IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

9 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 8 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
InSight Cruise Phase, Events during Mars transit prior to EDL
PaulH51
post Nov 21 2018, 11:47 PM
Post #76


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2425
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



QUOTE (djellison @ Nov 22 2018, 12:27 AM) *
They have cameras. They'll be flying by Mars. Fingers crossed...there will be pics. ph34r.gif

Fingers and Toes crossed smile.gif Thanks for the info Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Nov 22 2018, 01:49 AM
Post #77


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (PaulH51 @ Nov 21 2018, 03:47 PM) *
Fingers and Toes crossed


And then some...... smile.gif Spoiler alert - I'm helping with planning and processing of pics from their tiny camera. Trying our best to estimate reasonable exposure times in the next 48hrs before committing on Sat AM.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Nov 22 2018, 03:19 AM
Post #78


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2425
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



QUOTE (djellison @ Nov 22 2018, 09:49 AM) *
...before committing on Sat AM.

Excellent news indeed smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_mcmcmc_*
post Nov 22 2018, 07:59 AM
Post #79





Guests






QUOTE (Gerald @ Nov 21 2018, 06:18 PM) *
Maybe this document, and the according server and directories could be a better point to start from.
See also this LBL file together with this table.

Yes, that table (and PHXPROFILES) is all I was able to find, but I think they do not match with that description.

In this file you find the list of all fields:
QUOTE
PHXPROFILE.TAB contains the following items.

Time (relative to reference time, seconds) UTC_TIME
Radial distance (m) RADIAL_DISTANCE
Areocentric latitude (degrees north) LATITUDE
Areocentric longitude (degrees east) LONGITUDE
X-component of position (m) X_POSITION
Y-component of position (m) Y_POSITION
Z-component of position (m) Z_POSITION
Element 0 of quaternion (dimensionless) Q0
Element 1 of quaternion (dimensionless) Q1
Element 2 of quaternion (dimensionless) Q2
Element 3 of quaternion (dimensionless) Q3
X-component of velocity (m/s) X_VELOCITY
Y-component of velocity (m/s) Y_VELOCITY
Z-component of velocity (m/s) Z_VELOCITY
Speed of spacecraft relative to atmosphere (m/s) VREL
X-component of acceleration (m s^(-2)) X_ACCELERATION
Y-component of acceleration (m s^(-2)) Y_ACCELERATION
Z-component of acceleration (m s^(-2)) Z_ACCELERATION
Angle of attack (degrees) ALPHA
Axial force coefficient, CA (dimensionless) CA
Normal force coefficient, CN (dimensionless) CN
Mach number (dimensionless) MA
Knudsen number (dimensionless) KN
Density (kg m^(-3)) RHO
Pressure (Pa) PRESS
Temperature (K) TEMP


QUOTE
PHXCOMPACT.TAB contains the following items.

Radial distance (m) MRADIAL_DISTANCE
Altitude (km) MALTITUDE
Density (kg m^(-3)) MRHO
Pressure (Pa) MPRESS
Temperature (K) MTEMP



The description in my previous post says:
QUOTE
Spacecraft Clock count: Units = seconds
Relative time from a defined entry state: Units = seconds
The altitude of the spacecraft above the landing site: Units = seconds
Planetocentric latitude of the spacecraft at the time of sample acquisition: Units = degrees
Planetocentric east longitude of the spacecraft at the time of sample acquisition: Units = degrees
Speed of the Phoenix entry probe at the given location: Units = m/s


So I think they are different datasets.

-------------------------


I got weird results while turning "angle of attack" data into something graphical, i.e. an image of the lander rotating as per AoA data, so then I analysed visually last seconds of the data and also plotted them, and they're weird: how can AoA become greater than 90°? (AoA is column 2x19=38 in PHXPROFILES.TAB). It also remaines greater than 90° after landing.

Definition:
QUOTE
The angle of attack, namely the angle between the spacecraft symmetry axis and the
vector velocity of the atmosphere relative to the spacecraft, was also determined using the
assumption that the atmosphere rotates with the solid body of the planet.

Translation: angle w.r.t ground.

In the animation I obtained by rotating the image of spacecraft in realtime according to AoA (animation not yet online) it's clearly visible the effect of the engines being turned on (vibration of the lander), so one can assume that AoA>90° is due to backshell avoidance maneuver, but I expected AoA to become again 90° at landing, but it last value is 132°.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_mcmcmc_*
post Nov 22 2018, 01:43 PM
Post #80





Guests






These links provide raw numerical data for MARCO-A (code "-65") and MARCO-B (code "-66") as per NASA Horizons site.

Position & speed are expressed w.r.t. Mars center.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Nov 22 2018, 05:43 PM
Post #81


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



QUOTE (djellison @ Nov 21 2018, 05:49 PM) *
And then some...... smile.gif Spoiler alert - I'm helping with planning and processing of pics from their tiny camera.

Just make sure you don't get your thumb or the camera strap in the images and you should be OK.


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_mcmcmc_*
post Nov 22 2018, 05:55 PM
Post #82





Guests






QUOTE (djellison @ Nov 22 2018, 02:49 AM) *
And then some...... smile.gif Spoiler alert - I'm helping with planning and processing of pics from their tiny camera. Trying our best to estimate reasonable exposure times in the next 48hrs before committing on Sat AM.


Don't forget the switch to turn the images upside-down (somebody said on july 20th, 1969...) ;-)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Nov 22 2018, 08:09 PM
Post #83


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Forum note: The EDL thread will go live at 0800 PST (1600 GMT) this Monday, 26 Nov, and discussion concerning that will happen there. Will post a link to it then.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_mcmcmc_*
post Nov 22 2018, 09:15 PM
Post #84





Guests






Added manometers for deceleration and attack angle.
http://win98.altervista.org/space/explorat...-simulator.html

It's cool to see even parachute oscillations and legs deployment in the "amplified" accelerometer! (first gauge)
Paper says attack angle is unreliable after chute deployment, I don't know why.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_mcmcmc_*
post Nov 23 2018, 09:44 AM
Post #85





Guests






QUOTE (mcmcmc @ Nov 22 2018, 10:15 PM) *
Paper says attack angle is unreliable after chute deployment, I don't know why.

from official papers it results that even NASA does not why attack angle data are totally unreliable after parachute deployment, but i can't find any further update after 2010.

There are 3 different issues on attack angle reconstruction:
1) discrepancies between predicted and re-constructed angles of attack addressed by Desai et al.(2008).
2) discrepancies (+/- 2° , which could be "explained" by a 300 m/s wind) between results from direct reconstruction from gyros and indirect reconstruction from accelerometers - "Results from the Phoenix Atmospheric Structure Experiment" Paul Withers and David Catling - 2010
3) nonsense values of angle attack at parachute deployment (46°) and after (up to 132°) - "Production of Reduced Data Records for the Phoenix Atmospheric Structure Experiment" - Paul Withers, D. C. Catlingb -

From data it also appears that Phoenix touched ground... 1.2 km above ground ("Results from the Phoenix Atmospheric Structure Experiment" Paul Withers and David Catling - 2010). I'm not sure if they are talking about "above MOLA level" or "above ground level".


MSL EDL data just stop at 12 km above surface.
I've yet to examine EDL data for MPF, MER, and Schiaparelli, anyway last part of EDLs looks quite "mysterious" yet. Still a lot of work to do till safe manned capsule landing on Mars!

Now I am very curious about what Insight EDL data will show.

----------------

I also found another interesting paper about an unexpected issue on Phoenix mission: descent radar locking on jettisoned heatshield and thus providing false values for altitude!
"Phoenix Landing Radar Heatshield Anomaly" - J. Eric Belz, Curtis Chen, and Ben Cichy

Together with high possibility of Phoenix cruise stage recontact with Phoenix lander during EDL, it's an issue I was totally unaware of till a week ago.


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_mcmcmc_*
post Nov 23 2018, 02:08 PM
Post #86





Guests






Just to better know what Insight is about to face:
Overview of the Phoenix Entry, Descent, and Landing System Architecture - Myron R. Grover III, Benjamin D. Cichy
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nogal
post Nov 23 2018, 04:09 PM
Post #87


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 886
Joined: 15-June 09
From: Lisbon, Portugal
Member No.: 4824



For the Google Mars community, here is a KMZ file with InSight's landing ellipse.

Unfortunately, Google Mars does not have any CTX registered for this area, so I suggest going to GE's left panel and in the Layers section, select under Global Maps the Daytime Infrared. This is the base map appearing, for instance, in landing ellipse image contained in the press kit.

To install the file, download it to your favorite location and double click it. This should startup Google Earth, if not already opened, and initiate a switch to Google Mars (a pop-up will display). The globe should automatically rotate and position itself over the ellipse area. Acknowledgements, credits, and a short explanation are available on the file's help panel. To get to the panel select the file's name on GE's Places panel.

The ellipse is approximated by a 180-sided polygon. I'd welcome information on any errors that may exist.
Fernando
Attached File  InSight.kmz ( 4.74K ) Number of downloads: 244

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_mcmcmc_*
post Nov 23 2018, 06:58 PM
Post #88





Guests






QUOTE (nogal @ Nov 23 2018, 05:09 PM) *
For the Google Mars community


Damn! blink.gif
If just you'd remebered me before about existence of Google Earth, I could have set up something better than this.... blink.gif
I totally forgot that I can create animations in google earth!
This is the Phoenix EDL:
http://win98.altervista.org/space/explorat...Phoenix-EDL.kmz

It's even possibile to make the marker shape change depending on altitude, and shift whole trajectory to Insight site (just for fun, it's a simulator)... but I think it would require more time than remaining time to the event. :-(

In case anybody has time/wish to help, this is the source code which converts EDL data into KML format:
http://win98.altervista.org/space/explorat...t/crea-EDL.html

Data are here:
http://win98.altervista.org/space/explorat...ht/js/coords.js

Taken as usual from PHXPROFILES.TAB .

This line gets one sample every 200 to make things faster; change "200" to "1" for a realtime animation:
CODE
    for (index = 0; index <= latLonAlt.length-1; index += 200) {
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Nov 23 2018, 08:20 PM
Post #89


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



I believe that angle of attack information after chute deployment is irrelevant. The aeroshell is no longer providing any significant lift; it's all about the inflated chute at that point, which had better be normal to the flight path.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_mcmcmc_*
post Nov 23 2018, 08:37 PM
Post #90





Guests






QUOTE (nprev @ Nov 23 2018, 09:20 PM) *
I believe that angle of attack information after chute deployment is irrelevant.

Irrelevant for what?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

9 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 8 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th April 2024 - 01:51 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.