IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


El Mitico
Posted on: Mar 29 2021, 05:14 PM


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 19-January 07
From: La Plata, Argentina
Member No.: 1630


Hi. Longtime lurker here....working in the field of cosmic rays

It seems to me that the image shows a combination of stellar objects on the background, producing the left to right streaks due to the long exposure, with stratight traces from cosmic rays on the ccd, plus particles moving in the near field during said exposure time. Why do they move like that? local electromagnetic fields from the spacecraft? radiation pressure?...no idea!. But electrostatic forces alone would produce more straight lines wouldnt they?
  Forum: Sun · Post Preview: #251265 · Replies: 149 · Views: 508841

El Mitico
Posted on: Jan 31 2018, 02:05 PM


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 19-January 07
From: La Plata, Argentina
Member No.: 1630


Launched on March 25, 2000, IMAGE, short for Imager for Magnetopause-to-Aurora Global Exploration, was designed to image Earth's magnetosphere and produce the first comprehensive global images of the plasma populations in this region.

After successfully completing and extending its initial two-year mission in 2002, contact was unexpectedly lost on December 18, 2005.

After an amateur astronomer recorded observations of a satellite in high Earth orbit on January 20, 2018, his initial research suggested it was the IMAGE satellite.

you can find more in his blog

https://skyriddles.wordpress.com/2018/01/21...llite-is-alive/

pretty cool!
  Forum: Earth Observations · Post Preview: #238474 · Replies: 5 · Views: 19709

El Mitico
Posted on: Apr 17 2007, 04:26 PM


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 19-January 07
From: La Plata, Argentina
Member No.: 1630


Here You can follow the news and watch a video of ASTRO placing a battery on its client satellite.

http://www.darpa.mil/orbitalexpress/mission_updates.html

nice, isnt it?
  Forum: Private Missions · Post Preview: #88461 · Replies: 2 · Views: 7702

El Mitico
Posted on: Apr 16 2007, 09:42 PM


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 19-January 07
From: La Plata, Argentina
Member No.: 1630


Hi! My Fist New topic!
I didn't know if the category is right. I finally chosen private missions thinking in its potencial for private use
Mr Moderator, if you think this goes anywhere else feel free to move it (I know you don't need my authorization, I'm just being polite)

It was strange to me not to hear anything about this in UMSF. ( Maybe I missed it?). As one of the articles say, taking this
approach can change drastically how missions can be designed.

Sending a lot of fuel in one big tank, for instance, is far more weight efficient (cheaper) than sending along with your ship.

And if you are going to stay in earth orbit, you can design your craft with smaller tanks and relly on resuplys

http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0704/03orbitalexpress/

http://feedmoo.com/2007/04/09/astro-satell...cts-to-nextsat/


Greetings
El Mitico, La Plata, Argentina
  Forum: Private Missions · Post Preview: #88416 · Replies: 2 · Views: 7702

El Mitico
Posted on: Jan 21 2007, 08:22 PM


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 19-January 07
From: La Plata, Argentina
Member No.: 1630


QUOTE (Mongo @ Jan 21 2007, 01:12 PM) *
The total to date would be 96 points (I had not heard that it had a prominant anti-tail, so I have not given points for that. Was there a report of one visible?)
Bill


Thanks bill!. About the anti-tail, it was my mystake. I had a missconception of what an anti tail was. No anti tail is seen in this comet so long.
  Forum: Cometary and Asteroid Missions · Post Preview: #81214 · Replies: 200 · Views: 201293

El Mitico
Posted on: Jan 21 2007, 01:48 PM


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 19-January 07
From: La Plata, Argentina
Member No.: 1630


QUOTE (Mongo @ Jan 7 2007, 12:40 AM) *
Here is a list I made for my own amusement some time ago, of the greatest naked-eye comets of the last two centuries, visible to observers in the northern temperate regions. I used a points system as follows:

MAGNITUDE: 10 points for every degree of magnitude brighter than +3 (dark-sky; daytime magnitude gets counted separately)

TAIL: 1 point for every two degrees of length of naked-eye visible tail in dark sky

DURATION VISIBLE: 1 point for every month naked-eye visible in dark sky

BONUS POINTS:
2 visible tails = 10 points
5 visible tails (West 1976) = 20 points
15 degree long anti-tail (Arend-Roland 1957) = 10 points
curved tail (Donati 1858) = 5 points
'bright' tail (Daylight 1910) = 10 points
'brilliant' tail (Ikeya-Seki 1965, Great September 1882) = 20 points
circumpolar all night (Hyakutake 1996, Tebbutt 1861) = 10 points
Mag. -3 in daylight (West 1976) or Mag. -5 in daylight (Daylight 1910) = 10 points
Mag. -8 in daylight (Great March 1843) = 15 points
Mag. -15 in daylight (Ikeya-Seki 1965) or Mag. -17 in daylight (Great September 1882) = 30 points

1861 123 pts Tebbutt
1882 101 pts Great September Comet
1910 95 pts P/Halley
1976 90 pts West
1996 78 pts Hyakutake
1997 73 pts Hale-Bopp
1858 68 pts Donati
1965 64 pts Ikeya-Seki
1970 61 pts Bennett
1957 57 pts Arend-Roland
1910 54 pts Daylight Comet
1811 52 pts Great Comet
1843 50 pts Great March Comet
1874 46 pts Coggia
1881 42 pts Great Comet
1807 37 pts Great Comet
1853 37 pts Klinkerfues
1835 35 pts P/Halley
1957 35 pts Mrkos
1860 31 pts Great Comet
1911 29 pts Beljawsky
1911 28 pts Brooks
1819 25 pts Tralles
1854 24 pts Great Comet

Here is the same list in reverse chronological order:

1997 73 pts Hale-Bopp
1996 78 pts Hyakutake
1976 90 pts West
1970 61 pts Bennett
1965 64 pts Ikeya-Seki
1957 57 pts Arend-Roland
1957 35 pts Mrkos
1911 29 pts Beljawsky
1911 28 pts Brooks
1910 95 pts P/Halley
1910 54 pts Daylight Comet
1882 101 pts Great September Comet
1881 42 pts Great Comet
1874 46 pts Coggia
1861 123 pts Tebbutt
1860 31 pts Great Comet
1858 68 pts Donati
1854 24 pts Great Comet
1853 37 pts Klinkerfues
1843 50 pts Great March Comet
1835 35 pts P/Halley
1819 25 pts Tralles
1811 52 pts Great Comet
1807 37 pts Great Comet

Bill


According to bill's scale, I rate Mc Naught

Magnitude -5 : 80 points (not sure if this is correct, maybe I should rate -2 for dark skies or less?)
Tail: 10 points
Duration: 1 point

BONUS POINTS:
15 degree long anti-tail (Arend-Roland 1957) = 10 points
curved tail (Donati 1858) = 5 points
'bright' tail (Daylight 1910) = 10 points
Mag. -3 in daylight (West 1976) or Mag. -5 in daylight (Daylight 1910) = 10 points

Total: 126 (or 96?)!

Bill...please rate it!
  Forum: Cometary and Asteroid Missions · Post Preview: #81193 · Replies: 200 · Views: 201293

El Mitico
Posted on: Jan 20 2007, 10:27 PM


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 19-January 07
From: La Plata, Argentina
Member No.: 1630


Hi there!. I'm a new proud memmber of UMSF (lurking for about 3 years!). I'm from argentina and maybe today wheather will be nice to see the comet (again, luky me! tongue.gif).

I have one question I couldn't google and would like to know. Why the comet tail is not continuous? why it looks like aurora borealis? is it an atmospheric effect? can anyone give me some insights on this.

I understand why it is curved, but I expected it to be more homogeneous.

Thanks!
  Forum: Cometary and Asteroid Missions · Post Preview: #81157 · Replies: 50 · Views: 49044


New Posts  New Replies
No New Posts  No New Replies
Hot topic  Hot Topic (New)
No new  Hot Topic (No New)
Poll  Poll (New)
No new votes  Poll (No New)
Closed  Locked Topic
Moved  Moved Topic
 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 02:33 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.