IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

462 Pages V  « < 412 413 414 415 416 > » 

djellison
Posted on: Apr 5 2005, 07:17 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


QUOTE (dilo @ Apr 5 2005, 03:24 AM)
Aldo, really JPL is talking about 1000sol extention? It's a lot of time!!!!


No - not a 1000 sol extension - a total life of 1000 sols ( so around 550 more )

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #7984 · Replies: 302 · Views: 140255

djellison
Posted on: Apr 4 2005, 11:45 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


QUOTE (gpurcell @ Apr 4 2005, 10:52 PM)
Can the MER Rovers use MRO as a communications relay?  Not a question I ever thought would have to be addressed....
*


Yes - it's possible, they will be able to talk and if for no other reason that to test the ability - I imagine they'll use it if they're still alive when MRO arrives

Infact - the early aerobraking elliptical orbit will give very long UHF passes, and combined with MRO's downlink of up to 4 Mbits - the potential is enormous

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #7965 · Replies: 5 · Views: 7730

djellison
Posted on: Apr 4 2005, 07:28 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


I'll hold one end - and you start walking, stop when I give it two tugs so I can tie the next reel on, then get going when I give it three tugs.

That - or wait for MRO- with it's 4mbps downlink smile.gif

I think MEX is about as able as Odyssey - and it would be a nice repayment of the Odyssey-Beagle 2 attempts - if Odyssey takes a few days longer that would be a very good idea - but with MARSIS antenna deployment due soon - would they be up for it?

Doug
  Forum: Mars Odyssey · Post Preview: #7955 · Replies: 36 · Views: 48290

djellison
Posted on: Apr 4 2005, 06:23 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


QUOTE (aldo12xu @ Apr 4 2005, 04:59 PM)
That's 600 sols by your calculations, Doug.  JPL is now talking about a target of 1000 sols for the rovers.......so we could be in that pallpark.  Or at least in the parking lot wink.gif Wishful thinking but within the realm of possibility (fingers crossed).
*


Seing as we're nearly on Sol 450, and there's another 100 sols at LEAST to be spent in the hills - and they'll go SW after the peak to investigate the SWn side for perhaps another 100 sols....the ballpark is as far away now as ever tongue.gif

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #7949 · Replies: 302 · Views: 140255

djellison
Posted on: Apr 4 2005, 06:22 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


QUOTE (dot.dk @ Apr 4 2005, 04:18 PM)
downlink via direct to Earth sessions.


One 12 minute UHF pass with Odyssey = 184 Mbits
Typically done 2 times per sol, call it 300 Mbits.

300 Mbits at 8kbps DTE (on DSN antennae already scheduled for other missions) = 10.4 hrs. The most they could use the DTE for in a sol is a couple of hours, it takes a lot of power, and means that a single sols data would take perhaps 4 sols to downlink - during which time, the flash memory will have filled up - two fold smile.gif

MGS uses the MOC buffer for UHF ops - and so it plays hell with scheduling of MGS ops - has to be planned quite well in advance. Odyssey was doing more than enough for relay ops - so MGS was turned back to mapping ops. They only uplink to MGS about 3 or 4 times a week - and the sequence to include fill-in UHF passes would take a week or so to write - so by the time they've written the sequences, uplinked them....Odyssey will be back on course smile.gif

Doug
  Forum: Mars Odyssey · Post Preview: #7948 · Replies: 36 · Views: 48290

djellison
Posted on: Apr 4 2005, 04:49 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


I think it will becomer harder to justify - but not impossible. I'm sure that given a few more hundred sols they can get even more efficient at driving these things - less chains in the chain of command and so on.

This has always been my main gripe with people pitching for half a dozen MER clones - given a few hundred sols of operation, it's the running of the things that costs a fortune

But - even at $50m/year (which is about right I believe) - they are a bargin and should be used until they die.


Doug
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #7940 · Replies: 7 · Views: 6680

djellison
Posted on: Apr 4 2005, 04:46 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


QUOTE (aldo12xu @ Apr 4 2005, 04:34 PM)
And after that Spirit should be sent southeast to explore the contact between basaltic flows (green) and layered volcanics (red).

http://www.marsgeo.com/Photos/Orbiters/GusevInterp.jpg


Thats getting on for 18 - 20km away wink.gif

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #7938 · Replies: 302 · Views: 140255

djellison
Posted on: Apr 4 2005, 04:21 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


A typical rover day - roughtly - in local solar time....

10:00 - Wakeup
11:00 - Direct from Earth HGA uplink of days commands
11:30 - 5 min carrier only tone on LGA to confirm handover to new sequence (if driving at the same time, this is called a honk - and no, they've not observed a dopler from the rover driving smile.gif )
11:40 - Sometimes a nap for a half an hour, or an hour.
15:00 - Sometimes an Odyssey Pass
16:00 - Sometimes an Odyssey Pass - usually one, sometimes 2 - about 90 mins apart
17:00 - Sleep
if deep sleep -thenskip straight thru to the following morning, otherwise
03:00 - 04:00 - same UHF as before, one or two, about 90 mins apart.

The bulk of the rovers activities occur between around 11:00 and 15:00. Very VERY little data gets downlinked via DTE on the HGA usually - as it's power inefficient compared to UHF ( on a Whrs / Mbit scale )

I imagine, without UHF passes - they might use an extended HGA pass in the morning and add some DTE after the uplink - and perhaps another short one in the afternoon to downlink housekeeping data for the day, and a very small ammount of science data - probably little more than thumbnails, and reduced navcam frames.

Doug
  Forum: Mars Odyssey · Post Preview: #7935 · Replies: 36 · Views: 48290

djellison
Posted on: Apr 4 2005, 03:37 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


MSL is something like 10km - but considering MER was 0.6km...smile.gif

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #7932 · Replies: 302 · Views: 140255

djellison
Posted on: Apr 4 2005, 03:12 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


When thinking about the distance driven - a fair gauge of the maximum traversability of where a rover is is simply to take an average - so for Opportunity - I would suggest that in it's 110 sols since leaving Endurance have had it cover around 3ish KM -so I would suggest that a fair gauge of it's traversability at meridiani is something like 30 sols/km. Yes - I know it did more than a km in less than a week- but that was a short sprint that HAD to be followed by down time for downlinking.

Spirit - on the otherhand - is a much slower proposition really - it took from sols 85 to 154 to get from Bonne to the Hills - thats around 69 sols to cover about 2500 metres - so I would suggest about the same figure for Spirit - call it 30 sols/km roughly.

So - if you want to travel 5km - thats 150 sols.

10km - 300 sols.

Give that the rovers are about 6500 miles apart, or 10 500 km

At the average 'distance covering' pace of the rovers during phases of mainly driving - it would take 315,000 sols to drive from one rover to the other - or as little as 160,000 sols if they were to meet in the middle smile.gif

Even to cover the tiny distance between Viking 1 and pathfinder would take 20,050 sols smile.gif

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #7927 · Replies: 302 · Views: 140255

djellison
Posted on: Apr 4 2005, 02:55 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Now that's bad news. I suppose they could bring MGS back into a relay role, but it would take about as long to write and uplink the commands for that as it will to fix odyssey - any URL's with news on this?

Doug
  Forum: Mars Odyssey · Post Preview: #7926 · Replies: 36 · Views: 48290

djellison
Posted on: Apr 4 2005, 11:32 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


I would head S - SW

http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/2004/0...03.gusev25m.gif

Toward the slightly different terrain and some interesting craters - and just at the edge of the ellipse is perhaps a slight hill-edge or something like that.

http://themis-data.asu.edu/img/newimg/V079...JPEG&stretch=S2



Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #7918 · Replies: 302 · Views: 140255

djellison
Posted on: Apr 4 2005, 10:52 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


The obvious thing would be to hang around rock-hounding ont he way to the summit - then as the season progresses, head whichever way best aids the power budget smile.gif

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #7914 · Replies: 302 · Views: 140255

djellison
Posted on: Apr 4 2005, 07:42 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


QUOTE
Surely a base or two won't contaminate an entire planet?


You can detect the radiation from Chernobyl in plants the world over. Ditto certain volcanic events etc. Simply to maintain the validity in studying martian life - we have to be very very carefull with it. If life is there, then like our own it is probably a delicate thing that we need to be sensitive towards. How will history judge us if we render all species, if any, on the first planet we visit outside our own, extinct?

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #7907 · Replies: 52 · Views: 48577

djellison
Posted on: Apr 3 2005, 09:41 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Baby steps maybe - but it was more than 100m in total - which was quite an achievment.

If you scale up from that to Spirit, at say 4km - then you've have to ask MSL to do 160km for a similar scale up smile.gif

Doug
  Forum: Past and Future · Post Preview: #7882 · Replies: 10 · Views: 10559

djellison
Posted on: Apr 3 2005, 09:00 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1




taa daa

Go to the PDS and there's probably a bigger version

Doug
  Forum: Past and Future · Post Preview: #7879 · Replies: 10 · Views: 10559

djellison
Posted on: Apr 3 2005, 08:58 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


No - Victoria is very big, very deep, and very much larger than Endurance - let alone viking and voyager

Doug
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #7878 · Replies: 28 · Views: 27567

djellison
Posted on: Apr 2 2005, 05:16 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


QUOTE (ElkGroveDan @ Apr 2 2005, 04:15 PM)
can anyone calculate the relative focal length on a lone pancam shot compared to a 35mm slr?  I'm guessing it's the equivalent to 60-80mm). 


105mm I believe.

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #7858 · Replies: 52 · Views: 48577

djellison
Posted on: Apr 1 2005, 10:49 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


It isnt the backshell. It's the wrong colour, the wrong size, and the wrong distance.

Doug
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #7826 · Replies: 3597 · Views: 3531676

djellison
Posted on: Apr 1 2005, 07:31 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


It was never meant to be a complete photo-real job - I only though of it an hour before I left work yesterday smile.gif I just though I'll just botch it up and whack it out for a laugh - NO ONE will think it's real - but they might go "heh..cool"

tongue.gif

The colour thumbnail does look quite good though tongue.gif

I was going to do just the mast in a RHAZ shot - but couldnt get it to look any good at all and the alpha layer was giving me grief with the shadow tga - so I thought "Sod it - it'll be easier to render the whole damn thing" - and it was smile.gif

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #7818 · Replies: 32 · Views: 42151

djellison
Posted on: Apr 1 2005, 06:46 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


We cant see the heatshield anymore - why should we be able to see the backshell?

Doug
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #7817 · Replies: 3597 · Views: 3531676

djellison
Posted on: Apr 1 2005, 10:35 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1






Amazingly it took a while to get right as the one you can download and built from the Nye Labs website is VERY wrong ! ohmy.gif

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #7806 · Replies: 32 · Views: 42151

djellison
Posted on: Apr 1 2005, 08:45 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


QUOTE (dot.dk @ Apr 1 2005, 07:59 AM)
What's special in that picture?  huh.gif
*


The - err - sundial mast sat on the ground next to a rock tongue.gif

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #7803 · Replies: 32 · Views: 42151

djellison
Posted on: Apr 1 2005, 07:18 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


It was bad enough that two people fell for it hook, line + sinker smile.gif

I was going to post this one at the same time...



But it wasnt really good enough to be fool-worthey smile.gif

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #7800 · Replies: 32 · Views: 42151

djellison
Posted on: Apr 1 2005, 06:58 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


The backshell and parachute were observed from Eagle Crater - and look very very different to what we're seing here

Doug
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #7798 · Replies: 3597 · Views: 3531676

462 Pages V  « < 412 413 414 415 416 > » 

New Posts  New Replies
No New Posts  No New Replies
Hot topic  Hot Topic (New)
No new  Hot Topic (No New)
Poll  Poll (New)
No new votes  Poll (No New)
Closed  Locked Topic
Moved  Moved Topic
 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 06:10 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.