The western route, 5th leg after stop at Absecon / Reeds Bay |
The western route, 5th leg after stop at Absecon / Reeds Bay |
Jul 11 2009, 05:57 PM
Post
#1
|
||
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 4279 Joined: 19-April 05 From: .br at .es Member No.: 253 |
Time for a new thread.
After moving southwards for ages, the "detour" by the western path has started with a 60+ meters drive on sol 1942. There are no images yet --they should be available on the next update-- so this image was calculated solely based on the rover's mobility info. I'll update the route map later. |
|
|
||
Aug 3 2009, 01:32 AM
Post
#211
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 267 Joined: 5-February 06 Member No.: 675 |
The criss-cross lines don't quite look like a Widmanstätten pattern. They have a less crystalline appearance and seem rounded and have something that looks like droplets near the ends.
Let me suggest two more possibilities: * A Widmanstätten pattern was modified by melting during atmospheric entry. * Widmanstätten patterns have nothing to do with it, and we're looking at flows of viscous melt during different phases of entry. Steve M |
|
|
Aug 3 2009, 01:46 AM
Post
#212
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1044 Joined: 17-February 09 Member No.: 4605 |
I initially though that this could be a Mesosiderite which would explain the deep cavities, but on reflection these cavities and the pronounced etching of the surface are most easily explained by initial burial of the meteorite and exposure to the acidic groundwater proposed by JPL. And there is an example of this process available.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willamette_Meteorite In fact this meteorite could well be the definitive smoking gun supporting the JPL theory for Meridiani and finally putting the surge alternative to bed. (As I duck for cover I wish we had an emoticon with a crash helmet). |
|
|
Aug 3 2009, 05:00 AM
Post
#213
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2228 Joined: 1-December 04 From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA Member No.: 116 |
Yep, the simplest and most logical explanation. I would whole-heartedly agree with that.I'm not a meteorite expert, but regarding the possible Widmanstatten patterns, this would be the first time I've seen them exposed on a naturally weathered, meteorite surface. The geometry of these features seems right, but I would expect the patterns to be more repetitive, if you know what I mean. I think I see what you're saying, serpens. Since we normally etch iron-nickel meteorites with acid to expose their Widmanstatten structure, the fact that this naturally weathered, Martian meteorite may be displaying such internal crystallinity on its surface suggests that it may have been exposed to an acidic environment in its past. Interesting. Block Island was definitely worthy of the effort to go to back for a second look. I never dared to dream that I might, one day, be able to explore another world like this. What a ride this has been! -------------------- ...Tom
I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast. |
|
|
Aug 3 2009, 06:07 AM
Post
#214
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 258 Joined: 22-December 06 Member No.: 1503 |
Ah, OK! You were referring to the Niles-Michalski "icy test tubes model". I suspected as much, but had to allow that there might be some recent publication I hadn't seen yet that actually related blueberry formation with ice. Unlike the Niles-Michalski paper. We did discuss this previously in the "Meridiani Ice theory" thread. There Paul Niles himself assured us that their model did not account for blueberry formation, but was concerned with the formation of the characteristic sulfate deposits of the Meridiani bedrock prior to the diagenesis of concretions. Niles conceded that the MER team's original scenario of blueberries concreting at regularly-spaced intervals within the deposited sulfate sandstones (after the icy phase) fit with the observations. That scenario does not predict concretions forming in closely-packed layers such as we see on Block Island. Such aggregations would only occur by advection of the blueberries after formation. I understand the caution and doubt from a scientific perspective. But you have to start somewhere. You take a bit of speculation and develop it to come up with a hypothesis that can be tested. That's all I've done. The blueberries need acid to form, but that wouldn't last long in this soil. That suggests a mechanism other than simply groundwater must have played a part. If SO2 from volcanism played a significant part in atmospheric warming instead of the normally accepted CO2, then interaction of dust and atmosphere to make the necessary acid on top of the glacial ice field is a possibility. In fact, its a high probability that this scenario is the correct one because of the sulfates found...yet no limestone deposits have been discovered anywhere on Mars. Was there groundwater? Of course. If there was glacial melt and sublimation, then there must have been ground water too. But groundwater alone cannot explain all the variables found in the soil at Meridiani. Ice and atmospheric interaction provides a convenient method over an extended period of time to change the top layers of the soil from basic to acid and back to basic again. The fact is that we don't know how the blueberries were formed. Figure out the real conditions present eons ago, and we might have a chance to figure out exactly how the blueberries developed. |
|
|
Aug 3 2009, 07:19 AM
Post
#215
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1044 Joined: 17-February 09 Member No.: 4605 |
Ice and atmospheric interaction provides a convenient method over an extended period of time to change the top layers of the soil from basic to acid and back to basic again. But a simpler explanation is a groundwater playa in a basaltic environment with a period of volcanism that created an acidic aquifer that overcame the natural buffering until the acidification influence diminished and the natural buffering took over again. |
|
|
Aug 3 2009, 07:40 AM
Post
#216
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 258 Joined: 22-December 06 Member No.: 1503 |
But the distribution of of the berries does not suggest this. In fact, multiple cycles of basic, acid, basic, acid, basic, acid, and basic are suggested because the berries are through all the layers. One prolonged period would have created berries similar to Earth examples...meaning a lot larger and a different distribution.
Why do people continue to fight the obvious? The martian climate has changed drastically in certain ways. A water table appearing and disappearing as you suggest is just another type of climate change, but no less dramatic. So if the climate changed in one way, why not in an alternative way that can explain things? All the ingredients were present. It is just a question of form. Mars was warmer in the distant past. There was liquid water present at one time or another. Today liquid water cannot exist on the surface of Mars for long because of the thin atmosphere. Is it such a leap of logic that the once liquid water must have gone somewhere, like became frozen near the surface, before it eventually migrated through sublimation to the current poles? And we know for a fact that those poles were not always Mar's poles. |
|
|
Aug 3 2009, 09:26 AM
Post
#217
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14432 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
If you want to have an argument about the history of Meridiani, can you start a new thread please.
edit : I see someone decided to ignore this request. Post deleted. Twice. |
|
|
Aug 3 2009, 04:30 PM
Post
#218
|
|
The Poet Dude Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Aug 3 2009, 04:44 PM
Post
#219
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1584 Joined: 14-October 05 From: Vermont Member No.: 530 |
What's the prevailing wind direction indicated by the smoothed edge of this rock? It's interesting that the dunes to the east seem to have a longer wavelength. Wake effect?
|
|
|
Aug 3 2009, 05:49 PM
Post
#220
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1887 Joined: 20-November 04 From: Iowa Member No.: 110 |
[quote name='Stu' post='144234' date='Aug 3 2009, 11:30 AM']How big is Block Island? I make it very roughly this size...
It looks like its being held over someones head. Block Island is a foot high and at least two feet across, probably weighs nearly half a ton. It would be more realistic to show someone crushed underneath it. |
|
|
Aug 3 2009, 08:45 PM
Post
#221
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2922 Joined: 14-February 06 From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France) Member No.: 682 |
I thought "you" were not able to convert foot to metrics, I see now you're not even able to make a difference between hand and foot
-------------------- |
|
|
Aug 3 2009, 09:48 PM
Post
#222
|
|
The Poet Dude Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
It looks like its being held over someones head. Block Island is a foot high and at least two feet across, probably weighs nearly half a ton. It would be more realistic to show someone crushed underneath it. Anyone else out there guess I wasn't going for "realism"? haha! The hand is simply there for scale! -------------------- |
|
|
Aug 4 2009, 01:34 AM
Post
#223
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 258 Joined: 22-December 06 Member No.: 1503 |
Anyone else out there guess I wasn't going for "realism"? haha! The hand is simply there for scale! Well, I guess you could make it a 3D animation where BI is rotating on your index finger like a Harlem Globetrotter's basketball! But I guess we need more data for realism. We need a peek at the underside of the rock 1st before we can create an accurate rendition. |
|
|
Aug 4 2009, 04:13 AM
Post
#224
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 293 Joined: 22-September 08 From: Spain Member No.: 4350 |
|
|
|
Aug 4 2009, 03:13 PM
Post
#225
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 311 Joined: 31-August 05 From: Florida & Texas, USA Member No.: 482 |
Playing with an image registration tool and the last MI images. Looks like a high percentage of metallic minerals reflecting so much light. Seems like these are fairly common on Mars. Are Iron-Nickel meteors more common on Mars because of proximity to the Asteroid Belt, or are meteors preserved due to lack of weathering and other geologic forces that allow them to concentrate on the surface much more than Earth? |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st June 2024 - 05:00 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |