IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
The Erebus Complex
Bill Harris
post Nov 5 2005, 04:39 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



Looking at Erebus in a regional context, it should be remembered that Mars has been bombarded over the past few billion years and that Erebus is not a standalone feature. This MOC image shows Erebus in relation to other impacts in this area. It seems to me that the three large craters ("Purgatory", Erebus and Terra Nova) are contemporaneous since they appear equally eroded. I've also included an image layer showing overlying large sand drifts.

--Bill



edit: image updated


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Nov 5 2005, 05:57 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



Here is a larger scale regional image showing eroded craters in the etched terrain between Erebus and Victoria.

--Bill



EDIT: revised image per posts #3 and #5.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dot.dk
post Nov 5 2005, 06:14 PM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 578
Joined: 5-November 04
From: Denmark
Member No.: 107



QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Nov 5 2005, 05:57 PM)
Here is a larger scale regional image showing eroded craters in the etched terrain between Endurance and Victoria; the rover path is shown in green.

--Bill
*


I think it's difficult to identify some of those features you have marked as craters. And your rover path is a little way off to the left smile.gif


--------------------
"I want to make as many people as possible feel like they are part of this adventure. We are going to give everybody a sense of what exploring the surface of another world is really like"
- Steven Squyres
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Nov 5 2005, 06:18 PM
Post #4





Guests






There is a large area around Victoria crater that appears to be free of dunes - or much smoother than the surrounding plains. Good for driving on smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Nov 5 2005, 09:15 PM
Post #5


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10166
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Interesting, Bill.

"Find the circle" is a game which gives different results every time you play it. I think most of yours are OK, but I might add one or two, or remove a couple. But the basic idea is good, I think. There are craters here, very eroded but faintly visible. I would not have said the big craters were equally eroded, I think there's a clear progression of degree of erosion and filling, plus overlap - Purgatory (oldest), Terra Nova, Erebus (youngest).

And the rover path... your north arrow is off, and that's causing you to rotate the path. The image is within a degree or two of north-up anyway, and the long rover path should be near-vertical on the image. In fact you can see Viking and Voyager craters as small bright dots in the image north of Erebus, and the path should run between them.

This is all meant constructively. I really like the mapping work being done here, by everybody. I'm hoping Dilo will give us another reprojected map soon. And I would personally like to see some of this taken back to earlier in the mission.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tman
post Nov 5 2005, 09:34 PM
Post #6


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 877
Joined: 7-March 05
From: Switzerland
Member No.: 186



>>I think there's a clear progression of degree of erosion and filling, plus overlap - Purgatory (oldest), Terra Nova, Erebus (youngest). <<
Think so too Phil. Fantastic that we are at a position with Oppy where we find all these different old craters for investigation.


Btw. Is Dilo on vacation or what's up with him?

Not again that someone suddenly disappears who can deliver such great generated views from that POV-Ray software again - like Erwann.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Nov 6 2005, 01:02 AM
Post #7


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



You're right, the north arrow/path is off, and those three craters, although eroded, are not equal; Phil has the right sequence.

What can I say? I was still giddy at the prospect of seeing something besides sandy ripples, and in a hurry to get something posted before going out to do honey-do's.

Happily, the drawings are made on separate layers and it'll be easy to fix.

Sunspot, that smoothish area is the ejecta blanket of Victoria; it might be smooth as a babie's hind end, or it might be a field of impassable boulders...


Good feedback...

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RNeuhaus
post Nov 6 2005, 02:36 AM
Post #8


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1636
Joined: 9-May 05
From: Lima, Peru
Member No.: 385



Yes, Bill's circles drawings around Erebus are the ones buried impact craters. I found your comments very interesting.

I hope that with the sonar equipment of MRO (SARAD) will be able to describe better the nature of the subsurface arround that zone or not?

Indeed, the Victoria's crater must be the youngest of that zone since it is deeper, vertical alike slopes and have some rims around the crater or not?

Rodolfo
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tty
post Nov 6 2005, 06:19 PM
Post #9


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 688
Joined: 20-April 05
From: Sweden
Member No.: 273



QUOTE (Sunspot @ Nov 5 2005, 08:18 PM)
There is a large area around Victoria crater that appears to be free of dunes - or much smoother than the surrounding plains.  Good for driving on  smile.gif
*


To me it looks like an ejecta blanket. Whether it is good driving or not remains to be seen. unsure.gif

tty
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nix
post Nov 8 2005, 11:25 PM
Post #10


Chief Assistant
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1409
Joined: 5-January 05
From: Ierapetra, Greece
Member No.: 136



As much as I hope for Oppy to reach Victoria, do some good science, observing a larger stratigraphic record AND get us some very 'perdy pichures' for a pan -when I look at Victoria I can't help thinking of Oppy getting stuck some distance off the rim in that dark sand all around it.

But I try to be optimistic rolleyes.gif You could say I'm preparing for the worst -not reaching that HUGE crater...

Nico


--------------------
photographer, space imagery enthusiast, proud father and partner, and geek.


http://500px.com/sacred-photons &
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
edstrick
post Nov 9 2005, 07:49 AM
Post #11


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1870
Joined: 20-February 05
Member No.: 174



Go back and compare Erebus's ejecta zone with Endurance's. All we saw as the rovers rolled up to the crater was odd (secondary impact???) pitting and some fractures here and there on a rumpled, relatively drift-free sand-and-blueberry-sheet with some scattered sulfate-rock cobbles.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Nov 10 2005, 07:40 AM
Post #12


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Sol638 PanCam mosaic...
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd May 2024 - 01:44 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.