IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

104 Pages V  « < 37 38 39 40 41 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Post Conjunction: Santa Maria to Cape York, The Journey to 'Spirit Point'
Poolio
post Jun 12 2011, 01:21 PM
Post #571


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 128
Joined: 28-October 08
From: Boston, MA
Member No.: 4469



QUOTE (kenny @ Jun 12 2011, 06:43 AM) *
We've already had one Apollo craft name, Gumdrop, the Command Module from Apollo 9.

Yes, and we had Yankee Clipper and Intrepid shortly before arriving at Santa Maria. Plus we can't forget that the very first crater we saw was named Eagle. And although it wasn't a direct Apollo reference, Endeavour was the name of the Apollo 15 CSM.

Personally though I think it would be great to have a crater named "Snoopy".
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Floyd
post Jun 12 2011, 09:21 PM
Post #572


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 910
Joined: 4-September 06
From: Boston
Member No.: 1102



QUOTE (Tesheiner @ Jun 7 2011, 04:41 PM) *
Scott Maxwell tweeted: "What's better than driving a Mars rover? Driving a Mars rover with Paolo. Today, maybe ~ 100m with drive-by imaging of a crater for Matt G.".

Anyone know if they got the drive-by images. If they did, must be lower priority than dirve direction images.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Jun 12 2011, 09:40 PM
Post #573


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



QUOTE (Stu @ Jun 12 2011, 05:10 AM) *
3D view of "Crater Cluster"...

Looks like a corduroy jacket with cigarette burns.


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Jun 12 2011, 09:57 PM
Post #574


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



QUOTE (Floyd @ Jun 12 2011, 10:21 PM) *
Anyone know if they got the drive-by images.


That's the question I've been holding off asking all day because I don't like to sound impatient laugh.gif .

I think they must have, but I don't know. I want to see the southern horizon.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Jun 12 2011, 10:01 PM
Post #575


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



QUOTE (Floyd @ Jun 12 2011, 10:21 PM) *
Anyone know if they got the drive-by images. If they did, must be lower priority than dirve direction images.


Yes, they were taken (Don't expect anything spectacular though, a single colour pancan of a 'ray' and some navcams)

And yes, images like this always have a much lower priority, drive images are needed right away to plan the next drive, science ones can sometimes take weeks to make it down.


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Jun 12 2011, 10:29 PM
Post #576


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



James, you obviously know exactly what to expect. Can you point us to the source of that information?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Jun 13 2011, 12:55 AM
Post #577


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



It's interesting to note that from "crater cluster" to Spirit Point, Opportunity has about the same distance to traverse as Spirit did on its trek from Bonneville Crater to West Spur in the Columbia Hills. Who could have known such a comparison could be made seven years later!
Attached Image

Source maps:
http://marsrover.nasa.gov/mission/tm-spiri...rit-sol517.html
http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...st&p=173814
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Jun 13 2011, 02:24 AM
Post #578


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



... or viewed in the context of "almost there."


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jun 13 2011, 06:08 AM
Post #579


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (ngunn @ Jun 12 2011, 03:29 PM) *
James, you obviously know exactly what to expect. Can you point us to the source of that information?


The Pancam tracking database holds that information. What's planned. What's taken. What's yet to be transmitted. What's received.

My advice would be to just enjoy the results of those who know where it is and how to use it. It's hard to use, slow, and a very constrained resource.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Jun 13 2011, 07:51 AM
Post #580


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



QUOTE (djellison @ Jun 13 2011, 07:08 AM) *
advice


Taken! smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Floyd
post Jun 13 2011, 09:15 AM
Post #581


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 910
Joined: 4-September 06
From: Boston
Member No.: 1102



Thanks for the information James--as expected on priority.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Jun 13 2011, 02:53 PM
Post #582


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



Yes, as Doug says the information is from the tracking site which is a massively useful resource (map making, MMB metadata, thumbnail images, planned sequences, etc.) and as such the last thing we want to do is overuse it hand have it closed off.

For those of you who don't know, over recent weeks I've started posting a daily tweet summarizing what Oppy is up to based largely on the tracking data. So even less reason for others to need to query the database themselves. smile.gif

http://twitter.com/nivnac

James


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jun 13 2011, 07:43 PM
Post #583


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4247
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (Floyd @ Jun 12 2011, 09:21 PM) *
Anyone know if they got the drive-by images.

Some navcams are now down:
http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...0M1.JPG?sol2621
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
charborob
post Jun 13 2011, 07:54 PM
Post #584


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1074
Joined: 21-September 07
From: Québec, Canada
Member No.: 3908



Gemini 5 crater navcam panorama:
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
antoniseb
post Jun 13 2011, 08:44 PM
Post #585


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 235
Joined: 2-August 05
Member No.: 451



Full inline quote removed. You've been here > half a decade - you should know better - ADMIN

Wow, I don't recall ever seeing such clear images showing that the rocks excavated by the crater formation landed after the dune formation... and that the dunes haven't substantially moved since then.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

104 Pages V  « < 37 38 39 40 41 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th May 2024 - 05:26 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.