IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Martian Hydrology
ngunn
post Nov 23 2010, 08:46 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



An interesting article from Space Daily today: http://www.marsdaily.com/reports/Shallow_G...n_Mars_999.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
marsbug
post Nov 27 2010, 08:53 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 401
Joined: 5-January 07
From: Manchester England
Member No.: 1563



How big would such an aquifer need to be to be picked up by SHARAD? We know there is a fair bit of relatively low lattitude ice a few meters beneath the martian surface, so wouldn't we expect to have seen some evidence if aquifers if this were happening in the present day?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Nov 27 2010, 09:18 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



I'm curious about this too, and my ignorance of the workings of ground penetrating radar knows no bounds. Maybe someone can enlighten us. Can SHARAD and MARDI distinguish between ice and liquid water? (A seismic survey - now that would be another thing.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
marsbug
post Nov 27 2010, 09:45 PM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 401
Joined: 5-January 07
From: Manchester England
Member No.: 1563



A very quick bit of reading tells me that SHARAD has avertical resolution of 15 to 20 meters. The electrical ( and hence radar) properties of water are different from those of ice so at a very very ill informed guess I'd say that SHARAD probably could distinguish between the two. So assuming my guess is near the mark the question is what is the vertical extent of these possible aquifers?



--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Nov 27 2010, 10:14 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



We know that Mars has plenty of H2O, and that like any other world it gets warmer as you go down, so I think their must be liquid water at some depth on Mars (to be drilled for perhaps by future inhabitants). Of course when it has the temerity to appear at the surface it immediately freezes and pretty soon sublimes away, so we're looking at the dry rind of a wet planet.
How near the surface the liqiud phase gets and how often are great questions. I hope we get answers from the current generation of Mars explorers.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Den
post Dec 7 2010, 06:39 PM
Post #6


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 59
Joined: 12-November 09
Member No.: 5039



QUOTE (ngunn @ Nov 27 2010, 11:14 PM) *
We know that Mars has plenty of H2O, and that like any other world it gets warmer as you go down, so I think their must be liquid water at some depth on Mars (to be drilled for perhaps by future inhabitants). Of course when it has the temerity to appear at the surface it immediately freezes and pretty soon sublimes away, so we're looking at the dry rind of a wet planet.
How near the surface the liqiud phase gets and how often are great questions.


If temp rises by ~30 C with every kilometer, then liquid water should be at about three kilometers down.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ZLD
post Dec 7 2010, 07:15 PM
Post #7


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 555
Joined: 27-September 10
Member No.: 5458



Quoting the Wikipedia entry on Martian Climate:

QUOTE
Differing values have been reported for the average temperature on Mars, with a common value being −55 °C. Surface temperatures have been estimated from the Viking Orbiter Infrared Thermal Mapper data; this gives extremes from a warmest of 27 °C to −143 °C at the winter polar caps. Actual temperature measurements from the Viking landers range from −17.2 °C to −107 °C.


If that's true, then water could very possibly be just meters below the surface in some areas during daytime hours based on the lander estimates and could reside as liquid on the surface (if it was to get there) for extended periods according to the oribiter.

For comparison, Antarctica's climate ranges from -80°C at the pole to 15 °C on the coasts.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Dec 7 2010, 07:26 PM
Post #8


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Den and ZLD - you're both forgetting one vital part of this puzzle. Air Pressure.

Surface conditions on Mars - at the very warmest - are playing around at the triple point of water. There would only be a tiny temperature window between ice melting, and evaporating away.

http://www.cims.nyu.edu/~gladish/teaching/...ase-diagram.jpg

There are times and places where liquid water could exist on the surface of Mars. Those times are uncommon, and brief.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ZLD
post Dec 7 2010, 08:06 PM
Post #9


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 555
Joined: 27-September 10
Member No.: 5458



And most people forget that the ground has pressure as well. wink.gif

Edit: I guess I overlooked your last line. Yes, in this sense, it would be rare for liquid water to ever exist on the surface of Mars. However, honestly I have no idea what temperature water would need to be to exist as liquid. I will have to calculate that out.

Edit 2: Heres and interesting link. I found this on a quick search. Looks like a good read for this thread.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Dec 7 2010, 08:54 PM
Post #10


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



That paper is 10 years old, and many other studies since have suggested alternative mechanisms for those landslides - including dry dust avalanches, CO2 sublimation etc. The wet theory behind them is less popular than a decade ago.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Den
post Dec 8 2010, 02:00 AM
Post #11


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 59
Joined: 12-November 09
Member No.: 5039



QUOTE (ZLD @ Dec 7 2010, 08:15 PM) *
Quoting the Wikipedia entry on Martian Climate:

If that's true, then water could very possibly be just meters below the surface in some areas during daytime hours


No, it can't. Subsurface temperature quickly - in less than 20 meters - settles to year-average. Thus, even on Mars equator the subsurface temperature is about -40 C IIRC.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Den
post Dec 8 2010, 02:03 AM
Post #12


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 59
Joined: 12-November 09
Member No.: 5039



QUOTE (djellison @ Dec 7 2010, 08:26 PM) *
Den and ZLD - you're both forgetting one vital part of this puzzle. Air Pressure.

Surface conditions on Mars - at the very warmest - are playing around at the triple point of water. There would only be a tiny temperature window between ice melting, and evaporating away.


I never forget that. But with having positive Celsius temps a few *kilometers* down means than any vapor has ample time to re-freeze while it creeps through pores towards surface. I think over time this creates an extensive subsurface layer of permafrost, nearly airtight and impenetrable for water vapor from below.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Den
post Dec 8 2010, 02:19 AM
Post #13


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 59
Joined: 12-November 09
Member No.: 5039



QUOTE (ZLD @ Dec 7 2010, 09:06 PM) *
And most people forget that the ground has pressure as well. wink.gif

Edit: I guess I overlooked your last line. Yes, in this sense, it would be rare for liquid water to ever exist on the surface of Mars. However, honestly I have no idea what temperature water would need to be to exist as liquid. I will have to calculate that out.


Water needs 0 C or 273 K to become liquid. Even on Mars. Melting temp depends only weakly on pressure.

QUOTE
Edit 2: Heres and interesting link. I found this on a quick search. Looks like a good read for this thread.


Here is an photo example of mini-gullies on Earth which definitely are not formed by water:
http://uploaded.fresh.co.il/2007/03/16/46040681.jpg

Attached Image


I know it is far from being scientific, but still...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ZLD
post Dec 8 2010, 03:47 AM
Post #14


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 555
Joined: 27-September 10
Member No.: 5458



QUOTE (Den @ Dec 8 2010, 03:19 AM) *
Water needs 0 C or 273 K to become liquid. Even on Mars. Melting temp depends only weakly on pressure.


That isn't really all that true. Pressure can play a large part in the melting point, especially when you consider other factors such as water purity. Seawater for instance, freezes at -2C which is quite a big difference. Also, as pressure increases, melting points definitely do decrease, which is what allows Lake Vostok to remain (likely) in liquid form. Similarly, aquifers could exist at somewhat shallow (>1km) depths under Martian soil so long as the pressure exists. What would need to be determined then is, at what depth does this pressure exist?

Secondly, I never brought up the gullies. I am fully aware of the current hypothesis surrounding them. I was at work when I posted that link and didn't have a chance to fully read it. I only posted it because it seemed to have some information that related to this topic and I apologize for it not suiting that goal entirely.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Dec 8 2010, 05:11 AM
Post #15


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



QUOTE (Den @ Dec 7 2010, 06:19 PM) *
Melting temp depends only weakly on pressure.

That may be true but the boiling point of water depend quite a bit on pressure. And under most ambient Martian pressure conditions the boiling point is a fraction of a degree above and sometimes equal-to your melting point. As a result you are never going to have liquid water beyond a few fleeting moments under extremely rare conditions.

Best to leave your goldfish at home there's no stable liquid water on Mars.


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th March 2024 - 07:32 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.