IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

16 Pages V  « < 8 9 10 11 12 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Opportunity Leaves Olympia, Goodbye Purgatory 2
neb
post Feb 28 2006, 10:43 PM
Post #136


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 30
Joined: 15-November 05
Member No.: 553



QUOTE (Tesheiner @ Feb 28 2006, 02:18 PM) *
The "drive-direction" pancams from sol 745 are available at the exploratorium: http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...cam/2006-02-28/

Check for yourselves, but imo Oppy will take the route to the right of Payson i.e. by the top of the rim.


These images show the unconformable and in some places rather complex relationship between the upper and lower beds. I look forward to panorama of this series.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Mar 1 2006, 01:30 AM
Post #137


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



I was hoping that Oppy would walk this outcrop but evidently the operators feel it may be safer to not traverse the trough.

Oppy has the IDD deployed; note that the flat rock to the left of te tool cluster has been displaced.

--Bill

http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...3IP1152L0M1.JPG


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jeff7
post Mar 1 2006, 01:49 AM
Post #138


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 477
Joined: 2-March 05
Member No.: 180



I love how adaptable the rover controllers are with the rovers' various ailments. Programming problems, low power in winter, sticky wheels, a broken switch, a fussy spectrometer, and now a broken motor winding. All that, and the rovers just keep going.
Fast forward to sol 1500, when Opportunity is just dragging itself along with its single working wheel and one working instrument. "Keep goin' little feller!"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Mar 1 2006, 06:41 AM
Post #139


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



Well folks. It would appear I somehow managed to confuse the multi-quoter. Sorry about that.

QUOTE (Bill)
Tom, the bedding geometry is quite apparent in this exposure and likely represents at least a local dip if not regional-- the orientation appears to be along the Erebus crater rim, so I don't think it reflects the upturned strata of the crater. We'll know more at the next Payson exposure, which is more prominent than this one from orbital imagery. Of equal or greater interest to me are the near-vertical joints and fractures.
...

Well a regional dip would be consistent with a prior SS comment that the Oppster has been climbing stratigraphically as we've gone south. At this location I have seen quite a bit of variability in the dips, so I am suspecting local, perhaps on a regional trend. The dips I highlighted may simply be dunes/sandsheets filling paleo-depressions, or maybe a channel filling.

QUOTE (neb)
Your annotated image showing the dip within the unit below the planar beds is good. IMO the subsidence is fairly recent because you can see a point along the escarpment in Nirgual's image where the lower beds form a wedge and vertical displacement dies out further to the right. Illustrated by horizontal continuity of the upper planar unit. The lack of rubble off the cliff is also further indication of its age


If I haven't already said it, welcome to the forum, neb. I've enjoyed your comments, but I don't know where to look to see the things your are describing. It would sure help some of us if you'd post an annotated image with some of your comments. I'm not sure I see the upper planar unit you mention, nor continuity. There seems to be a fair amount of rubble below the eroded crater rim which Opportunity now faces, and I don't know where you see subsidence.

QUOTE (Tesheiner @ Feb 28 2006, 03:18 PM) *
The "drive-direction" pancams from sol 745 are available at the exploratorium: http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...cam/2006-02-28/

Check for yourselves, but imo Oppy will take the route to the right of Payson i.e. by the top of the rim.

Ahh, they're taking the high road, since the entrance ramp is nearby. That should be interesting. Like Bill, I was assuming they'd at least zip down the vertical exposure to collect better data from some other areas. Hmm, all I can see in the direction of the ramp, besides easy access to the top, are some possible...nope, I promised myself I wouldn't use the "f" word... It should be an interesting trip across the top though, as long as they take a few photos along the way.


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Mar 1 2006, 09:01 AM
Post #140


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



QUOTE (CosmicRocker @ Mar 1 2006, 07:41 AM) *
Ahh, they're taking the high road, since the entrance ramp is nearby.


That's my bet.
We should know the answer after tosol evening downlink; there is driving activity planned for sol 747.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Mar 1 2006, 11:52 AM
Post #141


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



QUOTE
Well a regional dip would be consistent with a prior SS comment that the Oppster has been climbing stratigraphically as we've gone south. At this location I have seen quite a bit of variability in the dips, so I am suspecting local, perhaps on a regional trend. The dips I highlighted may simply be dunes/sandsheets filling paleo-depressions, or maybe a channel filling.

The structure here tends to be confusing! From the MOLA data we seem to be climbing topographically, which means we have to be climbing stratigraphically if the beds are flat-lying. My "day job" is working with the Pennsylvanian Pottsville Fm in Alabama, which is a coal-bearing deltaic sequence. It is esssentially flat-lying with a gentle regional dip, but local sedimentary structures can make the local dip anything it wants to be. However, if the underlying "Payson Formation" can be correlated with the "Endurance Fm" this will help nail down the the structure and history of this area. This is our current ace-up-the-sleeve and something we should study as close as possible. I wanted Oppy to stop at the first exposure of the dark bedrock that we saw at "The Four Lane" on the North Erebus Rim but the priority then was to get on with the detour around that monster dune complex. Although forward progress is essential we should not pass up an opportunity to collect data. Although Victoria is an important site, we can't be sure it will be reached and we need to collect what we can when we can.

This current location is a bit troublesome to me: the trough reminds me of underground mine subsidence. It might just be a byproduct of desert winds and sand, but spot is spooky to me.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
AndyG
post Mar 1 2006, 11:58 AM
Post #142


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 593
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 279



QUOTE (Tesheiner @ Feb 28 2006, 09:18 AM) *
As a side note, see what would happen if Oppy is on a leveled terrain with dunes actually high like that: A very close horizon and the view blocked by the dunes i.e. a maze. Let's hope there is nothing like that on the way to Victoria. unsure.gif

I've just brewed this Flash-based application to calculate Martian horizons for those who are interested.

Andy
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SigurRosFan
post Mar 1 2006, 12:46 PM
Post #143


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 531
Joined: 24-August 05
Member No.: 471



Nice tool! Thanks Andy.


--------------------
- blue_scape / Nico -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
helvick
post Mar 1 2006, 01:21 PM
Post #144


Dublin Correspondent
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1799
Joined: 28-March 05
From: Celbridge, Ireland
Member No.: 220



QUOTE (AndyG @ Mar 1 2006, 11:58 AM) *
I've just brewed this Flash-based application to calculate Martian horizons for those who are interested.

Andy

Very slick.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Mar 1 2006, 02:01 PM
Post #145


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Mar 1 2006, 11:52 AM) *
This current location is a bit troublesome to me: the trough reminds me of underground mine subsidence. It might just be a byproduct of desert winds and sand, but spot is spooky to me.


Bill:

Yes - my thoughts on this spot are less to do with the detailed stratigraphy, which is of course important, than why the rock that isn't there has decided not to be. There's not much in the way of debris below the outcrop (compare it to the talus slope around HP) which suggests that we're not looking at simply some mass-wasting process. I'm beginning to wonder whether there is a localised faulting process at work, perhaps following the lines of weakness created by (very old) frost polygons.

I hope we get a good look at some of the other outcrops!

Bob Shaw


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Mar 1 2006, 02:54 PM
Post #146


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10189
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



I think the evaporite rocks and cemented aeolian sandstones simply crumble and blow away after millions of years of weathering, which explains the lack of ejecta blocks on all but the freshest craters. Payson is not the pristine rim of a crater, it's the remnant of an old crater after a billion years or more of weathering, scarp retreat etc. The central bowl of Erebus might be closer to the original crater size.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Mar 1 2006, 03:29 PM
Post #147


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14433
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Just a thought - the fact that we already have drive direction imaging showing a route up onto the top of Payson suggests that they're not going to hang around here and investigate the front of the outcrop

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Mar 1 2006, 03:37 PM
Post #148


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



Scarp retreat is exactly what I think we're seeing at Mogollon and Payson. It's my belief that the original Erebus was only about twice as large as Endurance, and that it struck into the western side of the bowl of an even older, larger crater (Terra Nova) that had already been mostly filled with dunes, evaporite and sediments. (If Terra Nova had been an unfilled crater at the time of the Erebus impact, I would imagine that you wouldn't see such a pronounced east rim on Erebus, which lies roughly on top of what would have been the deepest portion of Terra Nova.)

Because the evaporite and weakly cemented sandstones are rather friable, scarp retreat ensued rather quickly, and continued even as Erebus' own bowl was filled with sand, sediments and evaporite. It probably continues slowly to this day -- Mogollon and Payson might be moving away from the center of Erebus at the rate of a few centimeters every hundred thousand years or so... smile.gif

Remember, too, that most evaporites *shrink* a tiny bit as they completely dry out (think of the cracking you see in dried-out lakebeds). This process is complicated if the last stages of dessication involve ice as opposed to liquid water. There would be a tendency for an evaporite "cap" on the crater fill to shrink away from the crater rim a bit, encouraging a final subsidence along the rim line.

I think all of those factors are at work here...

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Mar 1 2006, 04:10 PM
Post #149


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



QUOTE (djellison @ Mar 1 2006, 04:29 PM) *
Just a thought - the fact that we already have drive direction imaging showing a route up onto the top of Payson suggests that they're not going to hang around here and investigate the front of the outcrop


We should know the answer today at 20:35 GMT (assuming the exploratorium is still working at that time). wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SigurRosFan
post Mar 1 2006, 04:21 PM
Post #150


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 531
Joined: 24-August 05
Member No.: 471



From me, too: Goodbye Olympia

Last view of this outcrop shows 3 out of the 4 named bedrock regions. Roosevelt is out of sight.

3 targeted outcrops (447 KB):


--------------------
- blue_scape / Nico -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

16 Pages V  « < 8 9 10 11 12 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 8th June 2024 - 05:48 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.