Google backs private Moon landing, Google is offering a $30m prize pot to private firms that land a |
Google backs private Moon landing, Google is offering a $30m prize pot to private firms that land a |
Sep 15 2007, 02:26 PM
Post
#31
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
My thoughts exactly there, Doug. It's pointless to even try to prove something to those guys, it's best to just let them go.
-------------------- |
|
|
Sep 16 2007, 01:12 AM
Post
#32
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8784 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Believe it or not, I used to work with a contractor--a satcom guy!-- that subscribed to this, er, [insert polite term for what I'm thinking]. He believed in satellites, of course, but maintained that the logistics of getting to the Moon were patently impossible.
Another guy I knew a few years ago was an absolutely brilliant electronics technician who maintained, with utter solemnity, that Apollo proved that the Earth-Moon system was only 6000 years old because 'NASA's computers crashed every time they tried to reconstruct orbits' farther back than then. What's scary is that both of these men are extraordinarily good at what they do, and work in technically demanding fields. I took it as a lesson in the dangers of insufficient imagination combined with unrestrained credulity towards negative arguments. Keep on educating, UMSFers... -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Sep 17 2007, 05:18 PM
Post
#33
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2922 Joined: 14-February 06 From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France) Member No.: 682 |
But for the whole scene, overall, I think that Tranquility Base ought to remain untouched and "unsullied" for now. I'd have no problems with rovers visiting any of the other five Apollo landing sites -- they're historical, but not so much as that first one. A few more rover tracks wouldn't damage anything at, say, Hadley or Taurus-Littrow. Or even at Fra Mauro. In fact, I think Fra Mauro would be a great place for an unmanned rover. Work it right and we might *finally* get to look into Cone Crater. I think it would be appropriate to allow Ed Mitchell to drive a rover right up to Cone's rim and be the first to look inside... or maybe, if Ed can't do it, let Jim Lovell and Fred Haise do it! -the other Doug I like these ideas O Doug, lot of souvenirs.... I like also Nprev's : Heck, I vote for Apollo 12; it's a two-fer, along with Surveyor 3! but because Apollo 12 is the only site where we didn't get LIVE TV transmissions -------------------- |
|
|
Sep 20 2007, 03:30 AM
Post
#34
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 428 Joined: 21-August 06 From: Northern Virginia Member No.: 1062 |
You underestimate the level of creativity of those guys. They'd claim that either the hardware had been deposited, unmanned, more recently - or that the visiting spacecraft was simply part of the conspiracy itself. Okay, it wouldn't convince the diehards, but it would convince just about anyone else... I mean, if you can see the footprints, can see the leftover lander equipment, from a totally private enterprise, well, that's quite a feat to deny... |
|
|
Sep 20 2007, 04:13 PM
Post
#35
|
|
The Poet Dude Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
This week's "Carnival of Space" has some interesting blog entries about the Lunar X-Prize...
-------------------- |
|
|
Sep 28 2007, 11:26 AM
Post
#36
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 213 Joined: 21-January 07 From: Wigan, England Member No.: 1638 |
Looks like the cringemaster wants a piece of the action:
http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2007/pu...927_003043.html Team UMSF.com? -------------------- "I got a call from NASA Headquarters wanting a color picture of Venus. I said, “What color would you like it?” - Laurance R. Doyle, former JPL image processing guy
|
|
|
Sep 28 2007, 11:40 AM
Post
#37
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14433 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Nahh - we're doing balloons
Doug |
|
|
Sep 28 2007, 12:35 PM
Post
#38
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 321 Joined: 6-April 06 From: Cape Canaveral Member No.: 734 |
Yeah; I was wondering about opportune piggybacks as well. Also, how many commercial GEO launches are using kick motors (Star-48s, etc.) these days to get there from LEO? Most of the gov ones I know use Hall Effect xenon thrusters, which takes a lot of time & obviously does not impart much dV per sec. Hall Effect xenon thrusters are only used for station keeping and not perigee raising. Kick motors for GTO only exist on Delta II's. Atlas, Delta IV, Proton and Ariane have all liquid upperstages. The last commercial Delta II GTO mission was in 1998. Perigee kick motors have been long gone, liquid systems are used since they are: 1. more efficient 2. left over prop can be used for station keeping 3. more flexible |
|
|
Oct 1 2007, 11:44 AM
Post
#39
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 247 Joined: 17-February 07 From: ESAC, cerca Madrid, Spain. Member No.: 1743 |
I was at the International Aeronautical Congress conference last week, in India. The X-Prize people did a large presentation there about the prize. They had a Google rep there, too, but the presentation was done by a guy from Ansari X. Most of what was said is on the web site, so I won't repeat it. And I didn't take much in the way of notes, so this is from memory.
I asked if an employee of a large, ponderous, out-of-date giant aerospace organization could volunteer time to the competitors. They said yes, most definitely. You'd just have to document somehow that you worked and didn't get paid in any way. By last week when I talked to them (Thu, 27 Sept), they had receieved seven team registrations and expected more soon. It costs $1000 to register your team. And as for the launch costs, they had an official launch 'partner' who would offer discounted launches to the teams that wanted them. I think it was Space-X, and the discount was about 10% off, as I recall. There was also a group who was offering the use of their ground station for free to all the teams. Located in California, I think. Don't recall the name. And they seconded the idea expressed earlier in this thread about the money covering the costs. There is no intention that the prize money finance the whole cost. It is indeed meant as an incentive to the winning team. The intention is that the winner (of this or any of their prizes) immediately becomes the leader in their field and can leverage the prize money and prize notoriety into a viable business which provides real returns. -------------------- --
cndwrld@yahoo.com |
|
|
Dec 3 2007, 04:03 AM
Post
#40
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 25-November 07 Member No.: 3968 |
It costs $1000 to register your team. The registration cost is $10,000 if submitted before the end of 2008. The letter of intent requires a $1000 deposit, towards the registration fee. First team to complete registration is "Odyssey Moon": History Making Moon Mission To Be Unveiled December 6th San Jose, CA - The first team to complete registration for the $30M Google Lunar X PRIZE will unveil its plans on December 6th at the Space Investment Summit in San Jose, California. Representatives of Odyssey Moon will announce their plans to make history with the first private robotic mission to the surface of the Moon and their intent to win the Google Lunar X PRIZE. Odyssey Moon's inaugural mission will involve a unique small robotic lander designed to deliver scientific, exploration and commercial payloads to the surface of the Moon. There website is given as http://www.odysseymoon.com but I'm having problems connecting to it at the moment. The domain contact for odysseymoon.com is given as: Technical Contact: Domain Discreet ATTN: odysseymoon.com P.O. Box 278 Yarmouth, NS B5A 4B2 Canada |
|
|
Dec 4 2007, 03:59 AM
Post
#41
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8784 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Hall Effect xenon thrusters are only used for station keeping and not perigee raising. Advanced EHF SVs are actually going to use their HETs for perigee raising, and station keeping thereafter...105 days of continuous thrust to reach GEO from LEO. (Yeah, I know what you're thinking; I was initially incredulous as well. Trade-off seems to be that a bit more vehicle mass budget outweighs time to get there, given that modern spacecraft have pretty long lifetimes.) -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10th June 2024 - 11:41 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |