IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

462 Pages V  « < 305 306 307 308 309 > » 

djellison
Posted on: May 4 2006, 07:17 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ May 4 2006, 02:02 AM) *
(A pity Alex isn't here; this would have been the perfect moment for a smartass remark from him.)


Oh - I think we all know what he'd say - and we're all thinking it - but it doesn't really need to be said, as I think you know what it is.

Doug
  Forum: Past and Future · Post Preview: #52684 · Replies: 32 · Views: 28720

djellison
Posted on: May 3 2006, 08:33 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


QUOTE (The Messenger @ May 3 2006, 08:57 PM) *
Navigation had nothing to do with the initial failure, but we do not know whether or not the initial failure might have been recoverable if there had been more time to work the problem.


There was no 'working' of the problem to be done. The spacecraft essentially vanished.

What you are speculating is IF the failure had not been fatal ( which it was ) AND the navigation had been wrong ( of which we have no indication ) THEN they would only have had 3 days to correct any problems before arriving at Mars.

But they were going to be arriving at Mars in 3 days anyway - the three navigation options are impact or flypast. Either of them were coming up 72 hours later, navigation right or wrong.

I'm not sure what point you're actually trying to make apart from being intentionally hyper-speculative and obtuse.

Doug
  Forum: Past and Future · Post Preview: #52636 · Replies: 32 · Views: 28720

djellison
Posted on: May 3 2006, 05:56 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Contact with Mars Observer was lost on August 21, 1993, three days before scheduled orbit insertion. Navigation has no part to play.


Doug
  Forum: Past and Future · Post Preview: #52624 · Replies: 32 · Views: 28720

djellison
Posted on: May 3 2006, 03:48 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


I wonder what sort of mission design you could do there.

A smaller spacecraft to visit Enc rides piggyback on the Titan orbiter which would I presume have a v.large HGA for radar and downlink. It could then act as a relay for the smaller craft.

Doug
  Forum: Titan · Post Preview: #52611 · Replies: 86 · Views: 88001

djellison
Posted on: May 3 2006, 01:43 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


I guess it means they'll chuck something on top, but not a 'customer' payload.

Doug
  Forum: Private Missions · Post Preview: #52596 · Replies: 511 · Views: 310795

djellison
Posted on: May 2 2006, 10:10 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Phoenix is just arrays, they will be almost parallel to the ground - but it will get 24 hr sunlight early in the mission (check the website for an animation that shows this) so a tilt would be a bad idea as you would get from one side only what you would drop on the other.

Phoenix is going to be a short lived mission, the very long, very cold polar night will kill it.

Doug
  Forum: Phoenix · Post Preview: #52554 · Replies: 275 · Views: 174194

djellison
Posted on: May 2 2006, 10:08 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ May 2 2006, 09:19 PM) *
he won't let


He has no money. Having been told to do X things, by date Y with Z dollars he has no options left but to cull a lot of other programs. It sucks, it is very wrong, but it is the only thing that he can do given the parameters than have been handed down to him from on high.

Doug
  Forum: Pluto / KBO · Post Preview: #52552 · Replies: 43 · Views: 63579

djellison
Posted on: May 2 2006, 06:28 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ May 2 2006, 06:18 PM) *
Meyer talks about 666,000 kilometers per hour — that's one year to Pluto,."


Yes - but how long to accelerate to 666000 kph ?

Doug
  Forum: Pluto / KBO · Post Preview: #52523 · Replies: 43 · Views: 63579

djellison
Posted on: May 2 2006, 05:50 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Good point, well made - we don't know where it is or why it's gone...we had a couple of fairly serious hacking attempts a few days ago, and it would coincide with that - still investigating.

Doug
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #52516 · Replies: 1472 · Views: 708277

djellison
Posted on: May 2 2006, 04:09 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Or better, the craft called 'earth'. Radar observations of NEO's, the moon and even, I believe, Mercury have been done from Earth using dishes like Arecibo and the DSN.

Doug
  Forum: Private Missions · Post Preview: #52509 · Replies: 22 · Views: 27733

djellison
Posted on: May 2 2006, 03:13 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


QUOTE (stevo @ May 2 2006, 03:11 PM) *
Congratulations Emily !
Now, where did I put my glasses ...


Under your pillow, but they're broken from when your head hit the pillow smile.gif

Doug
  Forum: Chit Chat · Post Preview: #52504 · Replies: 102 · Views: 82784

djellison
Posted on: May 2 2006, 01:41 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Interesting new release
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/pre.../20060501a.html
or
http://marswatch.astro.cornell.edu/pancam_.../low_ridge.html

Notice how the JPG'ing of the raw releases don't retain the same level of detail as calibrated data... tracks visible in the proper release, but just not quite there in the JPGs

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #52492 · Replies: 603 · Views: 379795

djellison
Posted on: May 2 2006, 01:05 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Wouldnt the ejecta look essentially like the 'stuff' it's ejecting. Consider Fram - yes, I know, very very small - but the small ammount of ejecta there was basically the same stuff that we saw inside Eagle and Endurance - the light coloured sulphate rich rocks.

Are the dynamics of a larger impact really so different that they would render that stuff almost black? Or is there, deep below the light coloured rocks of Eag and End, something alltogether different.

Doug
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #52489 · Replies: 1472 · Views: 708277

djellison
Posted on: May 2 2006, 11:55 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Emily will have some goodies to show you in the not too distant future re: the Dust Devils in the White-Rocks image...but meanwhile - another Gusev observation, this time Orbit 637, and I've changed my channel-mixing technique. I find using Colour Balance just on mid-tones is very effective ( +53, -10, -15 for those interested )

Doug
  Forum: Mars Express & Beagle 2 · Post Preview: #52484 · Replies: 68 · Views: 95142

djellison
Posted on: May 2 2006, 09:59 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Might it be a vertically oriented image, but with a cover or piece of structure blocking the first part thus giving the illusion of a horizon?

Doug
  Forum: Past and Future · Post Preview: #52479 · Replies: 220 · Views: 288433

djellison
Posted on: May 1 2006, 01:47 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Giving 200 Whrs as basically the cut-off of survivability, it's more like 90-150 sols on your graphs

Doug
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #52396 · Replies: 25 · Views: 23576

djellison
Posted on: May 1 2006, 11:22 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


QUOTE (FIN Mars @ May 1 2006, 10:32 AM) *
Why MGS don't take pictures from meridiani by same resolution?


It has - these are much larger dunes and other features than at Meridiani - but that image is no higher res than the best images of Meridiani.

Doug
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #52388 · Replies: 25 · Views: 23576

djellison
Posted on: May 1 2006, 10:28 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Top stuff Dan - much appreciated.

Doug
  Forum: Tech, General and Imagery · Post Preview: #52386 · Replies: 123 · Views: 99432

djellison
Posted on: Apr 30 2006, 12:35 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


I suppose you could add in calib-target images into the equation - that would add a lot of images to it smile.gif

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #52347 · Replies: 603 · Views: 379795

djellison
Posted on: Apr 30 2006, 10:19 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


I think 1500 images in 13 filters, that's 115 pointings. The Lion King pan was 93 pointings - so there's an extra 22 frames in there somewhere.

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #52345 · Replies: 603 · Views: 379795

djellison
Posted on: Apr 29 2006, 04:48 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


QUOTE (Stu @ Apr 29 2006, 04:45 PM) *
Just think, for your daughter, the Mars Rovers' mision will be history... blink.gif


Hopefully there will be a bit of overlap smile.gif

Doug
  Forum: Chit Chat · Post Preview: #52310 · Replies: 102 · Views: 82784

djellison
Posted on: Apr 29 2006, 01:54 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


The map interface for the PSA is crappy, and the classical PSA is as bug ridden as hell - null this, 1>=0 that, blah blah.....

Yuck

Doug
  Forum: Mars Express & Beagle 2 · Post Preview: #52300 · Replies: 68 · Views: 95142

djellison
Posted on: Apr 28 2006, 11:44 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


A bit of Val.Mar joy before bed smile.gif

Doug
  Forum: Mars Express & Beagle 2 · Post Preview: #52273 · Replies: 68 · Views: 95142

djellison
Posted on: Apr 28 2006, 10:56 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


To be fair, the samples may be scrap, but the aeroshell is recognisable - but I don't think they'd want to display it by any stretch of the imagination. It would be like exhibiting the dent in your bumper before getting an insurance quote for your car.

Doug
  Forum: Cometary and Asteroid Missions · Post Preview: #52268 · Replies: 80 · Views: 84846

djellison
Posted on: Apr 28 2006, 06:28 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Landed with the Viking landers, but iirc, V1's never worked, and V2's didn't detect anything worthy of note.

Doug
  Forum: Mars · Post Preview: #52238 · Replies: 33 · Views: 26466

462 Pages V  « < 305 306 307 308 309 > » 

New Posts  New Replies
No New Posts  No New Replies
Hot topic  Hot Topic (New)
No new  Hot Topic (No New)
Poll  Poll (New)
No new votes  Poll (No New)
Closed  Locked Topic
Moved  Moved Topic
 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 07:12 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.