IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

7 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Clouds, Clouds over Victoria
climber
post Oct 25 2006, 07:45 PM
Post #61


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Oct 25 2006, 09:35 PM) *
I was trying to look around for some references that would explain whether the "snow" that's mentioned for Mars actually fell from the sky or just precipitated in place (making it more what I'd call "frost" though it would be deeper). I always thought it precipitated in place but there are lots of researchers using the word "snow" so now I'm really confused. Anybody have any insight?
--Emily

I'm not trying to help on this, but I imagine that "your" frost, Emily, could be blown by the wind and become to look like "real" snow for a short period of time.
Welcome back to brain (snow) storm UMSF biggrin.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Oct 25 2006, 07:50 PM
Post #62


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



The MCS guys would be the first port of call I would have thought - I'm not sure what they're measuring, how they measure it and what they already know about it- but I've heard mention of them looking for snow like things in the polar regions at night.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Myran_*
post Oct 25 2006, 08:02 PM
Post #63





Guests






QUOTE
elakdawalla wrote: I always thought it precipitated in place but there are lots of researchers using the word "snow" so now I'm really confused. Anybody have any insight?


Well I dont have any real insight, but I have always thought that the 'snow' imagined by Viking actually was hoarfrost.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Oct 25 2006, 09:59 PM
Post #64


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



QUOTE (Myran @ Oct 25 2006, 09:02 PM) *
Well I dont have any real insight, but I have always thought that the 'snow' imagined by Viking actually was hoarfrost.


Hoarfrost implies saturated air at the surface. Clouds imply saturated air at altitude. Opponents of 'snow' seem to be saying there must always be an unsaturated layer in between where descending ice particles would sublime. I don't see why.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Oct 25 2006, 10:04 PM
Post #65


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Yes - that assumption presumes that any ice particle that forms will automatically sublimate in unsaturated air, yet if it's cold enough, it will not.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MarkL
post Oct 26 2006, 03:23 PM
Post #66


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 240
Joined: 18-July 06
Member No.: 981



Here's a link that provides one viewpoint.

http://www-mgcm.arc.nasa.gov/mgcm/HTML/FAQS/rain.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MichaelT
post Oct 26 2006, 04:00 PM
Post #67


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 156
Joined: 18-March 05
From: Germany
Member No.: 211



QUOTE (ngunn @ Oct 25 2006, 09:59 PM) *
Hoarfrost implies saturated air at the surface. Clouds imply saturated air at altitude. Opponents of 'snow' seem to be saying there must always be an unsaturated layer in between where descending ice particles would sublime. I don't see why.


If the current vapor pressure was equal to the saturation vapor pressure throughout the atmosphere you'd have very thick clouds (somthing like nimbostratus on Earth, at least you'd have more clouds than are observed at lower altitudes). And there aren't any, that is what we see. Thus, the water vapor pressure is lower than the saturation vapor pressure below the martian clouds. Therefore, any ice crystals that fall down would sublime long before they'd reach the surface.

On Earth there are situations where falling precipitation (snow) does not reach the surface, too, because the air layer below is very dry. As the falling snow evaporates/sublimes, the underlying air gets enriched with water vapor until the saturation vapor pressure is reached. So, consecutively, the snow can reach lower altitudes until the whole airmass below the clouds is very moist and the snow reaches the surface. That only works well if the dewpoint is below 0°C between the clouds and the surface (otherwise the air mass does not get cooled below 0°C and the snow melts). That just happened in Denver, CO. Yesterday they had 17°C, but the dewpoint was very low (<0°C) below the clouds. And today you have snow in Denver and temperatures around 0°C. That resulted from the process described above.
Such a process could not occur on Mars under current atmospheric conditions as you need *a lot of snow* = thick clouds to moisten the whole layer of air below the snow producing clouds. There simply isn't enough water vapor.

Michael
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Oct 26 2006, 04:13 PM
Post #68


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



QUOTE (MarkL @ Oct 26 2006, 08:23 AM) *
Here's a link that provides one viewpoint.

http://www-mgcm.arc.nasa.gov/mgcm/HTML/FAQS/rain.html

Thanks for this link -- just in time for me to cannibalize it for my Planetary Radio Q and A biggrin.gif

--Emily


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Oct 26 2006, 04:37 PM
Post #69


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



QUOTE (MichaelT @ Oct 26 2006, 05:00 PM) *
If the current vapor pressure was equal to the saturation vapor pressure throughout the atmosphere you'd have very thick clouds (somthing like nimbostratus on Earth, at least you'd have more clouds than are observed at lower altitudes). And there aren't any, that is what we see. Thus, the water vapor pressure is lower than the saturation vapor pressure below the martian clouds. Therefore, any ice crystals that fall down would sublime long before they'd reach the surface.


Sure, that's what we see in the daytime. But in the middle of a polar winter night?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MichaelT
post Oct 26 2006, 06:13 PM
Post #70


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 156
Joined: 18-March 05
From: Germany
Member No.: 211



QUOTE (ngunn @ Oct 26 2006, 04:37 PM) *
Sure, that's what we see in the daytime. But in the middle of a polar winter night?


Yes, that is certainly true.

I remember now that I read a publication by some french scientists who modelled clouds induced by orography over the north polar regions (observed through MOLA?). These clouds were made of dry ice particles (CO2). I think they wrote something about possible small amounts of precipitation from these clouds, but CO2-ice crystals, not water. Can't find that publication any more, unfortunately.

Michael
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Myran_*
post Oct 27 2006, 02:00 PM
Post #71





Guests






From the link provided by MarkL I borrowed the folloing quote: "But theoretical calculations seem to suggest that generally such snow would not tend to reach the surface."

And I tend to agree, look at this image from February 1979 and I think you will agree with me that this look quite more like frost than a result of actual snowfall. The white frost/snow dont cover the entire scene as after a snowfall.

Yet on the page where the image are found the word 'snow' are used again. So the word seems to have been repeated quite often t describe whats seen on those images.

As a sidenote, on that page we see that the martian sky might display colours quite different from the rusty red that seem to dominate the ones made by the excellent image manipulators of this forum.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Oct 27 2006, 02:06 PM
Post #72


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



That's a very early morning image, with the sun off to the right, and the image has been stretched quite a bit to get the detail of the ground to show well, so the sky has been saturated.

Some superb results from the PDS released Viking camera data - http://www.astrosurf.com/nunes/explor/explor_vik.htm

Particularly - http://www.astrosurf.com/nunes/explor/viki...03calstrech.jpg

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gsnorgathon
post Oct 27 2006, 03:16 PM
Post #73


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 259
Joined: 23-January 05
From: Seattle, WA
Member No.: 156



Clouds and Snow from MOLA
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ustrax
post Oct 27 2006, 03:26 PM
Post #74


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2168
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



Corrosive snow


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
vikingmars
post Oct 27 2006, 08:14 PM
Post #75


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1084
Joined: 19-February 05
From: Close to Meudon Observatory in France
Member No.: 172



smile.gif Here is a serie of 2 VL2 images showing the gradual condensation of water frost on Mars and then its full cover on the surface. The 1st image was taken in summer. The 4th image was taken early spring and shows its sublimation.
Enjoy !
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

7 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th April 2024 - 04:22 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.