IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

240 Pages V  « < 26 27 28 29 30 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Opportunity Route Map
dvandorn
post Apr 13 2005, 07:18 PM
Post #406


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



QUOTE (Sym05 @ Apr 13 2005, 01:01 PM)
QUOTE (Sunspot @ Apr 13 2005, 09:40 AM)
Hey, I think Opportunity is on the move again...........

.....this looks like a TINY meteorite impact crater:

http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...00P0703L0M1.JPG
*


Consider also a martian Myrmeleon Formicarius pitfall ...... smile.gif

.. should be ant-lion in english.
*



I think I can say with a fair degree of certainty that insects did *not* cause this pit.

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
scalbers
post Apr 13 2005, 09:24 PM
Post #407


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1641
Joined: 5-March 05
From: Boulder, CO
Member No.: 184



QUOTE (dvandorn @ Apr 13 2005, 04:56 PM)
QUOTE (paxdan @ Apr 13 2005, 04:48 AM)
Bright soil or just a reflection?. Might the etched terrain be a different soil type brought to the surface by victoria.... Nah! probably not.
*


As I noted within the last week, here, it looks from the orbital images like there are two different types of terrain between here an Victoria -- the true etched terrain (which features outcrops of evaporite) and a stretch of duned ground that appears to incorporate both dark and light sand/dust in the regolith and duning, but no evaporite outcrops. It's that second type of terrain, which only includes lighter sand in the regolith, that we're crossing now -- in fact, we don't really get to any of the "true" etched terrain until after we pass Erebus (unless we want to make a detour to the west of Erebus, which doesn't appear likely).



-the other Doug
*



Are there any good images from orbit for the "true" etched terrain? I have had some difficulty finding this...

Thanks,

Steve


--------------------
Steve [ my home page and planetary maps page ]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Apr 13 2005, 11:08 PM
Post #408


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



QUOTE (dvandorn @ Apr 13 2005, 05:05 PM)
[Well, it's either a small meteor crater (not unlikely, considering the thin Martian atmosphere, that an impactor the size of a grain of sand would hit and make a tiny crater) or it's a small sinkhole.

It's not at all difficult to imagine voids and gaps in the evaporite layer -- after all, subsidence around organized voids probably formed Anatolia and the other cracks we see out in the plains.  But this crater, situated halfway up the crest of a dune, looks a lot more like a tiny impact crater.

As such, it would only display the constituents of the sand in the dune... and therefore wouldn't be all that interesting to Oppy's remote sensors.  Right?

-the other Doug
*


I'm absolutely agree with you, Doug! I prefer non-meteoric explaination, also because small crater should be rapidly canceled from wind/sand
erosion (think to Vostok)... anyway, should be explored deeply by Oppy!


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Apr 14 2005, 12:13 AM
Post #409





Guests






An image of it with pancam would be nice...but they'll probably drive past it.

.........Anyone seen the classic 50's sci-fi moovie "Invaders from Mars" ? Where the Martians are hiding underground - the sand opens up and the victims fall through? That's what it reminded me of LOL. tongue.gif tongue.gif

The Martians arrive:


http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Hills/3411/images.htm
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Apr 14 2005, 05:38 AM
Post #410


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



I already posted yesterday, but I don't find... sad.gif
On sol 410, Opportunity already encountered other structures similar to this; here a mosaic of four Navcam subframes:

Based on this, I think meteoric origin should be excluded...


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Vladimorka
post Apr 14 2005, 07:53 AM
Post #411


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 42
Joined: 31-March 05
From: Sofia, Bulgaria
Member No.: 224



Why should be excluded?
It may be :-) A bigger impactor hit somewhere and lifted tiny pieces of rock in the air recently (a couple of years ago?), which made such small craterlets.
Look at the Oppy's trails, they still can be seen from orbit, and after exiting Endurance, there were very small differences in the trails left behind 6 months ago.So even in the windy Meridiani, dust deposition process is slow. And this "craterlet" seems with very round edges, so it is not impossible to have been formed years ago and not still been completly erased.

And sorry for my bad english, feel free to correct me anytime :-), I'd appreciate it :-).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcel
post Apr 14 2005, 08:47 AM
Post #412


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 290
Joined: 26-March 04
From: Edam, The Netherlands
Member No.: 65



QUOTE (Vladimorka @ Apr 14 2005, 07:53 AM)
Why should be excluded?
It may be :-) A bigger impactor hit somewhere and lifted tiny pieces of rock in the air recently (a couple of years ago?), which made such small craterlets.
Look at the Oppy's trails, they still can be seen from orbit, and after exiting Endurance, there were very small differences in the trails left behind 6 months ago.So even in the windy Meridiani, dust deposition process is slow. And this "craterlet" seems with very round edges, so it is not impossible to have been formed years ago and not still been completly erased.

And sorry for my bad english, feel free to correct me anytime :-), I'd appreciate it :-).
*


I'd like to say (after some thinking), it MUST have been an impact. As far as i can see (but this must be confirmed with pancam or MI) there's an elevated rim around the feature. This can't be there due to a pit caused by a void underneath. There must have been energy acting from inside out / up.

Your explanation of a secundairy impact makes sense to me. Primairy impacts are either some meters at least, or the meteorite burns up completely and doesn't reach the surface. A primairy impact caused by a meteorite the size of a pea that has made it all the way through the atmosphere without burning up completely seems too rare to me to be witnessed by us now. Especially when you consider the wind action, that wipes out this small craters within decades, i would eat my shoe (dutch) if this is a primairy impact.....

If a primairy impact wasn't rare....the plains should be peppered by them (or are they filled up more easy compared to the bigger craters ?) Statistical analyses of crater density (also on the moon and mercury) show, that the smaller the impact, the more frequent they occur (that is, on an atmosphere free body). Then why are there more 5+ meter craters at Meridiani than smaller ones like these ? Maybe it's the wind action that fills them, or it is the fact that meterorites below a certain dimension simply don't make it trough the atmosphere....

Very interesting finding Oppy ! We should take a closer look !
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Apr 14 2005, 09:59 AM
Post #413





Guests






Weird.........theyve moved back a bit blink.gif

http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...05P1214R0M1.JPG
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bert
post Apr 14 2005, 10:08 AM
Post #414


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 13
Joined: 26-January 05
From: Belgium
Member No.: 157



QUOTE (Marcel @ Apr 14 2005, 08:47 AM)
why are there more 5+ meter craters at Meridiani than smaller ones like these ?

My guess is, there *are* more small craters than 5+ meter ones. The only thing is, all "larger" craters within a certain area can be counted on satellite images. Dish-sized craters must be stumbled upon accidentally by Oppy before they are taken into account. So the sampling is skewed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tman
post Apr 14 2005, 10:40 AM
Post #415


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 877
Joined: 7-March 05
From: Switzerland
Member No.: 186



Resemble this hole not a bullet hole similar that would a bullet causes? Therefore I think it was rather a small meteorite that recently has fallen.

Have maybe anybody a picture of such a bullet hole in sand-like ground that he/she could post?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcel
post Apr 14 2005, 11:01 AM
Post #416


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 290
Joined: 26-March 04
From: Edam, The Netherlands
Member No.: 65



QUOTE (Bert @ Apr 14 2005, 10:08 AM)
QUOTE (Marcel @ Apr 14 2005, 08:47 AM)
why are there more 5+ meter craters at Meridiani than smaller ones like these ?

My guess is, there *are* more small craters than 5+ meter ones. The only thing is, all "larger" craters within a certain area can be counted on satellite images. Dish-sized craters must be stumbled upon accidentally by Oppy before they are taken into account. So the sampling is skewed.
*


I understand what you mean. This certainly is an aspect that has to be taken into account. But the fact that it really is the first one in 5 km's of driving.....makes me think the smaller ones are the minority.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Apr 14 2005, 11:24 AM
Post #417





Guests






We need an updated rout map from Pando biggrin.gif tongue.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Vladimorka
post Apr 14 2005, 02:13 PM
Post #418


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 42
Joined: 31-March 05
From: Sofia, Bulgaria
Member No.: 224



http://www.geocities.com/vladimorka/MerView.zip
Simple image name decoder - you can browse your downloaded images or just paste any image name in the editbox and click 'decode' to have it decoded.

And I don't think oppy has moved much farther than Voyager - there aren't any significant nav images since sunday.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
paxdan
post Apr 14 2005, 02:25 PM
Post #419


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 562
Joined: 29-March 05
Member No.: 221



QUOTE (Bert @ Apr 14 2005, 11:08 AM)
QUOTE (Marcel @ Apr 14 2005, 08:47 AM)
why are there more 5+ meter craters at Meridiani than smaller ones like these ?

My guess is, there *are* more small craters than 5+ meter ones. The only thing is, all "larger" craters within a certain area can be counted on satellite images. Dish-sized craters must be stumbled upon accidentally by Oppy before they are taken into account. So the sampling is skewed.
*



Talking about stumbling randomly I was looking at some old sol 95 images from Oppy and saw this dish shaped depression on the rim of endurance, Dish-sized crater or wind action?

I have gone to the trouble of making a stero pair which i have attached but can't figure out if it will pop correctly in the post.
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Apr 14 2005, 06:08 PM
Post #420


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



QUOTE (Marcel @ Apr 14 2005, 06:01 AM)
QUOTE (Bert @ Apr 14 2005, 10:08 AM)
QUOTE (Marcel @ Apr 14 2005, 08:47 AM)
why are there more 5+ meter craters at Meridiani than smaller ones like these ?

My guess is, there *are* more small craters than 5+ meter ones. The only thing is, all "larger" craters within a certain area can be counted on satellite images. Dish-sized craters must be stumbled upon accidentally by Oppy before they are taken into account. So the sampling is skewed.
*


I understand what you mean. This certainly is an aspect that has to be taken into account. But the fact that it really is the first one in 5 km's of driving.....makes me think the smaller ones are the minority.
*



Looks really fresh, though, doesn't it?

I think what we're seeing is the intersection of two surface-altering processes. The first is impact -- since Mars has a very thin atmosphere, the lower size limit of impactors that reach the surface is a lot smaller than here on Earth. But it's a lot larger than what would reach the lunar surface, for example. So, you get more craters from 6 cm on up than you do on Earth, but a lot less than you see on the Moon.

The second process is aeolian weathering. Over the course of just a few years, decades at most, this small little dimple crater will probably be covered over by sand and dust. Which means it's probably quite fresh -- a few years at most. Unlike on the Moon, where the most numerous craters are the zap pits made by grains of dust measured in microns, and where there are no other weathering processes happening, Mars doesn't retain craters of this size all that long. Because of aeolian weathering.

So, the impact flux of such particles must be pretty slow, or else we would see a bunch of these little dimples all over Meridiani in varying stages of obliteration. And we don't. In simple terms, aeolian erosion is happening a lot faster than tiny impacts are happening -- but both appear to be happening.

Seeing as this looks to be a very, very recent cratering event, let's bring up the topic of another thread, shall we? Perhaps this dimple was caused by a stray bolt, or fleck of metal, that separated from Oppy's cruise stage when it broke up and impacted at about a thousand KPH? I mean, going back to the Venn diagrams we did in grade school , there *is* an intersection of the sets "tiny craters made by very small impactors within the last few years" and "space debris that might have broken into some very small fragments that we *know* impacted close to here within the last few years."

I'm not saying this tiny dimple was caused by a tiny piece of Oppy's cruise stage -- but the timing and the size could well be correct. And it seems a bit coincidental that a really, really fresh crater should show up within what must be only several km of the debris footprint of Oppy's cruise stage...

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

240 Pages V  « < 26 27 28 29 30 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th May 2024 - 10:48 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.