IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

15 Pages V  « < 7 8 9 10 11 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Where is New Horizons now
yaohua2000
post Jun 12 2010, 02:00 AM
Post #121


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 86
Joined: 12-October 05
From: Beijing
Member No.: 526



smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
illexsquid
post Jun 14 2010, 07:14 PM
Post #122


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 24
Joined: 29-May 08
From: Seattle, USA
Member No.: 4162



Another halfway point today:

Halfway Heliocentric Distance Traveled from Earth at Launch to Pluto at Flyby

June 14, 2010

16.946 AU

(from Dr. Alan.)

IMHO the "real" halfway point is the time one (days from launch to encounter) and that's in October. Tick, tick, tick....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Alan Stern
post Jun 15 2010, 01:53 PM
Post #123


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 529
Joined: 19-February 05
Member No.: 173





....And half way from launch (19 Jan 2006) to Pluto encounter ops start (4 Jan 2015) comes next month, on July 13th.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greg Hullender
post Jul 2 2010, 04:44 PM
Post #124


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1018
Joined: 29-November 05
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Member No.: 590



Spaceflight now reports a small course correction for NH.

http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n1007/02newhorizons/

If I recall correctly, NH has enjoyed a larger-than-planned surplus of fuel after launch. I'm wondering how well that's holding up, since obviously it increases the options for a KBO encounter after Pluto.

--Greg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Alan Stern
post Jul 3 2010, 01:24 PM
Post #125


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 529
Joined: 19-February 05
Member No.: 173



QUOTE (Greg Hullender @ Jul 2 2010, 05:44 PM) *
Spaceflight now reports a small course correction for NH.

http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n1007/02newhorizons/

If I recall correctly, NH has enjoyed a larger-than-planned surplus of fuel after launch. I'm wondering how well that's holding up, since obviously it increases the options for a KBO encounter after Pluto.

--Greg


Greg- It's holding up well. We expect to have about 160 m/s for KBO targeting. The preflight predict was about half that.

-Alan
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
xtruel
post Jul 5 2010, 04:50 PM
Post #126


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 1-August 08
Member No.: 4280



Twice more fuel means four times more reachable places - I wonder how it translates into hoped-for sizes of encountered objects.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tasp
post Jul 5 2010, 05:55 PM
Post #127


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 903
Joined: 30-January 05
Member No.: 162



Excellent news regarding the fuel margin. I hope the luxury of being 'picky' about which follow on object(s) to explore occurs.


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Alan Stern
post Jul 10 2010, 10:56 PM
Post #128


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 529
Joined: 19-February 05
Member No.: 173



QUOTE (tasp @ Jul 5 2010, 06:55 PM) *
Excellent news regarding the fuel margin. I hope the luxury of being 'picky' about which follow on object(s) to explore occurs.


5 years from Wednesday, we reach Pluto! 5 years from tomorrow, 3.2 days out, we get our best look at the "farside" hemispheres of Pluto and Charon.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Jul 10 2010, 11:07 PM
Post #129


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



My how time flies. I can remember when NH was on the drawing boards thinking it was so far in the future as to nullify any excitement I had over it. But wow, just five years. Marking it on my Outlook calendar now.


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jul 10 2010, 11:11 PM
Post #130


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



5 years to go...wow. Seems like launch was literally yesterday; must be getting old! tongue.gif


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Jul 27 2010, 10:45 PM
Post #131


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



There is a new release on the New Horizons web site with distant images of Jupiter and Neptune
http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/news_center/news/20100727.php
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Jul 28 2010, 05:50 AM
Post #132


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



Whoua! I would have said a Venus like picture instead of a Moon like picture... and Nasa has invented a new mesurement unit: LORRI Pixels


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NW71
post Aug 10 2010, 09:40 PM
Post #133


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 71
Joined: 19-January 10
From: Grimsby, N.E. Lincs, UK
Member No.: 5179




I see New Horizons has just passed another milestone - she is now 2.5bn kms from Earth
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JGodbaz
post Aug 11 2010, 10:32 AM
Post #134


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 16
Joined: 30-March 08
Member No.: 4078



QUOTE (Paolo @ Jul 28 2010, 10:45 AM) *
There is a new release on the New Horizons web site with distant images of Jupiter and Neptune.


The images don't really look all that high quality -- did they not do proper bias/flat field calibration or is there something I'm missing? Certainly I would expect a fair bit of shot noise, but...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Aug 11 2010, 12:04 PM
Post #135


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Looking at the Jupiter image, my impression is that it was "brightened", as in reduced contrast (well, reduced compared to how it's normally reproduced) to show the Galilean satellites. This would also bring out low level noise, especially ratty noise like that given the really short exposure setting.

The detector and its gain isn't optimized for such short (9 ms) exposures, it was optimized for an order of magnitude longer exposures needed at Pluto. Even in the Jupiter flyby images it could be seen the images are distinctly noisier when exposure was kept shorter to avoid too much saturation.

The shot noise in the background could also be due to scattered light from looking that close to the sun.

In short, the conditions were far from optimal for LORRI.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

15 Pages V  « < 7 8 9 10 11 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th April 2024 - 06:13 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.