IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

26 Pages V  « < 23 24 25 26 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
The West Valley Route
marsophile
post May 8 2009, 08:33 PM
Post #361


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 507
Joined: 10-September 08
Member No.: 4338



QUOTE (imipak @ May 8 2009, 12:00 PM) *
... I'm thinking that it's sort of like a very deep trench in an ocean floor; a sort of -- oh, what's the word? It's on the tip of my tongue... wink.gif


Mariana Trench? That seems like a good name.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post May 8 2009, 10:00 PM
Post #362





Guests






This is extraordinary news.... its such a shame they are having some mobility problems in the soft soil at the moment.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post May 8 2009, 10:36 PM
Post #363


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



QUOTE (marsophile @ May 8 2009, 02:33 PM) *
Mariana Trench? That seems like a good name.

I think he was going for an abyssal plain, something like that... smile.gif

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fran Ontanaya
post May 8 2009, 11:02 PM
Post #364


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 293
Joined: 22-September 08
From: Spain
Member No.: 4350



A bright sun falling on her, stuck in white sand, a strange behaviour... she's like Jack Sparrow at the World's End. laugh.gif

Now she only needs an army of stone crabs to get her out of there.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post May 8 2009, 11:57 PM
Post #365


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Unbelievable numbers! blink.gif
So now we know where she should go when the power levels become too low. Perhaps in one mars year time, after the campaing at VB&G is finished and after enduring yet another winter somewhere nearby, she should return here to get some "cleaning" once again. smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post May 9 2009, 01:06 AM
Post #366


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



My concern is that we may not get a chance to see Spirit come back to this place... as in you can't come back to a place you're unable to leave... huh.gif

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post May 10 2009, 02:44 AM
Post #367


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1043
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



QUOTE (dvandorn @ May 9 2009, 02:06 AM) *
you can't come back to a place you're unable to leave... huh.gif


Oh ye of little faith. She is backing out. Slowly but surely. But if there is no passable route to VB for a crippled rover then then she will be all powered up with nowhere to go.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post May 10 2009, 01:06 PM
Post #368


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (Tesheiner @ May 9 2009, 01:57 AM) *
So now we know where she should go when the power levels become too low. Perhaps in one mars year time, after the campaing at VB&G is finished and after enduring yet another winter somewhere nearby, she should return here to get some "cleaning" once again. smile.gif

I don't think we'll need to.
Now we know that we have to winter with an angle and that we have to get a place for clean up around the solstice. My choice for next solstice will be to get in between Goddard and VB (IF we can climb there) where the ridges physionomy are very much the same as where we are: a kind of col (path).
Now I'm wondering if the place where we are stucked (not for long I believe smile.gif ) is due to a material accumulation by the wind for the same reason this location is a cleaning place. If this is the case we have to know where the wind come from since the material can accumulate before the col or after... or both... which in this case will mean more sand traps in a range of 20-50 meters from where we are now.
This come from my mountainery experience essentialy with snow and winds.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nomadd22
post May 10 2009, 01:29 PM
Post #369


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 13
Joined: 6-April 09
Member No.: 4720



QUOTE (helvick @ May 8 2009, 03:00 PM) *
I know there isn't any doubt but just to reiterate the recent changes have almost all been about cleaning. At the end of March she was generating 223 watt-hours per sol, with a dust factor of 0.297 - basically 70% of possible energy was being blocked by the dust on the panels. Tau was also a bit high then at 1.19 which in effect dropped the power down by about 25-30% compared to where it is now (with Tau at 0.8).

Waaay back on Sol 577 over on Husband Hill (The first Summer Solsitice) she was generating ~900-950W-hr when Tau was at 0.8-0.9. And that was basically pristinely clean.

So now we have 656Whr at almost exactly the same time, with the same opacity. That's not pristine but it is amazing. The very first confirmed power number that I have for Spirit was 700Whr on Sol 80 although it has to be said that the actual insolation at that time was about 20% below the levels that is is right now because it was just after the SH Autumnal Equinox.

It couldn't have happened to a nicer Rover. :)


I would have expected some solar panel degradation (20%?) just from their advanced age. (Sort of like my knees) I may be a little behind on the technology, or it might be a lot less of a problem at martian light levels.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post May 10 2009, 03:08 PM
Post #370


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (Nomadd22 @ May 10 2009, 02:29 PM) *
I would have expected some solar panel degradation (20%?) just from their advanced age.



http://zeus.nascom.nasa.gov/~bfleck/SOHO/SaDeg.pdf

In deep space - closer to the sun - 13% in 6 years. I'm not sure what the contributing factors are. MER arrays are 50% further from the sun, and exposed to that sun only 50% of the time - so if sun-bathing (i.e. radiation effects) are the primary cause, then with a similar performance drop off, MER arrays would be be <5% of initial performance.

I would imagine, however, it would be impossible to separate array degradation (however small) from dust obstruction (significantly larger)

At the summit of Husband hill - so after >500 sols - Spirit was generating more electricity than the day it landed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
helvick
post May 10 2009, 03:16 PM
Post #371


Dublin Correspondent
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1799
Joined: 28-March 05
From: Celbridge, Ireland
Member No.: 220



I'm not 100% certain what the expected standard degradation rate is for the specific arrays on the MER's but for the GAInP\GaAs cell types that are used on them it is expected to be about 0.5% pa. So that's somewhere around 2.5% at this point rather than 20%. [ http://trs-new.jpl.nasa.gov/dspace/bitstre...3/1/04-2642.pdf ]. That's pretty good - I thought it was actually around 2-3% pa which would have made a much more noticeable dent in the potential energy generating capability.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post May 10 2009, 09:10 PM
Post #372


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



New images of the solar panels, from sol 1902. Looking pretty nice!
http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/spirit/na...DNP1943R0M1.JPG
Can anyone identify the circular, out-of-focus, bright area in the extreme lower right corner of this frame? The same foreground feature appears in exactly the same part of this frame, although the background has changed:
http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/spirit/na...DNP1943R0M1.JPG
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post May 10 2009, 09:20 PM
Post #373


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Pancam lens dustcovers - what pancam was looking out thru cruise - I think.

http://mpfwww.jpl.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/spa...mer2_021003.jpg


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RoverDriver
post May 11 2009, 12:11 AM
Post #374


Member
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 976
Joined: 29-September 06
From: Pasadena, CA - USA
Member No.: 1200



QUOTE (fredk @ May 10 2009, 01:10 PM) *
New images of the solar panels, from sol 1902. Looking pretty nice!
...
...


These images were taken to assess the state of the middle wheels which can be seen through the opening in the deck.

Paolo


--------------------
Disclaimer: all opinions, ideas and information included here are my own,and should not be intended to represent opinion or policy of my employer.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post May 11 2009, 04:43 AM
Post #375


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Thanks, Paolo, I don't think even the sharp eyed members of UMSF would have noticed that! It makes sense that the current emphasis would be on mobility rather than characterizing the panels.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

26 Pages V  « < 23 24 25 26 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st May 2024 - 08:36 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.