Jupiter-mass diamond orbiting pulsar PSR J1719-1438 |
Jupiter-mass diamond orbiting pulsar PSR J1719-1438 |
Aug 25 2011, 08:28 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 723 Joined: 13-June 04 Member No.: 82 |
This has to be one of the most bizarre planets yet discovered. Not "merely" a pulsar planet, but a Jupiter-sized diamond orbiting a pulsar with a year lasting 2.2 hours. I wonder what the tidal forces are?
(I would think that radio telescopes are covered under "Telescopic Observations") Pulsar in the Sky, With Diamonds The object orbiting it is Jupiter mass, with some uncertainty in the exact mass due to as yet unmeasured inclination, has an orbital period of 2.2 hours! That implies an orbital radius less than a solar radius! The orbit is, near as we can tell, perfectly circular. Further, the object is not overflowing its Roche lobe, implying a minimum mean density of 23! Possibly considerably larger. From both observational constraints, and from theoretical grounds based on models of the origin of the object, it is most likely a pure cold crystalline carbon core of a low mass star, with the rest of the star accreted, blown away and ablated by the millisecond pulsar formation process. Yes, it is a 10^31 carat diamond. That is 10,000,000 trillion trillion carats of hot sparkly rock! |
|
|
Aug 25 2011, 10:52 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
A density of 23? I doubt if the familiar diamond lattice structure survives at that density. Liquid carbon perhaps??
|
|
|
Aug 26 2011, 12:18 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1444 Joined: 26-July 08 Member No.: 4270 |
If it's the remnant of a white dwarf, isn't it realistic to entertain the idea of degenerate matter?
-------------------- -- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
|
|
|
Aug 26 2011, 01:10 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 723 Joined: 13-June 04 Member No.: 82 |
I am not sure. The interior of the object was surely degenerate when the object was much more massive, but is matter degeneracy stable when the mass of the object gets below a couple of Jupiter masses? I would expect that as the pressure at the core decreases, the matter would 'rebound' to a normal non-degenerate state, meaning that each carbon atom would have close to a full complement of electrons. Although the remaining free electrons suggest to me that some form of 'metallic carbon', rather than 'diamond-like carbon' might exist there.
In any case, this is surely one of the most unusual planetary-mass objects discovered so far, in my opinion. |
|
|
Aug 26 2011, 02:43 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8784 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
It's a remarkable find, and a remarkable object.
Of course, my wife found it quite entertaining, and the jokes wrote themselves! "In space you don't wear diamond ring...ring wears YOU!" -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Aug 26 2011, 03:04 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member Group: Admin Posts: 3108 Joined: 21-December 05 From: Canberra, Australia Member No.: 615 |
How long until the media starts calling PSR J1719-1438 "Lucy" as in, "...in the sky with diamonds"
|
|
|
Aug 29 2011, 12:26 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 723 Joined: 13-June 04 Member No.: 82 |
|
|
|
Aug 29 2011, 03:27 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1444 Joined: 26-July 08 Member No.: 4270 |
How long until the media starts calling PSR J1719-1438 "Lucy" as in, "...in the sky with diamonds" As soon as they forget about having already used that for BPM 37093. -------------------- -- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2024 - 11:58 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |