IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

62 Pages V  « < 27 28 29 30 31 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Post Block Island Meteor Studies (The Western Route), The 6th Leg in our Zig Zag Journey to Endeavour Crater
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Oct 23 2009, 11:12 AM
Post #421





Guests






And that big crater bottom left gets my vote after they finish with Endeavour. wink.gif wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Oct 23 2009, 12:03 PM
Post #422


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



QUOTE (ustrax @ Oct 23 2009, 11:55 AM) *
btw, does that crater have a name? smile.gif


Google (Mars) is your friend. wink.gif
Attached Image


QUOTE (Sunspot @ Oct 23 2009, 01:12 PM) *
And that big crater bottom left gets my vote after they finish with Endeavour. wink.gif wink.gif

Oh! No problem at all; it's "only" 50km away...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tim53
post Oct 23 2009, 02:07 PM
Post #423


Member
***

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 136
Joined: 8-August 06
Member No.: 1022



I've been looking for Bopolu in the horizon pans, when we get to take them in that direction. I think we should be able to see it at some point, particularly as we roll off this "nose" of topography we're on and start our descent toward Endeavour - the topo also drops off to the southwest of us, and the intevening surface should 'get out of our way' soon.

-Tim.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tman
post Oct 23 2009, 02:46 PM
Post #424


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 877
Joined: 7-March 05
From: Switzerland
Member No.: 186



That should be the intervening surface in southwest direction (~227°)

http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all...GP2427R1M1.HTML

If my math is correct, in the distance of 50km the rim have to be at least 368m... eh, ~370m high to appear over a flat horizon.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Oct 23 2009, 03:09 PM
Post #425


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



QUOTE (tim53 @ Oct 23 2009, 04:07 PM) *
...
I think we should be able to see it at some point, particularly as we roll off this "nose" of topography we're on and start our descent toward Endeavour - the topo also drops off to the southwest of us, and the intevening surface should 'get out of our way' soon.


Could you point out the "high point" of our current path? More or less the point in which we could get a clear horizon view?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marz
post Oct 23 2009, 03:40 PM
Post #426


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 311
Joined: 31-August 05
From: Florida & Texas, USA
Member No.: 482



QUOTE (Tesheiner @ Oct 23 2009, 06:03 AM) *
Google (Mars) is your friend. wink.gif

Oh! No problem at all; it's "only" 50km away...


I like this thinking! laugh.gif
Let's see, we're just approaching the 19km mark, so just another 15 years and we're there?

It is interesting that of the 4 craters in that Google image, all have obvious ejacta aprons except Endeavour. Does that imply Endeavour is much more ancient, or does it hint that the geology is different? (and apologies in advance if I'm regurgitating previous posts)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
antoniseb
post Oct 23 2009, 03:58 PM
Post #427


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 235
Joined: 2-August 05
Member No.: 451



QUOTE (Marz @ Oct 23 2009, 10:40 AM) *
It is interesting that of the 4 craters in that Google image, all have obvious ejacta aprons except Endeavour. Does that imply Endeavour is much more ancient, or does it hint that the geology is different? (and apologies in advance if I'm regurgitating previous posts)


Speaking not as a geologist, but as someone who played on the beach as a kid, Endeavor looks like a crater made in wet sand.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tim53
post Oct 23 2009, 04:02 PM
Post #428


Member
***

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 136
Joined: 8-August 06
Member No.: 1022



QUOTE (Tesheiner @ Oct 23 2009, 07:09 AM) *
Could you point out the "high point" of our current path? More or less the point in which we could get a clear horizon view?


I'm off work today, so it'll have to wait until Monday. Problem is that the MOLA topography is pretty coarse in longitude in particular, so there could be higher frequency topography in the near and mid distance that isn't resolved by MOLA. Plus, we're near the edge of a large convergence angle stereo pair taken around April, so I can't see the smaller features in the stereo either. But in general we should be able to see more as we progress south and southeast from our current location. We have to take a gander periodically, which requires pointing pancam in the direction we're not driving. Probably albedo pans are our best bet for dection followed by targeted imaging. Or Navcam if the Bopolu rim is high enough to show at that scale.

-Tim.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
algorimancer
post Oct 23 2009, 04:05 PM
Post #429


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 656
Joined: 20-April 05
From: League City, Texas
Member No.: 285



QUOTE (Marz @ Oct 23 2009, 09:40 AM) *
It is interesting that of the 4 craters in that Google image, all have obvious ejacta aprons except Endeavour.

As I recall, the thought is that Endeavour is very old, and the older terrain is draped by overlying sediment. The rim of Endeavour apparently is elevated above the sediment and has a distinctly different composition than what we've seen so far ... which is why it is an interesting destination to drive towards. Oppy has been driving over the overlying sediment all along, so reaching the rim of Endeavour would be a chance to see some really new geology. An argument may also be made that water may once have pooled within Endeavour, making for further interesting geology. The other craters, being more recent, would lack all or part of the sediment draping. Iazu (to the south in the Google Mars image) has the "splosh" outline characteristic of an impact into wet/icy terrain, while Bopolu (to the southwest) seems to lack this, perhaps indicative of different eras at the time of impact.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tim53
post Oct 23 2009, 04:05 PM
Post #430


Member
***

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 136
Joined: 8-August 06
Member No.: 1022



QUOTE (Marz @ Oct 23 2009, 07:40 AM) *
I like this thinking! laugh.gif
Let's see, we're just approaching the 19km mark, so just another 15 years and we're there?

It is interesting that of the 4 craters in that Google image, all have obvious ejacta aprons except Endeavour. Does that imply Endeavour is much more ancient, or does it hint that the geology is different? (and apologies in advance if I'm regurgitating previous posts)


Endeavour is "under" the Meridiani sulfate deposits, poking through them, whereas Bopolu and Iazu formed after the deposits were laid down.

-Tim.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Oct 23 2009, 04:20 PM
Post #431


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



QUOTE (tim53 @ Oct 23 2009, 08:05 AM) *
Bopolu and Iazu formed after the deposits were laid down.


That fits with the impression I get of Bopolu that it looks like one of those "splat" craters in the icy soil regions. I'd be willing to predict that there would be evidence of flowing water on the downslope regions of the denser ejecta apron. In fact if you look at about the five o'clock position on Bopolu some river-canyon features are definitely visible which would have been cut by brief catastrophic melt/flooding.


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ustrax
post Oct 23 2009, 04:41 PM
Post #432


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2168
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



QUOTE (ElkGroveDan @ Oct 23 2009, 05:20 PM) *
river-canyon features


Mark in your agendas...canyoning on Mars with Oppy by 2015.


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Oct 23 2009, 05:02 PM
Post #433


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4247
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (Tman @ Oct 23 2009, 03:46 PM) *
If my math is correct, in the distance of 50km the rim have to be at least 368m... eh, ~370m high to appear over a flat horizon.

I agree with your math. Can anyone estimate the height of Bopolu's rim above the surrounding plains using GM or whatever?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fran Ontanaya
post Oct 23 2009, 06:21 PM
Post #434


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 293
Joined: 22-September 08
From: Spain
Member No.: 4350



Try this:
http://hrscview.fu-berlin.de/cgi-bin/ion-p...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Oct 23 2009, 07:10 PM
Post #435


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



There is an elevated 'island' almost due south of us at about the same distance. Actually it's at the end of a larger peninsula that seems to rise above the plains, perhaps part of a very large crater rim. That island does look as if it casts an appreciable shadow so might also be worth checking out if someone is working on elevations. It has the added advantage of being located front centre for a southbound traveller.

http://www.google.com/mars/#lat=-3.118576&...mp;q=spacecraft

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

62 Pages V  « < 27 28 29 30 31 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th May 2024 - 04:24 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.