Post Solar Conjunction/Santorini Study Drive, The second leg in our Journey to Endeavor Crater |
Post Solar Conjunction/Santorini Study Drive, The second leg in our Journey to Endeavor Crater |
Feb 27 2009, 11:09 PM
Post
#361
|
|
Member Group: Admin Posts: 976 Joined: 29-September 06 From: Pasadena, CA - USA Member No.: 1200 |
Are they still dealing with that dodgy wheel? No, They are loading a new SW patch. Probably the last FSW ptch on the rovers. -------------------- Disclaimer: all opinions, ideas and information included here are my own,and should not be intended to represent opinion or policy of my employer.
|
|
|
Feb 28 2009, 04:55 AM
Post
#362
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2228 Joined: 1-December 04 From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA Member No.: 116 |
Considering the amazing longevity of these magnificent rovers, how can you suggest that this most recent update will be the last?
-------------------- ...Tom
I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast. |
|
|
Feb 28 2009, 06:03 AM
Post
#363
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8784 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Paolo, a bit OT here, but do you know if any of the MER code will be reused on MSL (or adapted for same)? Have seen a lot of this on modern airplanes.
-------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Feb 28 2009, 09:29 AM
Post
#364
|
|
Member Group: Admin Posts: 976 Joined: 29-September 06 From: Pasadena, CA - USA Member No.: 1200 |
Considering the amazing longevity of these magnificent rovers, how can you suggest that this most recent update will be the last? That's what I have been told. This update was necessary since hardcoded in theSW there was a limit of 2010 as date relative to commands. Any command dated past 2010 would have been refused. We might upload some small patched to be able to overcome malfunctions or loss of HW, but I do not believe there will be any significant change in the flight SW. Paolo -------------------- Disclaimer: all opinions, ideas and information included here are my own,and should not be intended to represent opinion or policy of my employer.
|
|
|
Feb 28 2009, 09:30 AM
Post
#365
|
|
Member Group: Admin Posts: 976 Joined: 29-September 06 From: Pasadena, CA - USA Member No.: 1200 |
Paolo, a bit OT here, but do you know if any of the MER code will be reused on MSL (or adapted for same)? Have seen a lot of this on modern airplanes. Yes. Lots of commands and sw will be reused. Some of the ground tools as well. Paolo -------------------- Disclaimer: all opinions, ideas and information included here are my own,and should not be intended to represent opinion or policy of my employer.
|
|
|
Feb 28 2009, 10:06 AM
Post
#366
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 4279 Joined: 19-April 05 From: .br at .es Member No.: 253 |
|
|
|
Feb 28 2009, 04:13 PM
Post
#367
|
|
Senior Member Group: Admin Posts: 4763 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Glendale, AZ Member No.: 197 |
Any command dated past 2010 would have been refused. There has got to be a work-around solution. Is is possible to roll back the clocks on the rovers with a carefully written routine to adress the host of other issues likely to arise? (as long as it's uploaded by 2010 ) -------------------- If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
|
|
|
Feb 28 2009, 10:02 PM
Post
#368
|
|
Member Group: Admin Posts: 976 Joined: 29-September 06 From: Pasadena, CA - USA Member No.: 1200 |
There has got to be a work-around solution. Is is possible to roll back the clocks on the rovers with a carefully written routine to adress the host of other issues likely to arise? (as long as it's uploaded by 2010 ) The workaround is the patch that has been loaded on Opportunity (for now). This new version of the FSW now can accept commands past 2010. Now we have to start thinking about how to fix the next time restriction due to Unix and Linux timespec. ;-) Paolo -------------------- Disclaimer: all opinions, ideas and information included here are my own,and should not be intended to represent opinion or policy of my employer.
|
|
|
Feb 28 2009, 11:47 PM
Post
#369
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 713 Joined: 30-March 05 Member No.: 223 |
Now we have to start thinking about how to fix the next time restriction due to Unix and Linux timespec. ;-) Paolo that will be 2038. but before this happens, we will hit the limit of the space-clock counter in the MER file names, the last navigation camera image being something like 1N999999999... on Sol 9821, Tue. 09. 09. 2031 ... approx. seven years before the UNIX time_t overflow |
|
|
Mar 1 2009, 01:56 AM
Post
#370
|
|
Member Group: Admin Posts: 976 Joined: 29-September 06 From: Pasadena, CA - USA Member No.: 1200 |
that will be 2038. but before this happens, we will hit the limit of the space-clock counter in the MER file names, the last navigation camera image being something like 1N999999999... on Sol 9821, Tue. 09. 09. 2031 ... approx. seven years before the UNIX time_t overflow I forgot about that. In either case I believe it will be someone else's problem as I will be retired by then (hopefully). Paolo. -------------------- Disclaimer: all opinions, ideas and information included here are my own,and should not be intended to represent opinion or policy of my employer.
|
|
|
Mar 1 2009, 08:44 AM
Post
#371
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2228 Joined: 1-December 04 From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA Member No.: 116 |
This has been an interesting subtopic.
At the time this code was written who would believe such a limit could be reached!!! No kidding, who would have guessed? Who could have guessed? Let's hope the coders of future exploratory missions are encouraged to be somewhat more optimistic.that will be 2038. but before this happens, we will hit the limit of the space-clock counter in the MER file names, the last navigation camera image being something like 1N999999999... on Sol 9821, Tue. 09. 09. 2031 ... approx. seven years before the UNIX time_t overflow If I am fortunate enough to remain sentient until those years, I'll be either 81 or 88 years old. Excuse me. I have to poll one or more of my various sensors, and report back. -------------------- ...Tom
I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast. |
|
|
Mar 1 2009, 08:59 AM
Post
#372
|
|
The Poet Dude Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
that will be 2038. but before this happens, we will hit the limit of the space-clock counter in the MER file names, the last navigation camera image being something like 1N999999999... on Sol 9821, Tue. 09. 09. 2031 ... approx. seven years before the UNIX time_t overflow If the rovers are still working by 2031 there'll hopefully be people on Mars more than happy to PUSH them around! -------------------- |
|
|
Mar 1 2009, 09:07 AM
Post
#373
|
|
Member Group: Admin Posts: 976 Joined: 29-September 06 From: Pasadena, CA - USA Member No.: 1200 |
This has been an interesting subtopic. No kidding, who would have guessed? Who could have guessed? Let's hope the coders of future exploratory missions are encouraged to be somewhat more optimistic. ... The limit of 2010 was a safety measure in order to prevent execution of commands that were received in error. Besides error correction code, there are some additional safety cross checks in place and this was one of them. 2010 *was* a very, very optimistic date at that time. ;-) Paolo -------------------- Disclaimer: all opinions, ideas and information included here are my own,and should not be intended to represent opinion or policy of my employer.
|
|
|
Mar 1 2009, 09:43 AM
Post
#374
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 206 Joined: 15-August 07 From: Shrewsbury, Shropshire Member No.: 3233 |
that will be 2038. but before this happens, we will hit the limit of the space-clock counter in the MER file names, the last navigation camera image being something like 1N999999999... on Sol 9821, Tue. 09. 09. 2031 ... approx. seven years before the UNIX time_t overflow Steve Squyres thinks that Oppy could drive 12 km over 2 years. I estimate that by 2031 Oppy will have travelled another 132 km. Oppy will easily reach the Miyamoto MSL landing site by then. Endeavour and Miyamoto are both visible in Tedstryk's Mariner 6 mosaic: http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...st&id=15664 On a more serious note, what are the plans when Oppy has reached Endeavour? Is there a plan to drive to the interesting hills on the South East side of Endeavour? Are there plans to drive down to the floor of Endeavour? |
|
|
Mar 1 2009, 11:55 AM
Post
#375
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 236 Joined: 5-June 08 From: Udon Thani Member No.: 4185 |
Yes. Lots of commands and sw will be reused. Some of the ground tools as well. Just supposing both MER rovers will still be active by the time MSL lands, how much load will that put on the ground-teams, SS has once commented that operating two rovers at the same time could be quite tough, would it be possible to operate 3 rovers at the same time? (Having in mind also comm-passes and relay capacity of the orbiters, DSN availability, etc). I suppose the landing-location of MSL will be very important in this aspect, if it lands "close" to one of the MER rovers this will be harder on the relay? Regards, Geert. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th May 2024 - 09:29 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |