IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

80 Pages V  « < 19 20 21 22 23 > » 

jamescanvin
Posted on: Mar 12 2009, 08:06 AM


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16


Thanks Tim, glad we're in agreement about what we are seeing. smile.gif
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #137712 · Replies: 543 · Views: 284450

jamescanvin
Posted on: Mar 11 2009, 10:50 PM


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16


Parts of Iazu are only a little further than Cook on the far side of Endeavour, ~20% further off the top of my head (not at my machine ATM) certainly close enough to be visible if it is in our LOS - which is possible if it's rim is higher than Endeavour's as Google Earth suggests.

From the azimuth it could be either, it's in the direction of the extreme west edge of Endeavour and the centre(ish) of Iazu beyond.
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #137700 · Replies: 543 · Views: 284450

jamescanvin
Posted on: Mar 11 2009, 07:04 PM


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16


QUOTE (fredk @ Mar 11 2009, 01:49 PM) *
These new bits are visible in other frames using a different filter (R1), so they're definitely real. Looking at James' inverse polar view, I'd say we're seeing here parts of the west rim further around to the SE from the most obvious bit.


Maybe, but is a lot more hazy than the other West rim feature and Cook on the far rim which imply it's considerably further away. Looking on Google Earth it possible we are seeing the crater beyond! Iazu crater according to Google, does appear to have a more pronounced rim than Endeavour.
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #137687 · Replies: 543 · Views: 284450

jamescanvin
Posted on: Mar 10 2009, 02:24 PM


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16


What I find most confusing is that the Resolution mosaic was taken after the drive. It would have been much better taken before the drive when Oppy was much closer to the crater. I'm sure all will become clear in due course.

  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #137636 · Replies: 543 · Views: 284450

jamescanvin
Posted on: Mar 10 2009, 10:24 AM


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16


We don't know yet.

Discussion of this type should be posted in this thread rather than here in the route map thread.
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #137628 · Replies: 3597 · Views: 3531676

jamescanvin
Posted on: Mar 9 2009, 08:32 PM


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16


QUOTE (ustrax @ Mar 9 2009, 07:20 PM) *
Why should I speculate when you delivered us this incredible view?...


I was expecting you to pull more features out of the noise. wink.gif

QUOTE (ustrax @ Mar 9 2009, 07:20 PM) *
I believe it is the first time we see this feature on the west rim, right?


I think so.
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #137569 · Replies: 543 · Views: 284450

jamescanvin
Posted on: Mar 9 2009, 07:11 PM


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16


And here is that image overlaid on one of those 'inverse polar' orbital images I've made in the past. (where each column of the image is one line of sight from our current position)

Attached Image


I'll leave Rui to draw any lines and do any wild speculation, wink.gif but...

I see three distinct features, twin peaks, Cook and then on the right, a feature that coincides with the most prominent feature on the west rim; where we are heading!

I think now might be a more appropriate time to say "Land ahoy!" eh, Stu?

James

P.S I'll try and do this with a better orbital image at some point.
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #137557 · Replies: 543 · Views: 284450

jamescanvin
Posted on: Mar 9 2009, 06:38 PM


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16


Quick 10x Phil-o-vision and contrast stretch of the horizon L2's




  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #137553 · Replies: 543 · Views: 284450

jamescanvin
Posted on: Mar 9 2009, 04:05 PM


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16


Wow! Nice. smile.gif

http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...93P2421R2M1.JPG

http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...93P2421R2M1.JPG
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #137534 · Replies: 543 · Views: 284450

jamescanvin
Posted on: Mar 8 2009, 03:07 PM


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16


Well that was a little unexpected. North-West?

http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...93P0675R0M1.JPG
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #137493 · Replies: 543 · Views: 284450

jamescanvin
Posted on: Mar 7 2009, 02:54 PM


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16


Thanks Ant - welcome back smile.gif


I've been waiting for the rest of the Ranger Crater pan. However I've just checked the PDT and it looks like the second tier has already been deleted from the rover without being downlinked. So we are left with a long thin 19x1 image.



Click image

James
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #137456 · Replies: 543 · Views: 284450

jamescanvin
Posted on: Mar 5 2009, 05:32 PM


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16


The Huygens image is actually greyscale - all the coloured versions out there are artificial.
  Forum: Titan · Post Preview: #137281 · Replies: 3 · Views: 4376

jamescanvin
Posted on: Mar 5 2009, 02:12 PM


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16


QUOTE (Poolio @ Mar 5 2009, 02:05 PM) *
I also think we saw a short drive yesterday, about 35m to the SSW. Can someone verify?


Correct. Sol 1816 ~40m SSW from a quick check of the tracking data
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #137255 · Replies: 543 · Views: 284450

jamescanvin
Posted on: Mar 4 2009, 06:05 PM


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16


Which pancam is that? Twin peaks and Cook are far to far apart to appear on the same pancam image.

EDIT: Actually, given how hazy the Twin Peaks are, we may struggle to see the more distant Cook at this time.
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #137195 · Replies: 325 · Views: 233313

jamescanvin
Posted on: Mar 4 2009, 02:43 PM


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16


I'm with Rui on this one - If anything the 'Twin Peaks' are less distinct now than when we were at Victoria.

They are quite hazy now, but look at the raw image Rui linked in post 1 of this thread they are quite distinct, as is 'Cook'. Of course the added hazyness does give a better impression of distance.

Doesn't really matter though does it, it's just nice to have them back on the horizon again. smile.gif
Looking forward to seeing 'Cook' again as well sometime - it'll be nice to have a beacon on the far rim for a change. wink.gif
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #137181 · Replies: 325 · Views: 233313

jamescanvin
Posted on: Mar 4 2009, 01:01 PM


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16


QUOTE (kenny @ Mar 4 2009, 10:36 AM) *
looking forward to seeing them closer.


Don't count on it. Those peaks are on the north section of Endeavour - almost due east from Oppys current position.

She is headed to the west rim and with the route we are taking I don't expect her to get significantly closer to those peaks.

Don't worry though, I'm sure we'll get some very alluring peaks to aim at sometime soon. smile.gif
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #137174 · Replies: 325 · Views: 233313

jamescanvin
Posted on: Mar 3 2009, 02:25 PM


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16


QUOTE (Jeffrey @ Mar 3 2009, 02:08 PM) *
It's the whole "get printed" bit. The print shops to which I've gone with these sorts of things suggest it would be prohibitively expensive.


There are lots of online printers these days that are reasonably priced - I just put the 1.3m x 1.0m size quoted for that map into a poster printing site I've used in the UK before and get a quote of £39 (~$55 US) Not too bad for such a large photo quality print.
  Forum: Earth Observations · Post Preview: #137117 · Replies: 15 · Views: 62392

jamescanvin
Posted on: Mar 2 2009, 06:42 PM


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16


I've been a bit out of the loop recently, learning how to be a parent! However I think I've mastered the important 'hold baby in one arm while using the other to process MER images' technique. wink.gif

Cobble survey from sol 1811



James

  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #137041 · Replies: 543 · Views: 284450

jamescanvin
Posted on: Feb 15 2009, 11:15 PM


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16


So I did - fixed.

Thanks Emily.
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #136149 · Replies: 3597 · Views: 3531676

jamescanvin
Posted on: Feb 15 2009, 10:58 PM


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16


I thought it might help visualise our progress and speed towards Endeavour by plotting Opportunities position every 100 sols on a large map.

Now we're at sol 1800 here is the first one.

Attached Image


and with the ripple map overlay

Attached Image


James
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #136147 · Replies: 3597 · Views: 3531676

jamescanvin
Posted on: Feb 10 2009, 07:30 PM


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16


Here is a first draft of a Google Mars file with links to all the Opportunity images I have created over the years. smile.gif

http://www.nivnac.co.uk/mer/Martian_Vistas_Opportunity.kml

You need to have Google Earth open and in 'Mars mode' else the links will be in the Atlantic. rolleyes.gif

Click on an icon to bring up a thumbnail image then click on image to open the relevant entry on my site in a browser.

Attached Image


Comments, corrections welcome...

James
  Forum: Mars · Post Preview: #135815 · Replies: 80 · Views: 91649

jamescanvin
Posted on: Feb 10 2009, 06:15 PM


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16


Personally I think we should avoid using ships for our own informal names to reduce the possibility of there being a conflict between the two. i.e. ending up with same name for different objects.

I could easily see a different crater getting the official name Lightning - and that would get confusing.

I vote for sticking with Mini-Endurance. wink.gif
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #135812 · Replies: 543 · Views: 284450

jamescanvin
Posted on: Feb 10 2009, 04:12 PM


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16


QUOTE (fredk @ Feb 10 2009, 03:42 PM) *
I suppose there may be a specific target or interesting region to the SW that they want to taste.


Porcupine maybe? I can't see any other reason to continue SW. May be quite an interesting target - and photogenic as well, I'm getting bored of these endless ripples again now. wink.gif
  Forum: Opportunity · Post Preview: #135788 · Replies: 543 · Views: 284450

jamescanvin
Posted on: Feb 10 2009, 11:06 AM


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16


That is because the old one is still in your cache. Hold the shift key while clicking reload.
  Forum: Forum News · Post Preview: #135767 · Replies: 41 · Views: 124152

jamescanvin
Posted on: Feb 9 2009, 08:08 PM


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16


It took a couple of weeks for the Internet Archive to index the site - the earliest record is from the 20th Feb 2004:

http://web.archive.org/web/20040220210240/....rlproject.com/


QUOTE ('mer.rlproject.com on 20/02/2004')
Our members have made a total of 159 posts
We have 38 registered members
The newest member is Bjorn Jonsson

  Forum: Forum News · Post Preview: #135739 · Replies: 41 · Views: 124152

80 Pages V  « < 19 20 21 22 23 > » 

New Posts  New Replies
No New Posts  No New Replies
Hot topic  Hot Topic (New)
No new  Hot Topic (No New)
Poll  Poll (New)
No new votes  Poll (No New)
Closed  Locked Topic
Moved  Moved Topic
 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 04:34 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.