IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

25 Pages V  « < 17 18 19 20 21 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
MSL landing site: Gale Crater
Pando
post Jul 30 2012, 07:51 PM
Post #271


The Insider
***

Group: Members
Posts: 669
Joined: 3-May 04
Member No.: 73



Some perspective images of the cliffs at Gale Crater. This place is unreal.


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pando
post Jul 30 2012, 07:54 PM
Post #272


The Insider
***

Group: Members
Posts: 669
Joined: 3-May 04
Member No.: 73



More cliffs...

Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
Attached Image

Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jul 30 2012, 09:31 PM
Post #273


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



In the red corner... Gale Crater...

In the blue corner... Endeavour Crater...

How do they compare? Let's have a look...

Attached Image


Kinda brings it home, doesn't it? blink.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Syrinx
post Jul 30 2012, 10:46 PM
Post #274


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 131
Joined: 31-May 08
From: San Carlos, California, USA
Member No.: 4168



Question for you guys that make the anaglyph images. What are the appropriate glasses to buy? I have a set of glasses from the Pathfinder days, approximately red-blue, but they don't work with the pictures I see here on UMSF.

Glasses will be an absolute necessity for MSL.

I hate to ask this question! But I looked in the FAQ and it's not there, and Google didn't help. I found some threads on UMSF with some links to Amazon, but most of the links now go to general Amazon search pages with a dozen different kinds of glasses.

http://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&keywo...sl_2htsk4yeuh_b
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url...amp;x=0&y=0

This page has remained direct:

http://www.amazon.com/Over-size-Clip-on-An...982&sr=8-12

Thanks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Roby72
post Jul 30 2012, 10:53 PM
Post #275


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 121
Joined: 26-June 04
From: Austria
Member No.: 89



Is this the deepest Mars landing ever ?

Viking 1 landing in Chryse Planitia was "at reference altitude of −2.69 km relative to a reference ellipsoid with an equatorial radius of 3397.2 km" acc. to Wikipedia.
Viking 2 found at about -4.23 km.
For Mars Pathfinder I could not find any altitude.
Mars3 ?
Phoenix was at -4.1km in the northern plains.(Google)
MER-A/B I found to be at -1.91/-1.44 km respectively at their ellipse centers.
In the "MRO looks down" video I saw for MSL an altitude of -4.912km below the reference ellipsoid - is that correct ?

6 days to go !
Robert
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
walfy
post Jul 31 2012, 03:42 AM
Post #276


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 404
Joined: 5-January 10
Member No.: 5161



QUOTE (Syrinx @ Jul 30 2012, 02:46 PM) *
Question for you guys that make the anaglyph images. What are the appropriate glasses to buy? I have a set of glasses from the Pathfinder days, approximately red-blue, but they don't work with the pictures I see here on UMSF.


Any of those red/blue or red/cyan glasses should work. It's strange that your older pair doesn't work. Make sure the red lens is on the left, blue/cyan on the right.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
walfy
post Jul 31 2012, 04:43 AM
Post #277


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 404
Joined: 5-January 10
Member No.: 5161



Hovering over part of the Grand Canyon of Gale Crater, 3.42 km across:

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
walfy
post Jul 31 2012, 07:13 AM
Post #278


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 404
Joined: 5-January 10
Member No.: 5161



Assuming the rover is 2.9 meters long (according to this webpage) and this HiRISE image resolution is 25 cm per pixel (according to the HiRISE page), then the rover should be 11.6 pixels in length! So I Photoshopped it in to this very small part of a much larger HiRISE image. The image is a crop from the original, no reduction nor increase in size were made. Every pixel is the original, representing 25 cm across the surface of Mars. It's in the "inverted river" prime target area. My best understanding now is that with the good fortune of an extended mission in years to come, we might be driving up here!

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pgrindrod
post Jul 31 2012, 09:25 AM
Post #279


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 59
Joined: 18-July 07
From: London, UK
Member No.: 2873



QUOTE (fredk @ Jul 30 2012, 05:33 PM) *
Thanks again, Pete. Just one little thing - the elevation map has the slope scale.

Doh! Thanks fredk, changed accordingly.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
belleraphon1
post Jul 31 2012, 11:57 AM
Post #280


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 813
Joined: 29-December 05
From: NE Oh, USA
Member No.: 627




Gobsmacked!!!!!

I just cannot think of another word right now.

Gale is magnificent.

So is this forum.

All you folks who participate on this forum, from the poets, the image mages, the rover drivers, the enginners, the scientists.
Magnificent talents all.

Thanks for what you do!

Craig

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post Jul 31 2012, 12:00 PM
Post #281


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



QUOTE (RoverDriver @ Jul 30 2012, 12:44 PM) *
Now, for those of you that have a slope map, try to isolate the areas above 25 degrees. That should be pretty easy. Next try to find areas that are surrounded by slopes higher than 25 degrees. That is a tad more difficult. Now if you join these regions you will have an idea of where MSL is likely not to drive.
This does not take into account the different types of terrain of course but it is a start.


Interesting... I read somewhere that the rover was tested on some crazy steep slopes but that left the question as to what the practical limit is for normal drives. So 25° then. So after masking out the >25° slopes themselves and then the regions that may be flattish but surrounded by >25° moats, I guess that would leave the trail map that MarsEngineer alluded to.

Hat's off to you, with the daily responsibility of not putting a multi-billion dollar ride into a ditch or into quicksand & still making the whole enterprise pay off scientifically.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SpaceListener
post Jul 31 2012, 04:19 PM
Post #282


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 279
Joined: 19-August 07
Member No.: 3299



After seeing the terrain pictures, I realized that this place will be by far the most interesting place to visit Mars! Lots of geology variety (different slopes, different kind of land, close to a high mountain, through a canon) and finally, I am not comfortable to landing place since it is not so plain surface as the MER's landing sites. I still cannot figure out about how the geology has shaped the landing place so bumpy. The time is already approaching fast! Thanks to all who has put nice pictures to let others to see.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RoverDriver
post Jul 31 2012, 04:20 PM
Post #283


Member
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 976
Joined: 29-September 06
From: Pasadena, CA - USA
Member No.: 1200



QUOTE (jmknapp @ Jul 31 2012, 04:00 AM) *
Interesting... I read somewhere that the rover was tested on some crazy steep slopes but that left the question as to what the practical limit is for normal drives. So 25° then. So after masking out the >25° slopes themselves and then the regions that may be flattish but surrounded by >25° moats, I guess that would leave the trail map that MarsEngineer alluded to.

Hat's off to you, with the daily responsibility of not putting a multi-billion dollar ride into a ditch or into quicksand & still making the whole enterprise pay off scientifically.


I personally drove Scarecrow on very steep terrain and there are definitely some differences on how it behaves relative to MER. I'm not sure whether the terrain Scarecrow was tested in was all relevant o Gale but it is a start. I'm not sure how much of MER driving will also help. My hunch (not shared by everyone on the driver's team) is that it will be a combination of Gusev and Duck Bay. I will devour the first HAZCAMs and NAVCAMs as you all probably will. My first shift will be on Aug 8!

For people that want to explore Gale, I asked ElkGroveDan to post a tarball with a clickable map that links to the appropriate HiRISE pages.

Paolo


--------------------
Disclaimer: all opinions, ideas and information included here are my own,and should not be intended to represent opinion or policy of my employer.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
walfy
post Aug 1 2012, 12:39 AM
Post #284


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 404
Joined: 5-January 10
Member No.: 5161



...don't tell my boss why I'm falling behind my work! Here is an anaglyph of my estimation of where the center of the landing ellipse is (based on what I could glean from the interwebs). If anyone with special knowledge could confirm a better estimate of the location, I'd be happy to rework this image.

Attached Image



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
walfy
post Aug 1 2012, 12:42 AM
Post #285


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 404
Joined: 5-January 10
Member No.: 5161



Here's my approximate center of the landing ellipse in more detail (see my previous post for wider perspective).

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

25 Pages V  « < 17 18 19 20 21 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th April 2024 - 03:01 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.