Matijevic Hill first survey, Sol 3057 - 3152 |
Matijevic Hill first survey, Sol 3057 - 3152 |
Oct 3 2012, 05:54 PM
Post
#301
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1619 Joined: 12-February 06 From: Bergerac - FR Member No.: 678 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Oct 3 2012, 07:13 PM
Post
#302
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 19-September 12 Member No.: 6658 |
|
|
|
Oct 3 2012, 08:27 PM
Post
#303
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 19-September 12 Member No.: 6658 |
|
|
|
Oct 3 2012, 09:41 PM
Post
#304
|
||
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 40 Joined: 29-December 11 Member No.: 6295 |
Here's my corresponding colour image:
The drill result looks pretty different in colour than the undisturbed surface. Cheers, Udo -------------------- But to be a lament on the lips of the loved one is glorious, For the prosaic goes toneless to Orcus below. (Friedrich Schiller: Naenie)
Home of marspages.eu and plutoidenpages.eu |
|
|
||
Oct 4 2012, 02:30 AM
Post
#305
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 408 Joined: 3-August 05 Member No.: 453 |
|
|
|
Oct 4 2012, 02:34 AM
Post
#306
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1044 Joined: 17-February 09 Member No.: 4605 |
And since the fines provide a pseudo streak test we can be pretty confident that there is no hematite in the mix.
An aside - the drift from greek roots continues. From haematite to hematite, aeolian to eolian, aeon to eon. |
|
|
Oct 4 2012, 07:11 AM
Post
#307
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1088 Joined: 19-February 05 From: Close to Meudon Observatory in France Member No.: 172 |
The drill result looks pretty different in colour than the undisturbed surface. I confirm : the layer seems to be really grey, not blue, but as grey as the plaster of Paris... http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...st&p=191488 |
|
|
Oct 4 2012, 01:06 PM
Post
#308
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 4279 Joined: 19-April 05 From: .br at .es Member No.: 253 |
A.J. S. Rayl monthly MER update now available at The Planetary Society Blog... Mars Exploration Rovers Update: Opportunity Finds Thrill of Newberries on Matijevic Hill http://www.planetary.org/explore/space-top...newberries.html Have not had time to read it yet.... Craig I'm reading it right now and would like to remark these paragraphs: The plan ahead is for Opportunity to check out other sites around Matijevic Hill and "move back and forth and up and down along the outcrop to really understand the structure and the stratigraphy and how the layers combined, and the composition and the variation in composition," Arvidson said. and "We will undoubtedly come back to Kirkwood, undoubtedly, and move along the length of the outcrop, looking for variations in the density and the patterns of the spherules and trying to find a big aerial exposure of the brecciated part of it, and trying to find a big aerial exposure of these veins so we can get the turret in there to do MIs and APXS' of these different parts of Kirkwood," said Arvidson. |
|
|
Oct 4 2012, 02:23 PM
Post
#309
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2998 Joined: 30-October 04 Member No.: 105 |
QUOTE And since the fines provide a pseudo streak test... Yes. And look how incredibly fine and cohesive the cuttings are from this APXS press. The impressions of the phillips-head screws are preserved. And note the fractures meandering across the smooth area.http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...00P2976M2M1.JPG --Bill -------------------- |
|
|
Oct 4 2012, 05:21 PM
Post
#310
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 252 Joined: 5-May 05 From: Mississippi (USA) Member No.: 379 |
SOL 3087 - MI stitch: Its not perfect yet ... An excellent anaglyph, but I also suspect that the left & right images are reversed. The Phillips head screw slots are indented. I was beginning to wonder if we had discovered buried metal machine parts! http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...st&id=28433 The impression of the Phillips head screw slots looks correct in Bills non-anaglyph image. (link below) http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...00P2976M2M1.JPG |
|
|
Oct 4 2012, 07:46 PM
Post
#311
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 19-September 12 Member No.: 6658 |
Sorry guys - I'll make a better one next week when I'm back at work
|
|
|
Oct 4 2012, 11:31 PM
Post
#312
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1044 Joined: 17-February 09 Member No.: 4605 |
... look how incredibly fine and cohesive the cuttings are from this APXS press. --Bill Well they define it as sandstone (100u grain size). Those fines and the really fine clastic structure sure looks like mudstone and 100u is pretty much on the classification boundary. Maximum identified grain size? I wonder what the cementing is? Clay? It would be interesting to get Tim Demko's reassessment of this area now that we have more information available. Ngunn - I really want to understand what you're saying, but this bit defeats me Just noting that Cape York seems a continuation of the curve delineated by Cape Tribulation, Cape Byron etc. These are at the edge of the existing bowl and are raised well above the enroaching plains material. This effect would most likely reflect uplift rim. |
|
|
Oct 5 2012, 08:06 PM
Post
#313
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2835 Joined: 22-April 05 From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands Member No.: 353 |
|
|
|
Oct 6 2012, 02:24 PM
Post
#314
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 4247 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
Tiny bump downslope on 3092 - compare these two frames:
http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...0M1.JPG?sol3092 http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...0M1.JPG?sol3092 |
|
|
Oct 7 2012, 09:40 PM
Post
#315
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1619 Joined: 12-February 06 From: Bergerac - FR Member No.: 678 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th May 2024 - 09:51 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |