IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

462 Pages V  « < 413 414 415 416 417 > » 

djellison
Posted on: Mar 31 2005, 10:53 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


They finished the student sundial program some time ago - so I'm not sure they'd be that bothered.

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #7766 · Replies: 32 · Views: 42151

djellison
Posted on: Mar 31 2005, 10:41 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Looks like it was part of a full L2->L7 + r's sequence that they sometimes do - I've bagged the RAD's from the workbook but only the RTH's are down so far, the thumbnails - but hey - see for yourself

  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #7762 · Replies: 32 · Views: 42151

djellison
Posted on: Mar 31 2005, 10:15 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


I know the recent dust-devils have shown evidence of high wind speeds, but I didnt think we'd see this ohmy.gif



Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #7758 · Replies: 32 · Views: 42151

djellison
Posted on: Mar 31 2005, 06:24 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


QUOTE (spaceffm @ Mar 31 2005, 06:10 PM)
Perhaps the Administrator should delete the thread  if members get so tired with it.
dry.gif
*


Who, me ? smile.gif

Hell no - it's a healthy discussion smile.gif

Doug
  Forum: Past and Future · Post Preview: #7748 · Replies: 48 · Views: 39809

djellison
Posted on: Mar 31 2005, 03:57 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


I make the main flat part -1385m, the etched terrain -1380m, and the rim of Vic -1375m

A total of 5m altitude change at the etched terrain - and a further 5 at Victorias rim.

Victoria itself would appear to be -1410 at its deepest - making it, from rim to bottom - about 35m deep - excavating to a depth some 25m below our current altitude.

Doug
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #7738 · Replies: 28 · Views: 27567

djellison
Posted on: Mar 31 2005, 12:55 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


QUOTE (paxdan @ Mar 31 2005, 12:30 PM)
With so many frames taken by Huygens of those icy blocks from the surface of titan is it possible to assemble a superresolution image showing more detail? I'm no whizz with photoshop, but stacking all the images to produce a superresolution image should be straightforward. I remember the same thing being done with pathfinder images to improve the resolution of the twin peaks.
*



I've tried - but the results are no good - to do proper Super Res - you need to have the camera actually moving a tiny ammount. With MER they did just that - move it around a little. With MPF - they moved it away, then back to supposedly the same position but slack in the mechanism made it slightly different. Huygens just sat there - so every pixel is looking at the identical patch of ground for the full series of images.

Doug
  Forum: Titan · Post Preview: #7725 · Replies: 665 · Views: 396022

djellison
Posted on: Mar 31 2005, 10:37 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Vostok always looked flat to me - MOC imagery showed no elevation.

However - there is almost certainly ( and infact, we can almost see in Erebus from where we are now ) quite a lot of elevation there.

Doug
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #7715 · Replies: 28 · Views: 27567

djellison
Posted on: Mar 31 2005, 09:20 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Instead of wasting my tax money on a misison like Exo Mars - I would MUCH rather they worked on a unique and important mission like Netlander. THAT - is something ESA could do - THAT would be worth doing. Trying to compete with NASA for the flagship stuff is pointless and ultimately consigned to fail

Doug
  Forum: Past and Future · Post Preview: #7711 · Replies: 48 · Views: 39809

djellison
Posted on: Mar 31 2005, 08:03 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


THanks P - that's what I was going to do when I got in to work smile.gif

Doug
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #7705 · Replies: 54 · Views: 37547

djellison
Posted on: Mar 31 2005, 07:56 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Consider the NASA Phoenix mission. It's half built already, has $400m in funding in place, and is launching 2007. The 2009 MSL for which they have plenty of funding and plenty of heritage is probably going to get pushed on to 2011.

ESA have no funding in place, no pre-cursor mission in place which they insist must occur before ExoMars, no heritage of any succesfull mars lander. 2009 is a bad joke, 2011 is quite a bad joke. Exo Mars isnt happening this decade - and frankly I find it hard to believe it'll happen before 2015 if at all -at which time it'll be redundent as the science it's intending to do will have been done by MSL - probably twice.

Doug
  Forum: Past and Future · Post Preview: #7703 · Replies: 48 · Views: 39809

djellison
Posted on: Mar 31 2005, 07:53 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


QUOTE (Decepticon @ Mar 31 2005, 02:45 AM)
I'm curious if there is a trajectory map is available threw the Jupiter system?

*


As John said - not until after launch. The exact launch date will define where the jovian moons will be at the flyby - and launch windows and elv's being what they are - the only time you can guarentee when you're going to leave the ground is when you've done it :0

Doug
  Forum: New Horizons · Post Preview: #7702 · Replies: 1628 · Views: 1114094

djellison
Posted on: Mar 31 2005, 07:48 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


In the very middle of your mosaic is the small crater just to the West of our current location - and then 4 to 5 frames to the left of it is - going from right to left - Voyager, then Viking.

I'm amazed to see so many people saying "I still dont think we see them" or "It cant be viking".

It is. That is whee we are. They're right there in front of us. Alan has us nailed with that most recent location image.

Doug
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #7701 · Replies: 54 · Views: 37547

djellison
Posted on: Mar 30 2005, 09:21 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


QUOTE (spaceffm @ Mar 30 2005, 09:03 PM)
Well i think that this mission will come for sure.


I dont. Not a chance within the next decade.

But this is the right place to discuss is 'Past and Future'

Doug
  Forum: Past and Future · Post Preview: #7675 · Replies: 48 · Views: 39809

djellison
Posted on: Mar 30 2005, 03:30 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/doug_im...gs_r0500651.jpg
Ascraeus Mons


http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/doug_im...gs_sp124401.jpg
Amazonis Olympus

I've gone thru most of the wide angle images under the 'Images that include the limb of Mars or other targets off the surface of Mars" catagory - and I may have a poke around for other wide angle images with a large footprint in the first batch as well ( the Aerobraking and Suplimental stuff)

Doug
  Forum: Mars Global Surveyor · Post Preview: #7662 · Replies: 4 · Views: 8076

djellison
Posted on: Mar 30 2005, 02:39 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/doug_im...gs_r0500315.jpg
Arsia Mons


http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/doug_im...gs_sp237701.jpg
Tharsis


http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/doug_im...gs_sp238601.jpg
Phlegra Tartarus


http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/doug_im...gs_sp239201.jpg
Olympus Mons

Doug
  Forum: Mars Global Surveyor · Post Preview: #7660 · Replies: 4 · Views: 8076

djellison
Posted on: Mar 30 2005, 12:22 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


QUOTE (wyogold @ Mar 30 2005, 11:49 AM)
any pools on which sol we reach the top? 460?

scott
*


Not before 500 imho - more likely 520 I think.

Considering how long the last 200m to get to LL took - and despite the improved power situation, the many scientific targets on the way up - I dont think it's a quick jog to the top of the hill, but a slow walk.

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #7654 · Replies: 302 · Views: 140255

djellison
Posted on: Mar 30 2005, 12:21 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/doug_im...gs_ab104501.jpg
Wide Angle Global Push-Broom over Tharsis


http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/doug_im...gs_r0500191.jpg
Looking West toward Olympus Mons


http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/doug_im...gs_r1303897.jpg
Meridiani during MER-B Landing


http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/doug_im...gs_sp126301.jpg
Olympus Mons (You've probably seen a similar image to this - I thought I'd have a go myself)


http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/doug_im...gs_sp255001.jpg
North Pole

Enjoy smile.gif

Doug
  Forum: Mars Global Surveyor · Post Preview: #7653 · Replies: 4 · Views: 8076

djellison
Posted on: Mar 30 2005, 09:42 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


QUOTE (dot.dk @ Mar 30 2005, 09:34 AM)
Looks like we are going up up up  biggrin.gif

*


This is like the good driving terrain we had before LL - the sort of dust+cobbles seems quick tractionable.

The road ahead doesnt look too bad actually - certainly as far as that skyline about 10m away
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #7643 · Replies: 302 · Views: 140255

djellison
Posted on: Mar 30 2005, 09:33 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


It took us 100 sols to get to LL from just down the hill - progress is tough and awkward and stop-start climbing up complex hills.

The last 3 sols appear to have had driving in the right direction though - in the 5-20m range

No insider info from this quarter though sad.gif

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #7641 · Replies: 302 · Views: 140255

djellison
Posted on: Mar 30 2005, 08:32 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


QUOTE (CosmicRocker @ Mar 30 2005, 05:59 AM)
Wherever we are, it can't be Viking.
*


Alan nailed it with this image

http://img236.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img236&ima...toerebus5vp.jpg

Thats where we are. That L4 image is looking west past a small crater - the other images are looking south toward viking and voyager

Doug
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #7637 · Replies: 54 · Views: 37547

djellison
Posted on: Mar 29 2005, 10:17 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


The next 6 months is due for release in the first week of April - just got word from the PDS about it

Doug
  Forum: Mars Global Surveyor · Post Preview: #7622 · Replies: 0 · Views: 4984

djellison
Posted on: Mar 29 2005, 09:42 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


QUOTE (Tman @ Mar 29 2005, 09:24 PM)
After extensive investigations rolleyes.gif Ok, after doug's and youremi's announcement  smile.gif  - we can "Larry's Lookout" still see right between the interrupt of the red lines in Sym's image. Right?
*


Thats about right - we're probably no more than 20-30m SE of LL

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #7621 · Replies: 302 · Views: 140255

djellison
Posted on: Mar 29 2005, 09:06 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


No - we're still a long way from the summit - it's a common optical illusion that the summit is closer than you think> There's a good half km to the summit from here

If you look at Alans map two posts up - we're about where the 1 of 410 is written

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #7618 · Replies: 663 · Views: 767566

djellison
Posted on: Mar 29 2005, 08:15 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


QUOTE (gregp1962 @ Mar 29 2005, 08:14 PM)
OK, I suppose, I'll take your word for it that those are V & V. But, that was sol 414. Where are now? Are we moving?
*


In about the same place - a little closer

http://207.7.139.5/mars/opportunity/forwar...08P1110L0M1.JPG

Doug
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #7613 · Replies: 3597 · Views: 3531676

djellison
Posted on: Mar 29 2005, 04:25 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Looking further up the hill toward Husband Hill

http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/doug_im...spirit_A912.jpg

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #7595 · Replies: 302 · Views: 140255

462 Pages V  « < 413 414 415 416 417 > » 

New Posts  New Replies
No New Posts  No New Replies
Hot topic  Hot Topic (New)
No new  Hot Topic (No New)
Poll  Poll (New)
No new votes  Poll (No New)
Closed  Locked Topic
Moved  Moved Topic
 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 06:10 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.