IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

9 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Earth-like planet found?
Adam
post Apr 24 2007, 08:33 PM
Post #1


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 61
Joined: 17-September 05
From: Sweden
Member No.: 499



While browsing the webb I've been hearing some rumors about a recent discovery about an earth-like exoplanet. When checking wikipedia I found this article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gliese_581) that states that "a planet about 1.5x the size of the Earth discovered in 2007. The latter is notable as it is the first exoplanet discovered which lies within the habitable zone of the star."
I thought this would be all over the news by now, but I have found nothing. The wikipedia article seems a bit unreliable too. I have no idea if this is true or just some kind of hoax. Is there someone here who knows whats going on?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post Apr 24 2007, 08:49 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1585
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Vermont
Member No.: 530



A little use of Google News and here we go:
http://www.zeenews.com/articles.asp?aid=36...=27&sid=ENV
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adam
post Apr 24 2007, 08:57 PM
Post #3


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 61
Joined: 17-September 05
From: Sweden
Member No.: 499



Oh, so it was true. Found nothing on BBC or on any other major site. Guess I should use google news instead wink.gif
Thanks for confirming it, this is really exciting news.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post Apr 24 2007, 09:00 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1585
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Vermont
Member No.: 530



Well, you have to search for it... so it's good if you see an uniformative blurb at some other site and really want to go digging for meatier articles.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
helvick
post Apr 24 2007, 09:07 PM
Post #5


Dublin Correspondent
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1799
Joined: 28-March 05
From: Celbridge, Ireland
Member No.: 220



I'm pretty sure this refers to OGLE 2005-BLG-390LB - That's a largish probably icy planet at ~5.5 Earth Masses, ~2.2AU from its sun, probably around 2.4x earth diameter. Surface gravity should be pretty close to Earth's.

Kind of at the extreme limit of "habitable" but arguable.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Apr 24 2007, 09:44 PM
Post #6


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8784
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



I don't know, Helvick. The news article, if it's reliable, specifically identifies the star as Gleise 861 while the OGLE object "presumes" that it's orbiting an M-class dwarf. The article also states that the planet's orbital radius is around 0.1 AU. Doesn't sound like they're talking about the same planets.

Noticed the dateline on the article was today as well. If this is for real, the rest of the media should catch fire shortly... wink.gif


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RedSky
post Apr 24 2007, 09:59 PM
Post #7


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 129
Joined: 25-March 05
Member No.: 218



This is the feature story today on Space.com...

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/0704..._exoplanet.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Holder of the Tw...
post Apr 24 2007, 09:59 PM
Post #8


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 541
Joined: 17-November 05
From: Oklahoma
Member No.: 557



It's now being reported on Space.com and FoxNews.com

Astronomers Believe They May Have Found Earth-Like Planet
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Juramike
post Apr 24 2007, 10:00 PM
Post #9


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2785
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 1345



Gee, only 20.5 light years away....maybe we should make sure New Horizons' final trajectory is in this direction.

-Mike


--------------------
Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
helvick
post Apr 24 2007, 10:03 PM
Post #10


Dublin Correspondent
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1799
Joined: 28-March 05
From: Celbridge, Ireland
Member No.: 220



You're right - I was caught in a cross post there and hadn't done the Google thing effectively. The story looks like it is hitting the wires after all. Interesting that this Red Dwarf has already been identified as having a Neptune class planet even closer in with a 5 day orbit so this find makes for a really interesting little solar system.

Assuming its all true - I find it odd that the story has hit solely via the PR news wires and not more normal astro news sites. There's nothing on the press pages of ESO, The Geneva Observatory or Astronomy and Astrophysics. Weird but perhaps the press release just leaked a bit ahead of plan.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Holder of the Tw...
post Apr 24 2007, 10:13 PM
Post #11


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 541
Joined: 17-November 05
From: Oklahoma
Member No.: 557



One of the internet news services had "It's happy New Year every 13 days!" as the link to their story.

Off hand, given the mass and dimensions, I'm guessing 3 to 4 g's of surface gravity. Interesting to speculate what land plants and animals would look like under those conditions. Sea based life might not see that increase in gravity as such a major factor.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
helvick
post Apr 24 2007, 10:35 PM
Post #12


Dublin Correspondent
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1799
Joined: 28-March 05
From: Celbridge, Ireland
Member No.: 220



I'd fair kill for a link to real data on this - the eternally repeated AP wire story is wearing thin. One or two of the stories are adding that local gravity is around 1.6g .
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greg Hullender
post Apr 24 2007, 11:21 PM
Post #13


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1018
Joined: 29-November 05
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Member No.: 590



Does MSNBC count as a real link?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18293978/

--Greg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bart
post Apr 24 2007, 11:24 PM
Post #14


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 48
Joined: 8-December 05
Member No.: 603



Here's a link to the basic data on the Extrasolar Encyclopedia:

http://vo.obspm.fr/exoplanetes/encyclo/sta...l%20581#a_publi

I believe the paper that discusses the discovery is this one:
UDRY S., BONFILS X., DELFOSSE X., FORVEILLE T., MAYOR M., PERRIER C., BOUCHY F., LOVIS C., PEPE F., QUELOZ D. & BERTAUX J.-L. , 2007
The HARPS search for southern extrasolar planets XI.
Astron. & Astrophys. , - , -

It's the last reference for planets around this star, it's recent, and it matches the periodical cited in the news stories. Unfortunately, there's no link to the actual paper or even the abstract.

Bart
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Apr 24 2007, 11:39 PM
Post #15


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8784
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Thanks, Bart!

Interesting that the metallicities of red dwarfs seem lower than the solar value. Does this perhaps indicate an enhanced amount of volatiles in the planetary system...?


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

9 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 8th June 2024 - 09:54 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.