Cape York, Landfall! |
Cape York, Landfall! |
Aug 19 2011, 11:44 PM
Post
#271
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1619 Joined: 12-February 06 From: Bergerac - FR Member No.: 678 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Aug 19 2011, 11:47 PM
Post
#272
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 26 Joined: 15-July 10 Member No.: 5388 |
Phew !
When I posted my rambling thanks I was on page 6, and hadn't quite grasped what 12 more pages could hold. Ye gods and little fishes - I am the 5000. Thank you all, I will bathe my red eyes, got to bed and dream of eating pineapples on an aircraft carrier. Mike |
|
|
Aug 19 2011, 11:53 PM
Post
#273
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 399 Joined: 28-August 07 From: San Francisco Member No.: 3511 |
Has there been a reference to Tisdale_1 ?
Could the team have spotted a post-split sibling ? -------------------- 'She drove until the wheels fell off...'
|
|
|
Aug 19 2011, 11:59 PM
Post
#274
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1043 Joined: 17-February 09 Member No.: 4605 |
Guys, do you know what happened to the excellent site: marsgeo.com ? Has it just changed name or is it deleted? It just disappeared during the trek to Victoria. One day it was there and the next the site name was up for grabs. It was an absolutely outstanding explanation and analysis of the early MER findings and now a reminder of the ephemeral nature of internet based information. I wish I had copied it page by page. |
|
|
Aug 20 2011, 01:27 AM
Post
#275
|
|
The Poet Dude Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Aug 20 2011, 05:42 AM
Post
#276
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 7 Joined: 29-September 06 Member No.: 1195 |
It just disappeared during the trek to Victoria. One day it was there and the next the site name was up for grabs. It was an absolutely outstanding explanation and analysis of the early MER findings and now a reminder of the ephemeral nature of internet based information. I wish I had copied it page by page. Some portions may be recoverable here |
|
|
Aug 20 2011, 07:11 AM
Post
#277
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 547 Joined: 1-May 06 From: Scotland (Ecosse, Escocia) Member No.: 759 |
Seeing two flat white rocks here at Odyssey crater makes me wonder if a block has been split along the line of one of those white veins we saw earlier poking out the ground. http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...st&id=25257 It looks like there might be a counterpart to Tinsdale laying on the ground further north. |
|
|
Aug 20 2011, 08:07 AM
Post
#278
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 404 Joined: 5-January 10 Member No.: 5161 |
|
|
|
Aug 20 2011, 08:29 AM
Post
#279
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 404 Joined: 5-January 10 Member No.: 5161 |
|
|
|
Aug 20 2011, 10:56 AM
Post
#280
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 4279 Joined: 19-April 05 From: .br at .es Member No.: 253 |
|
|
|
Aug 20 2011, 01:17 PM
Post
#281
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10153 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
My guess, Tisdale is the rock, 1 and 2 are target spots on it.
Phil (EDIT: Apparently I was McStooken) -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Aug 20 2011, 01:52 PM
Post
#282
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 4279 Joined: 19-April 05 From: .br at .es Member No.: 253 |
Tisdale 1 and 2 were named for the first time on these imaging sequences from sol 2686.
02686::p2584::27::4::0::0::4::2::10::pancam_tisdale_1_L257R2 02686::p2585::27::4::0::0::4::2::10::pancam_tisdale_2_L257R2 On a different matter, I saw this reference to the "faulted drives" on the weekly report: QUOTE On Sol 2688 (Aug. 16, 2011), the planned approach drive stopped early because the rover's visual odometry could not measure progress accurately due to a lack of visual features in the camera field of view. Glad to know it was due to somethink so benign instead of a HW related issue. |
|
|
Aug 20 2011, 03:55 PM
Post
#283
|
|
The Poet Dude Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
'Lack of visual features', eh? What a shame they didn't have a whopping big flat-topped rocky slab...thing...right in front of them...
-------------------- |
|
|
Aug 20 2011, 04:37 PM
Post
#284
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 98 Joined: 17-July 11 From: Pasadena, CA Member No.: 6066 |
'Lack of visual features', eh? What a shame they didn't have a whopping big flat-topped rocky slab...thing...right in front of them... We didn't aim the cameras that way during that particular drive. It's also that the turns were too big and there was a lack of features to detect a change from in the last image that the rover took. After tonight, pending a successful drive -- and I'm telling you, the RPs yesterday really pulled some heroics to sequence it -- we'll have close-ups of the left side of Tisdale 2. I smell a week of IDD! Cool part is, I'm on shift through Wednesday. Sweet. -m |
|
|
Aug 20 2011, 04:53 PM
Post
#285
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 3431 Joined: 11-August 04 From: USA Member No.: 98 |
Coool.
Something a little different: a 100(-ish) degree wide perspective view of the Navcam images from sol 2690. One thing that's more apparent to me in the anaglyph version is, behind Tisdale 2 there's what looks like perhaps a similar rock so eroded that all that's left is a light-colored pile. Tisdale 1.5? Anyway I recommend the anaglyph version. And since it looks like it's going to be a while (maybe forever?) until the last data dropouts are fixed in the sol 2685-2688 Navcam panorama, here's a sort-of-final version with some holes. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 29th April 2024 - 03:16 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |