IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

240 Pages V  « < 68 69 70 71 72 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Opportunity Route Map
Tesheiner
post Feb 28 2006, 09:51 AM
Post #1036


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Route map, including my estimation for sol 745 (based on Phil polar pan for sol 742).


Attached Image
(239k)

Edit: I've included the landing ellipse on it. What do you think?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Feb 28 2006, 01:13 PM
Post #1037


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



QUOTE (Tesheiner @ Feb 28 2006, 09:51 AM) *
Route map, including my estimation for sol 745 (based on Phil polar pan for sol 742).

Edit: I've included the landing ellipse on it. What do you think?


As ever, great - but no hypothetical path?

Bob Shaw


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Feb 28 2006, 01:43 PM
Post #1038


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Spot On for the ellipse as I understand it - the only ellipse worth using really is the pre-launch ellipse, which my photoshopping shows to be in the same spot as yours there.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Feb 28 2006, 01:51 PM
Post #1039


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



>Edit: I've included the landing ellipse on it. What do you think?

I'd label it "southern edge of landing ellipse" since those who have not followed the landing ellipse discussion might not understand which part it is. I would be inclined to make the line narrower since the width of the line was due to the small scale of the original landing site image.

Otherwise, it's fine.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Feb 28 2006, 01:57 PM
Post #1040


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



I'd keep the ellipse line large - that demonstrates the level of accuracy to which we know it (and probably just as accurate as when it was defined) To make it thinner would suggest a level of accuracy we just don't have.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Feb 28 2006, 02:15 PM
Post #1041


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



QUOTE
I'd keep the ellipse line large - that demonstrates the level of accuracy to which we know it...


Good point and that crossed my mind after I posted. Actually, the landing ellipse is an area of uncertainty around the landing point and we certainly don't know that zone of uncertainty with precision.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
odave
post Feb 28 2006, 02:32 PM
Post #1042


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 510
Joined: 17-March 05
From: Southeast Michigan
Member No.: 209



So does Oppy get her 6 points when she breaks the plane of the ellipse, or does she need to be completely in the end zone?

smile.gif


--------------------
--O'Dave
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
helvick
post Feb 28 2006, 02:39 PM
Post #1043


Dublin Correspondent
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1799
Joined: 28-March 05
From: Celbridge, Ireland
Member No.: 220



QUOTE (odave @ Feb 28 2006, 02:32 PM) *
So does Oppy get her 6 points when she breaks the plane of the ellipse, or does she need to be completely in the end zone?

She has to be clearly over the line and fully in control of the ball at the time. smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Feb 28 2006, 02:56 PM
Post #1044


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



No, no, no -- the *ball* has to cross the plane of the ellipse line. That's all that's required.

Oppy is a pretty good running back, she's rushed for well over a thousand yards in this, her rookie season. But who are we going to get to kick the extra point?

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Feb 28 2006, 03:06 PM
Post #1045


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Feb 28 2006, 02:13 PM) *
As ever, great - but no hypothetical path?

Bob Shaw


Oh, not for the moment.
I had one when we were discussing about the way to Mogollon rim, which makes no sense now.
Future path to Victoria? That would be too much for a guess.

QUOTE (djellison @ Feb 28 2006, 02:43 PM) *
Spot On for the ellipse as I understand it - the only ellipse worth using really is the pre-launch ellipse, which my photoshopping shows to be in the same spot as yours there.

Doug


It's a mask based on a copy&paste from your previous post, that's why they are at the same spot. biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Burmese
post Feb 28 2006, 03:09 PM
Post #1046


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 252
Joined: 27-April 05
Member No.: 365



QUOTE (dvandorn @ Feb 28 2006, 08:56 AM) *
But who are we going to get to kick the extra point?


She gets the extra point when she sights Victoria in full back behind the goal line.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Feb 28 2006, 03:28 PM
Post #1047


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



Right, the hypothetical paths were done because that area north of Erebus was a big Skinner Box and we didn't know which way Oppy would go. biggrin.gif

My guess for a possible path would be along the light bedrock exposure in a southeast direction with stops as needed. After that, who knows? Hopefully by that time we'll have orbital imagery from MRO for guidance.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Feb 28 2006, 03:47 PM
Post #1048


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



OT: The landing ellipse issue reminded me of an indication about the Greenwich meridian in the highway going from Madrid to Barcelona.

Google found me this: http://www.microsiervos.com/archivo/mundor...-greenwich.html (Text in spanish, but there are some pics to the right)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RNeuhaus
post Feb 28 2006, 08:25 PM
Post #1049


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1636
Joined: 9-May 05
From: Lima, Peru
Member No.: 385



Outside of ellipse line, is like as an unknown terrain so, after crossing that line, Oppy becomes an interprid adventurer and it must take own risks on their hike toward to Victoria crater.

Rodolfo
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
neb
post Feb 28 2006, 10:58 PM
Post #1050


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 30
Joined: 15-November 05
Member No.: 553



QUOTE (Tesheiner @ Feb 28 2006, 02:51 AM) *
Route map, including my estimation for sol 745 (based on Phil polar pan for sol 742).


Attached Image
(239k)

Edit: I've included the landing ellipse on it. What do you think?


Anyone care to estimate where that pile of dark rocks (we passed by) is on this image. The dark area to the right of the rover looks to be easily penetrated and might be worth investigating to see what it represents.I personally am not in a hurry to get to Victoria because I don't see any access to the crater, so what do we do then.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

240 Pages V  « < 68 69 70 71 72 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th May 2024 - 01:18 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.