IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

24 Pages V  « < 6 7 8 9 10 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Some Statistics for Spirit & Oppy, As the journey continues on Mars
briv1016
post May 20 2010, 01:43 AM
Post #106


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 239
Joined: 18-December 07
From: New York
Member No.: 3982



Now that Opportunity has surpassed Viking 1 in mission duration (longest surface mission) I tried to find some orbital spacecraft for new milestones.


Mission, Orbital Insertion-Mission Ended, Duration, Date Spirit Should Surpass

Galileo, 12/07/1995-09/21/2003, 2846 days, 10/19/2011
MGS, 09/11/1997-11/05/2006, 3343 days, 02/27/2013
PV*, 12/04/1978-10/08/1992, 5058 days, 11/08/2017

*Pioneer Venus


Mars Odyssey and both Voyagers entered operation before MER and hopefully won't be ending for a long, long time. wink.gif
(All figures are hopefully within a day or two. Feel free to correct me.)


Edit: BTW, Odyssey should be surpassing MGS in "at Mars duration" on December 18th.

Edit Edit: Corrected for VP end of mission date. (Thank you Paolo.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post May 20 2010, 05:22 AM
Post #107


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



QUOTE (briv1016 @ May 20 2010, 03:43 AM) *
**Wikipedia has PV ending "August 1992." If you have a more precise date, please correct me.


PV was lost on 8 October 1992 and was still transmitting when it "aerobraked"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Jun 9 2010, 05:27 PM
Post #108


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Time for an update...

Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Jun 9 2010, 06:12 PM
Post #109





Guests






The upturn in energy for Opportunity is the result of minor panel cleaning events rather than coming out of the winter solstice.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MoreInput
post Jun 18 2010, 09:26 PM
Post #110


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 194
Joined: 3-January 10
Member No.: 5156



hi Dilo!

Is it possible to post the raw data of your diagrams?
Just to play with it and make some stupid statistics on my own.

thanks,
Moreinput


--------------------
Need more input ...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Jun 19 2010, 06:24 AM
Post #111


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Sure, this is my updated file in .xls format (original is .ods, but I think is limited in compatibility)- I removed plots-
Attached File(s)
Attached File  MER_statistics_noplots.xls ( 355K ) Number of downloads: 330
 


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Jul 3 2010, 05:43 PM
Post #112


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



My monthly update:
Attached Image

Great energy increase in the 2nd half of June!


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PDP8E
post Jul 16 2010, 01:41 AM
Post #113


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 808
Joined: 10-October 06
From: Maynard Mass USA
Member No.: 1241



Here is a graph showing the weekly values of Opportunity's Watt Hours, Tau, and Dust Factor (as stated in the weekly Opportunity Updates on the main Mars Rover website) from January 2010 to July 15, 2010.

Attached Image


Low tau's are good -- high dust factors are good.
A tau of 4.7 is a 99% blocked atmosphere - we are in a very clear sky period ( t=0.2)
I am assuming a dust factor of 1.0 is how Oppy left the clean-room.

Notice when Tau goes up (sol 2253) and the Dust Factor goes down, the power goes down. And when tau is very low (sol 2300) and the dust has been cleaned off (0.7) the power zooms (for what is available in winter!). The winter solstice was Sol 2260 ( i think?)

For a review of Tau, I refer you to Emily's awesome recap of the (click) 2007 Dust Storm
I haven't found a good description of the dust factor yet(!)

Cheers



--------------------
CLA CLL
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Jul 16 2010, 09:49 AM
Post #114


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Cool plot, thanks PDP8E!


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jul 16 2010, 02:04 PM
Post #115


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (PDP8E @ Jul 16 2010, 02:41 AM) *
Here is a graph

I've been hoping someone would do that! Thanks PDP. That shows nicely how we've climbed out of the 50% dust factor level we'd been mired in for so long.

One little request: would you consider showing the individual data points the next time you do a plot?
QUOTE
I haven't found a good description of the dust factor yet(!)

There's not much to it - it's just the percentage of light that gets through the dust coating the panels. It drops as dust settles onto the arrays (usually slowly), and rises as wind gusts clean the arrays off (can be very suddenly).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PDP8E
post Jul 16 2010, 07:53 PM
Post #116


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 808
Joined: 10-October 06
From: Maynard Mass USA
Member No.: 1241



Thanks Dilo and FredK

I was wondering if Tau was zero and the dust factor was 100% what are the Whrs differences between Winter solstice and Summer solstice. A nice sine function between those points should give you the maximum possible Whrs on any given Martian day (depending on latitude)




--------------------
CLA CLL
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jul 16 2010, 08:54 PM
Post #117


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



That's an interesting question. Presumably it wouldn't be precisely a sinusoid, even if the solar arrays were level. In addition to the varying incidence angle, the total hours that the Sun is up vary with time of year. And the incidence angles in morning and late afternoon are low even when the Sun climbs high at local summer. I'm sure someone has done an accurate calculation...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Jul 17 2010, 03:14 PM
Post #118


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



Some of Helvick's early posts in the old Whrs thread have a max power curve - for example here

Remember the days when we thought 400Whrs was needed to do anything, and rover death was at 290? smile.gif


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
brellis
post Jul 17 2010, 08:56 PM
Post #119


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 754
Joined: 9-February 07
Member No.: 1700



For baseball nuts who love stats: Considering the 70m restraint vs. now driving three sols in a row, I wonder what distance record Oppy might set for some period of time like 3 or 5 or 10 or 100 sols.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Jul 29 2010, 08:18 AM
Post #120


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



I need to slightly anticipate my monthly update because I could have some connection trouble in the next month due to home transfer... sad.gif
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

24 Pages V  « < 6 7 8 9 10 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th April 2024 - 12:35 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.