IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

37 Pages V  « < 18 19 20 21 22 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Post Solar Conjunction/Santorini Study Drive, The second leg in our Journey to Endeavor Crater
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Feb 12 2009, 10:09 PM
Post #286





Guests






The rovers shadows look a bit subdued... is there a dust storm?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Feb 12 2009, 10:52 PM
Post #287


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



The images were taken quite late in the day, at 16:20. It may be that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nirgal
post Feb 12 2009, 11:15 PM
Post #288


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 713
Joined: 30-March 05
Member No.: 223



QUOTE (Sunspot @ Feb 12 2009, 11:09 PM) *
The rovers shadows look a bit subdued... is there a dust storm?


It's just the dust on the lens ... after five years ... wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Feb 12 2009, 11:16 PM
Post #289


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



I wouldn't call those images dust-storm indicative. Very long shadows mean late in the day, mean decreased contrast between shadow and lit surfaces.


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nirgal
post Feb 12 2009, 11:28 PM
Post #290


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 713
Joined: 30-March 05
Member No.: 223



QUOTE (RoverDriver @ Feb 12 2009, 07:42 PM) *
We are clearly behind in the 100m/drive average, but in a few Km we are back on a parking lot type of soil, so I assume that we will be able to do long drives consistently and for many many sols.

Paolo


Yeah... I've always wondered what the Rovers are really capable of when they are as fully dedicated to driving as they were for prolonged stationary study campaign in the past like at the looong "Olympia" Stay or just recently during "Santorini".

Just imagine what such a 100-or-so Sols stop would mean in equivalents of dedicated driving, even with a moderat 50 meter-per-sols average, such a driving-only period would put us 5 Kilometers further towards our goal smile.gif

And I'm fully aware that the driving is not an "end in itself" but serves the science in the end. So I'm
always kind of thinking of the Rover's wheels als the ultimate long range science instrument deployment tools ...

wheel.gif smile.gif wheel.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Feb 13 2009, 07:49 AM
Post #291


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (fredk @ Feb 12 2009, 03:50 PM) *
Looking more and more like a parking lot with every drive! smile.gif

So we're done with the hard part? What were we ever worried about! laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ustrax
post Feb 13 2009, 04:55 PM
Post #292


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2168
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



Here's my map for the whole second leg of the journey...I believe this time I won't be so lucky... wink.gif
And 8 months seems now a lot of time seing how Oppy is flying... smile.gif

EDITED: new pancams images are at exploratorium but no sign of Endeavour...


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nirgal
post Feb 13 2009, 05:26 PM
Post #293


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 713
Joined: 30-March 05
Member No.: 223



I think the real "parking lot" terrain that Rover Driver mentioned is still some 2 or 3 kilometers away to the south east ...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RoverDriver
post Feb 13 2009, 05:39 PM
Post #294


Member
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 976
Joined: 29-September 06
From: Pasadena, CA - USA
Member No.: 1200



QUOTE (Nirgal @ Feb 13 2009, 09:26 AM) *
I think the real "parking lot" terrain that Rover Driver mentioned is still some 2 or 3 kilometers away to the south east ...



That is correct. Parking lot=no ripples.

Paolo


--------------------
Disclaimer: all opinions, ideas and information included here are my own,and should not be intended to represent opinion or policy of my employer.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Feb 13 2009, 05:48 PM
Post #295


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



QUOTE (ustrax @ Feb 13 2009, 05:55 PM) *
EDITED: new pancams images are at exploratorium but no sign of Endeavour...

They were taken but not downlinked yet except for the thumbnails.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Feb 13 2009, 07:33 PM
Post #296


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



QUOTE (RoverDriver @ Feb 13 2009, 09:39 AM) *
That is correct. Parking lot=no ripples.


... and no "Anatolia's" unsure.gif


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Geert
post Feb 14 2009, 11:42 AM
Post #297


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 236
Joined: 5-June 08
From: Udon Thani
Member No.: 4185



A bit further south from the Sol 1797 position there is a somewhat weird feature.

Attached Image


Looks like the dune's are disturbed with (seemingly) very dark sand blown away over the bedrock, or a very long shadow. Area is clearly darker then its surroundings but it doesn't really look like a 'hidden crater' or Anatolia type feature. There are a few more spots around where patches of very dark sand seem to be covering the bedrock just to the lee of some dunes, but this is the most prominent. It these are high dune's, casting a shadow, then it doesn't match up with their 'wavelength' unless they are very steep.

Can't really think what to make of it...

I for one don't think we are on 'parkinglot' material yet, the dunes may be smaller but there are more 'disturbances', especially further south, and some of them might be potential dust-traps.

Regards,

Geert
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SFJCody
post Feb 14 2009, 04:09 PM
Post #298


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 813
Joined: 8-February 04
From: Arabia Terra
Member No.: 12



Doesn't look like there is a drive today, but there is one planned for sol 1800. wheel.gif wheel.gif wheel.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Floyd
post Feb 15 2009, 09:39 PM
Post #299


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 910
Joined: 4-September 06
From: Boston
Member No.: 1102



As Tesheiner explained in the map thread, Opportunity moved backwards ~10 m and then forwand for a net gain of about 4 m. Must be a good reason for such a drive--but I'm coming up blank--Paolo can you explain? Drive images are down at the Exploratorium.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RoverDriver
post Feb 15 2009, 09:46 PM
Post #300


Member
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 976
Joined: 29-September 06
From: Pasadena, CA - USA
Member No.: 1200



QUOTE (Floyd @ Feb 15 2009, 01:39 PM) *
As Tesheiner explained in the map thread, Opportunity moved backwards ~10 m and then forwand for a net gain of about 4 m. Must be a good reason for such a drive--but I'm coming up blank--Paolo can you explain? Drive images are down at the Exploratorium.


On 1797 the RF drive currents where high. My take on it was that it is due to wheel soil interaction but other felt different and we canceled the 1798 drive. On 1800 we drove backwards that in the past help redistribute the lubricant, then drove forwards the same way we drove on 1797 and we'll see what the wheel currents look like. At the end of the drive we also did a few steps in a way they match the natural curvature of the RF wheel as another test to see if the currents are back to normal.

Paolo


--------------------
Disclaimer: all opinions, ideas and information included here are my own,and should not be intended to represent opinion or policy of my employer.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

37 Pages V  « < 18 19 20 21 22 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th May 2024 - 10:33 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.