IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

462 Pages V  « < 349 350 351 352 353 > » 

djellison
Posted on: Jan 4 2006, 02:35 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


CODE
714 p1795.03 0   0   0   0   0   0    navcam_5x1_az_342_3_bpp


Looks like a 'look back' to El-D to me - I'm desperate to see that as we're in some comparatively 'Alan is lost' type terrain here smile.gif

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #34531 · Replies: 783 · Views: 434417

djellison
Posted on: Jan 4 2006, 02:31 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Given that these rocks (well, the ones we looked at when we first got to Erebus) have this very salt-rich rind on them, something not seen in the sections at Eagle or Endurance afaik, then they should be higher in the pile shouldnt they?

This very fine Xbedding indicitive of flowing water in the rocks here at Olympia would suggest being at the top end of the story at the very least. Go much down the stack and you hit the wind blown deposits that we saw in Burns cliff.

Doug
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #34530 · Replies: 690 · Views: 512126

djellison
Posted on: Jan 4 2006, 12:35 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Large versions and others
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/targetFamily/Mars

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #34520 · Replies: 211 · Views: 186504

djellison
Posted on: Jan 4 2006, 12:02 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Just found out - I've got 40 minutes in the 25th- just about right to cover Spirit properly since last April

Doug
  Forum: Chit Chat · Post Preview: #34518 · Replies: 10 · Views: 10019

djellison
Posted on: Jan 4 2006, 12:00 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


QUOTE (ugordan @ Jan 4 2006, 11:30 AM)
Perhaps press releases like that are more common out there than you think


Not really - NASA press releases can be a bit 'hollywood' - but they dont tend to lay claim to something that's already been investigated.

Doug
  Forum: Pluto / KBO · Post Preview: #34517 · Replies: 6 · Views: 11892

djellison
Posted on: Jan 4 2006, 11:36 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Jim's been busy...


http://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/solars...103-images.html

Shows how much the raw jpg's are stretched, I had so much more contrast than that, but I just didnt know it.

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #34516 · Replies: 211 · Views: 186504

djellison
Posted on: Jan 4 2006, 10:52 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Well - you could infer one from overlaying an older image that does have an image scale couldnt you?

I guess you use photoshop and layers, scale the whole thing 200% - then put the new image over the top and scale it to fit you current base map perhaps?

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #34511 · Replies: 20 · Views: 29296

djellison
Posted on: Jan 4 2006, 10:05 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Yup - the maths could get quite interesting. Is it worth spending perhaps $10m upgrading to a slightly heavier version of your ELV to get larger solar arrays so you can have a more powerfull transmitter and thus get more kbps and thus fewer sessions.

Might have had my maths a bit wrong earlier.....but this is all very very 'ballpark guestimation'

say 14 1hr passes of 35m coverage per week ( i.e. the daily uplink for MER plus beep back ) would be something like $2424/hr, or about $34k/week ( $1.7m/year ). The finances for doing MER Relay with Odyssey is probably quite interesting, I think it would probably be something like 1 hr of Odysseys downlink per day is MER related - so a similar figure.



Voyager
QUOTE (Voyager update in the middle of '05)
There were 90.3 hours of DSN scheduled support for Voyager 1 of which 32.6 hours were large aperture coverage
There were 76.5 hours of DSN scheduled support for Voyager 2 of which 25.9 hours were large aperture coverage


Say it's 28 sessions a week, 7 on 70m, 21 on 35m

$6745/hr for the 70m - $400k (as near as makes no difference)
$527k for the 35m - so that week's Voyager DSN ops cost about $927K.

Youch.

Very rough maths - probably very wrong to be honest.

7 x 8hr 70m passes per week, at 5kbps is $377,220 per week, for 984 MBytes - or $552 per floppy disk smile.gif

Doug
  Forum: Cometary and Asteroid Missions · Post Preview: #34506 · Replies: 113 · Views: 138381

djellison
Posted on: Jan 4 2006, 08:44 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Sounds like Harvard PAO went on an ESA 'claim something we already know' press release writing course.

Doug
  Forum: Pluto / KBO · Post Preview: #34493 · Replies: 6 · Views: 11892

djellison
Posted on: Jan 4 2006, 08:26 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


QUOTE (Tosols Imaging)
713 p0695.03 10  0  0  10  0  20  navcam_5x1_az_162_3_bpp
713 p1212.07 2  0  0  2  0  4    front_haz_ultimate_2_bpp_pri15
713 p1219.02 2  0  0  2  0  4    front_hazcam_loco_pri_56
713 p1312.09 2  0  0  2  0  4    ultimate_rear_hazcam_2_bpp_pri15
713 p2102.13 3  0  3  0  1  7    pancam_isc_voc_cal_L267
713 p2104.10 3  0  3  0  1  7    pancam_mtes_cal_target_L267
713 p2433.14 12  0  0  12  2  26  pancam_6x1_drive_direction_L7R1
713 p2514.05 2  0  0  2  2  6    pancam_clast_survey_L7R1
713 p2600.07 2  2  0  0  2  6    pancam_tau
713 p2600.07 2  2  0  0  2  6    pancam_tau
713 p2631.01 11  0  0  0  2  13  pancam_sky_spot_L234567R34567


Looks to me like alternate driving days and imaging days, perhaps it's a bit restricted at the moment.

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #34492 · Replies: 783 · Views: 434417

djellison
Posted on: Jan 4 2006, 12:54 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


The ELV doc is very interesting....I wonder how close that figure they quote for each performance target matches the bill from Boeing or LoMart.

Very interesting chart for DSN charges as well - trying to figure out a rough value - but with 5 contacts a week, 70m DSN access is about $2114 per hour *, with the 34m access being 1/4 of that. It must get to a point where the design of a telecoms system to go onboard a spacecraft is an exercise in accounting more than engineering.

Lots of excellent reading to be had in there - it'll be interesting to see the applications in a few months time.

Doug

(*PS - at say 128kbps, $2114/hr is roughly $37 / megabyte )
  Forum: Cometary and Asteroid Missions · Post Preview: #34442 · Replies: 113 · Views: 138381

djellison
Posted on: Jan 4 2006, 12:19 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


I agree Emily, ISIS for Win would be good, but in the mean time I've had luck using the 'Gimp' and a PDS plugin for it....it's worked for Themis files.

Gimp for Windows http://gimp-win.sourceforge.net/
PDS Plugin http://registry.gimp.org/plugin?id=445

But so far, it just makes pds.exe ( the plugin ) crash with VIMS cubes sad.gif

Doug
  Forum: Cassini general discussion and science results · Post Preview: #34440 · Replies: 20 · Views: 24136

djellison
Posted on: Jan 3 2006, 11:32 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


I think I've managed to find a copy of the guide on Ebay smile.gif

But I dont know they did the DVD's at all ohmy.gif Where on earth can one get them?

Doug
  Forum: Conferences and Broadcasts · Post Preview: #34432 · Replies: 31 · Views: 36011

djellison
Posted on: Jan 3 2006, 11:28 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


All the documentation says there are guides to the current status of Stardust and DI at the library
http://discovery.larc.nasa.gov/discovery/dpl.html

but I cant find them ohmy.gif

Doug
  Forum: Cometary and Asteroid Missions · Post Preview: #34431 · Replies: 113 · Views: 138381

djellison
Posted on: Jan 3 2006, 09:15 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


What I especially like is that if you blow it right up, it looks quite a lot like my CPROTO simulation of Oppy @ Purg, which was a precursor to my simulation of HIRISE




Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #34392 · Replies: 20 · Views: 29296

djellison
Posted on: Jan 3 2006, 08:59 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Another BAA meeting, another Doug Talk. I'm only giving a short update on Spirit, but if any of you are in or around London on the evening of the 25th, pop along smile.gif

It's at New Hunts House, Guys Hospital, near London Bridge Tube Station - 17:00 for 17:30 till 20:00. The other speakers are the ever entertaining Martin Mobberley with his Sky Notes, and Chris Lintott (yes, the guy from The Sky at Night) talking on Cosmology:Into the Unknown - and....me doing an Update on the last year of Spirit (just about, the last time I talked to the BAA about Spirit was last April, so it'll be everything from Larrys Lookout to now really)

Would be great to see anyone who can make it down there smile.gif

I'm also talking at the Out of London Weekend ( Fri 21st to Sun 23rd of April in Liverpool) , York AS on the night of June 2nd giving Spirits full story, and Opportunity's full story on Sat, Dec 16th (1430 - 1730) at the London Bridge venue again

More info, ish, at www.britastro.org

Doug
  Forum: Chit Chat · Post Preview: #34388 · Replies: 10 · Views: 10019

djellison
Posted on: Jan 3 2006, 02:51 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


They DVD'd the Beagle programs from the OU ohmy.gif

DOUG WANT! Not found that anywhere - any pointers?

I cant actually see any 'stuff' on your blog, just lots of images down each side - there's a Beagle 2 Guide it seems ( after CP's book Beagle which I have ) - what on earth's that?

Doug
  Forum: Conferences and Broadcasts · Post Preview: #34307 · Replies: 31 · Views: 36011

djellison
Posted on: Jan 3 2006, 02:35 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Oh - I've known about Jims book plan for some time, and he has given me his blessing to do my own book as well. What I'm aiming for is very very specific, and nothing published or planned is similar as far as I know.

Doug
  Forum: Forum News · Post Preview: #34301 · Replies: 46 · Views: 67873

djellison
Posted on: Jan 3 2006, 02:12 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Oh - I've flown enough Orbiter to understand all that smile.gif What I was trying to demonstrate was the fact that getting high, and getting to orbit, are very very different ballparks smile.gif

Doug
  Forum: Earth Observations · Post Preview: #34298 · Replies: 32 · Views: 45539

djellison
Posted on: Jan 3 2006, 12:08 PM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


Actually - for once, JPL's up to date as well

http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/tm-spirit/index.html

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #34286 · Replies: 211 · Views: 186504

djellison
Posted on: Jan 3 2006, 11:58 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...pe=post&id=3100 has it down perfectly imho

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #34283 · Replies: 211 · Views: 186504

djellison
Posted on: Jan 3 2006, 11:57 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


This item might have made it into space - but never into orbit.

Ignoring the fall off of gravity, and ignoring air resistance, getting into orbit is a two fold issue. Getting high, and getting fast.

Say you need 200km and 7500 m/sec

The pot.energy of, say, 1kg @ 200km is 200,000 J
The Kinetic Energy of that 1kg doing 7500 m/s (orbital velocity) is 28,125,000 J

Those are the two things you need to add to something to get it into orbit.

So even if they gave it enough shove to overcome friction, and it survived the massive heating, it might have got into space, but it would never have got into orbit smile.gif

Doug
  Forum: Earth Observations · Post Preview: #34282 · Replies: 32 · Views: 45539

djellison
Posted on: Jan 3 2006, 11:39 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/2006/01/03/index.html


Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #34279 · Replies: 20 · Views: 29296

djellison
Posted on: Jan 3 2006, 11:30 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


I think we'll get a good view of all of El-D from the home plate area, till then it's just a side-on view I guess.

I still cant figure out where that BIG drive was without any same-sol-post-drive-imaging.

It looks like the saved the post drive imaging for the following sol.

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #34277 · Replies: 211 · Views: 186504

djellison
Posted on: Jan 3 2006, 11:28 AM


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1


I'm not a geologist, but I'll put my $5 on Olivine rich basaltic sand

Doug
  Forum: Spirit · Post Preview: #34275 · Replies: 21 · Views: 30468

462 Pages V  « < 349 350 351 352 353 > » 

New Posts  New Replies
No New Posts  No New Replies
Hot topic  Hot Topic (New)
No new  Hot Topic (No New)
Poll  Poll (New)
No new votes  Poll (No New)
Closed  Locked Topic
Moved  Moved Topic
 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 06:48 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.