IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

27 Pages V  « < 11 12 13 14 15 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
INCOMING!, Detection and observation of Earth-approaching asteroids.
Juramike
post Nov 11 2009, 09:02 PM
Post #181


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2785
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 1345



Swing and a miss!

http://www.universetoday.com/2009/11/09/su...d-buzzed-earth/


--------------------
Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
maschnitz
post Nov 11 2009, 09:38 PM
Post #182


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 60
Joined: 3-January 09
Member No.: 4520



We will apparently be seeing 2009 VA again in the 2020s and 2030s. Also, here's the orbital diagram.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Holder of the Tw...
post Nov 12 2009, 01:27 AM
Post #183


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 540
Joined: 17-November 05
From: Oklahoma
Member No.: 557



Sorry, but we will probably never be seeing it again, ever. It was poorly observed near closest approach. Unless someone has observations they have not yet turned in (a possiblility), then we're stuck with an orbit with large error margins. It is too close now to the sun to be observed, and will be too faint to see (25th magnitude) when it is back in view. And its sky location is already uncertain by a degree.

There is a 4% chance it will come within 0.2 AU of earth in 2026, and 3% in 2030. It will have to get a lot closer than that, and in the right part of the sky, to be bright enough for a survey to stumble on it again. That's even if PanSTARRS is up and running. 2009 VA is a tiny object.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_mcgyver_*
post Nov 18 2009, 06:39 PM
Post #184





Guests






I googled around and looked for info in NASA NEO site, but couldn't find any statistical data, so I'm asking it here:
how much part of the sky, and for how long in a day is monitored for approaching NEOs? I was quite surprised by the asteroid passed half the GEO orbit near Earth some days ago, being spotted only a few hours before it reached minimum distance, as I thought the sky was constantly monitored for such events.
Is it not? huh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Nov 18 2009, 08:10 PM
Post #185


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



Although there are constantly people looking at some part of the sky, the entire sky is not photographed continuously, and faint objects can (and, most often, do) slip by unobserved, or are only seen within hours of their closest approach. And don't forget that we basically have no hope of spotting previously undiscovered things that are coming at us from the dayside of Earth! But these faintest objects that are only discovered within hours of their closest approach are also the smallest and, if they were to hit us, would explode in the atmosphere on their way down; any damage on the ground is caused by direct hits from flying debris, rather than from impact effects. Larger objects are brighter and therefore discovered earlier. Only one asteroid has ever been discovered before it became an impactor -- 2008 TC3.


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greg Hullender
post Nov 18 2009, 11:21 PM
Post #186


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1018
Joined: 29-November 05
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Member No.: 590



QUOTE (mcgyver @ Nov 18 2009, 10:39 AM) *
how much part of the sky, and for how long in a day is monitored for approaching NEOs? . . . Is it not? huh.gif

Far as I know, it is not.

Although Pan-STARRS would do it, if it actually gets built.

http://pan-starrs.ifa.hawaii.edu/public/as...oid_threat.html

WISE, which should launch next month, ought to give us a MUCH better picture of what we're up against, at least.

http://wise.ssl.berkeley.edu/mission.html

--Greg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Nov 19 2009, 03:57 AM
Post #187


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



Sky Coverage from the IAU Minor Planet Center
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_PhilCo126_*
post Nov 19 2009, 09:15 AM
Post #188





Guests






Another nice meteor trail:
http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=8714738
and
http://www.heliotown.com/FB20091118_0707utAshcraft.mp4

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Nov 19 2009, 02:51 PM
Post #189


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



QUOTE
Folks at the Clark Planetarium say this rock was big--between the size of a microwave and washer-dryer unit.


I see we have a couple of new units of measure.


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Nov 19 2009, 03:51 PM
Post #190


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Microwave (Sojourner) and Washing Machine (Deep Imapct Impactor) are already on the official (but non existent) NASA scale of size objects list smile.gif

Others I know of...
Golf Cart ( MER )
Mini Cooper ( MSL )
School Bus ( Cassini )
Squash Court ( Eagle Crater )
Utah ( Hematite & Meridiani )

Thrust should be expressed in the weight of a piece of paper, or multiples of Jumbo Jets.

All rocks, described in terms of the closest representing piece of fruit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Nov 19 2009, 09:15 PM
Post #191


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



Also any extremely elongated asteroid is described in multiples of "Manhattan" with Eros being the most commonly mentioned body as "twice the size of Manhattan".


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fran Ontanaya
post Nov 19 2009, 09:58 PM
Post #192


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 293
Joined: 22-September 08
From: Spain
Member No.: 4350



The amount of propane in the atmosphere of Titan is measured in Labor Day Barbecues. ohmy.gif

I wonder how many Labor Day Barbecues of fuel are needed to provide enough Jumbo Jets of thrust to propel a Washing Machine to Ludicrous speed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Nov 19 2009, 10:14 PM
Post #193


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (djellison @ Nov 19 2009, 04:51 PM) *
Microwave (Sojourner) and Washing Machine (Deep Imapct Impactor) are already on the official (but non existent) NASA scale of size objects list smile.gif

Others I know of...

As soon as Spirit is making progress extracting herself from Troy, I don't mind new references been invented.
In France a very little distance is said as been "1/4th of a fly ass hair" (sorry for the rude reference)


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Nov 19 2009, 11:14 PM
Post #194


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



That's OK, we're used to rude Frenchmen. smile.gif


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Nov 19 2009, 11:25 PM
Post #195


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



Excuse me, but on the ships I sailed the proper term for a small quantity was 'half a gnat's cock'.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

27 Pages V  « < 11 12 13 14 15 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 02:51 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.