IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

12 Pages V  « < 5 6 7 8 9 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Perseverance Imagery, technical discussion of processing, cameras, etc.
phase4
post Mar 14 2021, 08:17 PM
Post #91


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 95
Joined: 11-January 07
From: Amsterdam
Member No.: 1584



QUOTE (fredk @ Mar 14 2021, 07:13 PM) *
Has anyone figured out how to sort the images at mars.nasa.gov/mars2020/multimedia/raw-images/ by time taken?

Not from the website directly. For the arm animation I made earlier I sorted the JSON entries on the spacecraft clock time which is given as "extended/sclk". (and can also be found as part of the image filename)


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hynee
post Mar 15 2021, 10:57 AM
Post #92


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 265



Does anybody know this plate's purpose?



Here are some other pictures:



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Mar 15 2021, 11:22 AM
Post #93


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2430
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



QUOTE (Hynee @ Mar 15 2021, 06:57 PM) *
Does anybody know this plate's purpose?

It's a 'Bellypan' that protected the Adaptive Caching Assembly (ACA) since launch, but especially during the final part of EDL...

Surface operations on Mars require the Sample Handling Assembly (SHA) to extend approximately 200 mm (~8 inches) below the Rover’s bellypan. Therefore, an ejectable belly-pan was implemented directly below the Adaptive Caching Assembly (ACA) volume, which was released after landing to provide the SHA with an unobstructed volume to extend into during operations. Surface features are then assessed via Rover imaging prior to SHA motion to prevent contact with potential obstacles below the Rover.

Extracted from this PDF titled: Mars 2020 Rover Adaptive Caching Assembly: Caching Martian Samples for Potential Earth Return
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hynee
post Mar 15 2021, 11:25 AM
Post #94


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 265



QUOTE (PaulH51 @ Mar 15 2021, 10:22 PM) *
It's a 'Bellypan' that protected the Adaptive Caching Assembly (ACA) since launch, but especially during the final part of EDL...

Surface operations on Mars require the Sample Handling Assembly (SHA) to extend approximately 200 mm (~8 inches) below the Rover’s bellypan. Therefore, an ejectable belly-pan was implemented directly below the Adaptive Caching Assembly (ACA) volume, which was released after landing to provide the SHA with an unobstructed volume to extend into during operations. Surface features are then assessed via Rover imaging prior to SHA motion to prevent contact with potential obstacles below the Rover.

Extracted from this PDF titled: Mars 2020 Rover Adaptive Caching Assembly: Caching Martian Samples for Potential Earth Return

Thanks!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ChrisC
post Mar 15 2021, 09:19 PM
Post #95


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 59
Joined: 4-July 08
Member No.: 4251



QUOTE (Hynee @ Mar 15 2021, 05:57 AM) *
Does anybody know this plate's purpose?

FYI this event is discussed in the regular thread:
http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...=8608&st=60

I think this thread here is supposed to be focused on imagery, e.g. technical discussion of processing, cameras, metadata etc.

ADMIN: Chris is correct. Let's please post mission event pictures such as the panel deployment in the real-time progress threads (Perseverance Early Drives being the current one) and reserve this thread for technical discussion of the imagery systems and methods.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
htspace
post Mar 16 2021, 12:02 PM
Post #96


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 20
Joined: 6-August 20
Member No.: 8852



After I installed the required plugins,how to perform batch debayer in ImageJ and GIMP software?

Need an installation script, right? How to do it?
unsure.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adam Hurcewicz
post Mar 16 2021, 12:39 PM
Post #97


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 102
Joined: 29-January 10
From: Poland
Member No.: 5205



I use FitsWork to debayer images. It's great!


--------------------
Adam Hurcewicz from Poland
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
htspace
post Mar 16 2021, 01:45 PM
Post #98


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 20
Joined: 6-August 20
Member No.: 8852



QUOTE (Adam Hurcewicz @ Mar 16 2021, 08:39 PM) *
I use FitsWork to debayer images. It's great!

Can it be processed in batches? How to do it? tongue.gif
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PDP8E
post Mar 16 2021, 11:39 PM
Post #99


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 808
Joined: 10-October 06
From: Maynard Mass USA
Member No.: 1241



use the command-line interface to your tool (if it has one) and a batch file.


--------------------
CLA CLL
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
htspace
post Mar 17 2021, 12:13 AM
Post #100


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 20
Joined: 6-August 20
Member No.: 8852



QUOTE (PDP8E @ Mar 17 2021, 07:39 AM) *
use the command-line interface to your tool (if it has one) and a batch file.

I get it, it's great! biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
htspace
post Mar 17 2021, 12:14 AM
Post #101


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 20
Joined: 6-August 20
Member No.: 8852



QUOTE (Adam Hurcewicz @ Mar 16 2021, 08:39 PM) *
I use FitsWork to debayer images. It's great!

Yeah,I get it, it's great!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MarkL
post Mar 22 2021, 07:30 PM
Post #102


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 240
Joined: 18-July 06
Member No.: 981



QUOTE (phase4 @ Mar 14 2021, 09:17 PM) *
Not from the website directly. For the arm animation I made earlier I sorted the JSON entries on the spacecraft clock time which is given as "extended/sclk". (and can also be found as part of the image filename)


Do you have any insight into the MET portion of the filename. When did MET start (ie. when was it zero?)

At the moment its around 0669527872.

I would like to rename some of the raw images in the order they were taken and where pairs were taken keep those together - I think they would be taken at about the same MET anyway so sorting by MET should work to keep stereo pairs together.

MET seems to have been wrong on some images, or at least, the MET is the time the image was uploaded by the spacecraft rather than the time it was taken by the camera. Especially the EDL images. Or have they fixed that now?

Thanks!

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Mar 22 2021, 11:35 PM
Post #103


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4251
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



The sclk (mission time) filename (and json) field appears to start on Jan 1st, 2000 - see here. And yeah, that field is still incorrect on at least some EDL camera images.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Mar 23 2021, 02:58 AM
Post #104


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2517
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (fredk @ Mar 22 2021, 03:35 PM) *
The sclk (mission time) filename (and json) field appears to start on Jan 1st, 2000...

0 is 2000-001T11:58:55.816 ("epoch of J2000" in Coordinated Universal Time.)

This then drifts as a function of rover clock rate and is tracked by the NAIF file that Fred linked to, so you need to use the NAIF function scs2e or something like that to get a usable time. https://naif.jpl.nasa.gov/pub/naif/toolkit_...C/req/sclk.html


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Mar 23 2021, 11:05 AM
Post #105


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2430
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



Hope this is the right thread for this question?

The SHERLOC imager is said to be a direct build to print version of the MAHLI imager on MSL. With MAHLI images the focus motor count is provided on the raw image server, using that count enables users to approximate the distance and scale of 'close-up' / 'in-focus' MAHLI images.

The SHERLOC images returned so far don't appear to have a motor count on the raw image server (that I can find)

Is the SHERLOC motor count provided on an image JSON feed somewhere? Any pointers would be appreciated, as I'd hope to check it's my use of the count using targets like the PIXL calibration target where its exact size is known. Then I can use it for scaling the geological targets in the future. TIA smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

12 Pages V  « < 5 6 7 8 9 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 5th June 2024 - 08:04 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.