IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

32 Pages V  « < 17 18 19 20 21 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Cape York, Landfall!
Ant103
post Aug 19 2011, 11:44 PM
Post #271


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1619
Joined: 12-February 06
From: Bergerac - FR
Member No.: 678



And… hmmm… Yet, another Tisdale wink.gif



--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
empebe
post Aug 19 2011, 11:47 PM
Post #272


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 26
Joined: 15-July 10
Member No.: 5388



Phew ! smile.gif
When I posted my rambling thanks I was on page 6, and hadn't quite grasped what 12 more pages could hold.
Ye gods and little fishes - I am the 5000.
Thank you all, I will bathe my red eyes, got to bed and dream of eating pineapples on an aircraft carrier. smile.gif smile.gif smile.gif
Mike
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eoincampbell
post Aug 19 2011, 11:53 PM
Post #273


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 399
Joined: 28-August 07
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 3511



Has there been a reference to Tisdale_1 ?
Could the team have spotted a post-split sibling ?


--------------------
'She drove until the wheels fell off...'
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Aug 19 2011, 11:59 PM
Post #274


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1043
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



QUOTE (Ipparchus @ Aug 19 2011, 03:56 PM) *
Guys, do you know what happened to the excellent site: marsgeo.com ? Has it just changed name or is it deleted?

It just disappeared during the trek to Victoria. One day it was there and the next the site name was up for grabs. It was an absolutely outstanding explanation and analysis of the early MER findings and now a reminder of the ephemeral nature of internet based information. I wish I had copied it page by page.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Aug 20 2011, 01:27 AM
Post #275


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



This MUST be the most fascinating rock Oppy's come across in a long, long time...

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nocturne
post Aug 20 2011, 05:42 AM
Post #276


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 29-September 06
Member No.: 1195



QUOTE (serpens @ Aug 19 2011, 03:59 PM) *
It just disappeared during the trek to Victoria. One day it was there and the next the site name was up for grabs. It was an absolutely outstanding explanation and analysis of the early MER findings and now a reminder of the ephemeral nature of internet based information. I wish I had copied it page by page.


Some portions may be recoverable here

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kenny
post Aug 20 2011, 07:11 AM
Post #277


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 547
Joined: 1-May 06
From: Scotland (Ecosse, Escocia)
Member No.: 759



QUOTE (kenny @ Aug 14 2011, 02:16 PM) *
Seeing two flat white rocks here at Odyssey crater makes me wonder if a block has been split along the line of one of those white veins we saw earlier poking out the ground.


http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...st&id=25257

It looks like there might be a counterpart to Tinsdale laying on the ground further north.


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
walfy
post Aug 20 2011, 08:07 AM
Post #278


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 404
Joined: 5-January 10
Member No.: 5161



Tisdale foredeck just came down.

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
walfy
post Aug 20 2011, 08:29 AM
Post #279


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 404
Joined: 5-January 10
Member No.: 5161



I think this is the view left of Tisdale now, contrast cranked up to boost 3D effect (more uniformly a dull gray, otherwise). There's a stepped, lighter-toned rock back there, partly submerged, with the two big darker-toned rocks on top of it. Very interesting.

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Aug 20 2011, 10:56 AM
Post #280


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



QUOTE (eoincampbell @ Aug 20 2011, 01:53 AM) *
Has there been a reference to Tisdale_1 ?
Could the team have spotted a post-split sibling ?

This is Tisdale 1.
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Aug 20 2011, 01:17 PM
Post #281


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10153
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



My guess, Tisdale is the rock, 1 and 2 are target spots on it.

Phil

(EDIT: Apparently I was McStooken)


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Aug 20 2011, 01:52 PM
Post #282


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Tisdale 1 and 2 were named for the first time on these imaging sequences from sol 2686.

02686::p2584::27::4::0::0::4::2::10::pancam_tisdale_1_L257R2


02686::p2585::27::4::0::0::4::2::10::pancam_tisdale_2_L257R2


On a different matter, I saw this reference to the "faulted drives" on the weekly report:
QUOTE
On Sol 2688 (Aug. 16, 2011), the planned approach drive stopped early because the rover's visual odometry could not measure progress accurately due to a lack of visual features in the camera field of view.

Glad to know it was due to somethink so benign instead of a HW related issue.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Aug 20 2011, 03:55 PM
Post #283


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



'Lack of visual features', eh? What a shame they didn't have a whopping big flat-topped rocky slab...thing...right in front of them...

smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Matt Lenda
post Aug 20 2011, 04:37 PM
Post #284


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 98
Joined: 17-July 11
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 6066



QUOTE (Stu @ Aug 20 2011, 07:55 AM) *
'Lack of visual features', eh? What a shame they didn't have a whopping big flat-topped rocky slab...thing...right in front of them...

smile.gif

smile.gif

We didn't aim the cameras that way during that particular drive.

It's also that the turns were too big and there was a lack of features to detect a change from in the last image that the rover took.

After tonight, pending a successful drive -- and I'm telling you, the RPs yesterday really pulled some heroics to sequence it -- we'll have close-ups of the left side of Tisdale 2. I smell a week of IDD! Cool part is, I'm on shift through Wednesday. Sweet.

-m
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mhoward
post Aug 20 2011, 04:53 PM
Post #285


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3431
Joined: 11-August 04
From: USA
Member No.: 98



Coool.

Something a little different: a 100(-ish) degree wide perspective view of the Navcam images from sol 2690. One thing that's more apparent to me in the anaglyph version is, behind Tisdale 2 there's what looks like perhaps a similar rock so eroded that all that's left is a light-colored pile. Tisdale 1.5? Anyway I recommend the anaglyph version.



And since it looks like it's going to be a while (maybe forever?) until the last data dropouts are fixed in the sol 2685-2688 Navcam panorama, here's a sort-of-final version with some holes.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

32 Pages V  « < 17 18 19 20 21 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th April 2024 - 03:16 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.