Dust Storm |
Dust Storm |
Nov 18 2005, 08:47 PM
Post
#106
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 578 Joined: 5-November 04 From: Denmark Member No.: 107 |
Indeed the dust storm is over and a fresh new cleaning event was in order
Rover update at JPL/NASA http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/sta...tml#opportunity QUOTE Opportunity is healthy. The solar array was apparently cleaned again on sol 638. Average solar array energy is around 720 watt-hours after the cleaning event!
-------------------- "I want to make as many people as possible feel like they are part of this adventure. We are going to give everybody a sense of what exploring the surface of another world is really like"
- Steven Squyres |
|
|
Nov 18 2005, 08:51 PM
Post
#107
|
|
Senior Member Group: Admin Posts: 4763 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Glendale, AZ Member No.: 197 |
QUOTE (jaredGalen @ Nov 18 2005, 09:27 AM) It's left over from the "cleaning event." -------------------- If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
|
|
|
Nov 18 2005, 10:02 PM
Post
#108
|
|
Dublin Correspondent Group: Admin Posts: 1799 Joined: 28-March 05 From: Celbridge, Ireland Member No.: 220 |
720 watt hours is nice and healthy, the cleaning event seems to have boosted Oppy's energy generating capacity by about 10%. Before this dust storm she was generating somewhere around 670 watt hours and the total insolation has dropped slightly so I had been expecting that she would return to around 650 watt hours when the dust cleared.
|
|
|
Nov 18 2005, 10:22 PM
Post
#109
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 713 Joined: 30-March 05 Member No.: 223 |
QUOTE (helvick @ Nov 19 2005, 12:02 AM) 720 watt hours is nice and healthy, the cleaning event seems to have boosted Oppy's energy generating capacity by about 10%. Before this dust storm she was generating somewhere around 670 watt hours and the total insolation has dropped slightly so I had been expecting that she would return to around 650 watt hours when the dust cleared. helvick, what would be your best estimate of Oppy's remaining life time, if it were limited by solar power alone ... a) without further cleaning events or assuming one or two additioanl 10% cleaning events during the remaining life time ? From your latest chart it would seem that we could expect solar power to last well into February, right ? Nirgal ... who still can't stop dreaming the Victoria dream |
|
|
Nov 18 2005, 11:41 PM
Post
#110
|
|
Dublin Correspondent Group: Admin Posts: 1799 Joined: 28-March 05 From: Celbridge, Ireland Member No.: 220 |
QUOTE (Nirgal @ Nov 18 2005, 11:22 PM) helvick, what would be your best estimate of Oppy's remaining life time, if it were limited by solar power alone ... a) without further cleaning events or assuming one or two additioanl 10% cleaning events during the remaining life time ? From your latest chart it would seem that we could expect solar power to last well into February, right ? Nirgal ... who still can't stop dreaming the Victoria dream I now think that it will be well past February, in fact I don't think that declining Solar power will be an issue at all until very close to mid winter (around the start of July 2006). She now has a very good chance of being able to generate enough power to survive for at least another martian year and a half. Other things are probably becoming more critical though but power is definitely looking very good indeed. A few weeks back I estimated that the power levels at mid winter on her second year would be around 260 Watt hours but that was based on the then current level of dust loading. This cleaning event has added about 70 watt hours of capacity at the moment and if the pattern of dust deposition between now and Sol 870 (the Sol with the lowest insolation ~ July 5 2006) follows the pattern from Sols 1 to 196 then my estimate needs to be increased by 35-40 watt hours. So I think we're now looking at a minimum of 295-300 Watt hours for a few days in mid winter. That is survivable, particularly if the planners\drivers can find some handy 10-15 degree north facing slopes to pitch out on for a week or two in the depths of winter. |
|
|
Nov 18 2005, 11:47 PM
Post
#111
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 235 Joined: 2-August 05 Member No.: 451 |
QUOTE (helvick @ Nov 18 2005, 06:41 PM) That is survivable, particularly if the planners\drivers can find some handy 10-15 degree north facing slopes to pitch out on for a week or two in the depths of winter. I had the impression that Opportunity was close to the Equator, and that we are using the term "winter" to denote the time period when Mars is near aphelion. I don't think that being pitched 10-15 degrees could help much of anything, except perhaps to allow gravity to help the dust to roll off the solar panels. |
|
|
Nov 18 2005, 11:51 PM
Post
#112
|
|
Senior Member Group: Admin Posts: 4763 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Glendale, AZ Member No.: 197 |
QUOTE (helvick @ Nov 18 2005, 11:41 PM) That is survivable, particularly if the planners\drivers can find some handy 10-15 degree north facing slopes to pitch out on for a week or two in the depths of winter. Heck they can find a slope like that on any large sand dune. That raises another question though. Does anyone know if the wheels can be partially retracted again? (For example to create an artifical tilt to the rovers) or did they permanently lock into place upon initial deployment? -------------------- If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
|
|
|
Nov 19 2005, 12:04 AM
Post
#113
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 524 Joined: 24-November 04 From: Heraklion, GR. Member No.: 112 |
I could be wrong, but straight from memory I think some pyros were fired to deploy the wheels, so probably they can't be retracted back.
|
|
|
Nov 19 2005, 12:07 AM
Post
#114
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 35 Joined: 8-July 05 Member No.: 432 |
QUOTE (ElkGroveDan @ Nov 18 2005, 06:51 PM) Heck they can find a slope like that on any large sand dune. That raises another question though. Does anyone know if the wheels can be partially retracted again? (For example to create an artifical tilt to the rovers) or did they permanently lock into place upon initial deployment? Locked on deployment.. In terms of power, was there an issue of battery cycles and can we tell if they are degrading? |
|
|
Nov 19 2005, 12:58 AM
Post
#115
|
|
Dublin Correspondent Group: Admin Posts: 1799 Joined: 28-March 05 From: Celbridge, Ireland Member No.: 220 |
QUOTE (antoniseb @ Nov 19 2005, 12:47 AM) I had the impression that Opportunity was close to the Equator, and that we are using the term "winter" to denote the time period when Mars is near aphelion. I don't think that being pitched 10-15 degrees could help much of anything, except perhaps to allow gravity to help the dust to roll off the solar panels. When I'm talking about "winter" I'm referring to the Southern Hemisphere winter. Sorry I should have been specific, I was being sloppy. I've tended to refer to Winter instead of being specific because there is a "seasonal" cycle even for Opportunity. You are correct about winter in this context being when Mars is near aphelion but the seasons that result from obliquity still have an effect on insolation even at the equator. The top of atmosphere insolation level varies according to the mars:sun distance (going from ~500-~700 watts/m^2 from aphelion to perihelion) but the surface insolation at any point also varies as the planet's obliquity causes the suns Zenith angle to change throughout the year. For any point (even one on the equator) this leads to a change in insolation with two maxima during the year (at the equinoxes), this effect is smaller for Opportunity than the first effect but the sun's zenith angle in Mid SH winter is 25 degrees (to the North, at noon). Solar panel efficiency is improved under such conditions by ensuring that the panel is tilted towards the position of the noon sun. This is particularly important during the Martian Southern Hemisphere winter season because Tau drops to around 0.3-0.4 over much of the planet at that time and when Tau is low solar panels become very sensitive to the incidence angle of the incoming sunlight. When Tau is high, as happens during the SH summer, the solar panels generate a significant percentage of their power from diffuse light and do not suffer significantly if they are not precisely aligned to the noon sun. The difference might not seem that much (40-50 Watt hours in mid SH winter) but the difference between pointing in a favourable direction and an unfavourable one can easily be 80 watt hours. Spirit's power levels dropped briefly from 370 watt hours on sol 203 to 288 watt hours on sol 204 because a drive terminated early and left her pointing in the wrong direction. Likewise Opportunity benefited extensively during the last winter season because she spent most of her time pitched between 15 and 20 degrees on the North facing inner slopes of Endurance. |
|
|
Nov 19 2005, 04:45 PM
Post
#116
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 128 Joined: 5-May 04 Member No.: 74 |
|
|
|
Nov 19 2005, 08:49 PM
Post
#117
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1281 Joined: 18-December 04 From: San Diego, CA Member No.: 124 |
-------------------- Lyford Rome
"Zis is not nuts, zis is super-nuts!" Mathematician Richard Courant on viewing an Orion test |
|
|
Nov 21 2005, 04:10 AM
Post
#118
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2998 Joined: 30-October 04 Member No.: 105 |
On dust devils-- or the failure to see them-- at Meridiani: I was looking at MOC imagery for examples of the anatolia features and found these two images near the Oppy landing site. A histogram equalize was done to enhance low-contrast features and behold, (apparent) dust devil tracks.
FWIW; open to interpretation. But applying the Duck Criteria.... --Bill -------------------- |
|
|
Nov 21 2005, 08:42 AM
Post
#119
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 290 Joined: 26-March 04 From: Edam, The Netherlands Member No.: 65 |
QUOTE (bergadder @ Nov 19 2005, 12:07 AM) I remember them being designed to be able to do about a 1000 cycles. That (to my opinion and guess) is going to be THE problem in the end. As far as i can tell, the degradation of the batteries can be assessed easy when charge and recharge currents, -times and -characteristics are compared over time. Is this data available to the public ? Can we ask for this numbers in some way ? It's pretty important considering how much more adventure we can expect on the long run. There might be a possibility of solely operating on solar energy directly from the arrays when batteries get worse, there will be no (or not much) energy left at night however to prevent the Warm Electronic Box to drift outside temp. design limits. Eventually, they'll probably freeze to death. But that might take another Martian year ! |
|
|
Nov 21 2005, 01:31 PM
Post
#120
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Nov 20 2005, 10:10 PM) On dust devils-- or the failure to see them-- at Meridiani: I was looking at MOC imagery for examples of the anatolia features and found these two images near the Oppy landing site. A histogram equalize was done to enhance low-contrast features and behold, (apparent) dust devil tracks. FWIW; open to interpretation. But applying the Duck Criteria.... --Bill Open to interpretation is right... frankly, I don't see dust devil tracks there. I see wind tails and I see compression artifacts. Note that there are two very obvious dark lines in the image on the right that don't appear on the image on the left -- a sure sign that these are being enhanced out of the noise. There's nothing of the curly-q type of tracks you see, for example, at the Gusev site. Whatever shown in these images that's true wind effects, IMHO, is from straight-line winds. -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 29th April 2024 - 06:49 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |