IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

39 Pages V  « < 21 22 23 24 25 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Matijevic Hill first survey, Sol 3057 - 3152
CosmicRocker
post Oct 9 2012, 06:15 AM
Post #331


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



Whitewater appears to be a finely laminated rock. The dark patches we see on the top of Whitewater seem to be remnants of one of those laminae. I was hoping to get a closer look at the darker material, and that is apparently what we are seeing in the MIs from sol 3094. The attached image highlights the approximate location of the MIs on a false color pancam composite from sol 3092.
Attached Image

Interestingly, the dark, vitreous-appearing lamination seems to be thinner than the diameter of the embedded spherule.


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Oct 9 2012, 02:48 PM
Post #332


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



You're correct, CR, Whitewater is laminated and not "massive or amorphous"-- I've corrected my earlier description. I was too focused in on one area of the whole outcrop. The laminations appear to be quite variable and the unit is riddled with fractures.

The "Blue Resistant Area" (call it Blue Goo?) on this outcrop appears to be a remnant of a thicker zone-- it has been weathered, and eroded by the wind and is the contact between two rock types (yeah, I've hopped back to the "this is a contact" camp again). So this is a unique spot-- it could tell us what the surface of Whitewater was like at the time that the overlying unit (Kirkwood??) was deposited. Note this puzzle-piece: brushing at the previous IDD location showed that this outcrop has a thin, soft, ochre-colored surface underlain by a light-bluish material. It might be dust, but with the persistent prevailing winds of this area that is less likely and dust has not been seen on the adjacent Blue Crunchy Kirkwood fragments. It could be a weathering rind that occurs on the exposed Whitewater outcrop. Looking closely at this remnant Blue Goo material will tell a lot.

I needs to get off me duff and upload the many views of this outctop area to my photosite. Been putting it off-- give me a couple of days and I'll announce when there are enough up to warrant a visit.

CR-- your location of the current IDD spot is dead-on. Good find.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
marsophile
post Oct 9 2012, 07:30 PM
Post #333


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 507
Joined: 10-September 08
Member No.: 4338



QUOTE (dvandorn @ Oct 8 2012, 09:17 PM) *
..."varnish" ...


Rock varnish tends to be high in Mn as well as clays, so the composition may help to discriminate among the possibilities.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Oct 10 2012, 03:35 PM
Post #334


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



New MIs in the pipeline:

http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...ger/2012-10-10/

They've RAT-brushed another, adjacent spot at the second IDD site on the "resistant blue area" on Sol 3096.

And are drooling on a new target: Lindsley, P2575 and P2576, which appears to be bedding-plane outcrop with multiple layers:

http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...29P2575R4M1.JPG

Thumb-twiddling for the next ODY-pass...

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Oct 10 2012, 03:58 PM
Post #335


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



Did Oppy drive over some portion of the later MI image coverage area? There are two arcs of what appear to be scratches in the less-durable covering layer on the right side of the image linked below; one large arc and another much narrower arc tangent to the larger one:

http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...29P2956M2M1.JPG

These "scratch arcs" look decidedly artificial to me.

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Oct 10 2012, 04:29 PM
Post #336


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4247
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Artificial for sure - those are from the rat brush!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Oct 10 2012, 04:45 PM
Post #337


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



Those marks are from either from the RAT brush or the RAT contact ring. I wondered, too.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Oct 10 2012, 05:07 PM
Post #338


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



OK -- well, the arcs are far bigger than the outside arc of the RAT's circular footprint. I guess the RAT was turned on and dragged across the surface, eh? First time I've ever seen that.

Another first for Opportunity! wink.gif

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Oct 10 2012, 05:33 PM
Post #339


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



The brush has a larger and more diffuse footprint than the RAT itself. Outlying bristles could easily cause that exact pattern
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RoverDriver
post Oct 11 2012, 01:22 AM
Post #340


Member
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 976
Joined: 29-September 06
From: Pasadena, CA - USA
Member No.: 1200



QUOTE (dvandorn @ Oct 10 2012, 09:07 AM) *
OK -- well, the arcs are far bigger than the outside arc of the RAT's circular footprint. I guess the RAT was turned on and dragged across the surface, eh? First time I've ever seen that.

Another first for Opportunity! wink.gif

-the other Doug


Keeping in mind that I have no idea what the RPs did on that Sol (I haven't been on Oppy for almost three months now) the scratches tangent to the RAT brushes could be from the RAT butterfly contact switches. We definitely do not move the IDD while RATing or brushing.

Paolo


--------------------
Disclaimer: all opinions, ideas and information included here are my own,and should not be intended to represent opinion or policy of my employer.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
marsophile
post Oct 11 2012, 03:55 AM
Post #341


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 507
Joined: 10-September 08
Member No.: 4338



Attached Image


X-eye stereo. Separate laminae, equally thin, in unbrushed area.

Attached Image


Thin layer in brushed area also, and "canyon" between brushed and unbrushed areas.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ant103
post Oct 11 2012, 11:57 AM
Post #342


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1619
Joined: 12-February 06
From: Bergerac - FR
Member No.: 678



Sol 3098 Navcam pan. Just one missing frame to have the full 360°.



--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Oct 11 2012, 12:42 PM
Post #343


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



QUOTE (marsophile @ Oct 10 2012, 10:55 PM) *
X-eye stereo. Separate laminae, equally thin, in unbrushed area.

Thin layer in brushed area also, and "canyon" between brushed and unbrushed areas.
Very good! And there are a couple of spheriodules of unknownst affinity in those stereos.

And thissol, she's moved upslope and north-ish to tasty outcrops. New names listed in theTracking Web as "Site168" and "Chelmsford".

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Oct 12 2012, 03:10 AM
Post #344


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



Ant103: That's a beautiful and interesting panorama. Your work is always very good. Thanks for posting it. smile.gif

I wish I could understand the nature of these mounds. unsure.gif


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Floyd
post Oct 13 2012, 04:58 PM
Post #345


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 910
Joined: 4-September 06
From: Boston
Member No.: 1102



Hay everyone, there are fantastic pancams down today. image White gypsum layer?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

39 Pages V  « < 21 22 23 24 25 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd May 2024 - 09:39 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.