IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

62 Pages V  « < 25 26 27 28 29 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Post Block Island Meteor Studies (The Western Route), The 6th Leg in our Zig Zag Journey to Endeavour Crater
MarsIsImportant
post Oct 20 2009, 02:07 PM
Post #391


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 258
Joined: 22-December 06
Member No.: 1503



Oh. So gravity afterward is going to move them horizontally a whole meter when they topple. I don't think so. This sounds a whole lot like the pedestal theory when there clearly was not one at BI. If such toppling over billions of years was so significant, why aren't there any pedestals underneath any of the pieces of meteorites?

How can you say I forgot the movement of the sand grains and blueberries when I referred to the movement in my post?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Oct 20 2009, 02:12 PM
Post #392


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Well, I can't write about faeries riding on the backs of unicorns, bunnies hopping through enchanted forests, glorious sunrises, twin Barsoomian moonsets and marmalade skies all the time, even I need a change now and again :-)

No, seriously tho, that word just came to me when I realised how eaten away the meteorite appears, as if it's been devoured from inside. Seemed appropriate and accurate. That meteorite does look very, very ill to me. But hey, it's just some scribblings after all. smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MarsIsImportant
post Oct 20 2009, 02:21 PM
Post #393


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 258
Joined: 22-December 06
Member No.: 1503



Some seem to be forgetting that a meteorite the size of Mackinac should have left a sizable dent on the plain when it hit. So it probably did not land on the current surface. And all of these various meteorites are on the surface of the, except SI which was partially buried in a dune.

It still was on top of the hard surface below (my assumption but a good guess). The loose material starting to bury SI suggests predominant deposition rather than excavation. And remember there are no pedestals to indicate excavation.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Juramike
post Oct 20 2009, 02:23 PM
Post #394


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2785
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 1345



Does anyone know have many vertical meters have been deflated at Meridiani?


--------------------
Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Oct 20 2009, 03:22 PM
Post #395


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4247
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (MarsIsImportant @ Oct 20 2009, 12:55 PM) *
Moving grain size or smaller particles on Mars is a lot different than whole pieces that are several inches long and not round.

I went and actually measured the size of the piece in question. It's just under 4 cm across (about 1.5 inches).

I don't see a problem with such a piece being moved by wind/saltation over geological timescales. To move a metre in a billion years means moving on average a nanometre a year. That's a millionth of a millimetre a year, or something like 1/100 000 times a human hair width per year. Isn't wind/saltation supposed to have an important impact on rocks on Mars generally, moving them around over geological times?

But I'm sure there are many other possibilities as well. Shouldn't any fragments broken off on impact fall in a range of distances from the main piece (Mackinac), including some very close? Maybe some earlier surface that the meteorites sat on was more steeply sloped, so gravity could assist in moving small pieces around?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Vultur
post Oct 20 2009, 04:45 PM
Post #396


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 202
Joined: 9-September 08
Member No.: 4334



QUOTE (Stu @ Oct 19 2009, 03:06 PM) *
Just... well, see for yourselves...


Looks greenish in that picture... I suppose that's just contrast with the red soil?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Oct 20 2009, 10:04 PM
Post #397


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



QUOTE (fredk @ Oct 20 2009, 04:22 PM) *
But I'm sure there are many other possibilities as well. ...Maybe some earlier surface that the meteorites sat on was more steeply sloped, so gravity could assist in moving small pieces around?


The dunes of Meridiani come and go, don't they? Over time, I mean. That being the case, perhaps a dune rose beneath Mackinac at some point, and as the dune then eroded away there was a separation of some fragments from the meteorite, that fell away from the main body. Now Mackinac is on flat ground there's a gap between it and the fragments.

Important to remember how sloooooowly things move on Mars, and over how long a time they do that moving. It's easy to think in human terms when considering time. We really can't imagine something happening "over billions of years".


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ustrax
post Oct 21 2009, 02:09 PM
Post #398


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2168
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



New images are in...where are we?
Halfway between Oppy's previous position and the small crater due south or did she keep on roving SW?
Tesheiner?... rolleyes.gif


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fran Ontanaya
post Oct 21 2009, 02:22 PM
Post #399


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 293
Joined: 22-September 08
From: Spain
Member No.: 4350



QUOTE (fredk @ Oct 20 2009, 05:22 PM) *
But I'm sure there are many other possibilities as well.


Quakes from nearby impacts.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Oct 21 2009, 02:57 PM
Post #400


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4247
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (ustrax @ Oct 21 2009, 03:09 PM) *
New images are in...where are we?

I'm pretty sure I've found us. Extrapolate from 2038 to 2040, continuing in the same direction and same distance, to the 2041 location:
Attached Image

We've got some pretty sizable dunes close to our south now. I would guess that the next drive would be to the WSW to get onto the bedrock again and then thread between more large dunes ahead.

Of course this position isn't official until we hear from The Master! smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Oct 21 2009, 03:29 PM
Post #401


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



QUOTE (fredk @ Oct 21 2009, 04:57 PM) *
I'm pretty sure I've found us.

Right on the money! smile.gif We're just north of a pair of purgatoids.
I think that the SW heading leg will end in a sol or two and then we'll basically head south following the outcrop patches.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ustrax
post Oct 21 2009, 03:34 PM
Post #402


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2168
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



QUOTE (fredk @ Oct 21 2009, 03:57 PM) *
I'm pretty sure I've found us.


Thanks fredk!
And finally! Finally Oppy reaches the paralel of the halfway beacon on my 2nd leg of the quest for Endeavour! smile.gif
The delay has grown quite considerably, from 119 days in the previous mark to 227 currently what makes my prediction of arrival at Endeavour pass from February, 8 2010 to September, 23 2010... tongue.gif
Let's see some nice drives to catch up with the craziness! laugh.gif

Attached Image


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Oct 21 2009, 08:52 PM
Post #403


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2921
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (ustrax @ Oct 21 2009, 05:34 PM) *
what makes my prediction of arrival at Endeavour... September, 23 2010... tongue.gif

Less than a year from now will not be too bad after all


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Oct 22 2009, 02:01 PM
Post #404


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Here's a navcam mosaic made from today's post-drive images.
Attached Image

Nothing really special and the landscape is quite boring actually BUT to the right we start to identify the patches which will be the "yellow bricks" for the next couple of Kms. It's time to drive south again!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RobertEB
post Oct 22 2009, 02:36 PM
Post #405


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 57
Joined: 17-May 06
From: Houston, Texas
Member No.: 776



QUOTE (ustrax @ Oct 21 2009, 10:34 AM) *
Thanks fredk!
And finally! Finally Oppy reaches the paralel of the halfway beacon on my 2nd leg of the quest for Endeavour! smile.gif
The delay has grown quite considerably, from 119 days in the previous mark to 227 currently what makes my prediction of arrival at Endeavour pass from February, 8 2010 to September, 23 2010... tongue.gif
Let's see some nice drives to catch up with the craziness! laugh.gif

Attached Image


I think I see another meteorite laugh.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

62 Pages V  « < 25 26 27 28 29 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th May 2024 - 05:41 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.