IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

16 Pages V  « < 5 6 7 8 9 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
The Pioneer Anomaly
Bob Shaw
post Jan 5 2006, 01:16 PM
Post #91


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



QUOTE (ugordan @ Jan 5 2006, 09:52 AM)
Wasn't the spacecraft-solid rocket stack spin stabilized for the duration of the rocket's burn during Jupiter injection or was it also in 3-axis stabilization mode? I would have figured delivery errors would be minimized by spinning up first.

Another possible problem with spin-stabilizing is the star sensor, would it be able to cope with starfield smearing during rotation?
*


If all that's required is a beacon, then setting up a slow spin where the aim point of the antenna nutates around the position of the Earth might be better than a precisely-aimed but data-free arangement. The CG and dynamic behaviour of the Voyagers must be *very* well known by now (unless something has dropped off with the cold). If data is required, that's perhaps another story. Perhaps the lesson here is that future interstellar-precursor probes should be designed with graceful aging in mind, so that as their output of data reduces it still remains - just - there.

Oh, and isn't it good to hear that there's going to be another attempt to reach Pioneer!

Bob Shaw


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ljk4-1
post Jan 5 2006, 02:22 PM
Post #92


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2454
Joined: 8-July 05
From: NGC 5907
Member No.: 430



Can New Horizons participate in this experiment? Or was that another item left off the menu?


--------------------
"After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance.
I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard,
and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does
not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is
indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have
no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft."

- Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jan 5 2006, 02:43 PM
Post #93


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Jan 5 2006, 02:22 PM)
Can New Horizons participate in this experiment?  Or was that another item left off the menu?
*


That's an unfair and unjustified jab at the mission.

From http://www.planetary.org/programs/projects...e_20050720.html
QUOTE (Plan Soc Website)
The Pioneers are spin-stabilized spacecraft. The Voyagers are three-axis stabilized craft that fire thrusters to maintain their orientation in space or to slew around and point their instruments. Those thruster firings would introduce uncertainties in the tracking data that would overwhelm any effect as small as that occurring with Pioneer.

This difference in the way the spacecraft are stabilized actually is one of the reasons the Pioneer data are so important and unique. Most current spacecraft are three-axis stabilized, not spin stabilized. It is unlikely another spin-stabilized craft will be sent across the solar system in the foreseeable future.


Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tasp
post Jan 5 2006, 02:45 PM
Post #94


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 903
Joined: 30-January 05
Member No.: 162



If an objection to putting a Voyager into a slow spin is the likelihood that it would not be possible to stop the spin, do we care?

{well, of course we care, but you catch my drift}

IIRC, some of the fields and particle experiments on Voyager work better when the craft is spinning, and the craft has spun for short periods for that very reason during planetary encounters.

Maybe this isn't so unlikely?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Jan 5 2006, 02:50 PM
Post #95


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 5 2006, 03:43 PM)
That's an unfair and unjustified jab at the mission.

No - it cant, because it uses thrusters to manouver which would impart a small, but hard to calculate delta-V every time the spacecraft pitches, rolls and yaws.  Same reason that Voyager is of no use either.

Yes, but unlike the Voyagers, NH also has a spin mode which will be used during the long interplanetary cruise. So we might get long intervals when the s/c will be spin-stabilized and use it to get periods of precise tracking data. This will of course not be possible during the Jupiter encounter as well as the Pluto encounter phase, but at all other times (assuming thrusters will be off) it should be possible.
Seven years or so between Jupiter flyby and start of Pluto approach phase is a pretty good sample, IMHO.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jan 5 2006, 02:58 PM
Post #96


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Damn good point actually UG - hadnt thought of that.

Then again, they're planning a yearly checkout iirc though - and that may involved pitching/rolling/yawing the spacecraft to look at astronomical calibration targets, which would trash the effect wouldnt it?

QUOTE (pluto.jhuapl.edu)
activities during the approximately 8-year cruise to Pluto include annual spacecraft and instrument checkouts, trajectory corrections, instrument calibrations and Pluto encounter rehearsals.


Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Jan 5 2006, 03:05 PM
Post #97


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 5 2006, 03:58 PM)
Then again, they're planning a yearly checkout iirc though - and that may involved pitching/rolling/yawing the spacecraft to look at astronomical calibration targets, which would trash the effect wouldnt it?
*

I don't think it would trash the effect. At least much. They'll still have periods of inertial coast in between and still see if the modelled-out Doppler plots fit with the observed segments. A residual should still be detectable, though it won't take time do reach a big, nice and well-detectable magnitude before another "trashing" period. Then again, the s/c will probably have more stable RF oscillators so the balance could still hold.
On the other side, I vaguely *seem* to remember reading somewhere that NH actually won't be a good tool to measure the acceleration, I forget why.
Might have been something with the ultrastable oscillators thing.
Might have been a pigment of my imagination... unsure.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NMRguy
post Jan 5 2006, 05:19 PM
Post #98


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 98
Joined: 29-July 05
From: Amsterdam, NL
Member No.: 448



QUOTE (Alan Stern @ Feb 23 2005, 09:20 AM)
Yes, we spin most of cruise, stopping only rarely. It costs fuel that we want to hoard for encounters and KBO DeltaV. And yes, our radio science team hopes to look for
the Pioneer anaomaly. Contact Len Tyler or Ivan Linscott at Stanford.

