My Assistant
| Posted on: Feb 17 2006, 10:12 AM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Ahh - thanks to Jim for putting up that Super Res page - that's interesting to see, particularly as it's not really worth trying to do super-res with the JPG's. Meanwhile - Jim's done a transit page as well...including higher-res version of my simulation Mov's http://marswatch.astro.cornell.edu/pancam_...projects_4.html Doug |
| Forum: Forum News · Post Preview: #42021 · Replies: 21 · Views: 35142 |
| Posted on: Feb 17 2006, 09:50 AM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
, but since HiRISE is apparently using Jpeg2000, I would guess that MER could as well. I wonder whether the compression scheme in MER over For the raw quick-look releases (like we get with MER at the Exp and JPL) HiRise will be J2K, but the calibrated published data down the line will be uncompressed IMG's or similar I'm fairly sure. Doug |
| Forum: Forum News · Post Preview: #42020 · Replies: 82 · Views: 119793 |
| Posted on: Feb 17 2006, 09:48 AM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
tracert's people - tracert - then I can submit them to the hosting firm - lets find a common trouble-'node' and figure it out Doug |
| Forum: Chit Chat · Post Preview: #42019 · Replies: 65 · Views: 67212 |
| Posted on: Feb 17 2006, 09:43 AM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
|
| Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #42017 · Replies: 245 · Views: 185864 |
| Posted on: Feb 16 2006, 08:44 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Not only that, but the rover would have to make the whole way around the crater to it's southern size (northern looking wall) AND find a path into the crater. OR - outside the crater on the northern slope that approaches the rim ? Remember the southern slope they had driving around the southern edge of endurance making Oppy very power-low (in SS's book) Doug |
| Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #41961 · Replies: 245 · Views: 185864 |
| Posted on: Feb 16 2006, 08:42 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Yup - it's not as if taking 100,000 images would give you anything more than the 30 or so they did of the heatshield, and the 10-15 or so they did around the festoon targets. I'm not sure how one might make a quantitative estimate on the improvement of resolution in that attempt I made on the Heatshield - it's not a lot though, certainly less than 50% improvement, probably more like 25 or less. It takes features that are 'sort of' there, and brings them out just enough to be believable - I think that's the take Jim had on it. Doug |
| Forum: Forum News · Post Preview: #41960 · Replies: 21 · Views: 35142 |
| Posted on: Feb 16 2006, 08:38 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Currently Nasa software must be used to view the raw image data, whereas with Jpeg2000 compression the raw images would have been immediately accessible with standard image editing/viewing software. Are you talking about the PDS IMG's - as the rules and regs for what you publish to the PDS are basically set in stone as I understand it. I agree, better quality raw JPG's would be nice, but to be honest, so old and to date, fairly reliable is the system that's putting out the JPG's we see know, I'd not want to see it played with. iirc, you'll get some Jpeg2000 goodness with HiRISE images though Doug |
| Forum: Forum News · Post Preview: #41958 · Replies: 82 · Views: 119793 |
| Posted on: Feb 16 2006, 03:51 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Power 19% further out will be 41% lower, I think Doug |
| Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #41893 · Replies: 245 · Views: 185864 |
| Posted on: Feb 16 2006, 03:48 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
From the LPSC papers - a stereo pair that I've anaglyphed, simulated from LIDAR I believe.. |
| Forum: Cometary and Asteroid Missions · Post Preview: #41890 · Replies: 702 · Views: 694438 |
| Posted on: Feb 16 2006, 03:46 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Given the addition of some post-moi-pre-aerobraking imaging, at what appears to be between about 0000 and 0600 on the 15th of March - any idea on a nadir target for that sort of time? Doug |
| Forum: MRO 2005 · Post Preview: #41888 · Replies: 171 · Views: 226483 |
| Posted on: Feb 16 2006, 03:29 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Anyone who has read the excellent 'Beyond the Limits' by Ranulph Fiennes will have read about them searching for a lost city in the desert, and found it totally by accident by just digging randomly when local authorities began to suspect they were spies - but a NASA researcher made it to the press first, and claimed they'd found it using NASA imagery - which they hadnt Doug |
| Forum: Earth Observations · Post Preview: #41878 · Replies: 4 · Views: 7999 |
| Posted on: Feb 16 2006, 03:04 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
There are 5 blocked IP addresses currently, for people, how shall we put this, 'unwilling to participate in an mature and acceptable manor' They are ( with the end two numbers removed for privacy ) 24.88.something 69.141.something 61.11.something 61.17.something 65.121.something If they coincide with anyone who's having trouble - I'll unblock and see what happens. Doug |
| Forum: Chit Chat · Post Preview: #41874 · Replies: 65 · Views: 67212 |
| Posted on: Feb 16 2006, 12:01 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Yup - iirc the plan is to leave HP fairly soon, a week or two, and head to the hills, and then possibly return, depending on what the data they get now suggests about HP. Doug |
| Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #41846 · Replies: 596 · Views: 350222 |
| Posted on: Feb 16 2006, 10:29 AM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Thanks Doug, in which section can I find this ? As a matter of fact, I've seen here that you started your "membership" on feb 8th 04 : that was my 50th birthday !!!! OK, OK, OK, OK no big interest for the discussion... Climber Yup - Feb 8th would have been the day I first got the old forum up and running - hence people celebrating this places 2nd birthday a few days ago...thus....Happy 52nd to you! The section about the raw images is actually the very first question in the most recent update ( update 3 ) and the actual reference is about 2:25 in "having the downlink literally split, as soon as it gets to JPL - it duplicates and one path goes to a routine that automatically converts every image into a JPG and posted on the website as quickly as possible and the other branch of that split goes to the science team" Doug |
| Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #41842 · Replies: 690 · Views: 512126 |
| Posted on: Feb 16 2006, 10:00 AM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
I'm may be a little innocent but, are we sure they post images right away or do they kind of have a quick look at them to make sure that a BIG discovery isn't going to be seen by others first ? Take a listen to the latest Pancam update - Jim and I talk about this very issue, how the raw images fit in the flow - and they actually branch off before the images get to the science team. Doug |
| Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #41839 · Replies: 690 · Views: 512126 |
| Posted on: Feb 16 2006, 08:51 AM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
But even at 15km/h the problems are huge, and as it, no robot can do it, http://www.darpa.mil/grandchallenge/ 131 miles in 6hrs 53 mins Call it 18mph, or 28kph. Yes - I know - not entirely applicable to lunar exploration - but it's untrue to say 'no robot can do it'. The technology is beginning to be available whereby it's entirely plausable that a rover could operate on the moon at a pace similar to that of the LRV of the Apollo era, unmanned, without totally 'remote' control. Doug |
| Forum: Lunar Exploration · Post Preview: #41826 · Replies: 35 · Views: 42921 |
| Posted on: Feb 16 2006, 08:36 AM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
CODE 193 LINK, DOY, P, EVENT TIME (SCET), DURATION, ELEV, REQ TIME (SCET), REQ DUR, VOL, RAT, DROP DEAD TIME(U), FORWARD LAT, RETURN TIME (UTC), RETURN LAT, S, R, C, D, NOTES 220 MRB_ODY, 047, 1, 2006-047T00:04:28, 00:15:12, 18.8, 2006-047T00:04:28, 00:15:12, 73.0, 128, 2006-046T14:00:00, 10:04:29, 2006-047T00:40:00, 00:35:31, Y, Y, , , 221 MRB_ODY, 047, 2, 2006-047T10:58:11, 00:16:51, 38.9, 2006-047T10:58:11, 00:16:51, 113.0, 256, 2006-046T14:05:00, 20:53:12, 2006-047T12:00:00, 01:01:48, Y, Y, , Y, 222 MRB_ODY, 047, 3, 2006-047T12:58:44, 00:10:35, 5.7, , , , NA, 2006-046T14:05:00, 22:53:45, 2006-047T13:30:00, 00:31:15, , , , , 223 MRB_ODY, 047, 4, 2006-047T23:46:39, 00:17:29, 87.4, 2006-047T23:46:39, 00:17:29, 140.0, 256, 2006-047T21:30:00, 02:16:40, 2006-048T00:25:00, 00:38:20, Y, Y, , Y, 351 Overflight # Start (SCET) End (SCET) ODY Downlink Bitrate 369 MRB_ODY_DOY047_1 06-047/00:04:28.0 06-047/00:19:40.0 bit_rate = 28440 370 MRB_ODY_DOY047_2 06-047/10:58:11.0 06-047/11:15:02.0 bit_rate = 124425 371 MRB_ODY_DOY047_4 06-047/23:46:39.0 06-048/00:04:08.0 bit_rate = 39816 So - estimated first post-drive downlink, lunch time CODE Sol Seq.Ver ETH ESF EDN EFF ERP Tot Description --- -------- --- --- --- --- --- ---- ----------- 734 p1201.04 2 0 0 2 0 4 front_haz_penultimate_1_bpp_crit19 734 p1214.05 2 0 0 2 0 4 front_haz_ultimate_4bpp_pri15 734 p1214.05 2 0 0 2 0 4 front_haz_ultimate_4bpp_pri15 734 p1214.05 2 0 0 2 0 4 front_haz_ultimate_4bpp_pri15 734 p1301.03 2 0 0 2 0 4 rear_haz_penultimate_1bpp_pri16 734 p1312.06 2 0 0 2 0 4 rear_haz_ultimate_2_bpp_pri15 734 p1910.04 12 0 0 12 0 24 navcam_6x1_lvlaz198_3bpp 734 p2446.06 8 0 0 8 2 18 pancam_drive_direction_4x1_L2R2 734 p2600.07 2 2 0 0 2 6 pancam_tau 734 p2600.07 2 2 0 0 2 6 pancam_tau 734 p2631.01 11 0 0 0 2 13 pancam_sky_spot_L234567R34567 734 Total 47 4 0 32 8 91 PLEAAAASSEE work Doug |
| Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #41823 · Replies: 690 · Views: 512126 |
| Posted on: Feb 15 2006, 11:19 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
A couple more frames added... Perfect timing http://www.planetary.org/explore/topics/ma...vers/audio.html QUOTE (Latest Rover Update Entry) Related links: Mars Exploration Rover raw images » Pancam team image website » Home Plate views by James Canvin » Doug |
| Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #41788 · Replies: 596 · Views: 350222 |
| Posted on: Feb 15 2006, 10:55 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
(running time 25:14) QUOTE (Me when proposing these things to JB) Yeah - we could do little 10 minute Q'n'A things DOH! Thanks for giving them a home Emily, very much appreciated, and kudos to Jim for being so patient, keen, and informative. If anyone wants to transcribe - then do it in here. If you have new questions, you can post them http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.php?showtopic=2089 <there Doug (PS - sorry about the occasionally crappy audio, not sure what happened, but I'm doing a complete system re-install before the next one anyway and will have a thorough shake down beforehand - this one was a bit rushed ) |
| Forum: Forum News · Post Preview: #41784 · Replies: 21 · Views: 35142 |
| Posted on: Feb 15 2006, 09:44 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
if all the martian images we see are just colorized greyscale? They're not. You can get the data here - http://anserver1.eprsl.wustl.edu/navigator...rover=B&sol=294 That panorama, and specifically those frames happened to be taken at a point when the sun was directly behind the dial, and thus reflecting off its surface You can see that even in the raw imagery http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all...unity_p294.html I've gone and made that 'column' of data, and straight out of my normal processing flow I get the first attachment, and the seconds attachment is that image, stretched to maximize dynamic range - and one gets a very similar result to that of the Athena release image. Doug |
| Forum: Tech, General and Imagery · Post Preview: #41772 · Replies: 6 · Views: 6902 |
| Posted on: Feb 15 2006, 09:30 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Can we get a new clickable smilie showing the normal response to an atrocious pun? The green one - see above - from the "Post Icons" would come pretty close. You could just use CODE [img]http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/style_images/1/folder_post_icons/icon8.gif[/img] The standard reply for a bad pun is "Oh for goodness sake Bob" There are some guidelines on using the forum - under the 'help' section, top right of the page. Doug |
| Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #41767 · Replies: 690 · Views: 512126 |
| Posted on: Feb 15 2006, 08:03 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
The best overlay I've done is the one of the solar array -but obviously being so much closer to the pancam, that's to be expected Doug |
| Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #41750 · Replies: 596 · Views: 350222 |
| Posted on: Feb 15 2006, 06:50 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Just finished a new Q'n'A with Jim (mp3 will be up later) - and the scoop is that 734 is a big (40m) drive sol. (734 has literally JUST started, and so we will probably see something in 17 - 18 hrs) Doug |
| Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #41734 · Replies: 690 · Views: 512126 |
| Posted on: Feb 15 2006, 06:48 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Given the number of frames, and the overlap - I'd call that mosaic about 50mm across, 2x30-overlap To put it another way - about as big on each side as the length of your little finger. |
| Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #41733 · Replies: 596 · Views: 350222 |
| Posted on: Feb 15 2006, 05:08 PM | |
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
I'm not a geologist, so I havnt a clue if this is right - but if you take an X-section of where we are now, to Mongollon Rim - I think it might look like this.... (just realised - it's Mogollon not Mongollon as I've been calling it? It's like Squyres and Squires all over again |
| Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #41719 · Replies: 690 · Views: 512126 |
New Replies No New Replies Hot Topic (New) Hot Topic (No New) |
Poll (New) Poll (No New) Locked Topic Moved Topic |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 06:58 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|