IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

41 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Paolo's Plunge, First dip into Victoria
djellison
post Sep 16 2007, 07:32 AM
Post #61


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



But it was also mentioned that they wouldn't go up to the sides of the capes because of the shadowing (sun and telecoms) they would cause.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Oersted_*
post Sep 16 2007, 08:31 AM
Post #62





Guests






Ah, I'm sure the intrepid rover team will manage to find the right constellation of sun and communication angles to drive up and put the instruments on a cliff face. We should use the rover to its limits down there.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Sep 16 2007, 05:10 PM
Post #63


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



QUOTE (dvandorn @ Sep 15 2007, 10:07 PM) *
Oppy's exact preplanned path, was that she would head down to the "bright ring" layer (otherwise referred to as the "bathtub ring") and follow it around, parallel to the crater rim,

I have no problem with such a plan, but I would hope that the first thing they do is descend as far down the sequences as they can, ratting and sampling as many layers, as low as possible THEN go ahead and investigate along the ancient disconformity.

The dust storms reminded us that every day could be the last one for either rover, and I can't imagine anything more important geologically than a full understanding of the layering sequence as low as we can possibly go.


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Sep 16 2007, 06:39 PM
Post #64


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



As far as I can tell, the most we know about where Opportunity will go and what she will investigate comes from this Aviation Week article. They point out that, after the toe dip...
QUOTE
The plan is for the rover, heading south, to then drive 100 ft. into the crater. This will take several days. It will then be commanded tens of meters parallel along the crater wall. The objective will be to reach about a 1-meter-thick white rock layer that cuts through the wall of the entire crater--but at a point where it's easily sampled, not where it's also visible in the high promontories.
I can't see how they can travel parallel to the light band of rock for tens of meters unless Opportunity turns to the south to follow it across the bay.

I think the article also makes clear the initial scientific objective.
QUOTE
With Victoria, "we will really be making the first good vertical slice through an impact ejecta blanket and crater walls on another planet," says Squyres.
Then they go on to say...
QUOTE
This is the original Martian surface layer before the meteorite hit, burying and preserving the layer that was originally directly exposed to the Martian environment. At a minimum, the area is expected to provide direct data on the Martian climate billions of years ago. And even more, it could be (the) "bathtub ring," showing the Martin surface or ground water level at the time. If it's a surface or ground water signature, it will be important to Martian life assessments.


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Sep 16 2007, 10:47 PM
Post #65


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Thanks a lot for the entry location map, Alan. If anyone would like to visualize Oppy on the slope, Astro0's SFX image in this post shows the rover in almost exactly it's current location.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mhoward
post Sep 16 2007, 11:32 PM
Post #66


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3431
Joined: 11-August 04
From: USA
Member No.: 98



Here are a couple similar MMB views based on the drive data. The rover position is slightly off, but the scale should be more or less accurate. Astro0 had it pretty much right.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Sep 17 2007, 10:58 AM
Post #67


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Still on the issue of "which will be the next move?" I did a manual stitch of the "drive direction" mosaic from sol 1293 using the little thumbnails available at the pancam web. As this mosaic is usually used to plan the next move(s) it might give us a glimpse of the planned path.

Attached Image


This image correlates with the features in the *rightmost* picture of the navcam mosaic taken on the same sol, meaning that the plan (at least when these images were taken) is to move right (southeast), not left as I thought before.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Bobby_*
post Sep 17 2007, 06:30 PM
Post #68





Guests






No new images from The Exploratorium web site since Friday. Is it down or did they take the weekend off???

Hopefully today we will get updated images unsure.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Sep 17 2007, 06:39 PM
Post #69





Guests






QUOTE (Bobby @ Sep 17 2007, 07:30 PM) *
No new images from The Exploratorium web site since Friday. Is it down or did they take the weekend off???

Hopefully today we will get updated images unsure.gif


The Mars Odyssey spacecraft that relays most of the images went into safe mode.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Sep 17 2007, 06:40 PM
Post #70


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



CODE
0874331189:8 2007-258T13:40:54 ci2262 d:/seq/safe_mode_daily_diagnostics       RELATV 47A47FFE
0874512904:2 2007-260T16:09:28 ci2262 d:/seq/safe_mode_daily_diagnostics       RELATV 47A47FFE
0874513367:2 2007-260T16:17:11 ci3353 d:/seq/map_sm_recovery_reinits           RELATV 97F811A8


260 was yesterday - Oppy safed...nothing to worry about, just one of those things from time to time
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
OWW
post Sep 17 2007, 08:29 PM
Post #71


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 710
Joined: 28-September 04
Member No.: 99



QUOTE (djellison @ Sep 17 2007, 06:40 PM) *
260 was yesterday - Oppy safed...nothing to worry about, just one of those things from time to time


I hope you meant Oddy?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Sep 17 2007, 09:12 PM
Post #72


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Oops - yup - I did smile.gif

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Sep 18 2007, 09:16 AM
Post #73





Guests






Are power levels still too low to permit direct transmission of images to Earth?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Sep 18 2007, 09:29 AM
Post #74


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



They could probably do short DTE sessions, but is it really worth it for the big power they consume and the DSN demand it would have? Better to have a few sit-tight days, full batteries, then on with the fun.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mhoward
post Sep 19 2007, 04:07 AM
Post #75


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3431
Joined: 11-August 04
From: USA
Member No.: 98



Here's another little experimental movie of the plunge
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

41 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th April 2024 - 09:10 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.