IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

7 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Arrival At Etched Terrain
Burmese
post Aug 4 2005, 01:09 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 252
Joined: 27-April 05
Member No.: 365



Well, with Oppy on solid ground now I think we can say she has officially arrived at the Etched terrain.

On a side note, is it my imagination, or is the dust in the air clearing a lot the past few days? I haven't seen a shot this clear in ages...or perhaps this etched terrain is on slightly higher ground than the surround sea of dunes?

http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all...47P0607L0M1.JPG
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Aug 4 2005, 01:22 PM
Post #2


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



Oppy should be able to traverse more quickly over this rocky ground. Is Victoria peeking up from the horizon ?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Aug 4 2005, 01:30 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



> Oppy should be able to traverse more quickly over this rocky ground.

Yes, but see that there are more sandy terrain until we reach Erebus.

> Is Victoria peeking up from the horizon ?

As already said before, Victoria is below the current line of sight.
It won't be visible until a point more or less at the half-way between Erebus and Victoria.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RNeuhaus
post Aug 4 2005, 02:55 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1636
Joined: 9-May 05
From: Lima, Peru
Member No.: 385



I see that around there, etched terrain, there are more outcrop than the north way from the Endurance crater. The question is why it is so?

1) The land is higher than the north?

2) This zone has stronger or more often winds?

3) The water started to flow first around Erebus?

4) "By that time there were more Roman cart traffic?

Rodolfo.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Richard Trigaux_*
post Aug 5 2005, 09:50 AM
Post #5





Guests






With my opinion Erebus, like Bonneville, is not a major scientific target, as it is filled with sand and probably dangerous to try to descend in. So it is possible that they even not attempt to get closer, taking a short cut through etched terrain toward Victoria. The later is anyway an important target, at it may exhibits a much thicker layer of evaporites than Endurance. So the situation is similar to Endurance, but there may be no way to descend into Victoria, or no way to get out.
At last we are now sure that etched terrain is exposed layers of evaporites.
But with RNeuhaus I wonder why terrains are so different, while sharing the same geological properties (20-40cms of sand on evaporites):
-Near Endurance, flat terrain with only small ripples
-Near Viking, larger dunes
-An now round Victoria-Erebus, dunes separated by troughs hollowed down to the evaporite layer.

Would it be wind channels on Mars? And why?
Maybe the ration sand/blueberries is responsible for the dunes variations? or some component of the evaporites?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Aug 5 2005, 10:47 AM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



Erebus is potentially an important target since it is a deep excavation in the Evaporite sequence which has much of the ejecta weathered and eroded away. We are essentially left with a big road cut: although the interior of Erebus is sand-filled, the walls are visible With Victoria, it is newer and fresher and has a huge ejecta blanket obscuring details.

IMO, a significant target here ought to the "dark basal unit" (D1, D2 and those &%$# dark angular pieces we see) since it is something we didn't see at Endurance.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TheChemist
post Aug 5 2005, 11:44 AM
Post #7


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 524
Joined: 24-November 04
From: Heraklion, GR.
Member No.: 112



Let's see what the science instruments tell us about the etched terrain outcrop.
It seems the weekend will be spent there :
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cugel
post Aug 5 2005, 11:03 PM
Post #8


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 153
Joined: 11-December 04
Member No.: 120



QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Aug 5 2005, 10:47 AM)
Erebus is potentially an important target since it is a deep excavation in the Evaporite sequence which has much  of the ejecta weathered and eroded away.  We are essentially left with a big road cut: although the interior of Erebus is sand-filled, the walls are visible  With Victoria, it is newer and fresher and has a huge ejecta blanket obscuring details.

IMO, a significant target here ought to the "dark basal unit" (D1, D2 and those &%$# dark angular pieces we see) since it is something we didn't see at Endurance.

--Bill
*


Bill,

Looking at the map there might be some pretty hefty dune fields between Oppy and those targets (D1, D2). Driving through Erebus itself seems totally out of the question, so how likely is it that we can reach these outcrops? On this side of the crater there doesn't seem to be so much interesting stuff, does it? And how much topography does the etched terrain actually offer? Between this location and Victoria it seems to be as flat as a pancake. Maybe this is enough reason to put the pettle to the metal and try to reach Victoria ASAP?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Aug 6 2005, 01:34 AM
Post #9


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



There may be dune fields, but there is also the evaporite pavement along the north side of Erebus, which might be easily travelled. We'll see what it looks like once we get to Erebus.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Richard Trigaux_*
post Aug 6 2005, 08:22 AM
Post #10





Guests






Bill,


the evaporite pavement near Erebus is already known, and there is no hope to go deeper in Erebus than in Endurance, so I think it is why Erebus is not an important science target.
On the other hand, there is this pavement you mention along the norh side of Erebus, that may be easily traversed. (At rough guess, as it seems that there are many "Anatolia type" pits and cracks in the etched terrain). If they choose this path, they could spare some days to have a look into Erebus.
What makes Victoria very interesting, is that it is much deeper than Endurance, and so deeper layers of evaporite may be exposed, eventually underlying layers of another nature (which seem black in comparison with the evaporites). So They will certainly try to descend into Victoria, even if they could never get out of it. A similar bargain was made when discussing about descending into Endurance.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Aug 6 2005, 02:25 PM
Post #11


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



New PanCam images!
This is the full-res stitch from L2+L7 filters:

Attached Image


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Vladimorka
post Aug 6 2005, 04:13 PM
Post #12


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 42
Joined: 31-March 05
From: Sofia, Bulgaria
Member No.: 224



And we have a RAT - the first RAT in many months!!!
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all...47P2573R1M1.JPG
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DEChengst
post Aug 6 2005, 04:48 PM
Post #13


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 270
Joined: 29-December 04
From: NLA0:
Member No.: 133



QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Aug 5 2005, 11:50 AM)
So it is possible that they even not attempt to get closer, taking a short cut through etched terrain toward Victoria. The later is anyway an important target, at it may exhibits a much thicker layer of evaporites than Endurance. So the situation is similar to Endurance, but there may be no way to descend into Victoria, or no way to get out.
*


You wouldn't need to go into Victoria crater to examine the deeper layers. After all Victoria is a crater so you could examine the ejecta to measure the same stuff. Ofcourse this wouldn't give you direct information about the depth the stuff came from, but miniTES might help there. Also I think it wouldn't be a big deal if you could get in, but couldn't get out. I guess that other stuff that's different enough from what we've already seen to make it scientifically worthwhile, is probably way too far away to reach it. So going into Victoria and dying there may be very well the right choice.


--------------------
PDP, VAX and Alpha fanatic ; HP-Compaq is the Satan! ; Let us pray daily while facing Maynard! ; Life starts at 150 km/h ;
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jeff7
post Aug 6 2005, 05:16 PM
Post #14


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 477
Joined: 2-March 05
Member No.: 180



QUOTE (dilo @ Aug 6 2005, 09:25 AM)
New PanCam images!
This is the full-res stitch from L2+L7 filters:

Attached Image

*

Yikes, some of those dunes look pretty darn big.

Loads of exposed rock all over the place here too. Hopefully the wind will have granted us safe passage between the dunes. I too would like to see Victoria. I wonder how many Pancam shots it'd take to get a rim-based panorama of that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
um3k
post Aug 6 2005, 10:57 PM
Post #15


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 345
Joined: 2-May 05
Member No.: 372



QUOTE (Jeff7 @ Aug 6 2005, 01:16 PM)
Yikes, some of those dunes look pretty darn big.

Loads of exposed rock all over the place here too. Hopefully the wind will have granted us safe passage between the dunes. I too would like to see Victoria. I wonder how many Pancam shots it'd take to get a rim-based panorama of that.
*

The same number of shots that it would take to get a panorama of anything else. tongue.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

7 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th May 2024 - 11:58 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.