IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

12 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 > »   
Closed TopicStart new topic
Sol 65 and after, Digs in Neverland, Cupboard, Stone Soup, Burn Alive...
Hungry4info
post Aug 9 2008, 06:31 PM
Post #61


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1432
Joined: 26-July 08
Member No.: 4270



O_o if the ice is breaking up like that, what are the odds of scooping some of it up?

Ice cream, straight of the freezer, is hard to scoop up, but leave it out a while and it gets warmer and easier to carve into.
(perhaps not the best of analogies, lolol, I don't even like ice cream).

Is it's position under the lander going to make acquiring it difficult/impossible? Or would you not want to anyway for reasons of contamination when Phoenix landed?


--------------------
-- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Aug 9 2008, 06:55 PM
Post #62


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (Hungry4info @ Aug 9 2008, 07:31 PM) *
Is it's position under the lander going to make acquiring it difficult/impossible?


Yes.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
peter59
post Aug 9 2008, 08:13 PM
Post #63


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 568
Joined: 20-April 05
From: Silesia
Member No.: 299



I hope that Happy Pan will be significantly better than Peter Pan.

At last we have perfectly focused image of the horizon.
Sol 73 SSI LEFT, filter unknown (probably 2), Az: 96 (E)
Let's compare with out of focus image (Peter Pan).
Sol 28 SSI RIGHT, filter 1, Az: 96 (E)


--------------------
Free software for planetary science (including Cassini Image Viewer).
http://members.tripod.com/petermasek/marinerall.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Aug 9 2008, 08:16 PM
Post #64


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



That's not a focus issue, rather a raw contrast stretch issue.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
akuo
post Aug 9 2008, 08:19 PM
Post #65


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 470
Joined: 24-March 04
From: Finland
Member No.: 63



It is a focus issue, different filters have different focus smile.gif. The SSI is probably optimised for the blue filter's focus, as are pancams on MERs.


--------------------
Antti Kuosmanen
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Aug 9 2008, 08:32 PM
Post #66


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



The diopters are optimized for near field studies (i.e. on the s/c deck), most others have good focus at distances such as this. It looks more to me like different filters and illumination angles than anything else.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
akuo
post Aug 9 2008, 08:38 PM
Post #67


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 470
Joined: 24-March 04
From: Finland
Member No.: 63



Could be higher wavelett compression too, resulting in a softer image. The second image is clearly softer though, regardless of any illumination issues.


--------------------
Antti Kuosmanen
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Deimos
post Aug 9 2008, 08:39 PM
Post #68


Martian Photographer
***

Group: Members
Posts: 352
Joined: 3-March 05
Member No.: 183



SSI focus is optimized for 3 to 3.5 m distance, since the main role for SSI is support of digging ops, and it has no role in picking where to drive next. It is still good at the horizon, but not ideal. Sampling is best in the red stereo filters. As with Pancam, the blue filters look sharper, but that is due to aliasing. Super sharp is good for pretty pictures; good sampling is important for good stereo models even if it looks slightly less sharp.

And the new pan better end up higher quality--it costs 10x as much.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Aug 9 2008, 08:42 PM
Post #69


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (Deimos @ Aug 9 2008, 10:39 PM) *
And the new pan better end up higher quality--it costs 10x as much.

What are the estimates of date of it being completely on the ground?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Aug 9 2008, 10:15 PM
Post #70


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



QUOTE (ugordan @ Aug 9 2008, 01:42 PM) *
What are the estimates of date of it being completely on the ground?

Translation: "Are we there yet? Are we there yet? Are we there yet? Are we there yet?" biggrin.gif

--Emily


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Aug 10 2008, 01:47 AM
Post #71


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10173
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Some new extensions to Cupboard now. They've messed up poor old Dodo-Goldilocks a bit.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Deimos
post Aug 10 2008, 05:58 AM
Post #72


Martian Photographer
***

Group: Members
Posts: 352
Joined: 3-March 05
Member No.: 183



The new pan was sized to take to Nov 15, with various assumptions about available passes and competing priorities. That didn't include retakes of unrecoverable missing data, but there's a lot of slop in the estimate.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Aug 10 2008, 11:26 AM
Post #73


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Couple of new 3Ds in my Phoenixpics gallery now, if anyone wants a look... Those dirt dumps really are starting to look like moden art now...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Aug 11 2008, 11:18 AM
Post #74


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Really nice (I think!) view of the scoop actually... well... scooping... smile.gif

"Down in the dirt"


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Aug 12 2008, 12:17 PM
Post #75


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10173
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



The Cupboard trench is getting bigger:

http://phoenix.lpl.arizona.edu/images/gallery/lg_20646.jpg


Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

12 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » 
Closed TopicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 31st May 2024 - 10:36 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.