IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

240 Pages V  « < 31 32 33 34 35 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Opportunity Route Map
Nix
post Jul 25 2005, 05:57 AM
Post #481


Chief Assistant
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1409
Joined: 5-January 05
From: Ierapetra, Greece
Member No.: 136



Thanks for the updates dilo! Impressive work.

Nico


--------------------
photographer, space imagery enthusiast, proud father and partner, and geek.


http://500px.com/sacred-photons &
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Jul 25 2005, 03:25 PM
Post #482


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2835
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



A panoramic view of the Interstate to the south.
Erebus in the background.

Taken with the L7 Pancam on Sol 533.


jvandriel
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tty
post Jul 25 2005, 06:08 PM
Post #483


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 688
Joined: 20-April 05
From: Sweden
Member No.: 273



Have a look at this:

http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all...HP1607L0M1.HTML

I get a strong feeling that what we are seeing here is a thin layer of sand draped over a rather uneven bedrock surface. I wouldn't be in the least surprised if we have a karstic surface underneath. The small crater a few days back could just as easily have been a small doline.

tty
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Jul 25 2005, 06:15 PM
Post #484


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



QUOTE (NIX @ Jul 25 2005, 05:57 AM)
Thanks for the updates dilo! Impressive work.

Nico
*


Thanks to you, Master! wink.gif
Beautiful stitch, jvandriel...


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RNeuhaus
post Jul 25 2005, 08:06 PM
Post #485


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1636
Joined: 9-May 05
From: Lima, Peru
Member No.: 385



QUOTE (dot.dk @ Jul 24 2005, 07:42 PM)
JPL has updated the traverse map for Opportunity  smile.gif

http://marsrover.nasa.gov/mission/tm-opportunity/index.html
*


The best estimation that Oppy reach the hearth of Erberus crater is three weeks from now.

Rodolfo
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Jul 25 2005, 08:17 PM
Post #486


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



QUOTE (tty @ Jul 25 2005, 01:08 PM)
I get a strong feeling that what we are seeing here is a thin layer of sand draped over a rather uneven bedrock surface. I wouldn't be in the least surprised if we have a karstic surface underneath. The small crater a few days back could just as easily have been a small doline.
*

It *may* be karstic -- but I think the simpler answer is that the jumbled bedrock under this sand is the ejecta from Erebus and Terra Nova. They are craters, so they had to have emplaced ejecta blankets when they formed. And we're approaching their rims.

Why posit karsts to account for the uneven base of bedrock when we *know* the terrain must have been jumbled by the impacts?

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RNeuhaus
post Jul 25 2005, 08:26 PM
Post #487


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1636
Joined: 9-May 05
From: Lima, Peru
Member No.: 385



QUOTE (tty @ Jul 25 2005, 01:08 PM)
Have a look at this:

http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all...HP1607L0M1.HTML


I get a strong feeling that what we are seeing here is a thin layer of sand draped over a rather uneven bedrock surface. I wouldn't be in the least surprised if we have a karstic surface underneath. The small crater a few days back could just as easily have been a small doline.

tty
*

TTy

I agree with you, it might be the best explanation about the strange of mini-craters which the other Doug have mentioned. I tought these mini-craters might have caused by:

1) Small meteorite. It might occur but it is not so evident since there is no much debris around mini-crater. I remember that Oppy found a meteorite on the surface close to heatshield without any hole and no debris -very strange case ohmy.gif -
2) A expulsed stone from a nearby volcan. Descarted hypothesis. Not enough momentum to make such a hole.
3) Underground water filtration. Possible hypothesis. The water current might have erosioned the outcroup making a crack to underground.

and now the new hypothesis :

4) the hole follows to the strange surface of outcrop under sand.

Rodolfo
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Jul 25 2005, 11:26 PM
Post #488


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Looking carefully to Sol 533 PanCam images, closest Erebus rim is only 12 pixel (10mrad) below horizon; this should translate in a mere 150m distance! biggrin.gif
Attached Image

Meanwhile, this is the stitch+polar projection from Sol531:
Attached Image


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Jul 26 2005, 12:15 AM
Post #489


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Oops, I made a mistake, using the NavCam resolution figure instead of 0.28mrad/pixel of Pancam. dry.gif So distance is more than 400m, in agreement with last officail route maps. mad.gif !


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Jul 26 2005, 01:52 AM
Post #490





Guests






400m? I'm sure we're much closer than that. Remember that map is now about 8 days old.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Jul 26 2005, 05:23 AM
Post #491


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



QUOTE (Sunspot @ Jul 26 2005, 01:52 AM)
400m?  I'm sure we're much closer than that.  Remember that map is now about 8 days old.
*


You're right... more precisely, from last map
Attached Image
I estimated a 320m distance on Sol 528 (6 Sols ago).
An overestimated distance could arise from slightly elevated Erebus rim rolleyes.gif ... in fact, the far rim appear almost on the horizon for the same reason. wink.gif


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Aug 4 2005, 10:06 PM
Post #492


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



This is a combination of last 3 days vertical projections of NavCam Panoramas, showing the path over the etched terrain:
Attached Image

From waypoints, movement was:
SOL541: 21.9m
SOL542: 9.1m
(official odometry should be slightly higher, due to slippage and deviations from linear path...)


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Aug 4 2005, 10:20 PM
Post #493


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Trying to match up your image, with my old 1m MOC mosaic..
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Decepticon
post Aug 5 2005, 02:11 AM
Post #494


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1276
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



Dilo that map is amazing!( via_Meridiani.jpg) I hope to see more of those!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Aug 5 2005, 06:14 AM
Post #495


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



QUOTE (Decepticon @ Aug 5 2005, 02:11 AM)
Dilo that map is amazing!( via_Meridiani.jpg)  I hope to see more of those!
*


You can be sure, Decepticon! stay tuned... wink.gif


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

240 Pages V  « < 31 32 33 34 35 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th May 2024 - 02:37 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.