1:
I have been adding some major internal components to the Viking '75 Mars lander 3D digital model, including the large Equipment Plate that spans most of the upper interior of the lander. The Equipment Plate is a one-piece aluminum machined unit which is supported by nine titanium fittings attached to the sides of the lander body. Most of the lander's interior equipment (batteries, power control, tape recorder, science instruments, computer, communications assemblies) are bolted to the bottom surface of the Equipment Plate and hang down below it within the volume of the lander body. Here is an overall view of the lander body and equipment plate, without the lander's top dust cover.
The next Viking lander component 3D models to be completed represent the lander's two thermal switches, which were mounted on the upper surface of the lander's Equipment Plate (the subject of my prior post above). The thermal switches are seen here as green-tinted boxy objects (the contactor assembly) connected to horizontal cylinders (the actuator assembly), on the left and right sides of the rendering. The green coloration represents the fact that I don't have exact measurements for these components.
Here are a few recent photos of the spare flight qualified lander VL3, being prepared for exhibit at a museum in Oregon:
https://www.facebook.com/VikingMarsMission/photos/pcb.3227767737535008/3227767297535052/
Indeed the Flight Capsule 3 or FC3/VL3 backup lander has moved from The Museum of Flight in Seattle where it was exhibited for many years, now to be exhibited at the Evergreen Aviation and Space Museum in McMinnville, OR. Hopefully the exhibit presentation will be informative and the lander will be as accessible as possible.
For what it's worth, I have visited the FC3 lander a number of times while it was exhibited at The Museum of Flight, including a visit with permission of the unit's owner (the https://vikingpreservationproject.org) and supervision by Museum staff that allowed me to capture many detailed measurements of various lander components. I have also taken hundreds of high-resolution detailed photographs of the unit, available in this https://goo.gl/photos/hedHCChRTyAbsN7W9.
Just wondering if anybody has come across a document(s) for the lander equivalent to "Viking 75 Orbiter System and Launch Operations Final Report". With emphasis on the launch operations.
I have recently completed modeling the Viking lander’s two Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators (RTGs). Here are some overall views:
Thank you Tom. The models and writeup are outstanding. It is fascinating to see and read about all that went into making the RTG as reliable and safe (to accident) as possible.
Great post on the RTGs, Tom! Looking forward to seeing them integrated into the overall model. I've never been sure of exactly where they were, as they are underneath a cover and not shown well in most extent drawings and photos.
It's a little surprising to me that having the RTGs "inside" was the configuration they chose (with a "thermal switch"* to control the conduction between the RTG and the equipment plate). MSL and M2020, of course, have their RTGs outside with a fluid loop to bring in the heat. Seems like it would get pretty hot under the RTG cover.
* https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19810001592/downloads/19810001592.pdf page 34.
Indeed it surely was pretty hot within the lander's wind covers, given that the RTG exterior housings were over 300F continuously. Even so, the conduction and radiation of heat into the lander was not sufficient during cold winter nights, thus the need for thermal switches used to occasionally provide a higher-efficiency conduction path under each RTG's front edge. (An earlier reply above has details of those thermal switches.) I think the rationale for enclosing the Viking lander's RTGs was due to lack of knowledge of Martian surface winds, and to some extent of surface pressure and gas composition. The covers were a strategy to avoid loosing too much heat to worst-case estimated winds; the risk of over-heating was apparently deemed minimal.
Regarding the installation of the RTGs, I have almost completed modeling the associated wind covers and their internal framework and fasteners, the RTG Upper and Lower End Cap Coolers and their plumbing, etc. Here is a sneak peak at the RTGs and wind covers on a partial lander for context:
I have completed integrating the SNAP-19 Viking RTGs into my work-in-progress Viking '75 Mars lander 3D model. Here are renderings of the coolant loop, from above and below, that was used prior to launch to remove excess heat from the RTGs and lander interior. The RTGs directly generated electricity from the copious amount of heat produced by radioactive decay of plutonium 235 fuel within each RTG. The RTGs and associated integration mechanisms were designed for the Mars surface environment, which is very low pressure and quite cold. Earth's warm higher-pressure atmosphere caused excessive heating of the lander after the RTGs were installed during the final few months prior to launch. Sterilized chilled water was circulated through the loop almost without interruption (even during the lift of the shrouded orbiter and lander capsule onto the Titan launch vehicle) until shortly before launch. At that point, the coolant was purged with hot dry sterile nitrogen gas, and then a pyrotechnic cutter severed the lines within the Base Cover (top half of the inner layer of the lander capsule). This elaborate procedure was used to avoid unsealing the bioshield (outer layer of the capsule within which the sterilized lander was enclosed) and contaminating the lander with Earthly spores and microbes.
The large black objects affixed to the top and bottom of the RTGs (seen in transparent form to better reveal coolant loop components) are passive End Cap Coolers (ECCs). The coolant circulated through tubing embedded within the ECCs to carry away some RTG heat, and the large surface area of the conical upper ECC and the flat disk lower ECC radiated additional heat.
The loop was also used during the two-day complete-capsule sterilization procedure, temporarily replacing the chilled water with hot water to speed up heating the lander interior (otherwise the lander body's insulation would require a much longer heat soak period).
Here are exploded views of the wind cover for RTG #2. The two wind covers are nearly-identical mirror images of each other. They differ primarily in small items attached to the front face of the wind cover, and that the top of wind cover #2 has an indentation for clearance of the Low Gain Antenna which is located very close to the wind cover. As can be seen, the wind covers are more complicated than they perhaps appear. Each wind cover has internal stiffening ribs along the side and an internal panel near front-center. Each wind cover has a large circular vent on its bottom face near a front corner (visible left of center in the second exploded view below). The vent allows equalization of pressure during launch from Earth and landing on Mars, and is covered with fine mesh to filter out most Martian atmospheric dust. Each wind cover has a camera Reference Test Chart (RTC) attached to its front face. The RTC itself is exploded in these views. A small skirt surrounds the sides and front of the wind cover bottom edge, to minimize build-up of Mars dust under the wind cover during the mission.
Here are renderings of the entire RTG installation of the work-in-progress lander model, without the RTG wind cover tops to reveal the RTGs and details within. Compare these to a historic photo posted a few replies back.
Lastly (for now!) here is an overall view of the work-in-progress lander. Various exterior components remain to be modeled, which will keep me occupied for a few more years (literally). I began the creating model in December 2013, so I'm coming up on the tenth anniversary of the project. The model is freely available as a https://www.dropbox.com/s/ulbw4ukmvbfyc6g/Viking%20Lander.skp?dl=0 hosted on DropBox (note: it is nearly 400MB).
I just completed a 21-minute video describing the Viking '75 Mars lander's two SNAP-19 Viking https://youtu.be/2ZnnzusE1mo (RTGs) in detail. The video illustrates the RTGs using a high-fidelity 3D digital model that is a work-in-progress hobby effort of mine (for the past ten years, as of this month), see earlier replies in this topic. The WIP digital model is freely available in SketchUp format via https://www.dropbox.com/s/ulbw4ukmvbfyc6g/Viking%20Lander.skp?dl=0 as a 386MB SKP format file.
Second that- wonderful and amazing stuff, and I learned a lot about how RTGs work.
John
Powered by Invision Power Board (http://www.invisionboard.com)
© Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com)