IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

37 Pages V  « < 14 15 16 17 18 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
The Storm, Dust storm of 2007
OWW
post Jul 20 2007, 07:36 PM
Post #226


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 710
Joined: 28-September 04
Member No.: 99



AND Spirit is only 20 sols away from beating Viking 2!

Back OT. From the space.com article:
If Mars really wants to kill these vehicles it can, but we have a lot of things working in our favor.

Question: what things? huh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
paxdan
post Jul 20 2007, 07:48 PM
Post #227


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 562
Joined: 29-March 05
Member No.: 221



QUOTE (OWW @ Jul 20 2007, 08:36 PM) *
Question: what things? huh.gif

Rocket scientists biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Del Palmer
post Jul 20 2007, 08:07 PM
Post #228


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 213
Joined: 21-January 07
From: Wigan, England
Member No.: 1638



THEMIS dust maps:
http://themis.asu.edu/dustmaps/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mongo
post Jul 20 2007, 08:22 PM
Post #229


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 723
Joined: 13-June 04
Member No.: 82



QUOTE (djellison @ Jul 20 2007, 01:27 PM) *
A couple of decades.

Doug

Really? I looked at the project website, and they were saying that the RTG was designed to provide an operating lifespan of 'a full Martian year'. The MERs are already at twice that timespan.

Bill
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jul 20 2007, 08:55 PM
Post #230


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



It'll last for years and years and years - like NH's or the Voyager ones.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ToSeek
post Jul 20 2007, 09:18 PM
Post #231


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 128
Joined: 5-May 04
Member No.: 74



QUOTE (Mongo @ Jul 20 2007, 04:22 PM) *
Really? I looked at the project website, and they were saying that the RTG was designed to provide an operating lifespan of 'a full Martian year'. The MERs are already at twice that timespan.

Bill


MSL is being designed to last a full Martian year the same way the MERs were designed to last 90 sols.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tom Tamlyn
post Jul 20 2007, 09:56 PM
Post #232


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 444
Joined: 1-July 05
From: New York City
Member No.: 424



The website describes the RTG power system as "giv[ing] the mission an operating lifespan on Mars' surface of a full Martian year (687 Earth days) or more." (my emphasis) All the page is saying is that the power system will work for a lengthy nominal mission. It's not discussing how much longer than the nominal mission the RTG can operate.

The prose could be a little more clear, but I think that mission designers are understandably wary of making comments that could be interpreted as predictions of exceptionally long lifespans for the equipment. The fact that the RTG will keep working for decades isn't very important unless lots of other systems are still working as well.

TTT
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Jul 20 2007, 10:26 PM
Post #233


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



Phew! Story posted. This was a complex one and done in a bit of a rush so I'd appreciate an email if anyone finds any errors.

http://www.planetary.org/news/2007/0720_Th...Crisis_for.html

--Emily


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pando
post Jul 20 2007, 11:24 PM
Post #234


The Insider
***

Group: Members
Posts: 669
Joined: 3-May 04
Member No.: 73



Thanks Emily, great article,

I'm still in awe looking at the dimming horizon image in there... blink.gif ohmy.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jul 20 2007, 11:29 PM
Post #235


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



The MCS stuff is great as well - really good to see what could be an outreach-challenging instrument get good airtime via TPS.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Jul 21 2007, 12:02 AM
Post #236


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



There's a lot more where that came from -- I only got those graphs an hour before I posted, so there's much more in there than I had time to explain. More from MCS next week -- that's the instrument that's REALLY designed to stuyd what's going on with the storm.

--Emily


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tom Tamlyn
post Jul 21 2007, 12:54 AM
Post #237


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 444
Joined: 1-July 05
From: New York City
Member No.: 424



Emily,

Wonderful story; it's exactly what I was hoping for as a backgrounder on the storm.

Is MCL still unable to perform vertical profiles?

TTT
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Norm Hartnett
post Jul 21 2007, 01:51 AM
Post #238


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 70
Joined: 12-November 06
Member No.: 1354



QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Jul 20 2007, 05:02 PM) *
There's a lot more where that came from -- I only got those graphs an hour before I posted, so there's much more in there than I had time to explain. More from MCS next week -- that's the instrument that's REALLY designed to stuyd what's going on with the storm.

--Emily


Really excellent article Emily, thanks.

If I might make a request? It would be very nice if you could post a follow up article in a day or two once we get comm back from Oppy that goes into more detail on the on going orbital results as well as Rover status.

BTW You really should get that article to some of the major National/International newspapers. It would make a great Sunday Science article.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aussie
post Jul 21 2007, 02:03 AM
Post #239


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 144
Joined: 17-July 07
From: Canberra Australia
Member No.: 2865



Emily,
As always, your article provides a clear and concise explanation of the situation. The dimming horizons graphic is outstanding.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
brellis
post Jul 21 2007, 03:06 AM
Post #240


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 754
Joined: 9-February 07
Member No.: 1700



Great work Emily, I always enjoy reading your articles!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

37 Pages V  « < 14 15 16 17 18 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th April 2024 - 08:05 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.