-Alan
*



Alan addressed this back in Feb 05 in the "New Horizons, Pluto and the Kuiper belt" page. It seems like he plans to take full advantage of this opportunity.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_AlexBlackwell_*
post Jan 5 2006, 05:56 PM
Post #99





Guests






QUOTE (NMRguy @ Jan 5 2006, 05:19 PM)
Alan addressed this back in Feb 05 in the "New Horizons, Pluto and the Kuiper belt" page.  It seems like he plans to take full advantage of this opportunity.
Below is an excerpt from The Planetary Society's website of Merek Chertkow's report on the 2005 Pioneer Anomaly Conference:

QUOTE
[Slava] Turyshev introduced the possibility of working with New Horizons, NASA’s Pluto-Kuiper belt mission scheduled to launch on January 11, 2006. The Pioneer anomaly investigation team was invited to come up with a thermal model of the New Horizons spacecraft. New Horizons was developed very rapidly on a very small budget. New Horizons was developed so quickly in order to catch the small launch period that is available to get a Jupiter fly by on the way to Pluto, which cuts flight time by a few years.

New Horizons is a great mission for us to look at; they have a spin-stabilized craft, the Doppler data will be very good (not as good as Cassini, but better than Pioneer), and it will be going out to Pluto (remember we found the Pioneer anomaly at the distance of Saturn)! As Turyshev put it, this is a once in a lifetime opportunity.
Sounds great, right?! Unfortunately, the funding for New Horizons is already limited and we will have to bring our own funding, as well as figuring out the study itself.  So, time will tell if this works out.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tty
post Jan 5 2006, 06:47 PM
Post #100


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 688
Joined: 20-April 05
From: Sweden
Member No.: 273



QUOTE (ugordan @ Jan 5 2006, 05:05 PM)
Might have been a pigment of my imagination...  unsure.gif
*


Just what colour is your imagination? wink.gif

tty
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stephen
post Jan 8 2006, 05:02 PM
Post #101


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 307
Joined: 16-March 05
Member No.: 198



QUOTE (Merek Chertkow's report)
Merek Chertkow's report on the 2005 Pioneer Anomaly Conference
"Turyshev and John Anderson, also of JPL, with financial support from The Planetary Society were able to save this additional information from simply being thrown in the dumpster! I know what you must be thinking! I can’t believe it either!"
That sounds just like the anecdote Don Wilhelms tells in "To a Rocky Moon"! When will NASA learn stop throwing its treasures out with the trash?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Steffen
post Jan 9 2006, 07:07 AM
Post #102


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 72
Joined: 22-December 05
Member No.: 616



Sorry, but what is this anomaly about?
( I'm a Newbie asking too many questions ) blink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Jan 9 2006, 04:26 PM
Post #103


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



QUOTE (Steffen @ Jan 8 2006, 11:07 PM)
Sorry, but what is this anomaly about?
( I'm a Newbie asking too many questions  ) blink.gif
*

Google searches will answer lots of questions -- try here for starters.
The Pioneer Anomaly

--Emily


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Planet X
post Jan 9 2006, 04:47 PM
Post #104


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 34
Joined: 9-January 06
Member No.: 639



QUOTE (tfisher @ Jan 3 2006, 01:10 AM)
Another cool tidbit: there is one last opportunity to attempt to contact Pioneer 10, coming up in this February/March.  (They think that, just barely maybe there is enough power still now in the old RTGs...) The round-trip light-time is 25 hours, so the contact would proceed by sending out a signal from Goldstone, waiting a day while the earth spins around once and the radio waves make their merry way, and listening for a response again at Goldstone.  Somehow that image amuses me :^)
*


Cool! I hope they attempt it and it's successful. Later!

J P
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jan 9 2006, 04:50 PM
Post #105


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



I have an image in my head of driving around the M25 ( the london 'orbital' motorway ) and yelling at a service station "BIG MAC AND FRIES PLEASE"...then doing another lap of the motorway, only to have a burger land on my windscreen about 80 miles later once I was back in the same place smile.gif

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

16 Pages V  « < 5 6 7 8 9 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th April 2024 - 08:36 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.