NASA Announces August 4 News Briefing On MRO Science Finding |
NASA Announces August 4 News Briefing On MRO Science Finding |
Aug 4 2011, 06:15 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 293 Joined: 22-September 08 From: Spain Member No.: 4350 |
Didn't we see something similar at Santa María?
http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...IEP1905L0M1.JPG |
|
|
Aug 4 2011, 06:26 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 701 Joined: 3-December 04 From: Boulder, Colorado, USA Member No.: 117 |
Cool! Though the fact that CRISM doesn't spectroscopically see any water associated with the dark features makes me somewhat skeptical. If they are made by water, why aren't they wet? I hope they keep scanning with CRISM in the hopes of catching one in the act- maybe it's a matter of looking at the right time of day.
Or maybe they are dust avalanches that happen to be triggered by summer winds, though in that case it's surprising that they advance downslope so slowly and gradually. Hmmm.... John |
|
|
Aug 4 2011, 06:29 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2087 Joined: 13-February 10 From: Ontario Member No.: 5221 |
Yes, they will keep looking with Crism. Apparently the resolution hasn't been good enough for it yet.
|
|
|
Aug 4 2011, 07:49 PM
Post
#19
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 810 Joined: 3-June 04 From: Brittany, France Member No.: 79 |
That's weird CRISM does not see anything. They argue that flows are much smaller than the CRISM pixel scale (18m). That's true for a single flow, which width scales between 0.5 and 5m, but some HiRISE pictures show 60m*60m areas covered by this dark flows. So CRISM shoud see them. And a mixture of water and salt does not change anything : there is still a strong signature of water. I'm very skeptical...
-------------------- |
|
|
Aug 4 2011, 08:39 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2922 Joined: 14-February 06 From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France) Member No.: 682 |
At one step, during the conference we saw what they've called 3D animations. Were they Doug's?
-------------------- |
|
|
Aug 4 2011, 08:58 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14432 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Nope - nothing to do with me.
|
|
|
Aug 4 2011, 11:41 PM
Post
#22
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 813 Joined: 29-December 05 From: NE Oh, USA Member No.: 627 |
That's weird CRISM does not see anything. They argue that flows are much smaller than the CRISM pixel scale (18m). That's true for a single flow, which width scales between 0.5 and 5m, but some HiRISE pictures show 60m*60m areas covered by this dark flows. So CRISM shoud see them. And a mixture of water and salt does not change anything : there is still a strong signature of water. I'm very skeptical... the water will boil off (evaporate) quickly under the low pressure. Suspect there would be some kind of evaporite (salt) left over. But for direct detection of water CRISM would almost need to catch it in the act. Will need to see the Science paper for more details. |
|
|
Aug 5 2011, 12:35 AM
Post
#23
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 204 Joined: 29-June 05 Member No.: 421 |
if there is water flowing downhill on mars today, what I wonder is how it gets back uphill. Condensation out of the atmosphere?
|
|
|
Aug 5 2011, 01:02 AM
Post
#24
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8784 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Possibly a naive question, but do any of the currently active orbiters have an instrument that can determine atmospheric humidity levels with high spatial resolution?
I'm sure there's not, but those would seem to be the root requirements for exactly the sort of gizmo you'd need to catch these things in the act & prove they're made by flowing mud. -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Aug 5 2011, 01:07 AM
Post
#25
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 293 Joined: 29-August 06 From: Columbia, MD Member No.: 1083 |
do any of the currently active orbiters have an instrument that can determine atmospheric humidity levels with high spatial resolution? Mars Climate Sounder onboard MRO can detect water vapor (and thus you can calculate humidity as it detects temperature also). But it probably wouldn't work for this scenario. It's not ideal for detecting these values in the lowest layers in the atmosphere and whatever water comes out of these features probably won't significantly effect the water vapor concentration at higher altitudes. |
|
|
Aug 5 2011, 01:13 AM
Post
#26
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1583 Joined: 14-October 05 From: Vermont Member No.: 530 |
Amusingly, it's similar images of water that make me wonder if the albedo changes simply have to do with the clumpiness of the dust in the streaks. There's activity in snowpack called either sloughing/sluffing. Basically by altering only the texture of the snow, it creates streaks like the ones found in the dust on Mars:
I guess this sort of thing is more common with SAR... but you can see it in plain old visible light. The whole slope is bright white snow. Up close the color of the sluffs is no different. They're just reflecting the sky back to the camera differently. Like snow, the dust probably falls in dry and sparsely packed, and clumps up more when something starts it rolling. I wonder if the streaks are just clumpier dust on airfall dust. They do need a trigger, though. That could be a tiny bit of water starting a basically dry sluff. |
|
|
Aug 5 2011, 02:48 AM
Post
#27
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8784 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Wow. I'd call that a significant contribution to the discussion, Steve. Morphologically, at least, these streaks are astoundingly similar in appearance.
-------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Aug 5 2011, 04:00 AM
Post
#28
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 555 Joined: 27-September 10 Member No.: 5458 |
What would be the correlation to seasonal changes for the reflectivity of dust/soil? It seemed as if that was a major component to the liquid water hypothesis.
-------------------- |
|
|
Aug 5 2011, 06:37 AM
Post
#29
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1583 Joined: 14-October 05 From: Vermont Member No.: 530 |
What would be the correlation to seasonal changes for the reflectivity of dust/soil? It seemed as if that was a major component to the liquid water hypothesis. Whatever triggers the streaks is seasonal, sure. I'm open to the trigger being water.. Something changes the properties of one small section of dust, and a cascade starts. I just think a sluff of dry dust could also explain the apparent albedo change, if dry dust rolling downslope is simply clumpier than dust that fell from the atmosphere. They slowly fade due to constant dust falling from the atmosphere. I think with any explanation for causing their appearance, that's the reason they disappear, right? I actually don't think dry processes can explain it all. Sure, a few exfoliating pieces of gravel could drop onto dust slopes that are at their maximal steepness and start dry cascades... but it seems like there's way too much action going on, so of it triggered away from any rock faces. The real question in my mind seeing the apparent albedo change... is there necessarily a change in composition, or is it just a change in texture? It looks more wet... it may just be more rough. (Or ruff, if I stick with the phonetic version of slough.) |
|
|
Aug 5 2011, 10:41 PM
Post
#30
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 866 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Santa Cruz, CA Member No.: 196 |
Intriguing and beautiful imagery...
http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/sim/science-2011-aug-4.php http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/MRO/news/mro20110804.html Of course i hope its water, but somehow wouldnt we expect dampened dust to be cohesive enough to clump together and change properties enough to over time alter the topography subtly but enough that we shoudl see some sort of evidence of that after repeated episodes over eons? With the analogous snow scenario posted above you wouldnt get any clumping or change of cohesion so that seems more persuasive. thanks for posting that. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st June 2024 - 03:33 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |