IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

24 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 8 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Some Statistics for Spirit & Oppy, As the journey continues on Mars
nprev
post Nov 25 2009, 02:17 AM
Post #76


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



That's an interesting perspective, Deimos. Would you say this culture change is a result of increased experience (and confidence) with Mars rover operations in general, or increased maturation of the players wink.gif, or perhaps a liitle of both?

All teasing aside, though, Sojourner was a secondary vehicle with admittedly far less capability then the MERs so its premature loss would not have been the end of the Pathfinder mission, just a degradation. This would probably foster a tendency to take greater risks with it if the potential rewards seemed at all achievable.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Jan 4 2010, 05:47 PM
Post #77


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Update on pictures and Whrs, in occasion of 6th anniversary:
Attached Image

As usual, on the left plot green curve shows cumulative pictures (Spirit only) and red is total (both rovers). Blue dotted is average pics/day from both.
Right plot shows energy in whr/sol, decay slope for Spirit is really worring...


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Jan 29 2010, 12:12 PM
Post #78


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



Spirit is less than one mission duration away from breaking Viking 2 duration of 2245 sols
Fingers crossed.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Jan 29 2010, 12:43 PM
Post #79


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Fingers crossed?!?
Nah! 90 days will be a piece of cake!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Jan 29 2010, 02:08 PM
Post #80


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



100% agree. What I was thinking was that if she sleeps at that time and dies before spring come, we'll never know if she made it.
But I'm on the optimistic side too; no doubt she'll make it and rove again.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eoincampbell
post Jan 30 2010, 06:44 AM
Post #81


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 399
Joined: 28-August 07
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 3511



I trust the Sun will look after Spirit smile.gif
Thanks for those intriguing stats Climber...


--------------------
'She drove until the wheels fell off...'
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Feb 11 2010, 09:32 AM
Post #82


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



3 milestones rounded up at the end of January 2010!
Oppy reaches 12 miles
27 km total for the Rovers
Which is 45 times more than scheduled

Also, there are more than 62 days differences between Sols and Days since landing. Except Scott Maxwell wink.gif , they all must be happy they did synchronise a while ago


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Feb 23 2010, 06:55 AM
Post #83


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



New update.
Attached Image

I'm starting to worry about Spirit power...


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Feb 23 2010, 07:27 AM
Post #84


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Scott Maxwell Tweeted:

"Below ~140W-hr/sol, we're power-negative & start dipping into batteries. Too many sols at that level & we hibernate. "

Hang in there, gal...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Feb 23 2010, 07:46 AM
Post #85


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Hoo boy. sad.gif Deus ex Machina!!!


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Feb 23 2010, 07:51 AM
Post #86


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



"Don't bet against Spirit"... <---- good advice, she's a tough one.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Mar 24 2010, 07:24 AM
Post #87


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



QUOTE (Stu @ Feb 23 2010, 08:27 AM) *
Below ~140W-hr/sol, we're power-negative & start dipping into batteries. Too many sols at that level & we hibernate.

Here we go (139Whr on sol 2203):
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Astro0
post Mar 24 2010, 08:47 AM
Post #88


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3108
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Canberra, Australia
Member No.: 615



@marsroverdriver mentioned that as IIRC, Spirit is down to 133whr as of March 22 (~ sol2210)
Hang in there girl!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Reed
post Mar 24 2010, 11:00 PM
Post #89


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 87
Joined: 17-May 08
Member No.: 4114



QUOTE (dilo @ Mar 23 2010, 11:24 PM) *
Here we go (139Whr on sol 2203):

This was mentioned in the spirit thread, but probably worth mentioning here. 140Whr is no longer the threshold for hibernation:
QUOTE (marsroverdriver)
Brilliant uplink team found way to shave Spirit's energy needs; can get by w/120ish now. Might stave off hibernation another couple weeks!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Mar 25 2010, 08:16 PM
Post #90


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



QUOTE (Deimos @ Mar 12 2009, 03:09 AM) *
Wikipedia knows all. But ...

VL1 was successfully commanded (to do the wrong thing) on sol 2252. It landed on sol 0, so that's 2253 sols of operations. The place that messed up the sols also messed up the Earth date (11/19, 1982, not 11/13).


Mark,

Sorry for replying to such an old post, but as Spirit and Opportunity are now closing in on the VL-1 record I have been trying to understand exactly what the record is.

While VL-1 was, as you say, given the faulty commands on sol 2252, as far as I can tell there was no response to that command and of course no subsequent response at all. At the time communications sessions were only being done approximately weekly, so as far as I can tell the last time that anything was actually heard from VL-1 was the previous DSN session back on sol 2245 (the date that most sources give for EOM)

I guess the question is: Is the end-of-mission, the day we broke it, or the day we last heard from it?

James


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

24 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 8 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th April 2024 - 08:29 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.