My Assistant
| Posted on: Jun 12 2006, 07:37 AM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
It's looks a lot like the terrain near/around the northen edge of the Erebus highway - hard work, but traverseable. Doug |
| Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #58042 · Replies: 1472 · Views: 708277 |
| Posted on: Jun 7 2006, 08:14 AM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Because the effect is so small it's impossible to seperate it from the small forces that result from RCS's on more modern vehicles. Doug |
| Forum: Cassini general discussion and science results · Post Preview: #57363 · Replies: 8 · Views: 8694 |
| Posted on: Jun 5 2006, 07:43 AM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Everyone should have thought of the chances of another purgatory dune thing....that's why I said ( but it didn't really get noticed some months back ) S1k - because that seemed sensible if you included another 'get stuck' moment Doug |
| Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #57039 · Replies: 294 · Views: 213936 |
| Posted on: Jun 5 2006, 07:41 AM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
In a brief 'still on holiday' pop-head-around-door The RD180 is two exhausts, but one engine I believe. Doug |
| Forum: MSL · Post Preview: #57038 · Replies: 42 · Views: 53249 |
| Posted on: Jun 2 2006, 10:39 AM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
He wasn't perfect, far from it....but one thing for which I think he deserves credit is going for two MERs. Doug |
| Forum: Past and Future · Post Preview: #56716 · Replies: 30 · Views: 33070 |
| Posted on: Jun 2 2006, 09:52 AM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Just a heads up, as of, err, about now-ish, Helen and I are off on a magical mystery tour.... Friday : York to give talk to York AS at 8pm Sat : York to Sunderland to visit relatives. Sun : Sunderland Monday : Sunderland to Haltwhistle near Carlisle - Roman fort and Hadrians Wall Tuesday : Haltwhistle to Kendal to meet Stu + Other half for dinner Wednesday : Kendal to Coniston - Ruskin Museum and Bluebird Cafe ( I'm a closet Land and Water Speed record freak, so Coniston is something of a mecca ) Thursday : Animal Park in the Southern Lake District Friday : Birkenhead (Helen's family) Sat : That museum that Bob mentioned in Manchester Sunday : Back to Leicester. Unlikely to get online in the interim, so you're in Nico and my co-admin team's able hands Doug |
| Forum: Chit Chat · Post Preview: #56710 · Replies: 2 · Views: 4439 |
| Posted on: Jun 2 2006, 06:50 AM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Oh great another investigation,how long this time ? a month like last time after getting extracted from the puratory dune ? Purgatory took 2 weeks just to access the situation,2 weeks give or take for extraction and a month of investigating. You're no stranger to mounding criticism onto the mission team...but you have zero justification for it this time around - at the very first opportunity they were backing out from it, and I am sure they'll continue to keep their foot in getting out as quickly as is wise, and it's only sensible to spend a few sols of remote-obs studying the resulting trench, and then move on. 10 sols all up perhaps. Again, you have to be reminded...these are not hot-rods...these are geologists. Doug |
| Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #56695 · Replies: 266 · Views: 173980 |
| Posted on: Jun 2 2006, 06:45 AM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Just to clarify slightly - Doug's reply makes it sound like the drive number is incremented by one for each image taken. This is nearly always not true. See my plots in this post points are shown with the difference in drive number between consecutive images. Most site/drive numbers have no images (100's at a time sometimes) - I suspect that the drive number is incremented whenever an internal mesurement is taken (rover orientation, etc) not when a picture is taken at a new position. Note there are some cases where a small movement of the rover happens but there is no increment in drive number. James Of course, one could also put visidom slip checks into the catagory og 'internal measurement' - and those images rarely get downlinked Doug |
| Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #56693 · Replies: 3597 · Views: 3531676 |
| Posted on: Jun 1 2006, 08:26 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
To be honest Akuo - it would take just as long to extract via sol by sol 'dumb' routines than it would to write the more intelligent routine Doug |
| Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #56644 · Replies: 266 · Views: 173980 |
| Posted on: Jun 1 2006, 07:54 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Any guess when the rovers will stop working? I can't start thinking about one till the other happens. Doug |
| Forum: Forum News · Post Preview: #56635 · Replies: 46 · Views: 67873 |
| Posted on: Jun 1 2006, 07:44 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Now we have proper data - we can see that there are differences - one could do things such as plotting graphs of brightness values all the way through the 12 full filters and see where the peaks and troughs are on specific wavelengths and then co-register those with potential minerals as seen in the TES library....proper science There's nothing particularly odd about it all though - why shouldn't various different minerals appear in cobbles / gravels etc? I'd have a go myself, but I'm off to York, Sunderland, Carlisle, Kendal, Coniston, Liverpool and Manchester starting tomorrow Doug |
| Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #56628 · Replies: 2 · Views: 4652 |
| Posted on: Jun 1 2006, 04:50 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Aghg - bad mental image...going to have to scour my retina again Doug |
| Forum: Tech, General and Imagery · Post Preview: #56603 · Replies: 7 · Views: 9236 |
| Posted on: Jun 1 2006, 10:53 AM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
|
| Forum: Past and Future · Post Preview: #56561 · Replies: 20 · Views: 25606 |
| Posted on: Jun 1 2006, 09:31 AM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Every time the vehicle drives, the drive number increases. It's not related to distance at all. After a significant drive, a new site number is declared and the drive number resets to zero. Now - when you're doing mid-drive imaging (like visidom for slip check or documenting egress progress from a dune) - you have to drive...stop...take images...and drive again..and repeat. Each time you do that - you increase the drive number... Thus yesterday's driving... http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...GBP1230L0M1.JPG http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...GCP1244L0M1.JPG http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...GDP1244L0M1.JPG http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...GEP1244L0M1.JPG http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...GFP1244L0M1.JPG http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...GGP1214L0M1.JPG or, more briefly... 1F202400423EFF71GBP1230L0M1.JPG 1F202402217ESF71GCP1244L0M1.JPG 1F202402594ESF71GDP1244L0M1.JPG 1F202402957ESF71GEP1244L0M1.JPG 1F202403340ESF71GFP1244L0M1.JPG 1F202404009EFF71GGP1214L0M1.JPG The day would have gone... Take images at same place as yesterday Site 71, Drive GB.. Drive a bit, thus completing drive GC take images Drive a bit more, thus going to GD take images etc etc - up to GG Tomorrow, we may see a similar increase, starting with GG for start of day image, then subframes of progress with GH, GI, GJ, GK, GL etc... Doug |
| Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #56552 · Replies: 3597 · Views: 3531676 |
| Posted on: Jun 1 2006, 08:53 AM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
I can't believe the naming is a random process and therefore it seems logical to tie it to distance. No - it really is just a drive number. Currently, because they use regular visidom slip checks, each instance of that will trigger a new site number - and I believe they do these every 6 or so metres..ish. Of course, if you do a lot of tiny short drives with lots of imaging in an attempt to say, get out of a dune, then you'll crank up the drive number quite quickly. I think they may have done 4 intermedite imaging sequences and one end imaging sequence with the first drive-out-of-dune sequence, which would = an increase in drive number of 5. It's not related to distance driven, just number of drives done. Doug |
| Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #56547 · Replies: 3597 · Views: 3531676 |
| Posted on: May 31 2006, 09:01 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Plenty of lessons learnt at purgatory - they know the routine Doug |
| Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #56487 · Replies: 266 · Views: 173980 |
| Posted on: May 31 2006, 08:14 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Odd - a drive number but seemingly without a drive. Doug |
| Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #56475 · Replies: 603 · Views: 379795 |
| Posted on: May 31 2006, 05:35 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Did some of of imago geniuses picked up the Mars 3 lander data?... I found this: http://pages.preferred.com/~[size="6&...ze]/mars3l.html See above |
| Forum: Image Processing Techniques · Post Preview: #56436 · Replies: 555 · Views: 309904 |
| Posted on: May 31 2006, 04:25 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Do you see any movement? I don't. Really? Load them both up and flick back and forth....there's motion This is one image as a 'difference' of the other - the horizon has moved more than a little. PERHAPS...here's a thought..it was a scheme to exercise the wheels, without actually moving anywhere, to minimise the risk of bad sticking when they come to use them properly in a few months time? I remember there being mention of motors having high currents when driving Oppy for the first time after the Olympia hiatus, probably due to the wheels getting a big 'draggy' after being parked for so long. If they had powered each wheel in turn, just to give them a bit of exercise..they might not have moved, but they might have settled the rover a little? Doug |
| Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #56427 · Replies: 603 · Views: 379795 |
| Posted on: May 31 2006, 03:21 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Well - the left pancam is 135.3mm from the rotational axis of the PMA - so just by looking 180 degrees, it moves 27cm to one side. I don't think a 50cm bump would make much different for anything but the very near-field. Doug |
| Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #56418 · Replies: 603 · Views: 379795 |
| Posted on: May 31 2006, 02:57 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
|
| Forum: Past and Future · Post Preview: #56413 · Replies: 20 · Views: 25606 |
| Posted on: May 31 2006, 12:47 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
It's worth a 'fram' look at. Quick scratch-n-sniff, pancam postcard...then onward. If they're cunning (and they usually are) they'll 'mount' a small rock to get a nice solar tilt and do the flight software upload Doug |
| Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #56403 · Replies: 1472 · Views: 708277 |
| Posted on: May 31 2006, 10:40 AM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Well - go for a very optimistic 250m/day, 1km every 4 days, perhaps 10km per month, 120km per year...1000km's is a very very long way Doug |
| Forum: Past and Future · Post Preview: #56391 · Replies: 20 · Views: 25606 |
| Posted on: May 31 2006, 09:14 AM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Yup - same here. I'm sure they'll be trying to fix it once it's office hours at the Exp. Doug |
| Forum: Tech, General and Imagery · Post Preview: #56378 · Replies: 7 · Views: 9236 |
| Posted on: May 31 2006, 04:56 AM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Thinking out loud a bit.... make an MMB data folder on the laptop drive, copy any data you want across into it (keeping the same folder structure) and then tell MMB about the new data set by changing the paths in the edit-preferences menu, and then update->rebuild image indexes.... you could then do a update to check for new stuff to drop on top of the data you copied across from the external HDD, and it would keep that update just on the laptop HDD copy. THEN.....to 'catch' any updates you had on the laptop, copy the stuff from the laptop back onto the external HDD ( overwriting things, but also putting the updates over as well ) - change the paths in the preferences back again, rebuild image indexes again (eek) and sanity is restored..ish. I think. Doug |
| Forum: Tech, General and Imagery · Post Preview: #56359 · Replies: 945 · Views: 730015 |
New Replies No New Replies Hot Topic (New) Hot Topic (No New) |
Poll (New) Poll (No New) Locked Topic Moved Topic |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 07:18 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|